PRT System Capacity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

PRT System Capacity

Description:

Title: PRT Images for Master Slide Author: kha user Last modified by: sam.lott Created Date: 11/2/2006 2:47:28 AM Document presentation format: On-screen Show (4:3) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: khau3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PRT System Capacity


1
PRT System Capacity
CARBON-FREE MOBILITY CONFERENCE
March 6, 2009 J. Sam Lott, P.E. Kimley-Horn and
Associates, Inc.
2
Presentation Overview
  • Capacity Defining the Issues
  • Station Operations
  • Main Line
  • Station/Main Line Transition Zone
  • Vehicle Occupancy
  • Conclusions

3
Capacity Defining the Issues
4
Capacity Defining the Issues
  • Safety
  • Operational sustainability
  • Failure mode recovery/work-around
  • Redundant elements More is not necessarily
    better
  • Public perception may negate some solutions

5
Station Operations
6
Station Operational Capacity A premise for
the near term
  • As important as line capacity issues are, the
    successful application of PRT systems will be
    determined by the practical and sustainable
    operational capacity limits of the stations
    serving the peak demand conditions of the system.
  • Ref. 2006 PT Expo PRT Stations System
    Capacity Implications by J. Sam Lott and Jill
    Capelli

7
Operational Concept and Station Configuration
  • Serial Station Berths
  • FIFO with head-end loading position(s)
  • FIFO with platooning and simultaneous loading
    positions
  • Parallel Station Berths
  • Parallel In-Line
  • Parallel Only Berths

8
Serial Berths - Head End Load
Unload only Positions
Load and Unload Positions
9
Serial Berths Platooning
10
Parallel Berths In Line
11
Parallel Berths With Reversing
12
Conclusions on Station Capacity
  • Dwell time is 1 variable
  • 2 to 20 sec. in theoretical studies, but
    passenger interactions could increase these
    values
  • Communication of loading berth location is
    complicated for visually impaired passengers
  • Extended dwell times required for elderly and
    handicapped
  • Loading and unloading of baggage significantly
    impacts dwell times

13
Conclusions on Station Capacity
  • Number of loading berths 2 variable
  • Station dimensions are a practical limit
  • Berth configuration (serial berths versus
    parallel berths) is 3 variable
  • Parallel berths reduce dwell and reliability
    impacts, but slow down operating speeds

14
Conclusions on Station Capacity
  • For the first PRT Systems we will implement
    (i.e., next ten years), the following are
    proposed practical maximums for planning
    purposes
  • Single-sided stations
  • 6 to 8 berths
  • 500 to 1000 vehicles/hr
  • 1000 to 2000 passengers/hr

15
Main Line
16
Main Line Capacity
  • Mainline throughput capacity issues include
  • Sustainable operating headway
  • Empty vehicle mix
  • Average passenger occupancy of loaded vehicles
  • Ref. 2005 TRB Capacity Analysis of Demand
    Responsive Systems by J. Sam Lott and
  • David S. Tai

17
Operating Headway
  • Determined by
  • Synchronous control means that provides space (or
    slot) for merging vehicles to enter the Main
    Line flow
  • Brick wall stop safety criteria
  • Sustainable average spacing between vehicles that
    accounts for operational perturbations i.e.,
    the real world

18
Station/Main Line Transition Zone
19
Designations of Operating Zones
  • Station Guideway Low speed operations with
    special train control considerations
  • Main Line Guideway Full speed operations under
    ATP safety functions
  • Station/Main Line Transition Zone
    Acceleration/deceleration zones where hand-off
    occurs between Station and Main Line control
    functions

20
Vehicle Occupancy
21
Vehicle Occupancy
  • Determined by the local demographic effect on
    travel party size (e.g., of families)
  • Shared ride options heavily effected by
  • Safety culture and physical context
  • Trip patterns conducive to shared ride
  • Surge flow characteristics
  • Empty vehicle management and storage locations
    drive the mix of empty vehicles
  • A new ASCE APM Conference paper by Ingmar
    Andréasson
  • addresses some of these aspects

22
Conclusions
23
Is Capacity a Big Deal? YES
  • Message to Owners/Developers
  • PRT is ready for consideration, however
  • Suitability must be determined for each specific
    application
  • Operations are very complex
  • Hidden capacity constraints can exist
  • Solutions applying redundant elements
  • may penalize PRT effectiveness

24
Is Capacity a Big Deal? YES
  • Message to Planners/Suppliers
  • PRT is ready for consideration, however
  • Dont force fit PRT to all applications
  • Be patient and let PRT technology mature before
    assuming capacity capabilities
  • Listen to what transit professionals have learned
    through experience

25
Is Capacity a Big Deal? YES
  • Message to Transit Professionals
  • PRT is ready for consideration, however
  • Capacity vs. safety issues are critically
    important to understand
  • Consider the world-wide design context
  • Be open minded, while remaining protective of
    passenger safety

26
PRT System Capacity
March 6, 2009 J. Sam Lott, P.E. Kimley-Horn and
Associates, Inc.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com