Title: Ocular Myasthenia Gravis: Diagnostic Studies and Long Term Impact of Treatment
1Ocular Myasthenia Gravis Diagnostic Studies and
Long Term Impact of Treatment
- Steven R. Hamilton, M.D.
- Neuro-ophthalmic Consultants Northwest
- Seattle Neuroscience Institute
- Seattle, WA
2Overview of Myasthenia Gravis (MG)
- Definition
- A neuromuscular disorder manifested by weakness
and fatigability of voluntary muscles - Prevalence
- 50-125 cases per million population
- 25,000 affected persons in the United States
- History of MG
- First described in 1672 by Thomas Willis
3Physiology of MG
- Acetylcholine (Ach) packaged in vesicles on
presynaptic neuron - Ach receptors (AchR) opposite the neuron in the
muscle endplate - Action potential ? end plate potential
- Ach degraded by acetylcholinesterase
4Structure of the Neuromuscular Junction
5(No Transcript)
6Immunopathogenesis of MG
- MG is the prototypical autoimmune disease
- Animal model
- Rabbits and the electric eel (Torpedo
californica) - Action of AChR antibodies
- Reversible blockade of receptors
- Conformation changes of the receptors
- Inflammation and destruction of receptors
(primarily through complement cascade) - Atrophy of receptor membranes with loss of folds
7(No Transcript)
8Epitope Spreading Concept
- During an autoimmune attack, the response begins
to be directed against other antigenic regions
(epitopes) on the original target or on
neighboring antigens on the target - Results in a widened autoimmune attack and
increased damage of the target receptors - Concept has radically changed treatment regimen
of rheumatoid arthritis patients - Early aggressive intervention with anti-TNF
(tumour necrosis factor) drugs in RA has been
proven to prevent permanent joint damage
9Osserman Classification
- Group I-ocular MG
- Group Ia-ocular MG with physiologic evidence of
dissemination - Group IIa-mild generalized MG (no respiratory)
- Group IIb-mild generalized MG respiratory
- Group III-acute fulminant MG (thymomas)
- Group IV-late severe MG from groups I or II after
2 years
10Ocular Myasthenia Gravis
- Variable ptosis and diplopia
- Presenting symptoms in 50-70 of patients
- Eventually present in 90 of MG patients
- Lid twitch and enhanced ptosis
- Weakness of orbicularis oculi muscles
- Pseudo-internuclear ophthalmoplegia
- Normal pupils
11My left eyelid droops
- 66-year-old man with thyroidectomy 40 years
earlier - Residual proptosis without diplopia
- Droopy left lid for one month, worse at night
- Transient double vision recently
12(No Transcript)
13Pseudo-INO of OMG
14Ocular MG Demographics
- 14 (2021/1,487 patients) with localized ocular
MG followed a mean of 18 years - Male female ratio 5743
- Age of onset male (43 yrs), female (32 yrs)
- Maximum level of severity reached within 3 yrs in
85
Grob et al, Annals NY Acad Sci 1987, 505 472
15Generalized MG Demographics
- Bulbar, extremity, or trunk weakness plus ocular
- 86 (1,285/1,487 patients) with generalized MG
- Male to female ratio 41 59
- Age of onset male (41 yrs), female (28 yrs)
- Onset time from ocular to generalized MG
- 58 lt 6 months
- 20 within first year
- 7 during 2nd and 3rd years
Grob et al, Annals NY Acad Sci 1987, 505 472
16Diagnostic Test Sensitivities
Test Ocular MG Generalized MG
AChR Ab 50 90
edrophonium 60-95 70-95
Repetitive nerve stim. 10-17 53-100
Single fiber EMG 82-99 82-99
Ice Test 89
17Edrophonium Test
18Caveats on Diagnostic Tests
- AChR Antibody (Ab) tests
- If negative binding AChR Ab level
- lt4 positive modulating Ab
- lt1 positive blocking Ab
- 50 of AchR Ab-negative patients have Ab to MuSK
(muscle specific kinase) (rare in OMG) - SF(single fiber) EMG
- 100 sensitive in SR-LP muscle groups
- 62 sensitive in OO group alone
19Treatment of OMG
- Two potential goals
- Return the person to a state of clear vision
- Prevent or limit the severity of generalized MG
- Treatment options
- Mechanical (patching) or strabismus surgery
- Medical therapy
- Symptomatic (pyridostigmine bromide)
- Immunosuppression
- Thymectomy
20The Dangers of Patching ocular MG Patients
- Too often patients are abandoned to poor quality
of life without the chance of binocular vision - An easy fix for the treating neurologist without
consideration of the long-term implications for
quality of life and the risk of generalization of
the disease
21Pyridostigmine Therapy of ocular MG
- Improves visual disability in 20-40 of OMG
patients - Most effective for isolated variable ptosis
- No immunomodulatory effect to prevent
generalization of disease - May actually mask underlying progression of
disease or even permit epitope spreading
22Immunosuppressive Therapies for Ocular MG
- Cochrane Review 2006
- There are no data from randomized controlled
trials on the impact of any form of treatment on
the risk of progression from ocular to
generalized myasthenia gravis. - Observational studies (cohort and case studies)
suggest corticosteroids and azathioprine may
reduce the risk of generalization of ocular MG
23Corticosteroids for Ocular MG
- Kupersmith et al. Arch Neurol. 2003
Feb60(2)243-8 - 147 pts with ocular MG
- Treated with 6 weeks of 40-60 mg prednisone per
day with gradual taper to once-a-day or
alternate-day low-dose therapy (2.5-10 mg) - 2 years follow-up data
- 7 vs. 36 development of generalized MG
24Corticosteroid Therapy for ocular MG
- Monsul et al. J Neurol Sci. 2004 Feb
15217(2)131-3 - 56 ocular MG patients
- Treated patients received 60 mg prednisone per
day with slow taper over 3-6 months - 2 year follow-up
- 11 vs. 35 development of generalized MG
25Combined Therapies for Ocular MG
- Sommer et al. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997
Feb62(2)156-62 - 78 pts with ocular MG with mean duration of
disease of 8 years - Only12 generalized if on corticosteroids (45),
azathioprine (27), or both (23) - 64 generalized if on no immunosuppression
- Thymectomy for abnormal chest CT also correlated
with good outcome
26Combined Therapies for OMG
- Mee et al. J Neuro-ophthalmol. 2003
Dec23(4)249-50 - Retrospective review of 34 patients who are
positive for AChR Antibodies - Treatment with corticosteroids and/or
azathioprine - 2 years of follow-up
- 21/34 (62) patients generalized
- 9 of those on immunomodulatory therapy
generalized - 86 of those on pyridostigmine alone generalized
27Mycophenolate mofetil
- Pro-drug of mycophenolic acid first isolated in
1898 from Penicillium - Inhibits lymphocyte purine synthesis by
reversibly and noncompetitively blocking inosine
monophosphate dehydrogenase. - Highly specific for lymphocytes
- Side effects gastrointestinal upset, increased
liver function tests. Rare bone marrow
suppression. - Better tolerated than azathioprine and
cyclosporine (less nephrotoxic)
28Mycophenolate mofetil (MM) for MG
- Faster onset of action than azathioprine
- 2-4 months average
- 250 mg/day for 1 week, then 250 mg twice a day
for 1 week, increasing gradually to 1-2 gms/day
in twice a day schedule - Take on an empty stomach
- Avoid pregnancy (class C drug)
- Check complete blood count, liver function tests
every 4 months
29MM Trials for Generalized MG
- Meriggioli et al. (Neurology 2003)
- Retrospective review of 85 patients
- 28 seronegative
- Dosages ranged from 1-3g/day
- 56 with prior thymectomy
- 73 achieved pharmacologic remission or
significant improvement - Maximal benefit at 26 weeks 6 discontinued due
to side effects
30MM Trials for GMGAspreva sponsored trial (Donald
Sanders _at_ Duke)
- 80 patient double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
- 12 week duration
- MM plus prednisone vs prednisone alone (20 mg
dose) - No significant difference in outcomes
- MM well tolerated
31Treatment of ocular MG with MMHamilton et al.
- Retrospective review of 14 patients with ocular
MG treated with Mycophenolate mofetil - Demographics
- Gender 9 Men, 5 Women
- Average age at presentation 52 (23-77)
- Average Follow up on MM 17 months (6-41)
- Diagnostic Tests
- 9/14 AchR Ab, 1 MuSK
- edrophonium test 4/7 tested 7 not performed
- CT chest 9/10 negative, 1 thymic hyperplasia
32Study Design
- Patients were started on MM for one of three
reasons - Primary agent besides pyridostigmine (3/14)
- Worsening symptoms on other immunosuppressives
(8/14) - Tapering off other immunosuppressives (3/14)
33Study Design
- Starting dose MM 250mg daily with gradual
increase to target dose of 1 gm twice a day. - Minimum duration of treatment for at least 6
months. - Blood monitoring of complete blood count with
differential and liver function tests. - Initially every 2 weeks
- Quarterly when patient reached maintenance
34Results
- 13/14 patients were able to reach a maintenance
dose of 1g twice a day. 1 patient reached 1,750
mg daily - 2 patients discontinued the medication
- 1 due to development of cellulitis
- 1 due to lack of response
35Results
- Based on MGFA assessment
- 8/14 in pharmacologic remission
- 4/14 improved
- 2/14 no change or worse
- Mean time to objective improvement
- 2 months
- Side effects 4/14 had mild liver enzyme
abnormalities 1 patient discontinued due to
development of cellulitis - No patients converted to generalized MG
36Thymectomy
- Introduced for thymoma, later for weakness
- Mulder et al series
- 249/781 patients with moderate-severe MG had
thymectomy - 87 benefited with supplemental medication
- 51 achieved remission
- Patients with thymoma responded least well
- Onset to improvement may take months-years
Mulder et al. Am J Surg 198314661
37Indications for Thymectomy
- Ocular only
- Thymoma
- All generalized
- Selected generalized
- Young onset
- Disabling MG
- Unresponsive to pyridostigmine
- Recent onset only (lt 5 yrs)
From a poll of 56 neurologists on the Med Adv
Board of the MGF (Lanska 1990)
38Thymectomy for Ocular MG
- Roberts et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
2001122562-8 - 61 patients with Ocular MG only underwent
thymectomy - Mean follow-up of 9 years
- 12 patients received anticholinesterase and
steroids - 51 cured, 20 improvement, 26 no change, 3
worsening - 70 were cured or improved post thymectomy
39Conclusions
- Ocular MG can usually be accurately diagnosed in
patients presenting with diplopia and/or ptosis - Ocular MG has a high spontaneous rate of
conversion to generalized MG over 3 years - There are strong immunological reasons to
seriously consider early immunosuppression of
ocular MG to optimize the patients quality of
life and prevent long-term generalization and
disability
40Bryce Canyon,Utah