Title: Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing
1Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing
Developed by Dr. June Carroll, Ms. Shawna
Morrison and Dr. Judith Allanson Special thanks
to the Childrens Hospital of Eastern Ontarios
Prenatal Genetics Team Last updated April 2014
2Disclaimer
- This presentation is for educational purposes
only and should not be used as a substitute for
clinical judgement. GEC-KO aims to aid the
practicing clinician by providing informed
opinions regarding genetic services that have
been developed in a rigorous and evidence-based
manner. Physicians must use their own clinical
judgement in addition to published articles and
the information presented herein. GEC-KO assumes
no responsibility or liability resulting from the
use of information contained herein.
3Objectives
- Following this session the learner will be able
to - Refer to their local genetics centre and/or order
genetic testing appropriately for prenatal
screening - Discuss and address patient concerns regarding
prenatal screening - Facilitate patient informed decision making
regarding prenatal screening options - Find high quality genomics educational resources
appropriate for primary care
4Case 1
- A 32 year old woman has had a positive Integrated
Prenatal Screening Test (IPS) result for Down
syndrome. She is about 17 weeks gestation. - Is NIPT a good option?
5Case 2
- A 40 year old G1 woman is about 9 weeks
gestation. She is in your office to discuss
prenatal testing options in this pregnancy
conceived by IVF. - Is NIPT a good option?
6Case 3
- A 36 year old G1P0 woman is very anxious about
Down syndrome in this pregnancy because she had a
second cousin with Down syndrome who passed away
as a child. - Is NIPT a good option?
7Case 4
- A 29 year old patient had a nuchal translucency
(NT) of 4.4mm at 125 weeks gestation - You offered NIPT and she accepted
- NIPT results were normal. She is now 142 weeks
gestation - What are the next steps?
8Prenatal Screening tests forDS, T18, T13 and
ONTD
9What is Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing?
- Screening test to prenatally detect Down syndrome
and other aneuploidies (extra or missing
chromosomes) - trisomy 21, 18, 13
- trisomy of sex chromosomes (XXX, XXY, XYY)
- Turner syndrome (monosomy X)
- triploidy (extra copy of all chromosomes)
10Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT)
- NIPT measures circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA)
from placenta present in maternal blood - Comprises 10 of DNA in maternal blood
- Increases with gestational age
- Companies offering NIPT use various technologies
to analyze cfDNA and determine chromosome
quantities - Performed on maternal blood sample
- As early as 9 weeks gestation (company specific)
- Dating U/S viability, accurate GA, exclude
multiples
11How good is Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing?
- Moving target
- Currently literature is primarily from companies
or those holding patents
Overall ranges Overall ranges Overall ranges
T21 T18 T13
Specificity () 99-100 99-100 99-100
Sensitivity () 98-100 97-100 79-100
Positive Predictive Value PPV () 90-95 84 52
Negative Predictive Value NPV () 99.9 99 100
ASHG Oct 2013 platform presentation data from
BGI China 63,543 pregnancies
12What is the evidence for Non-Invasive Prenatal
Testing (NIPT)?
- Studies emerging in low-risk population
- Performance of NIPT in a general obstetrical
population - False Positive Rate (FPR) for T21 and T18
combined was 0.5 vs 4.2 for standard screening - Positive Predictive Value (PPV) was
significantly higher than that for standard
screening, for both trisomy 21 (45.5 vs. 4.2)
and trisomy 18 (40.0 vs. 8.3)
Bianchi et al, NEJM 2014 3709
13What is the evidence for Non-Invasive Prenatal
Testing (NIPT)?
- 7 studies of high risk women
- High risk
- Screen (IPS, FTS) positive
- AMA (35 yrs)
- Ultrasound findings suggestive of aneuploidy
- Previous pregnancy with aneuploidy
14What is the evidence for Non-Invasive Prenatal
Testing (NIPT)?
- By far most accurate performance for T21/18
Benn et al, Ultras Obstet Gynecol 2013, 42 15-33
15What do the experts say?
- Society of Obstetricians Gynecologists of
Canada 2013 - Non-invasive prenatal testing using massive
parallel sequencing of cell-free DNA to test for
trisomies 21, 18, and 13 should be an option
available to women at increased risk in lieu of
amniocentesis. Pre-test counselling of these
women should include a discussion of the
limitations of non-invasive prenatal testing.
Genetics Ctte Technical Update JOGC Feb 2013
16What do the experts say?
- Society of Obstetricians Gynecologists of
Canada 2013 - No irrevocable obstetrical decision should be
made in pregnancies with a positive non-invasive
prenatal testing result without confirmatory
invasive diagnostic testing.
Genetics Ctte Technical Update JOGC Feb 2013
17Recommendations
- Offer all women
- Prenatal screening using either FTS, IPS or MSS
(SIPS or Quad) - Fetal morphology scan at 18-20 weeks gestation
18Consider discussing Non-Invasive Prenatal
Testing (NIPT) as an option for women who
- Are of advanced maternal ageĀ , defined as 40
years of age or older at estimated date of birth - Have an abnormal multiple marker screen i.e.
FTS/IPS/MSS - Have fetal nuchal translucency (NT) measurement
of 3.5mm or greaterĀ - Have had a previous pregnancy or child with
aneuploidy - Have other high risk factors
- Fetal congenital anomalies on ultrasound highly
suggestive of trisomy 13, 18 or 21 - Soft markers on ultrasound which are highly
suggestive of aneuploidy Refer to SOGC
guidelines, 2005. - At risk of carrying a male fetus with an X-linked
condition (NIPT would be used for sex
determination) - In Ontario, MOHLTC funding applications for the
indications above marked by an asterisk () must
be submitted by a geneticist or maternal fetal
medicine (MFM) specialist. In other provinces
circumstances may be different. Consult your
local genetics centre or MFM specialist.
19Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) results
- Results will be reported differently and may be
worded as - positive or negative
- aneuploidy detected, no aneuploidy detected or
aneuploidy suspected/borderline value - high risk or low risk
20Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) results
- If the result is negative, this is reassuring
- Your patient should still be offered
- MS-AFP between 15 and 206/7 weeks to screen for
open neural tube defect, as NIPT does not screen
for this physical anomaly - fetal morphology scan at 18-20 weeks gestation
- referral for genetic and/or maternal fetal
medicine consultation, which may be indicated for
additional counselling and testing, depending on
the reason your patient qualified for NIPT (e.g.
increased NT, other soft markers, congenital
anomalies)
21Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) results
- If the result is positive
- Genetic counselling
- Confirmation by diagnostic testing
- No irrevocable obstetrical decisions should be
made in pregnancies with abnormal NIPT results
without confirmatory invasive testing (CVS or
amniocentesis) - SOGC
22Benefits of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT)
- Fewer women having diagnostic tests with
associated risk of pregnancy loss - Early test result (drawn at 9-10 weeks at
earliest) - No risk of miscarriage
- Detects the most common chromosomal aneuploidies
- Higher detection rates and lower false positive
rates than IPS or MSS
23Limitations of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing
(NIPT)
- NIPT cannot
- Detect chromosome differences other than
aneuploidy of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y - some companies are now adding screening for other
trisomies and certain microdeletion syndromes - Completely rule out aneuploidy
- Detect single gene conditions
- Detect congenital anomalies
- Failed results
- 6.1 untested for insufficient sample quality
- 2 no result after testing (rarely happens with
conventional screening) - cfDNA decreases with increased maternal BMI, twin
pregnancies and where trisomy 18 and 13 are
present - Limited data on performance in IVF pregnancies
24Limitations of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing
Confined placental mosaicism
- False positives (and negatives) are possible
- Confined placental mosaicism
25Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) Landscape
- Increasing demand from women
- Increasing uptake in most (urban) centres
- 3 separate companies, 3 separate technologies
- Has NIPT become standard of care?
- Costs between 795 and 1200
- 8-10 days for result
26Where does Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT)
fit with respect to the 11 to 14 wk scan?
- 11 to 14 week scan has value to pregnancy care
- Raised NT may suggest other chromosomal, genetic
and structural disorders - Accurate dating/establishment of live fetus
- Multiples/chorionicity affects management
- Detects structural abnormalities
27Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) and
counselling
- Pre- and post-test counselling is important
- Consult genetics if unsure
- Refer for genetic counselling when appropriate
- Company websites
- Harmony Prenatal Test by Ariosa Diagnostics
through Gamma-Dynacare - Panorama by Natera through Lifelabs
- Verifi Prenatal Test by Verinata
28Ordering Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT)
- In Ontario, to order NIPT, first determine your
patients funding eligibility by looking at the
MOHLTC checklist, then - Complete the checklist and pages 2 and 4 of the
MOHLTC out-of-country testing prior approval form
- Download and complete the requisition from the
NIPT company of your and your patients choice - Selection may be based on the patients personal
research and preference, your experience with a
particular company, ease of access to a blood
draw location - Send all three completed forms to the fax number
613 536-3181 or 1 866 221-3536 and be sure to
indicate the patient is pregnant so approval can
be prioritized accordingly - Once approval has been received, give the patient
the approval letter and the NIPT requisition and
she can then have her blood drawn
29Case 1
- A 36 year old woman has had a positive
Integrated Prenatal Screening Test (IPS) result
for Down syndrome. She is about 17 weeks
gestation. - Is NIPT a good option?
30- Yes
- She is eligible for NIPT with MOH funding
- But consider
- More rapid result from amniocentesis
- What is her IPS risk?
- 1 in 2 versus 1 in 120
- She is at 17 weeks gestational age
- If NIPT is positive, guidelines recommend
confirmatory diagnostic testing by amniocentesis
delays timing for diagnosis - In the event of an abnormal result, is
termination of pregnancy an option for the
couple?
31Case 2
- A 40 year old G1 woman is about 9 weeks
gestation. She is in your office to discuss
prenatal testing options in this pregnancy
conceived by IVF. - Is NIPT a good option?
32- Yes
- Advanced maternal age (greater than 40 years at
EDB) is an appropriate indication for NIPT - Covered by MOH funding
- Better screen than IPS
- Earlier result
- Decreased chance with NIPT that patient would
receive screen positive result
33Case 3
- A 36 year old G1P0 woman is very anxious about
Down syndrome in this pregnancy because she had a
second cousin with Down syndrome who passed away
as a child. - Is NIPT a good option?
34Case 3
- She does not meet MOH criteria for coverage of
NIPT - You can reassure her that having a second cousin
with Down syndrome does not increase her risk to
have an affected child - If she is very anxious, you can proceed with NIPT
and she can pay out of pocket - If the patient herself had a previous affected
pregnancy then she would be eligible for MOH
funded NIPT
P
35Case 4
- A 29 year old patient had an NT of 4.4mm at 125
weeks gestation - You offered NIPT and she accepted
- NIPT results were normal. She is now 142 weeks
gestation - What are the next steps?
36- Genetic counselling is recommended
- Patient likely to be offered
- Chromosomal microarray
- Genetic testing for other single gene conditions
- Level II ultrasound
- Fetal echocardiogram
37Prenatal Screening Summary
- Offer all pregnant women, regardless of age
- PN screening for fetal aneuploidy (trisomy 13,
18, 21) through FTS, IPS, SIPS or Quad screening - Second trimester ultrasound for dating,
assessment of fetal anatomy and detection of
multiples - Maternal age should not be used as a basis for
recommending invasive testing when non-invasive
PN screening is available - Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT)
- Consider offering NIPT to high risk women
- Consider NIPT as a screen of higher sensitivity
if your patient is willing to pay for the test - Best for Down syndrome (trisomy 21) (but can be
wrong!) - so far, others not as good (T13 and sex
chromosomes) - Effectively sampling the placenta (not fetal
cells directly) - It is not a diagnostic test
- Not an all purpose genetic test, only gives info
on specific chromosomes, and so not indicated in
all circumstances
38Dont forget
- Take a family history to identify familial and/or
ethnicity-specific disorders and screen
accordingly - Consider consanguinity and screen and test
accordingly - Refer or consult genetics when in doubt
39Useful Genetics Resources
- GEC-KO website Genetics Education
- www.geneticseducation.ca
- NIPT fact sheets
- http//www.mountsinai.on.ca/care/family-medicine-g
enetics-program/prenatal - Prenatal Screening Ontario Website
- http//www.prenatalscreeningontario.ca/
- Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of
Canada (SOGC) national clinical guidelines in
prenatal genetics visit http//sogc.org/clinical-p
ractice-guidelines/ and scroll down to Genetics.