Manila - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Manila

Description:

Title: India: Biosafety Capacity Building Author: M.Hota Last modified by: Acer Valued Customers Created Date: 6/17/2004 10:16:34 AM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:93
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: M1186
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Manila


1
Public participation and awareness on genetically
engineered technologies of crops in India
Desh Deepak Verma Joint Secretary Ministry of
Environment an Forests
  • Manila
  • 21-25 June, 2004

2
  • The Ministry of Environment and Forests is the
    focal point for Convention on Biological
    Diversity and all biodiversity related matters
    including biosafety and
  • Ratified the Cartagena Protocol in January, 2003.

3
Biosafety Framework in IndiaGovernment
Commitment
  • Government of India has committed to biosafety
    issues by framing Rules for Manufacture, Use,
    Import, Export and Storage of Hazardous
    Microorganisms/ Genetically engineered organisms
    or cells under the EPA (1986).
  • The 1989 Rules cover the entire spectrum of
    activities relating to research, development and
    use of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) and
    their products.

4
  • Four principal facets of the biosafety regulatory
    framework namely, institutional, legal,
    environmental and public information are in
    place.
  • In accordance with Article 8(g) of the
    Convention, India is committed to establish or
    maintain means to regulate, manage or control the
    risks associated with the use and release of LMOs
    resulting from biotechnology.

5
Current Regulatory Mechanism for GMOs Statutory
Bodies
  1. Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBSC)
  2. Review Committee on Genetic Manipulation (RCGM)
  3. Genetic Engineering Approval Committee (GEAC)
  4. State Biotechnology Coordination Committee (SBCC)
  5. District Level Committee (DLC)

6
BENEFITS OF GMOs IN AGRICULTURE
  • Increased production to ensure food security
  • Reduced need for clearing more land for farms
  • Improved productivity of marginal lands
  • Fall in the irrigation and agrochemical
    requirements

Weed infested
Weed resistant
Golden rice with Vitamin A
Soyabean
7
POTENTIAL ENVIORNMENTAL AND RELATED PROBLEMS
  • Development of insect resistance
  • Effect on non target herbivore insects,
    pollinators etc.
  • Gene flow to wild relatives leading to gene
    contamination
  • Health hazard for human beings and cattle
  • Possible transfer of antibiotic resistant genes
    to other soil bacteria
  • Loss of local biodiversity
  • Capture of market by GMO seed-Monopoly

8
ONGOING FIELD TRIALS IN THE WORLD
Red countries that are growing GM crops
Yellow countries that are field testing GM crops
9
MAJOR GM CROPS, THEIR TRAITS AND AREA (MHA)
Crop Trait Area in 2001
1. Soybean Herbicide-tolerant 33.3
2. Corn Insect resistant (Bt) 5.9
3. Canola Herbicide-tolerant 2.7
4. Cotton Herbicide-tolerant 2.5
5. Cotton Insect resistant (Bt)/ Herbicide-tolerant 2.4
6. Corn Herbicide-tolerant 2.1
7. Cotton Insect resistant (Bt) 1.9
8. Corn Insect resistant (Bt)/ Herbicide-tolerant 1.8
TOTAL 52.6
10
GM CROPS APPROVED IN INDIA
  • Only one crop i.e. Bt cotton approved recently
    with various conditions for a period of three
    years by GEAC based upon recommendations of the
    Monitoring and Evaluation Committee (MEC), ICAR
    and biosafety evaluation.

Results of insect infestation on Bt (right) and
non-Bt (left) cotton bolls
11
(No Transcript)
12
Information sharing and data base management
  • Networking with various institutes and agencies.
  • Development of databases.
  • Web management for information dissemination to
    various stakeholders.

13
Involvement of stakeholders
  • Societal acceptance is the key element for
    successful implementation of various polices and
    adaptation of technologies.
  • Introduction of public consultation mechanism.
  • Public Awareness programs.

14
Institutions and Public participation
  • Indian R D institutions have expertise for
    conducting research in this area. However,they
    need to be strengthened meet the challenges that
    are emerging with the rapidly changing biosafety
    scenario.
  • Information sharing protocols and additional data
    capacity are needed to keep pace with the
    expected increase in trans-boundary movement of
    LMOs.

15
  • Increasing public participation and awareness
    building programmes for all stakeholder groups
    play an important role.
  • Knowledge and methodologies on Biosafety will be
    shared and transferred to the state agencies
    through training and awareness programmes.

16
  • Strengthening institutional capacity for
    coordination and decision making across
    ministries, specialized agencies and in state
    government in areas related to biosafety and the
    CP.
  • strengthen technical capacity to assess, manage
    and monitor risks associated with biosafety
    through the provision of training for core
    capacity development in relevant stakeholder
    ministries, specialized agencies and in state
    governments.

17
Training cum awareness workshops in India
  • To share the experience of the industry and
    farmers with scientists, policy makers, state
    governments and NGOs.
  • To sensitize and train state government officials
    and other stakeholders for effective monitoring
    of transgenic crops and review their performance.

18
  • To demonstrate monitoring techniques to the
    agriculture related officials in the states where
    Bt cotton has been introduced.
  • To create a better understanding of the rules and
    regulation related to biosafety of transgenic
    crops and apprise about developments related to
    transgenic crops in India.
  •  

19
The complexities of controversy
  • Recent developments in the agricultural
    biotechnology arena claim different degrees of
    trust in regulatory institutions.
  • Risks are not resolved easily once they become
    public controversies.
  • Public risk perception is influenced as much by
    social relations and feelings of power.

20
  • There is a need for developing integrated
    information systems through networking of
    institutions, databases, and establishment of a
    biosafety-clearing house that would interalia
    cover information on transboundary inventories of
    GMOs.

21
  • In addition to the scientific assessments,
    socio-economic evaluation is also important for
    acceptance of GMOs.
  • In this regard, creating awareness amongst
    various stakeholders is extremely important.

22
Capacity Building in Biosafety in India
  • Efforts are being made towards capacity building
    within the country with the key thrust on
    training and awareness.
  • Currently two such projects are underway
  • FAO Regional Capacity Building Project on
    Biosafety of GM Crops in Asia and
  • GEF-World Bank aided Capacity building project.

23
Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com