Title: CONTEMPORARY METHODS OF MORTALITY ANALYSIS
1CONTEMPORARY METHODS OF MORTALITY ANALYSIS
- Lecture 2
- Leonid Gavrilov
- Natalia Gavrilova
2Measures of Mortality
- Crude Death Rate
- Age-Specific Death Rates (Age-Specific Mortality
Rates) - Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates (Standardized
Mortality Rates) - Life Expectancy (at birth or other age)
- Measures of Infant Mortality
3Crude Death Rate
- Number of deaths in a population during a
specified time period, divided by the population
size "at risk" of dying during that study period.
- For one-year period, Crude Death Rate,
- CDRÂ Deaths in that year /mid-year
population size - x 1,000Â to adjust for standard-sized
population of 1,000 persons - mid-year population total population for
July 1
4Crude Death Rate Pros and Cons
- Pros - Easy to calculate, and require less
detailed data than other mortality measures -
Useful for calculation of the rate of natural
increase (crude birth rate minus crude death
rate) - Cons - Depends on population age structure
(proportions of younger and older people)
5Trends in crude death rates (per 1,000) for
Russia, USA and Estonia
6Distribution of crude death rates (per 1,000) in
Russia, 2003
7Age-Specific Death Rates (ASDR) or Age-Specific
Mortality Rates (ASMR)
- Number of deaths in a specific age group during a
specified time period, divided by the size of
this specific age group during that study period.
Example For one-year study period,
Age-Specific Death Rates, ASDR for males at age
45-49 years  Deaths to males aged 45-49 in
that year / Number of males aged 45-49 at
mid-year x 1,000Â to adjust for standard-sized
population of 1,000 persons of that age.
8Age-Specific Death Rates Pros and Cons
- Pros - Allows to study mortality by age (and
sex) - Cons - Requires detailed data on deaths by age
(not always available for developing countries,
war and crisis periods, historical studies)
9Age-adjusted death rate (ADR), standardized death
rate (SDR) or age-standardized death rate (ASDR)
- Death rate expected if the studied population had
the age distribution of another "standard"
population (arbitrary chosen for the purpose of
comparison). Calculated as weighted averageÂ
(with weights being proportions of the "standard"
population at each age)
10Age-Adjusted Death Rate or Age-Standardized
Death Rate
- Direct method of age standardization
- Mui is mortality rate in the studied population
at age i - Psi number of persons at age i in the standard
population. Ps total standard population.
11Age-Adjusted Death Rate or Age-Standardized
Death Rate
- Pros - Allows comparison of death rates of
populations despite differences in their age
distribution - Cons - Requires data on death rates by age (not
always available for developing countries, war
and crisis periods, historical studies) -
Results of comparison may depend on the arbitrary
choice of standard.
12Typical standard populations
- European standard population and World standard
population suggested by the World Health
Organization - In the United States 1940 U.S. standard
population and 2000 U.S. standard population
(applied around 2003)
13The Concept of Life Table
- Life table is a classic demographic format of
describing a population's mortality experience
with age. Life Table is built of a number of
standard numerical columns representing various
indicators of mortality and survival. The
concept of life table was first suggested in 1662
by John Graunt. Before the 17th century, death
was believed to be a magical or sacred phenomenon
that could not and should not be quantified. The
invention of life table was a scientific
breakthrough in mortality studies.
14Life Table
- Cohort life table as a simple example
- Consider survival in the cohort of fruit flies
born in the same time
15Number of dying, d(x)
16Number of survivors, l(x)
17Number of survivors at the beginning of the next
age interval
Probability of death in the age interval
q(x) d(x)/l(x)
18Probability of death, q(x)
19Person-years lived in the interval, L(x)
L(x) are needed to calculate life expectancy.
Life expectancy, e(x), is defined as an average
number of years lived after certain age. L(x) are
also used in calculation of net reproduction rate
(NRR)
20Calculation of life expectancy, e(x)
Life expectancy at birth is estimated as an area
below the survival curve divided by the number of
individuals at birth
21Life expectancy, e(x)
- T(x) L(x) L?
- where L? is L(x) for the last age interval.
- Summation starts from the last age interval
and goes back to the age at which life expectancy
is calculated. - e(x) T(x)/l(x)
- where x 0, 1, ,?
22Life Tables for Human Populations
- In the majority of cases life tables for humans
are constructed for hypothetic birth cohort using
cross-sectional data - Such life tables are called period life tables
- Construction of period life tables starts from
q(x) values rather than l(x) or d(x) as in the
case of experimental animals
23Formula for q(x) using age-specific mortality
rates
a(x) called the fraction of the last interval of
life is usually equal to 0.5 for all ages except
for the first age (from 0 to 1) Having q(x)
calculated, data for all other life table columns
are estimated using standard formulas.
24Life table probabilities of death, q(x), for men
in Russia and USA. 2005
25Period life table for hypothetical population
- Number of survivors, l(x), at the beginning is
equal to 100,000 - This initial number of l(x) is called the radix
of life table
26Life table number of survivors, l(x), for men in
Russia and USA. 2005.
27Life table number of dying, d(x), for men in
Russia and USA. 2005
28Life expectancy, e(x), for men in Russia and USA.
2005
29Trends in life expectancy for men in Russia, USA
and Estonia
30Trends in life expectancy for women in Russia,
USA and Estonia
31Special methods based on life table approach
- Multiple decrement life tables
- Cause-elimination life tables
- Decomposition of life expectancy
32Multiple decrement life tables
- Multiple decrement life tables
- Often used to construct life tables by cause of
death - In this case decrements are different causes of
death
33Multiple decrement life tables vs ordinary life
tables
- In an ordinary life table, membership in a
well-defined cohort can be terminated by a single
attrition factor. - In a multiple-decrement life table, there are
multiple reasons for attrition (death). - Ordinary life tables can be used to answer
questions about longevity. - A multiple-decrement life table will be used to
answer the question, "What is the probability
that a newborn will die due to a specific cause
before reaching age 65? - In an ordinary life table of mortality it is
assumed that everyone eventually dies. - The multiple-decrement life table will provide
the probability that a person will eventually die
due to a specific cause.
34Multiple decrement life table steps of
construction
- Construct an ordinary life table
- Calculate probabilities of death from cause k
35Multiple decrement life table steps of
construction (continue)
- Calculate number of decrements from cause k in
age interval (x, xn) - Calculate numbers of survivors to age y for those
who eventually die from cause k during his/her
life
36Multiple decrement life table steps of
construction (continue)
- Calculate life-time probability of dying from
cause k - lk/l0
- Calculate mean expected age at death from cause k
by calculating Lkx and Tkx - Calculated as life expectancy in the ordinary
life table
37Mean expected age at death by cause,women, Russia
????? ?., ?????? ? ????? 2006
38Comparison of mortality structure for Russia and
Western countries 1965
Vassin, 2006
39Comparison of mortality structure for Russia and
Western countries 2004 ???
????? ?., ?????? ? ????? 2006
40Decomposition of life expectancy
- Suggested by Andreev (1982), Pollard (1982) and
Arriaga (1984)
41Decomposition by age
Where values lx, Lx, Tx represent standard
functions from ordinary life table, and notations
1 and 2 correspond to populations 1 and 2
respectively (comparing populations).
Thus, we need first to calculate ordinary life
tables for populations 1 and 2
42Decomposition by age (continue)
The last open age interval
43Decomposition by contribution of different causes
of death
where Rix designates a proportion of deaths from
cause i in age group (x, xn), which is Dix/Dx.
In this case Dix corresponds to the observed
number of deaths from cause i in age interval (x,
xn), and Dx is a corresponding number of deaths
from all causes.
44Decomposition by causes of death (continue)
Notations (1) and (2) correspond to comparing
populations. Values mx correspond to life table
mortality rates derived from ordinary life
tables, because mx dx/Lx. In this formula
value ?x corresponds to contribution of
differences in mortality from all causes of death
in age interval (x, xn) to the observed
differences in life expectancy. It can be shown
that
45Decomposition of the U.S.-Russia gap in life
expectancy by cause
USA 1999 Russia 2001. Source Shkolnikov et
a. Mortality reversal in Russia.
46Decomposition of the U.S.-Russia gap in life
expectancy by cause
USA 1999 Russia 2001. Source Shkolnikov et
a. Mortality reversal in Russia.
47Additional reading
- Preston S. H., Heuveline P., Guillot M.
Demography. Measuring and modeling population
processes. Blackwell Publ., Oxford, 2001. - Â
48Cause elimination life tables
49Cause elimination life table
- Uses an additive property of hazard rate
- Chiangs method (1978) assumes proportionality
of hazard rates from different causes
50Main formula for cause elimination life table
In this formula notation k means that
probability of death is related to cause
elimination (not a power).
Proportionality ratio rk can be obtained from the
observed number of deaths in a particular age
interval
51Mortality in Central Asia
- An example of practical use of demographic methods
52Background on Mortality in Russia
53Before the World War IILife expectancy (both
sexes)
54Catching up with the WestLife expectancy in 1965
55Stagnation after 1965
56In 1992 and 1998 Russia experienced two serious
economic crises accompanied by drop in personal
income and rapid impoverishment
57Russia Trends in life expectancy
58Mortality reversal
- Situation when the usual time trend of declining
mortality is reversed (mortality is increasing
over time). - Observed in sub-Saharan Africa (AIDS epidemic),Â
Eastern Europe, and FSU countries including
Russia. - Mortality Reversal in FSU countries and Russia is
particularly strong among male population, with
excess mortality at ages about 35-55 years. - Particularly high increase in mortality from
violence and accidents among manual workers and
low education groups.
59Ethnic Differentials in Mortality
60Based on the Study of Ethnic Differentials in
Adult Mortality in Kyrgyzstan
- Michel Guillot (PI), University of
Wisconsin-Madison - Natalia Gavrilova, University of Chicago
- Tetyana Pudrovska, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Demography, 2011, 48(3) 1081-1104
61(No Transcript)
62Background on Kyrgyzstan
- Former Soviet republic became independent in
1991 - Population 5.2 million (2006)
- Experienced a severe economic depression after
break-up of Soviet Union - GNI per capita 440 USD 28th poorest country
in the world (2005) - 48 of population below national poverty line
(2001)
632008 Workshop, Bishkek
64Ethnic Groups in Kyrgyzstan
- Native Central Asian groups Kazakh, Kyrgyz,
Tajik, Turkmen, Uzbek (Sunni Muslims) - Slavs Russian, Ukrainian, Bielorussian
- Kyrgyzstan, 1999 census
- Central Asians 79 of pop. (Kyrgyz 65)
- Slavs 14 of pop. (Russian 12)
65Recorded trends in adult mortality (20-60 years)
66Mortality paradox?
- Soviet period Russians/Slavs occupied dominant
positions in the socio-economic structure of
Central Asian societies (Kahn 1993)
67Mortality paradox?
- Slavic females more educated than Central Asian
females (1989 and 1999 censuses) - Slavic males educational advantage not so clear
varies by age (1989 and 1999 censuses) - Slavic households less poor than Central Asians
(1993 World Bank poverty survey) - Infant mortality lower among Slavs (Soviet and
post-Soviet period)
68Proportion of individuals with post-secondary
education, by age and ethnicity, in 1989 census.
Females
69Mortality paradox?
- Slavic females more educated than Central Asian
females (1989 and 1999 censuses) - Slavic males educational advantage not so clear
varies by age (1989 and 1999 censuses) - Slavic households less poor than Central Asians
(1993 World Bank poverty survey) - Infant mortality lower among Slavs (Soviet and
post-Soviet period)
70Proportion of individuals with post-secondary
education, by age and ethnicity, in 1989 census.
Males.
71Mortality paradox?
- Slavic females more educated than Central Asian
females (1989 and 1999 censuses) - Slavic males educational advantage not so clear
varies by age (1989 and 1999 censuses) - Slavic households less poor than Central Asians
(1993 World Bank poverty survey) - Infant mortality lower among Slavs (Soviet and
post-Soviet period)
72(No Transcript)
73Mortality paradox?
- Slavic females more educated than Central Asian
females (1989 and 1999 censuses) - Slavic males educational advantage not so clear
varies by age (1989 and 1999 censuses) - Slavic households less poor than Central Asians
(1993 World Bank poverty survey) - Infant mortality lower among Slavs (Soviet and
post-Soviet period)
74IMR by ethnicity, 1958-2003, Kyrgyzstan
75Data
- Unpublished population and death tabulations
since 1959 - collected from local archives
- Individual census records 1999
- Individual death records 1998-1999
- obtained from national statistical office
76(No Transcript)
77(No Transcript)
78Possible explanations for mortality paradox
- Data artifacts
- Migration effects (esp. 1989-99)
- Cultural effects
79Data artifacts?
- Could the lower recorded mortality among Central
Asian adults be due to lower data quality among
them (coverage of deaths, age misreporting)?
80Migration effects?
- 1/3 of Russian population has left Kyrgyzstan
since 1991 - Could the increased disparity between Russian and
Kyrgyz adult mortality be due to selective
migration (healthy migrant effect)?
81Cultural effects?
- Culture may affect mortality in various ways
- individual health and lifestyle behaviors (e.g.,
diet, smoking, alcohol, use of preventive care) - family structure and social networks (denser
social networks may produce lower stress levels
and better health) - Could different cultural practices among Slavs
and Central Asians explain the observed mortality
differentials?
82Data artifacts?
- Intercensal estimates of death registration
coverage above age 60 (Guillot, 2004) - 90 as early as 1959 in urban areas
- coverage in rural areas was low initially (50)
but caught up with urban areas in 1980s - Total population 92 for 1989-99 period
- Adult deaths (20-59) usually better reported than
deaths 60
83(No Transcript)
84Health selection?
85Cohort-specific changes in educational
attainment, Males, 1989-99
86Cohort-specific changes in educational
attainment, Females, 1989-99
87Cultural effects?
- Analysis of causes of death by ethnicity, 1998-99
- Calculations based on micro-data
- Deaths vital registration (1998-99)
- Exposure census (March 1999)
- Ages 20-59
- Ethnicity Central Asians vs. Slavs
- 20,000 death records 2.2 million census
records
88Age-standardized Death Rates at working ages (per
100000), 1998-99, by cause and ethnicity, Males
89Contribution of causes of death to the difference
in life expectancy at working ages (40e20)
between Slavs and Central Asians Males (total
difference 2.90 years)
90Age-standardized Death Rates at working ages (per
100,000). Detailed Injuries, Males
91Age-standardized Death Rates at working ages (per
100,000), 1998-99, by cause and ethnicity, Females
92Contribution of causes of death to the difference
in life expectancy at working ages (40e20)
between Slavs and Central Asians Females (total
difference .28 years)
93Age-standardized Death Rates at working ages (per
100,000) Detailed Injuries, Females
94Alcohol-related Causes of Death(Chronic
alcoholism, Alcohol psychoses, Alcohol cirrhosis
of the liver, Accidental poisoning by alcohol)
Age-standardized Death Rates at working ages
(per 100,000)
95Multivariate analysis
- Do ethnic mortality differentials at adult ages
remain once we account for differences in
education and urban/rural residence? - Negative binomial regression
- Dependent variable deaths from all causes
deaths by major cause (7) - Explanatory variables exposure, dummy variables
for age, ethnicity, urban/rural residence,
education (3 cat.) - Males and Females analyzed separately
- Model 1 age, ethnicity
- Model 2 age, ethnicity, education, residence
96Males, all causes of death
97Risk Ratio Slavs/CAMales
98Risk Ratio Slavs/CAFemales
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
99Conclusions
- Excess mortality among adult Slavs (Soviet and
post-Soviet period) is not likely due to data
artifacts or migration effects - Excess mortality due to important ethnic
differences in cause-specific mortality alcohol
and suicide in particular - Differences remain unexplained by education or
residence
100Conclusions
- Role of cultural characteristics?
- Alcohol tied to cultural practices (culture of
alcohol among Russians Impact of Islam for
Central Asians) - Denser social networks and stronger social
support among Central Asian ethnic groups?
101Divergent paths for adult mortality in Russia and
Central AsiaEvidence from Kyrgyzstan
Further developments
- By M.Guillot, N.S.Gavrilova and L.Torgashova
- Presented at the annual meeting of the European
Association for Population Studies (2011)
102Age-standardized mortality rate, 40M20Kyrgyzstan
and Russia, 1981-2006
103Age-standardized mortality rate, 40M20Kyrgyzstan
and Russia, 1981-2006
104Study of autopsies in Barnaul during 1990-2004
(Zaridze et al., 2009)
- Among 5732 autopsied men aged 35-69 years who
were reported to have died from circulatory
diseases 49 had alcohol detected in their blood
and in 21 concentration of ethanol was 4g/l and
higher (lethal dose) - Of 5880 autopsied men aged 35-69 years who were
reported to have died from injuries 76 had
alcohol in their blood and in 38 concentration
of ethanol was 4g/l and higher
105Codes used for the calculation of cause-specific
mortality in Russia
And Kyrgyzstan
106Age-standardized mortality rate,
40M20Kyrgyzstan, 1981-2006, all causes and
broad causes
107Age-standardized mortality rate,
40M20Kyrgyzstan, 1981-2006, all causes and
broad causes
10840M20 (Russia) 40M20 (Kyrgyzstan), 1989-1999,
all causes and strongly alcohol related causes
10940M20 (Russia) 40M20 (Kyrgyzstan), 1989-1999,
all causes and strongly alcohol related causes
11040M20 (Russia) 40M20 (Kyrgyzstan), 1979-2009,
all causes and strongly alcohol related causes
111Framework for Understanding Health Crisis in
Russia vs. Central Asia
Russia Kyrgyzstan (Central Asia?)
Infant mortality Declined Stalled
Adult mortality Large increase Moderate increase
Explanatory framework Greater importance of detrimental adult health behaviors Greater importance of health care deterioration
112Trends in Life Expectancy Men
113Trends in Life Expectancy Women
114Workshop in Almaty, Kazakhstan, July 2011
- Organized by the United Nations Population Fund
(UNFPA) - Results of applying new methods to demographic
estimation of mortality in Central Asian countries
115Almaty is surrounded by mountains
116Workshop in Almaty
117Montmartre in Almaty
118Acknowledgements
- National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz
Republic - Zarylbek Kudabaev, Orozmat Abdykalykov, Liudmila
Torgashova, Larissa Mimbaeva, Elena Komandirova
and Mikhail Denisenko - NICHD R03 HD38752, R01 HD045531
119Additional reading
- Guillot M, Gavrilova N, Pudrovska T.
Understanding the "Russian mortality paradox" in
Central Asia Evidence from Kyrgyzstan.
Demography, 2011, 48(3) 1081-1104.