Responding to Requests for Information - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Responding to Requests for Information

Description:

Responding to Requests for Information Kimberly J. Ruppel Billee Lightvoet Ward Dickinson Wright PLLC – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:98
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: dickinson2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Responding to Requests for Information


1
Responding to Requests for Information
  • Kimberly J. Ruppel
  • Billee Lightvoet Ward
  • Dickinson Wright PLLC

2
REQUESTS FOR PHI
  • Requests for protected health information (PHI)
    can come from a variety of sources
  • Patients
  • Family and friends
  • Other healthcare providers
  • Other third parties
  • Requests for PHI can come in a variety of forms
  • Focus on requests through legal or
    administrative processes

3
REQUESTS FOR PHI
  • Facts and circumstances dictate HIPAA obligations
  • HIPAA requires disclosure in response to certain
    requests
  • Individuals
  • Secretary of the Department of Health and Human
    Services (DHHS)
  • HIPAA permits disclosure in other situations

4
What Form of Requests Can I Expect?
  • Court Order or Grand Jury Subpoena (issued by the
    Court)
  • HIPAA recognizes that the legal process for
    obtaining a court order and the secrecy of the
    grand jury process provides protections for the
    individuals private information.
  • Administrative Request or Civil Investigative
    Demand (issued by a governmental agency)

5
What Form Of Requests Can I Expect?
  • Discovery request from a party to a litigation
  • Request for the Production of Documents
  • Interrogatories
  • Notice for a Deposition
  • Subpoena
  • These are issued by lawyers without the Courts
    involvement.
  • Before responding, look for a protective order or
    an authorization form signed by the individual.

6
Request Scenarios
  • Personal injury lawsuit
  • Malpractice lawsuit
  • Employment litigation breach of covenant not to
    compete
  • Federal or state agency investigation
  • Consumer protection
  • Anti-kickback violations
  • Stark violations
  • Antitrust violations
  • Criminal law enforcement
  • Public health concerns

7
DISCLOSURES REQUIRED BY LAW
  • A Covered Entity may disclose PHI to the extent
    required by law if the disclosure complies with
    and is limited to the requirements of such law
  • Additional provisions apply to disclosures
  • About victims of abuse, neglect or domestic
    violence
  • For judicial and administrative proceedings
  • For law enforcement purposes

8
DISCLOSURES FOR JUDICIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
PROCEEDINGS
  • A Covered Entity may disclose PHI expressly
    authorized by an order of a Court or
    administrative tribunal
  • In response to a subpoena, discovery request or
    other process not accompanied by a Court order, a
    Covered Entity may disclose PHI only if
  • Satisfactory assurances
  • the individual has been given notice of the
    request and has not objected or all objections
    have been resolved to allow for disclosure or
  • Reasonable efforts have been made to secure a
    qualified protective order that (i) prohibits use
    of the PHI other than for the litigation at
    issue, and (ii) requires return or destruction of
    the PHI at the end of the litigation

9
DISCLOSURES FOR JUDICIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
PROCEEDINGS
  • Corrective actions imposed by the DHHS Office for
    Civil Rights
  • What did the hospital do wrong?
  • Responded to a subpoena unaccompanied by a court
    order
  • Satisfactory Assurances
  • Failed to determine that reasonable efforts were
    made to notify the individual of the request
  • Failed to receive satisfactory assurances that
    reasonable efforts were made to secure a
    qualified protective order
  • What corrective actions were imposed?
  • Improved staff awareness through training
  • Revised internal subpoena processing steps

10
DISCLOSURES FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES
  • A CE may disclose PHI to a law enforcement
    official for a law enforcement purpose
  • As required by law
  • In compliance with and as limited by a grand jury
    subpoena, Court order, Court-ordered warrant, or
    a subpoena or summons issued by a judicial
    officer or
  • Limited information to identify or locate a
    suspect, fugitive, material witness or missing
    person
  • Information about an individual suspected to be a
    victim of a crime
  • Individual agrees to the disclosure or
  • Individual cant agree due to incapacity or other
    emergency, but certain representations are made
    by official
  • CE determines that disclosure is in the best
    interest of the patient

11
DISCLOSURES FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES
  • Information about a decedent to alert law
    enforcement of the individuals death if the CE
    has a suspicion that such death may have resulted
    from criminal conduct
  • Information the CE believes in good faith is
    evidence of criminal conduct on the CEs premises
  • Information relating to a medical emergency
    (off-premises) if necessary to alert law
    enforcement to the commission, nature, location
    and victim(s) of a crime and the identity,
    description and location of the perpetrator of
    the crime.

12
DISCLOSURES FORHEALTH OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES
  • A CE may disclose PHI to a health oversight
    agency for oversight activities authorized by
    law
  • Audits
  • Civil, administrative or criminal investigations
    or proceedings
  • Inspections
  • Licensure/disciplinary actions
  • For oversight of the health care system and other
    programs, laws and entities where health
    information is relevant to eligibility or
    compliance

13
DISCLOSURES FOR PUBLIC HEALTH ACTIVITIES
  • HIPAA permits covered entities to disclose PHI to
    public health authorities, governmental
    authorities, and other persons in relation to
  • Controlling/preventing disease, injury or
    disability
  • Child abuse/neglect reporting
  • Quality, safety and effectiveness of
    FDA-regulated products/activities
  • Notification of exposure or risk relating to
    communicable disease
  • Reporting work-related illness or
    workplace-related medical surveillance
  • Providing proof of student immunization to schools

14
WHICH LAW APPLIES?
  • If a request for information potentially involves
    PHI, HIPAA must be considered at the forefront
  • HIPAA is a floor state privacy laws may offer
    greater protection
  • General Rule HIPAA applies (preemption) unless
  • state law relates to the privacy of individually
    identifiable health information AND
  • is more stringent than HIPAA
  • If HIPAA and state law dont conflict, comply
    with both

15
WHICH LAW APPLIES?
  • Consider provider-patient privilege laws
  • Applies to physicians, dentists, counselors,
    optometrists, social workers
  • PHI may not be disclosed without authorization
    except in the case of a personal injury or
    malpractice lawsuit by the patient against the
    provider
  • Parental access
  • Michigan law allows parents to access their
    childrens medical records in most, but not all,
    instances

16
WHEN YOU RECEIVE A REQUEST
  • Initial Assessment
  • Evaluate potential sources of responsive
    information
  • Medical Records and EMR
  • Billing, Scheduling, Administration
  • Policies/Procedures
  • Email and other correspondence
  • Laptops, smart phones or other mobile devices
  • Involve appropriate personnel
  • Privacy/Security Officer or other compliance
    personnel
  • Risk Management
  • Internal and/or External Legal Counsel

17
WHEN YOU RECEIVE A REQUEST
  • Preservation Steps
  • Determine who has possession, custody or
    control
  • Issue a legal hold notice to employees and any
    third parties who may have relevant information
  • Maintain documentation in its original form
  • Suspend routine document and data destruction
  • Proactively implement a document retention
    procedure
  • Document preservation steps
  • Involve administrative or technology staff to
    ensure that electronic information is not deleted
    or destroyed

18
Why Is Preservation Critical?
  • Legal obligation to preserve potentially relevant
    evidence
  • Spoliation of Evidence
  • Destruction (inadvertent or intentional) of
    information that is relevant to litigation or
    governmental investigation after you become aware
    of, or reasonably anticipate, the litigation or
    investigation
  • Penalties
  • Monetary damages
  • Presumption that destroyed information would
    support the opposing partys case

19
RESPONDING TO A REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
  • Evaluate the Scope and Burden of the Request
  • Practical Considerations
  • Is the time frame objectionable?
  • Is the volume of information overly burdensome?
  • What is the nature of the lawsuit or
    investigation?
  • What information is relevant?

20
RESPONDING TO A REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
  • HIPAA Considerations
  • Is PHI responsive and, even if not, is it
    included in potentially relevant data?
  • Would de-identified information satisfy the
    request?
  • Determine what HIPAA provision(s) apply
  • Involve your Privacy and Security Officers
  • Consult legal counsel as necessary

21
RESPONDING TO A REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
  • Attempt to negotiate with the opposing party to
    narrow the request
  • Timeframe (Federal Court Rules approve limiting
    to 5 years)
  • Use of search terms for electronic information
  • Identify and agree on employees who are the most
    likely custodians
  • De-duplication
  • Make reasonable efforts to limit disclosure to
    minimum necessary
  • Exception for disclosures to the individual,
    required by law or pursuant to authorization

22
RESPONDING TO A REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
  • Protective Measures
  • Consider obtaining the individuals authorization
    even if not required
  • Court Involvement may be an option (Motion to
    Quash) or may be required (Qualified Protective
    Order)
  • Ask the Court to shift search costs to the
    requesting party

23
WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT?
  • Renewed governmental focus
  • New regulations
  • Expanded liability new players
  • Increased penalties (up to 1.5 Million per
    violation)
  • Media attention
  • Patient sensitivity/awareness

24
WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT?
  • Beginning in 2011 first civil money penalty
    imposed by OCR 4.3 million fine for health
    plans denial of access to patients own medical
    records
  • Must provide patient a copy of medical records
    within 30 days and no later than 60 days of the
    patients request
  • Probably exacerbated by the health plans failure
    to cooperate with OCRs investigation
  • Inadvertent disclosures can be expensive (more
    next session)
  • Stolen unencrypted thumb drive resulted in
    150,000 settlement
  • Stolen unencrypted laptop resulted in 1.5
    million settlement
  • Leased photocopier returned without erasing data
    resulted in 1.2 million settlement

25
MITIGATING YOUR RISK
  • Maintain an updated records management program
  • Maintain appropriate HIPAA policies and
    procedures
  • Carefully select your vendors
  • Train your workforce
  • Document everything
  • Cooperate (reasonably) with OCR and other
    governmental authorities
  • Know your obligations when an inadvertent
    disclosure occurs

26
QUESTIONS?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com