Title: Current Topics
1Current Topics
Lyman Break Galaxies Dr Elizabeth
Stanway (E.R.Stanway_at_Bristol.ac.uk)
2Topic Summary
- Star Forming Galaxies and the Lyman-? Line
- Lyman Break Galaxies at zlt4
- Lyman Break Galaxies at zgt4
- Lyman Break Galaxies at zgt7
- Reionisation, SFH and Luminosity Functions
3LBGs at zgt7
z-drop candidates at z7
Bunker et al (2009), see also Bouwens Oesch
Castellano Wilkins etc, etc (About 20 papers in
Sep-Dec 2009)
4Size Evolution to zgt7
- Galaxies at z7 continue to get smaller
- This scales as
- size ? (1z)-1.12 0.17, consistent with
constant comoving sizes - Most z7 candidates very compact
- (Oesch et al 2010)
5The Rest UV spectral Slope
Y
J
H
- AGN have spectra described by a power law,
- L? ? ???????i.e L? ? ??????
- In the rest-frame ultraviolet, star forming
galaxies also show power-law spectra - The slope of the power law depends on the
temperature of the emitting source - This power law slope can be measured using
broadband photometry
z
z7 galaxy
Magnitude gives the flux in J and H gt fJ and fH
Know the central wavelengths of J and H gt ?J
and ?H LJ/LH fJ/fH ? (?J?????????
6Rest-UV Spectral Slope
- AGN have ?-1 at all redshifts
- Zero-age, star forming galaxies with normal
stellar populations have ?-2 - Dust or age will make this slope redder (i.e.
shallower) - Within the LBG population the spectral slope is
seen to evolve with z gt age evolution? Dust
evolution?
Bouwens et al (2010)
7Rest-UV slope at z 7 - 8
Bouwens et al (2010)
- At z7, candidate galaxies are very blue,
particularly faint galaxies - ?? lt -3 is very hard to explain with any normal
(Population II) stellar population
8Rest-UV slope at z 7 - 8
- Pop III stars are defined as having very low or
zero metallicity - With no metals, they have fewer ways to emit
radiation (i.e. cool down) - They can become hotter, and more massive
(supported by radiation pressure) - Hotter galaxies have bluer spectral slopes
Bouwens et al (2010)
? lt -3 slopes may indicate that z7 galaxies have
very low metallicity
9Ensemble Properties of LBGs
- At z2-4, you can study individual galaxies in
detail - At z5-6, and more so at zgt7, this becomes much
harder - Studying an individual galaxy only tells you
about its immediate environment - By looking about the ensemble properties of
galaxies you can study the universe as a whole gt
observational cosmology - By using a common selection method (LBGs), you
are comparing like-for-like across cosmic time - gt Insights into galaxy formation, the star
formation histoy of the Universe and Reionisation
10Luminosity Functions
- The number counts of galaxies changes as a
function of luminosity - This is described by a Schecter function
- N(L) dA ? (L/L)??e-(L/L) dA
- At low-z this parameterises the galaxy mass
distribution - The function has three important parameters
- Characteristic luminosity, L or M (26.5 at
z6) - Faint end slope, ????????
- Normalisation, ?
- (Bouwens et al, 2007)
z4
z5
z6
11Luminosity Functions
z4
z3
z6
z5
- Number counts are affected by incompleteness and
contamination - There is degeneracy in the parameter fitting
- gt The exact values at high z are still
uncertain, but - The typical magnitude of the population is
decreasing at high z gt younger, smaller galaxies - The faint end slope appears steeper at high z gt
more faint galaxies compared to bright galaxies - At any given luminosity there are fewer z6
galaxies than z3 galaxies - (Bouwens et al, 2007)
12LF Results at z gt7
- At zgt7 there are fewer galaxies and we dont
probe the faint end slope - The Luminosity function is continuing to evolve -
there are fewer Lyman Break galaxies as you move
to higher redshifts, but the fraction that are
faint increases
Bouwens et al (2010)
13Luminosity Function Implications
- At earlier times, star formation in the Universe
is increasingly dominated by small, hard to
detect galaxies - The fraction missed by a magnitude limited survey
is increasing - The more massive galaxies we see at z3 are
increasingly rare at higher z - star formation is
occuring in less massive, less mature regions
(i.e. lower metallicity? less dusty?) - A Schecter function still describes the
distribution reasonably well out to z6 - star
formation may still be tracing the mass
distribution despite the short-lived starbursts - Models for hierarchical merging suggest that the
typical luminosity is evolving to follow the
typical galaxy mass at a given redshift
14Cosmic Evolution of Star Formation
Property z1-3 z5-6 zgt7
Age 200 Myr 50 Myr May be younger
Mass few x 1010 M? 109 M? No data
Metallicity 0.3-0.5 Z? 0.2 Z? May be very low - Pop III
Size (half light radius) 1.5-2 kpc 1kpc scales as comoving 0.5 kpc
M -21.1 z5 -20.7 z5 -20.2 -19.9?
Faint end Slope -1.6 may be steeper No data
Dust E(B-V)0.2 Probably less dusty No data
Star Formation Rate 30 M?/yr 30 M?/yr 30 M?/yr
15The Star Formation History of the Universe
- LBGs are star forming galaxies
- If there was other star formation at the same z
it would be detected UNLESS it is extincted - So LBGs can be used to measure the star formation
history of the universe modulo dust extinction
16The Star Formation History of the Universe
- This was first done using LBGs in the mid-1990s
using Lyman Break Galaxies at z3-4 by Piero
Madau - As a result, the Star Formation History of the
Universe is usually shown on a diagram known as
the Madau Plot - Early work showed that star formation peaked
around z1, but it was unclear what happened at
higher redshifts
(Steidel et al 1999)
17The SFH out to z6
GOODS extended this work to z6 (for bright
galaxies)
The Star Formation Rate Density out to z6 shows
steep evolution, particularly when only bright
galaxies are considered
18Uncertainties in the Madau Plot
- To get to star formation rate density you need
- Number of objects per unit volume
- Star formation rate per object
- You have
- Number of galaxies (Complete sample?
Contamination?) - Rest-UV flux (after dust extinction)
- Redshift selection function (Survey and model
dependent) - Uncertainties
- How much UV flux has been absorbed by dust?
- How much is emitted by galaxies below your
selection limit? - How do star formation rate and rest-UV flux
relate?
19The Star Formation History of the Universe
The LF has a steep faint end slope at high-z The
fainter you integrate down the Luminosity
Function, the more flux youll see Even to faint
magnitudes the SFRD is still dropping at high
redshift
(Bouwens et al, 2007)
20The Star Formation History of the Universe
- Significant uncertainty in star formation density
- General consensus
- The SFRD is either steady beyond z2 or declining
slowly - It declines rapidly beyond z6
- Metallicity, age and duty cycle are all important
parameters
Verma et al, 2007
21But is this a complete picture?
- Until recently most models predicted SF peaking
much earlier - LBGs are selected to be rest-UV bright
- How complete is the picture of the z3 universe
they paint? - Do they even map out all the star formation?
- What about UV-dark or dusty material?
Many Models predict SFR should peak at zgt6
(Springel Hernquist, 2003)
22Sub-mm and Dust-obscured Galaxies
- Rest-UV flux is reprocessed and reemitted in the
far-infrared by dust - At z2, 25 of the far-infrared luminosity in the
universe is seen in IR-detected DOGs - Luminous sub-mm galaxies are rare but can have
SFRs of 100s of M?/yr
- Numbers of SMGs are known to peak at z2-3 (the
epoch of galaxy mergers) - At these redshifts, dust obscured galaxies
might contribute 50 or more of the cosmic SFRD
23Including Obscured Galaxies in the Madau Plot
- Newer SFH models include feedback from QSOs and
gas - Models tend not to consider dust obscuration
- Predict SFH peaking at z3-4
- Possible that SMGs could contribute to this
picture, particularly at z1-3
Nagamine et al (2009)
24Reionisation
- Lyman break galaxies are star-forming so directly
measure the star formation properties of the
universe - At z7 they are starting to probe a transition
known as reionisation when the galaxy went from
largely neutral to largely ionised
25Reionisation and the End of the Dark Ages
- After the Big Bang, the universe cooled and
recombined leaving a neutral universe. At this
time, all rest-frame UV light is absorbed by
neutral hydrogen ? the Cosmic Dark Ages - The IGM in the local universe is highly ionised
- So when and how did the universe reionise? What
ended the Dark Ages? - The WMAP satellite studied the optical depth to
the CMB data which suggests that zreion9-12 - The failure of the LAE Luminosity Function to
evolve implies zreiongt6 - However, the observation of a Gunn-Peterson
trough in the spectra of SDSS z6 QSOS implies
zreion6.2 (or at least a large neutral fraction) - Could z6 starbursts contribute to reionisation?
26Reionisation - Evidence from WMAP
- The CMB has been streaming through the Universe
since Recombination - The mean free path of CMB photons will depend on
the distance the radiation travels through a
neutral vs ionised medium - WMAP has measured the CMB power spectrum,
constraining cosmological properties
- One of these, ?, is the optical depth of CMB
photons to reionisation - After five years of data, the best fitting value
suggests zreion10.8 1.4
27Reionisation - Evidence from SDSS
- Damping of the spectrum due to Lyman-alpha forest
lines rapidly increases with increasing redshift - This can be seen in the spectra of distant QSOs
seen in the SDSS - Beyond z6.4 large regions of the spectrum are
seen with zero flux - These are known as Gunn-Peterson troughs and
indicate that the universe is at least partly
neutral beyond z6
28Reionisation - Evidence from LAEs
- Gunn-Peterson absorption (i.e. due to neutral
gas) has broad damping wings - Therefore if theres neutral gas surrounding a
Lyman-alpha emitter, the line can be suppressed,
even though its longwards of 1216(1z) A - In a neutral universe you expect to see a smaller
number of Lyman-alpha emitters detected
29Reionisation - Evidence from LAEs
- Gunn-Peterson absorption (i.e. due to neutral
gas) has broad damping wings - Therefore if theres neutral gas surrounding a
Lyman-alpha emitter, the line can be suppressed,
even though its longwards of 1216(1z) A - In a neutral universe you expect to see a smaller
number of Lyman-alpha emitters detected - There is some evidence for this at z6.6
Pure num. evolution
Pure lum. evolution
30
Ouchi in prep
Lya Luminosity Function (Lya LF)
30Reionisation - Evidence from LBGs
- The neutral IGM is ionised by UV-flux
- The dominant source of UV-flux in the universe is
star formation - The effect of UV-flux on the universe depends on
- Clumpy IGM
- Escape of UV-photons
- Temperature of IGM
- Cosmology
- Can determine a critical Star Formation Density
that will ionise the Universe given some values
for these parameters - By integrating the LBG LF we measure the total UV
flux and can compare it with this critical values
31Reionisation - Evidence from LBGs
- Can calculate the ionised fraction of the
universe due to contribution of LBG galaxies
given certain assumptions - For reasonable assumptions about a warm IGM, it
is possible to fit the data (within errors) and
ionise the universe with z7 LBGs - BUT LBGs are scarcer at higher redshifts - is
this a problem at z10?
Current best fit ?0.087-0.017
Oesch et al 2010
32Lecture Summary
- With increasing redshift see
- Decreasing metallicity
- Decreasing dust extinction
- Decreasing age
- Decreasing mass
- Very blue rest-UV spectra are hinting at changes
in the nature of star formation - LBGs at every redshift are used to characterise
evolution in star formation density and the
mechanisms and environment for star formation - This could be critical for understanding the star
formation history of the Universe and Reionisation