Non-Experimental designs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Non-Experimental designs

Description:

... serves as a quasi-independent variable Three major types Cross-sectional Longitudinal Cohort-sequential Video lecture ... aging process Changes in ... psychology ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:197
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: J796
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Non-Experimental designs


1
Non-Experimental designs
  • Psych 231 Research Methods in Psychology

2
Non-Experimental designs
  • Sometimes you just cant perform a fully
    controlled experiment
  • Because of the issue of interest
  • Limited resources (not enough subjects,
    observations are too costly, etc).
  • Surveys
  • Correlational
  • Quasi-Experiments
  • Developmental designs
  • Small-N designs
  • This does NOT imply that they are bad designs
  • Just remember the advantages and disadvantages of
    each

3
Developmental designs
  • Used to study changes in behavior that occur as a
    function of age changes
  • Age typically serves as a quasi-independent
    variable
  • Three major types
  • Cross-sectional
  • Longitudinal
  • Cohort-sequential

Video lecture (10 mins)
4
Developmental designs
  • Cross-sectional design
  • Groups are pre-defined on the basis of a
    pre-existing variable
  • Study groups of individuals of different ages at
    the same time
  • Use age to assign participants to group
  • Age is subject variable treated as a
    between-subjects variable

5
Developmental designs
  • Cross-sectional design
  • Advantages
  • Can gather data about different groups (i.e.,
    ages) at the same time
  • Participants are not required to commit for an
    extended period of time

6
Developmental designs
  • Cross-sectional design
  • Disadvantages
  • Individuals are not followed over time
  • Cohort (or generation) effect individuals of
    different ages may be inherently different due to
    factors in the environment
  • Are 5 year olds different from 15 year olds just
    because of age, or can factors present in their
    environment contribute to the differences?
  • Imagine a 15yr old saying back when I was 5 I
    didnt have a Wii, my own cell phone, or a
    netbook
  • Does not reveal development of any particular
    individuals
  • Cannot infer causality due to lack of control

7
Developmental designs
  • Longitudinal design
  • Follow the same individual or group over time
  • Age is treated as a within-subjects variable
  • Rather than comparing groups, the same
    individuals are compared to themselves at
    different times
  • Changes in dependent variable likely to reflect
    changes due to aging process
  • Changes in performance are compared on an
    individual basis and overall

8
Longitudinal Designs
  • Example
  • Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (WLS)
  • Began in 1957 and is still on-going (50 years)
  • 10,317 men and women who graduated from Wisconsin
    high schools in 1957 (and randomly selected
    brothers and sisters, and spouses too)
  • Originally studied plans for college after
    graduation
  • Now it can be used as a test of aging and
    maturation
  • Data collected in
  • 1957, 1964, 1975, 1992,
  • 2003, 2011

9
Developmental designs
  • Longitudinal design
  • Advantages
  • Can see developmental changes clearly
  • Can measure differences within individuals
  • Avoid some cohort effects (participants are all
    from same generation, so changes are more likely
    to be due to aging)

10
Developmental designs
  • Longitudinal design
  • Disadvantages
  • Can be very time-consuming
  • Can have cross-generational effects
  • Conclusions based on members of one generation
    may not apply to other generations
  • Numerous threats to internal validity
  • Attrition/mortality
  • History
  • Practice effects
  • Improved performance over multiple tests may be
    due to practice taking the test
  • Cannot determine causality

11
Developmental designs
  • Cohort-sequential design
  • Measure groups of participants as they age
  • Example measure a group of 5 year olds, then the
    same group 10 years later, as well as another
    group of 5 year olds
  • Age is both between and within subjects variable
  • Combines elements of cross-sectional and
    longitudinal designs
  • Addresses some of the concerns raised by other
    designs
  • For example, allows to evaluate the contribution
    of cohort effects

12
Developmental designs
  • Cohort-sequential design

Time of measurement
1975
1985
1995
Cohort A
1970s
Cohort B
1980s
Cohort C
1990s
13
Developmental designs
  • Cohort-sequential design
  • Advantages
  • Get more information
  • Can track developmental changes to individuals
  • Can compare different ages at a single time
  • Can measure generation effect
  • Less time-consuming than longitudinal (maybe)
  • Disadvantages
  • Still time-consuming
  • Need lots of groups of participants
  • Still cannot make causal claims

14
Non-Experimental designs
  • Sometimes you just cant perform a fully
    controlled experiment
  • Because of the issue of interest
  • Limited resources (not enough subjects,
    observations are too costly, etc).
  • Surveys
  • Correlational
  • Quasi-Experiments
  • Developmental designs
  • Small-N designs
  • This does NOT imply that they are bad designs
  • Just remember the advantages and disadvantages of
    each

15
Small N designs
  • What are they?
  • Historically, these were the typical kind of
    design used until 1920s when there was a shift
    to using larger sample sizes
  • Even today, in some sub-areas, using small N
    designs is common place
  • (e.g., psychophysics, clinical settings, animal
    studies, expertise, etc.)

16
Small N designs
  • In contrast to Large N-designs (comparing
    aggregated performance of large groups of
    participants)
  • One or a few participants
  • Data are typically not analyzed statistically
    rather rely on visual interpretation of the data

17
Small N designs
Steady state (baseline)
  • Observations begin in the absence of treatment
    (BASELINE)
  • Then treatment is implemented and changes in
    frequency, magnitude, or intensity of behavior
    are recorded

18
Small N designs
Transition steady state
Steady state (baseline)
Treatment introduced
  • Baseline experiments the basic idea is to show
  • when the IV occurs, you get the effect
  • when the IV doesnt occur, you dont get the
    effect (reversibility)

19
Small N designs
Unstable
Stable
  • Before introducing treatment (IV), baseline needs
    to be stable
  • Measure level and trend
  • Level how frequent (how intense) is behavior?
  • Are all the data points high or low?
  • Trend does behavior seem to increase (or
    decrease)
  • Are data points flat or on a slope?

20
ABA design
Steady state (baseline)
Transition steady state
Reversibility
  • ABA design (baseline, treatment, baseline)
  • The reversibility is necessary, otherwise
  • something else may have caused the effect
  • other than the IV (e.g., history, maturation,
    etc.)
  • There are other designs as well (e.g., ABAB see
    figure13.6 in your textbook)

21
Small N designs
  • Advantages
  • Focus on individual performance, not fooled by
    group averaging effects
  • Focus is on big effects (small effects typically
    cant be seen without using large groups)
  • Avoid some ethical problems e.g., with
    non-treatments
  • Allows to look at unusual (and rare) types of
    subjects (e.g., case studies of amnesics, experts
    vs. novices)
  • Often used to supplement large N studies, with
    more observations on fewer subjects

22
Small N designs
  • Disadvantages
  • Effects may be small relative to variability of
    situation so NEED more observation
  • Some effects are by definition between subjects
  • Treatment leads to a lasting change, so you dont
    get reversals
  • Difficult to determine how generalizable the
    effects are

23
Small N designs
  • Some researchers have argued that Small N designs
    are the best way to go.
  • The goal of psychology is to describe behavior of
    an individual
  • Looking at data collapsed over groups looks in
    the wrong place
  • Need to look at the data at the level of the
    individual
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com