Title: Chapter Seventeen: The Bureaucracy of Homeland Security
1Chapter SeventeenThe Bureaucracy of
Homeland Security
2Bureaucracy The Weberian Ideal
3Bureaucracy The Weberian Ideal
- Max Weber
- Max Weber coined the term bureaucracy to describe
professional, rational organizations - People organize for a purpose and their
organizations should accomplish that purpose - The process is rational There is a problem,
people organize to solve it, they work together,
and the problem is solved - Bureaucracy should be designed to accomplish
specific purposes
4Bureaucracy The Weberian Ideal
- The ideal bureaucracy
- In Webers ideal, labor is to be divided into
specific functions or bureaus, and all the
bureaus or functions of the organization are to
assemble logically to produce the whole - Modern bureaucratic management ideally comes from
leaders who excel at leadership - Every aspect of the organization centers on
rational efficiency
5Bureaucracy The Weberian Ideal
- Views concerning the expanded homeland security
bureaucracy - Supporters of one position maintain that
consolidating power is efficient. They argue that
a large bureaucracy with a clear mission will
empower the security forces to perform their
mission - Proponents of a second position suggest that
decentralizing power personalizes services and
helps develop links to communities. They believe
localized, informal offices are more adept at
recognizing and handling problems
6The Role of Law Enforcement and Intelligence
7The Role of Law Enforcement and Intelligence
- The lead agency for counterterrorism FBI
- Under Director Robert Mueller the FBIs charge is
to prevent terrorism - The FBI is to coordinate intelligence gathering
and sharing activities with the Border Patrol,
Secret Service, and CIA - The FBI is to operate as partners with state and
local law enforcement. - Finally, since the FBI is in the Department of
Justice, it is to coordinate activities with DHS
and the Department of Defense
8The Role of Law Enforcement and Intelligence
- A new role for the CIA
- Originally, the CIA was supposed to be the agency
that would coordinate al U.S. intelligence data - The CIA was to operate apart from U.S. criminal
law - Today, the CIA is to cooperate fully with the FBI
on counterterrorism intelligence
9The Role of Law Enforcement and Intelligence
- The Department of Homeland Security
- DHS is also charged with counterterrorism
- DHS includes law enforcement agencies, such as
the Secret Service, the Border Patrol, the new
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the U.S.
Customs Service, and other agencies - It has its own military, and its own intelligence
section
10The Role of Law Enforcement and Intelligence
- Department of Defense
- The DOD augments civilian defense, provides
special operation capabilities, and interdicts
terrorists before they arrive in the United
States - The main military role in counterterrorism is to
project American power overseas
11The Role of Law Enforcement and Intelligence
- The array of American power
- In theory, led by the FBI and the CIA, multiple
agencies will work together to gain information,
analyze it together, and share the results with
every bureaucracy concerned with homeland
security - The FBI and the CIA are to create a cooperative,
sharing atmosphere with thousands of state and
local law enforcement agencies - DHS calls on the entire system of homeland
security bureaucracies to form relations with
local communities and private industry
12Protecting the Borders
13Protecting the Borders
- Agencies protecting the American borders
- The Secret Service
- The Coast Guard
- Customs and Border Protection
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- The Federal Law Enforcement Training Center
- The Office of Domestic Preparedness
- The Transportation Security Administration
14Protecting the Borders
- Areas of vulnerability on the American borders
- Long stretches of unprotected areas along the
northern and southern borders are open to
infiltration - More than three hundred seaports must be secured
- The DHS has agencies responsible for securing
entry into the United States at airports, and it
is responsible for protecting air travel once the
entry points are protected - Border agents are responsible for staffing entry
points along the northern and southern borders - Another DHS agency has the task of accounting for
noncitizens within U.S. Borders
15Protecting the Borders
- DHS protecting the borders
- DHS cooperates with the FBI and CIA
- DHS has increased the number of people who patrol
the border - DHS uses technology, such as biometric
measuring-- that is, identification systems based
on body characteristics such as finger prints,
facial patterns, or DNA
16Protecting the Borders
- Criticisms of DHS activities
- Activities may not be effective
- Some DHS policies have not been popular with
other countries - Many local governments feel they need the tryst
and cooperation of foreigners living in their
areas
17Protecting the Borders
- 9-11 Commission Reports recommendations for
border security - A single agency should screen crossings with a
single format - An investigative agency should be established to
monitor aliens in the United States - The DHS should gather intelligence on the way
terrorists travel, and combine intelligence and
law enforcement activities to hamper their
mobility - There should be a standardize method for
obtaining identification and wanted passports
using biometric measures
18Infrastructure Protection
19Infrastructure Protection
- Identification and protection of critical
infrastructures - DHS states that law enforcement agencies will
need to develop cooperative links with public and
private bureaucracies, including private security
organizations, educational institutions, and
health care systems
20Infrastructure Protection
- Criticisms
- Too little is being done
- A year after September 11, the federal government
had failed to release resources to state and
local governments - Federal law enforcement does little to assist
private security
21Infrastructure Protection
- Richard Clarkes threats facing the nation of
infrastructures - Most computer systems are vulnerable to viruses
- The nations power system and technological
organizations that support it are vulnerable to
disruptions - The Internet and computer networks that support
these systems are vulnerable to attack
22Infrastructure Protection
- Protection of the infrastructure
- According to Clarke, the state and local law
enforcement should not play the leading role in
infrastructure protection - Protection of the infrastructure comes when
specialists in crime fighting and protection
establish critical links with the public and
private organizations serving Americas
infrastructure - The police should be linked to security forces
already associated with infrastructure functions - State and local law enforcement agencies must
establish formal and informal networks with the
organizations in their jurisdictions, and these
networks should expand to a cooperative federal
system
23DHS, Security, and Police Work
24DHS, Security, and Police Work
- Local law enforcement agencies
- The IACP believes that local law enforcement
agencies will become the hinge on which all local
efforts pivot - Homeland security entails coordinating efforts
from several local organizations, including
private industry, public service, health care
systems, and law enforcement - As local agencies become involved in homeland
security, they must become involved in assessing
threats in their jurisdictions. They must also
learn to recognize possible items that may add to
national defense intelligence and develop
routines to forward such information
25DHS, Security, and Police Work
- Police and gathering defense intelligence
- The process of gathering defense intelligence is
not readily apparent in American policing - Police work is political, and law enforcement
officers think locally
26DHS, Security, and Police Work
- Abstract reasoning skills
- State and local officers are not rewarded for
thinking in terms of international issues or
national security - Chiefs and sheriffs do not usually praise
abstract reasoning, and higher education has done
little to help this situation - Criminal justice programs do not produce
abstract, critical thinkers for law enforcement - To combat terrorism, security forces require
groups of people with abstract reasoning skills,
knowledge of international politics and history,
and specialized expertise in particular regions.
However, the ethos behind policing rejects this
logic
27Possible Approaches for Homeland Security
Bureaucracies
28Possible Approaches for Homeland Security
Bureaucracies
- Legal alternatives to police participation in
homeland defense - Gathering security information in the course of
criminal investigations - Combine training in alertness with specialized
training for selected officers
29Possible Approaches for Homeland Security
Bureaucracies
- The FBIs Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF)
- The JTTF combines local, state, and various
federal police officers, as well as corrections
officials and prosecutors, in regional units
designed to combat terrorism
30Possible Approaches for Homeland Security
Bureaucracies
- Opposition to the JTTF
- Local governments have refused to allow their
police forces to assist in counterterrorist
activities - Civil libertarians see the formation of a JTTF as
too great of a consolidation of government power - State and federal courts may well limit the role
of local agencies in homeland security
31Possible Approaches for Homeland Security
Bureaucracies
- Other democracies who have had their police
engage in intelligence gathering activities and
have expanded their role in national defense - France
- Germany
- Canada
- The British
32Bureaucratic Inhibitors
33Bureaucratic Inhibitors
- Public service organizations have foibles that
emerge in the everyday social construction of
reality - The FBI versus Police and Sheriffs Departments
- Many state and local police executives do not
trust the FBI, and the attitude extends down
through the ranks of law enforcement agencies - The relationship between the FBI and state and
local law enforcement must improve
34Bureaucratic Inhibitors
- Federal Law Enforcement Rivalries
- Organizations on every level frequently act out
of self-interest rather than concern with an
overall mission - Advocates of Local Control
- Some people feel cooperation between state and
local law enforcement will result in the de fact
concentration of police power
35Bureaucratic Inhibitors
- The Problem of Legal Bureaucracy
- The criminal justice system is actually not a
system at all, but a multifaceted bureaucracy
with intersecting layers - While police and correctional institutions
represent the executive branch of the government,
the courts autonomously belong to the judicial
branch
36Bureaucratic Inhibitors
- The Bureaucracy Problem
- Change can happen, and may even be welcome, if
federal agencies enter into cooperative
relationships with their local counterparts - Large organizations are difficult to manage, and
problems increase rapidly when organizational
effectiveness requires cooperation on several
levels - If the DHS can create effective partnerships with
intelligence and law enforcement agencies on the
federal level, it could focus attention on these
issues. However, homeland security becomes a
problem much larger than gathering and analyzing
information - The problem appears in preventing terrorism, and
preventing requires bureaucratic change
37Stephen Flynns Critique of the Ideal
38Stephen Flynns Critique of the Ideal
- Two mistakes made by the United States
- Homeland security has been separated from
national security - The infrastructure is vulnerable to attack
- Homeland security should be part of a national
strategy to defend the United States
39Stephen Flynns Critique of the Ideal
- Weapons of mass destruction
- According to the CIA, the most likely scenario
for smuggling weapons of mass destruction into
the United States is by sea - The Bush administration has done very little to
protect the nations 361 seaports
40Stephen Flynns Critique of the Ideal
- The nations infrastructure
- In the 2005 military budget, the infrastructure
for the entire nation will receive only 2.6
billion, whereas the DOD was allotted 7.6
billion - Flynn sees a problem in strategic thinking in DHS
and other agencies - Increased border protection will not protect
America against terrorist attacks
41Stephen Flynns Critique of the Ideal
- Jihadists are aware of the vulnerabilities in the
infrastructure - The safest and most effective way to hit America
is to strike the infrastructure - Reinvent homeland security
- DHS and other federal bureaucracies should think
of security from a broad perspective
42Stephen Flynns Critique of the Ideal
- Flynns recommendations for the future
- The best current model for homeland security is
the air industry - When bureaucracies recover from failure, people
will believe in their own safety and continue to
function - Americans must be able to absorb a major attack
and continue to function