CONTEMPORARY METHODS OF MORTALITY ANALYSIS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

CONTEMPORARY METHODS OF MORTALITY ANALYSIS

Description:

Gender Specific Effects of Early-Life Events on Adult Life – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:121
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 120
Provided by: Natal90
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CONTEMPORARY METHODS OF MORTALITY ANALYSIS


1
CONTEMPORARY METHODS OF MORTALITY ANALYSIS
  • Lecture 2
  • Leonid Gavrilov
  • Natalia Gavrilova

2
Measures of Mortality
  • Crude Death Rate
  • Age-Specific Death Rates (Age-Specific Mortality
    Rates)
  • Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates (Standardized
    Mortality Rates)
  • Life Expectancy (at birth or other age)
  • Measures of Infant Mortality

3
Crude Death Rate
  • Number of deaths in a population during a
    specified time period, divided by the population
    size "at risk" of dying during that study period.
  • For one-year period, Crude Death Rate,
  • CDR  Deaths in that year /mid-year
    population size
  • x 1,000  to adjust for standard-sized
    population of 1,000 persons
  • mid-year population total population for
    July 1

4
Crude Death Rate Pros and Cons
  • Pros - Easy to calculate, and require less
    detailed data than other mortality measures -
    Useful for calculation of the rate of natural
    increase (crude birth rate minus crude death
    rate)
  • Cons - Depends on population age structure
    (proportions of younger and older people)

5
Trends in crude death rates (per 1,000) for
Russia, USA and Estonia
6
Distribution of crude death rates (per 1,000) in
Russia, 2003
7
Age-Specific Death Rates (ASDR) or Age-Specific
Mortality Rates (ASMR)
  • Number of deaths in a specific age group during a
    specified time period, divided by the size of
    this specific age group during that study period.
    Example For one-year study period,
    Age-Specific Death Rates, ASDR for males at age
    45-49 years    Deaths to males aged 45-49 in
    that year / Number of males aged 45-49 at
    mid-year x 1,000  to adjust for standard-sized
    population of 1,000 persons of that age.

8
Age-Specific Death Rates Pros and Cons
  • Pros - Allows to study mortality by age (and
    sex)
  • Cons - Requires detailed data on deaths by age
    (not always available for developing countries,
    war and crisis periods, historical studies)

9
Age-adjusted death rate (ADR), standardized death
rate (SDR) or age-standardized death rate (ASDR)
  • Death rate expected if the studied population had
    the age distribution of another "standard"
    population (arbitrary chosen for the purpose of
    comparison). Calculated as weighted average 
    (with weights being proportions of the "standard"
    population at each age)

10
Age-Adjusted Death Rate or Age-Standardized
Death Rate
  • Direct method of age standardization
  • Mui is mortality rate in the studied population
    at age i
  • Psi number of persons at age i in the standard
    population. Ps total standard population.

11
Age-Adjusted Death Rate or Age-Standardized
Death Rate
  • Pros - Allows comparison of death rates of
    populations despite differences in their age
    distribution
  • Cons - Requires data on death rates by age (not
    always available for developing countries, war
    and crisis periods, historical studies) -
    Results of comparison may depend on the arbitrary
    choice of standard.

12
Typical standard populations
  • European standard population and World standard
    population suggested by the World Health
    Organization
  • In the United States 1940 U.S. standard
    population and 2000 U.S. standard population
    (applied around 2003)

13
The Concept of Life Table
  • Life table is a classic demographic format of
    describing a population's mortality experience
    with age. Life Table is built of a number of
    standard numerical columns representing various
    indicators of mortality and survival. The
    concept of life table was first suggested in 1662
    by John Graunt. Before the 17th century, death
    was believed to be a magical or sacred phenomenon
    that could not and should not be quantified.  The
    invention of life table was a scientific
    breakthrough in mortality studies.

14
Life Table
  • Cohort life table as a simple example
  • Consider survival in the cohort of fruit flies
    born in the same time

15
Number of dying, d(x)
16
Number of survivors, l(x)
17
Number of survivors at the beginning of the next
age interval
  • l(x1) l(x) d(x)

Probability of death in the age interval
q(x) d(x)/l(x)
18
Probability of death, q(x)
19
Person-years lived in the interval, L(x)
L(x) are needed to calculate life expectancy.
Life expectancy, e(x), is defined as an average
number of years lived after certain age. L(x) are
also used in calculation of net reproduction rate
(NRR)
20
Calculation of life expectancy, e(x)
Life expectancy at birth is estimated as an area
below the survival curve divided by the number of
individuals at birth
21
Life expectancy, e(x)
  • T(x) L(x) L?
  • where L? is L(x) for the last age interval.
  • Summation starts from the last age interval
    and goes back to the age at which life expectancy
    is calculated.
  • e(x) T(x)/l(x)
  • where x 0, 1, ,?

22
Life Tables for Human Populations
  • In the majority of cases life tables for humans
    are constructed for hypothetic birth cohort using
    cross-sectional data
  • Such life tables are called period life tables
  • Construction of period life tables starts from
    q(x) values rather than l(x) or d(x) as in the
    case of experimental animals

23
Formula for q(x) using age-specific mortality
rates
a(x) called the fraction of the last interval of
life is usually equal to 0.5 for all ages except
for the first age (from 0 to 1) Having q(x)
calculated, data for all other life table columns
are estimated using standard formulas.
24
Life table probabilities of death, q(x), for men
in Russia and USA. 2005
25
Period life table for hypothetical population
  • Number of survivors, l(x), at the beginning is
    equal to 100,000
  • This initial number of l(x) is called the radix
    of life table

26
Life table number of survivors, l(x), for men in
Russia and USA. 2005.
27
Life table number of dying, d(x), for men in
Russia and USA. 2005
28
Life expectancy, e(x), for men in Russia and USA.
2005
29
Trends in life expectancy for men in Russia, USA
and Estonia
30
Trends in life expectancy for women in Russia,
USA and Estonia
31
Special methods based on life table approach
  • Multiple decrement life tables
  • Cause-elimination life tables
  • Decomposition of life expectancy

32
Multiple decrement life tables
  • Multiple decrement life tables
  • Often used to construct life tables by cause of
    death
  • In this case decrements are different causes of
    death

33
Multiple decrement life tables vs ordinary life
tables
  • In an ordinary life table, membership in a
    well-defined cohort can be terminated by a single
    attrition factor.
  • In a multiple-decrement life table, there are
    multiple reasons for attrition (death).
  • Ordinary life tables can be used to answer
    questions about longevity.
  • A multiple-decrement life table will be used to
    answer the question, "What is the probability
    that a newborn will die due to a specific cause
    before reaching age 65?
  • In an ordinary life table of mortality it is
    assumed that everyone eventually dies.
  • The multiple-decrement life table will provide
    the probability that a person will eventually die
    due to a specific cause.

34
Multiple decrement life table steps of
construction
  • Construct an ordinary life table
  • Calculate probabilities of death from cause k

35
Multiple decrement life table steps of
construction (continue)
  • Calculate number of decrements from cause k in
    age interval (x, xn)
  • Calculate numbers of survivors to age y for those
    who eventually die from cause k during his/her
    life

36
Multiple decrement life table steps of
construction (continue)
  • Calculate life-time probability of dying from
    cause k
  • lk/l0
  • Calculate mean expected age at death from cause k
    by calculating Lkx and Tkx
  • Calculated as life expectancy in the ordinary
    life table

37
Mean expected age at death by cause,women, Russia
????? ?., ?????? ? ????? 2006
38
Comparison of mortality structure for Russia and
Western countries 1965
Vassin, 2006
39
Comparison of mortality structure for Russia and
Western countries 2004 ???
????? ?., ?????? ? ????? 2006
40
Decomposition of life expectancy
  • Suggested by Andreev (1982), Pollard (1982) and
    Arriaga (1984)

41
Decomposition by age
Where values lx, Lx, Tx represent standard
functions from ordinary life table, and notations
1 and 2 correspond to populations 1 and 2
respectively (comparing populations).
Thus, we need first to calculate ordinary life
tables for populations 1 and 2
42
Decomposition by age (continue)
The last open age interval
43
Decomposition by contribution of different causes
of death
where Rix designates a proportion of deaths from
cause i in age group (x, xn), which is Dix/Dx.
In this case Dix corresponds to the observed
number of deaths from cause i in age interval (x,
xn), and Dx is a corresponding number of deaths
from all causes.
44
Decomposition by causes of death (continue)
Notations (1) and (2) correspond to comparing
populations. Values mx correspond to life table
mortality rates derived from ordinary life
tables, because mx dx/Lx. In this formula
value ?x corresponds to contribution of
differences in mortality from all causes of death
in age interval (x, xn) to the observed
differences in life expectancy. It can be shown
that
45
Decomposition of the U.S.-Russia gap in life
expectancy by cause
USA 1999 Russia 2001. Source Shkolnikov et
a. Mortality reversal in Russia.
46
Decomposition of the U.S.-Russia gap in life
expectancy by cause
USA 1999 Russia 2001. Source Shkolnikov et
a. Mortality reversal in Russia.
47
Additional reading
  • Preston S. H., Heuveline P., Guillot M.
    Demography. Measuring and modeling population
    processes. Blackwell Publ., Oxford, 2001.
  •  

48
Cause elimination life tables
49
Cause elimination life table
  • Uses an additive property of hazard rate
  • Chiangs method (1978) assumes proportionality
    of hazard rates from different causes

50
Main formula for cause elimination life table
In this formula notation k means that
probability of death is related to cause
elimination (not a power).
Proportionality ratio rk can be obtained from the
observed number of deaths in a particular age
interval
51
Mortality in Central Asia
  • An example of practical use of demographic methods

52
Background on Mortality in Russia
53
Before the World War IILife expectancy (both
sexes)
54
Catching up with the WestLife expectancy in 1965
55
Stagnation after 1965
56
In 1992 and 1998 Russia experienced two serious
economic crises accompanied by drop in personal
income and rapid impoverishment
57
Russia Trends in life expectancy
58
Mortality reversal
  • Situation when the usual time trend of declining
    mortality is reversed (mortality is increasing
    over time).
  • Observed in sub-Saharan Africa (AIDS epidemic), 
    Eastern Europe, and FSU countries including
    Russia.
  • Mortality Reversal in FSU countries and Russia is
    particularly strong among male population, with
    excess mortality at ages about 35-55 years.
  • Particularly high increase in mortality from
    violence and accidents among manual workers and
    low education groups.

59
Ethnic Differentials in Mortality
60
Based on the Study of Ethnic Differentials in
Adult Mortality in Kyrgyzstan
  • Michel Guillot (PI), University of
    Wisconsin-Madison
  • Natalia Gavrilova, University of Chicago
  • Tetyana Pudrovska, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Demography, 2011, 48(3) 1081-1104
61
(No Transcript)
62
Background on Kyrgyzstan
  • Former Soviet republic became independent in
    1991
  • Population 5.2 million (2006)
  • Experienced a severe economic depression after
    break-up of Soviet Union
  • GNI per capita 440 USD 28th poorest country
    in the world (2005)
  • 48 of population below national poverty line
    (2001)

63
2008 Workshop, Bishkek
64
Ethnic Groups in Kyrgyzstan
  • Native Central Asian groups Kazakh, Kyrgyz,
    Tajik, Turkmen, Uzbek (Sunni Muslims)
  • Slavs Russian, Ukrainian, Bielorussian
  • Kyrgyzstan, 1999 census
  • Central Asians 79 of pop. (Kyrgyz 65)
  • Slavs 14 of pop. (Russian 12)

65
Recorded trends in adult mortality (20-60 years)
66
Mortality paradox?
  • Soviet period Russians/Slavs occupied dominant
    positions in the socio-economic structure of
    Central Asian societies (Kahn 1993)

67
Mortality paradox?
  • Slavic females more educated than Central Asian
    females (1989 and 1999 censuses)
  • Slavic males educational advantage not so clear
    varies by age (1989 and 1999 censuses)
  • Slavic households less poor than Central Asians
    (1993 World Bank poverty survey)
  • Infant mortality lower among Slavs (Soviet and
    post-Soviet period)

68
Proportion of individuals with post-secondary
education, by age and ethnicity, in 1989 census.
Females
69
Mortality paradox?
  • Slavic females more educated than Central Asian
    females (1989 and 1999 censuses)
  • Slavic males educational advantage not so clear
    varies by age (1989 and 1999 censuses)
  • Slavic households less poor than Central Asians
    (1993 World Bank poverty survey)
  • Infant mortality lower among Slavs (Soviet and
    post-Soviet period)

70
Proportion of individuals with post-secondary
education, by age and ethnicity, in 1989 census.
Males.
71
Mortality paradox?
  • Slavic females more educated than Central Asian
    females (1989 and 1999 censuses)
  • Slavic males educational advantage not so clear
    varies by age (1989 and 1999 censuses)
  • Slavic households less poor than Central Asians
    (1993 World Bank poverty survey)
  • Infant mortality lower among Slavs (Soviet and
    post-Soviet period)

72
(No Transcript)
73
Mortality paradox?
  • Slavic females more educated than Central Asian
    females (1989 and 1999 censuses)
  • Slavic males educational advantage not so clear
    varies by age (1989 and 1999 censuses)
  • Slavic households less poor than Central Asians
    (1993 World Bank poverty survey)
  • Infant mortality lower among Slavs (Soviet and
    post-Soviet period)

74
IMR by ethnicity, 1958-2003, Kyrgyzstan
75
Data
  • Unpublished population and death tabulations
    since 1959
  • collected from local archives
  • Individual census records 1999
  • Individual death records 1998-1999
  • obtained from national statistical office

76
(No Transcript)
77
(No Transcript)
78
Possible explanations for mortality paradox
  • Data artifacts
  • Migration effects (esp. 1989-99)
  • Cultural effects

79
Data artifacts?
  • Could the lower recorded mortality among Central
    Asian adults be due to lower data quality among
    them (coverage of deaths, age misreporting)?

80
Migration effects?
  • 1/3 of Russian population has left Kyrgyzstan
    since 1991
  • Could the increased disparity between Russian and
    Kyrgyz adult mortality be due to selective
    migration (healthy migrant effect)?

81
Cultural effects?
  • Culture may affect mortality in various ways
  • individual health and lifestyle behaviors (e.g.,
    diet, smoking, alcohol, use of preventive care)
  • family structure and social networks (denser
    social networks may produce lower stress levels
    and better health)
  • Could different cultural practices among Slavs
    and Central Asians explain the observed mortality
    differentials?

82
Data artifacts?
  • Intercensal estimates of death registration
    coverage above age 60 (Guillot, 2004)
  • 90 as early as 1959 in urban areas
  • coverage in rural areas was low initially (50)
    but caught up with urban areas in 1980s
  • Total population 92 for 1989-99 period
  • Adult deaths (20-59) usually better reported than
    deaths 60

83
(No Transcript)
84
Health selection?
85
Cohort-specific changes in educational
attainment, Males, 1989-99
86
Cohort-specific changes in educational
attainment, Females, 1989-99
87
Cultural effects?
  • Analysis of causes of death by ethnicity, 1998-99
  • Calculations based on micro-data
  • Deaths vital registration (1998-99)
  • Exposure census (March 1999)
  • Ages 20-59
  • Ethnicity Central Asians vs. Slavs
  • 20,000 death records 2.2 million census
    records

88
Age-standardized Death Rates at working ages (per
100000), 1998-99, by cause and ethnicity, Males
89
Contribution of causes of death to the difference
in life expectancy at working ages (40e20)
between Slavs and Central Asians Males (total
difference 2.90 years)
90
Age-standardized Death Rates at working ages (per
100,000). Detailed Injuries, Males
91
Age-standardized Death Rates at working ages (per
100,000), 1998-99, by cause and ethnicity, Females
92
Contribution of causes of death to the difference
in life expectancy at working ages (40e20)
between Slavs and Central Asians Females (total
difference .28 years)
93
Age-standardized Death Rates at working ages (per
100,000) Detailed Injuries, Females
94
Alcohol-related Causes of Death(Chronic
alcoholism, Alcohol psychoses, Alcohol cirrhosis
of the liver, Accidental poisoning by alcohol)
Age-standardized Death Rates at working ages
(per 100,000)
95
Multivariate analysis
  • Do ethnic mortality differentials at adult ages
    remain once we account for differences in
    education and urban/rural residence?
  • Negative binomial regression
  • Dependent variable deaths from all causes
    deaths by major cause (7)
  • Explanatory variables exposure, dummy variables
    for age, ethnicity, urban/rural residence,
    education (3 cat.)
  • Males and Females analyzed separately
  • Model 1 age, ethnicity
  • Model 2 age, ethnicity, education, residence

96
Males, all causes of death
97
Risk Ratio Slavs/CAMales
98
Risk Ratio Slavs/CAFemales
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
99
Conclusions
  • Excess mortality among adult Slavs (Soviet and
    post-Soviet period) is not likely due to data
    artifacts or migration effects
  • Excess mortality due to important ethnic
    differences in cause-specific mortality alcohol
    and suicide in particular
  • Differences remain unexplained by education or
    residence

100
Conclusions
  • Role of cultural characteristics?
  • Alcohol tied to cultural practices (culture of
    alcohol among Russians Impact of Islam for
    Central Asians)
  • Denser social networks and stronger social
    support among Central Asian ethnic groups?

101
Divergent paths for adult mortality in Russia and
Central AsiaEvidence from Kyrgyzstan
Further developments
  • By M.Guillot, N.S.Gavrilova and L.Torgashova
  • Presented at the annual meeting of the European
    Association for Population Studies (2011)

102
Age-standardized mortality rate, 40M20Kyrgyzstan
and Russia, 1981-2006
103
Age-standardized mortality rate, 40M20Kyrgyzstan
and Russia, 1981-2006
104
Study of autopsies in Barnaul during 1990-2004
(Zaridze et al., 2009)
  • Among 5732 autopsied men aged 35-69 years who
    were reported to have died from circulatory
    diseases 49 had alcohol detected in their blood
    and in 21 concentration of ethanol was 4g/l and
    higher (lethal dose)
  • Of 5880 autopsied men aged 35-69 years who were
    reported to have died from injuries 76 had
    alcohol in their blood and in 38 concentration
    of ethanol was 4g/l and higher

105
Codes used for the calculation of cause-specific
mortality in Russia
And Kyrgyzstan
106
Age-standardized mortality rate,
40M20Kyrgyzstan, 1981-2006, all causes and
broad causes
107
Age-standardized mortality rate,
40M20Kyrgyzstan, 1981-2006, all causes and
broad causes
108
40M20 (Russia) 40M20 (Kyrgyzstan), 1989-1999,
all causes and strongly alcohol related causes
109
40M20 (Russia) 40M20 (Kyrgyzstan), 1989-1999,
all causes and strongly alcohol related causes
110
40M20 (Russia) 40M20 (Kyrgyzstan), 1979-2009,
all causes and strongly alcohol related causes
111
Framework for Understanding Health Crisis in
Russia vs. Central Asia
Russia Kyrgyzstan (Central Asia?)
Infant mortality Declined Stalled
Adult mortality Large increase Moderate increase
Explanatory framework Greater importance of detrimental adult health behaviors Greater importance of health care deterioration
112
Trends in Life Expectancy Men
113
Trends in Life Expectancy Women
114
Workshop in Almaty, Kazakhstan, July 2011
  • Organized by the United Nations Population Fund
    (UNFPA)
  • Results of applying new methods to demographic
    estimation of mortality in Central Asian countries

115
Almaty is surrounded by mountains
116
Workshop in Almaty
117
Montmartre in Almaty
118
Acknowledgements
  • National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz
    Republic
  • Zarylbek Kudabaev, Orozmat Abdykalykov, Liudmila
    Torgashova, Larissa Mimbaeva, Elena Komandirova
    and Mikhail Denisenko
  • NICHD R03 HD38752, R01 HD045531

119
Additional reading
  • Guillot M, Gavrilova N, Pudrovska T.
    Understanding the "Russian mortality paradox" in
    Central Asia Evidence from Kyrgyzstan.
    Demography, 2011, 48(3) 1081-1104.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com