Title: The Value of Medication Therapy Management Services
1The Value of Medication Therapy Management
Services
2ORIGINS AND DEVELOPMENT OF MTMS
3From Pharmaceutical Care
- Pharmaceutical care is a practice in which the
practitioner takes responsibility for a patients
drug-related needs, and is held accountable for
this commitment.
Cipolle RJ, Strand LM, Morely PC. Pharmaceutical
Care Practice. 1998. McGraw-Hill Companies
4To Medication Therapy Management Services
- The term MTMS became widely accepted after it was
included in the Medicare Modernization Act in
2003 - The foundation of MTMS was built through the
development of pharmaceutical care - MTMS is not limited to any specific population or
payer group
5Purpose of MTMS
- To optimize therapeutic outcomes
- To decrease the likelihood of adverse events
- To enhance patient understanding and adherence
- To reduce overall healthcare spending
American Pharmacists Association
6Pharmacists Evolving Role
From Dispensing Services
to a clinical service provider
7Pharmacys Definition of MTMS
- Services provided by a pharmacist that improve
treatment outcomes for individual patients - A professional service to promote the safe and
effective use of medications - A way to provide better care for patients
- Promotes collaboration among the patient, the
pharmacist, and the patients other health care
providers - .
Bluml BM. Definition of medication therapy
management development of professionwide
consensus. J Am Pharm Assoc. 20054556672
8CMS MTMS Requirements
- The CMS MTMS Requirements only apply to the
Medicare population - CMS is regularly evaluating this service, and the
program definitions will likey evolve over time. - Currently, CMS requires that all Medicare Part D
Plans have an MTMS program which - Ensures optimum therapeutic outcomes for targeted
beneficiaries through improved medication use - Reduces the risk of adverse events
- Is developed in cooperation with licensed and
practicing pharmacists and physicians
www.cms.hhs.gov
9CMS MTMS Requirements
- Currently, CMS requires that all Medicare Part D
Plans have an MTMS program which - May be furnished by pharmacists or other
qualified providers - May distinguish between services in ambulatory
and institutional settings - Is coordinated with any care management plan
established for a targeted individual under a
chronic care improvement program (CCIP) - Describes the resources and time required to
implement the program if using outside personnel
and establishes the fees for pharmacists or
others
www.cms.hhs.gov
10Establishment of Billing Codes
- Three (3) pharmacist only CPT professional
service codes to bill third-party payers for MTM
Services delivered face-to-face between a
pharmacist and a patient - 99605 is to be used for a first-encounter
service (up to - 15 minutes)
- 99606 is to be used for a follow-up encounter
with an established patient (up to 15 minutes) - 99607 may be used with either 99605 or 99606 to
bill additional 15-minute increments. - Classified as Category 1 and became eligible for
use January 1, 2008.
Beebe M, Dalton JA, Espronceda M, et. al.
Current Procedural Terminology 2009. American
Medical Association Chicago, IL.
11CPT Code Definition of MTMS
- Medication Therapy Management services (MTMS)
describe face-to-face patient assessment and
intervention as appropriate, by a pharmacist - MTMS includes the following documented elements
- review of the pertinent patient history
- medication profile (prescription and
non-prescription) - recommendations for improving health outcomes and
treatment compliance.
Beebe M, Dalton JA, Espronceda M, et. al.
Current Procedural Terminology 2009. American
Medical Association Chicago, IL.
12ACTIVITIES INCLUDED IN MTMS
13MTMS Activities
- Assess patients health status
- Devise medication treatment plan
- Select, modify and administer medications
- Review current medications and identify
drug-related problems - Communicate care to other providers
- Provide patient education
- Refer patients for broader disease management
services
American Pharmacists Association
14The Spectrum of Pharmacist-Provided MTMS
- Comprehensive or Targeted Medication Therapy
Reviews - Adherence Services
- Based on the number and/or type of medications
- Targeted Medication Intervention Programs
- High-alert and/or high-cost medications
- Targeted patient population (i.e. geriatrics,
pediatrics) - Disease State Management
- Interdisciplinary approach to achieve therapeutic
goals - Example disease states Diabetes, Cholesterol,
Asthma - Health and Wellness Services
- Immunizations
- Wellness screenings
- Smoking cessation
- Weight management
American Pharmacists Association
15Components of the MTMS Core Elements Service
Model
- Medication Therapy Review (MTR)
- a review of all medications including
prescription, nonprescription, herbal products,
and other dietary supplements - Personal Medication Record (PMR)
- Medication-Related Action Plan (MAP) for the
patient - Intervention and/or Referral
- Documentation and Follow-Up
American Pharmacists Association
16Medication Therapy Reviews
- A Medication Therapy Review
- (MTR) is provided at routine
- intervals by a pharmacist
- Annual comprehensive MTR
- Additional comprehensive MTRs
- as needed
- Targeted MTR at any time to address new or
ongoing medication-related problems
American Pharmacists Association
17What Do Patients Get From Care Aligned With the
MTMS Core Elements Model?
- A complete list of all
- of their medications
- Personal Medication Record (PMR)
- A guide for managing their medications and
related conditions - Medication-Related Action Plan (MAP)
American Pharmacists Association
18Value of a Personal Medication Record
- The medication record helps give the doctors a
better picture of whats going on with me.
19Value of MTMS
Having the help of a person who specializes in
medications, which impacts me on a daily
basisputting drugs in my body.
20PHARMACISTS ROLE IN THE HEALTH CARE TEAM
21they are integral members of the health care team!
MTM Pharmacists do not work in silos.
22Physicians Value MTM Pharmacists
- Working with the MTM Pharmacist has helped me
to focus on the things that only I can do as a
physician.
23Medication Therapy Management Process
ASSESSMENT
? Evaluate appropriateness, effectiveness,
safety, and compliance with medications ?
Identify drug therapy problems
Practitioner
Patient
CARE PLAN
Experienced Decision Making
Medication Experience
? Resolve drug therapy problems ? Establish goals
of therapy ? Interventions
? Philosophy of Practice ? Social Obligation ?
Responsibility to identify, resolve, and
prevent drug therapy problems ?
Patient-centered approach ? Caring
? Todays wants and needs ? Responsibility to
participate in information sharing and
decision making
FOLLOW-UP
? Evaluate progress in meeting goals of therapy ?
Record actual patient outcomes ? Reassess new
problems
Therapeutic Relationship
24MTM Pharmacist/Prescriber Relationship
25Pharmacists Communication with other Health
Providers
- MTM Pharmacists will communicate regularly with
patients primary care provider, and other health
care team members as appropriate - Describe assessment
- Describe and rationalize recommendations for
medication changes - Recommendations for follow-up
26Medications Recommendations
- MTM pharmacists may make recommendations in
several ways - Directly to the patient
- Over-the-counter changes, general adherence tips,
managing side effects - Through the prescriber
- Changes in prescription medications
- Directly to the patient under a collaborative
practice agreements - Allows pharmacists to make adjustments to
prescription medications via protocol
27VALUE OF MTMS
28American Pharmacists Association
29How do we define value?
- Value on investment
- Economic
- Overall cost savings or cost
- Clinical
- Improvements in health outcomes
- Humanistic
- Patient satisfaction, improved quality of life,
worker productivity -
30EVIDENCE OF THE VALUE OF MTMS
31Studies Illustrating Value of MTMS
- Asheville Project Diabetes
- Asheville Project Asthma
- Diabetes Ten City Challenge
- Minnesota Experience Project
32Asheville Project Diabetes
- Evaluation of outcomes following community based
provision of MTMS to patients with diabetes
covered by a self-insured employer group - Longitudinal study with pre- and post- data
- Participants were provided incentives including
waiver of all copays for diabetes medications and
supplies - 5 years of follow-up data
- 187 participants entered the program, with 26
continuing at 5 years
Cranor CW, Bunting BA, Christensen DB. J Am Pharm
Assoc. 20034317384.
33Asheville Project Diabetes
- Pharmacists performed the following as part of
this study - Set and monitored treatment goals
- Glucometer training
- Adherence monitoring
- Basic physical assessment, including foot exam,
- blood pressure and weight
- Diabetes education
- Referral to other providers as needed
Cranor CW, Bunting BA, Christensen DB. J Am Pharm
Assoc. 20034317384.
34Clinical Outcomes of MTMSThe Asheville Project -
Diabetes
Cranor CW, Bunting BA, Christensen DB. The
Asheville Project long-term clinical and
economic outcomes of a community pharmacy
diabetes care program. J Am Pharm Assoc.
20034317384.
American Pharmacists Association
35Asheville Total Health Care Costs1
1Cranor CW, Bunting BA, Christensen DB. The
Asheville Project Long-term clinical and
economic outcomes of a community pharmacy
diabetes care program. J Am Pharm Assoc.
200343173-84.
American Pharmacists Association
36Average Annual Diabetic Sick-Leave Usage (City of
Asheville)
American Pharmacists Association
37Key Findings Asheville Diabetes
- Economic benefit
- Total health care costs for patients decreased
- Prescription costs increased, but medical costs
decreased - Clinical benefit
- Significant improvement seen in A1C and LDL
- Humanistic benefit
- Decreased sick leave increased worker
productivity
38Asheville Project Asthma
- Evaluation of outcomes following community based
provision of MTMS to patients with asthma covered
by a self-insured employer group - Longitudinal study with pre- and post- data
- Participants were provided incentives including
waiver of all copays for asthma medications and
supplies - 5 years of follow-up data
- 207 participants entered the program
Bunting BA, Cranor CW. JAPhA. 2006 46133-147.
39Asheville Project Asthma
- Pharmacists served as care managers and met with
subjects an average of every 3 months - Reviewed asthma action plans
- Medication assessments of inhaler use
- Assessment of inhaler technique
- Review of symptoms and peak flow meter readings
- Recommendations for treatment changes were sent
to physician
Bunting BA, Cranor CW. JAPhA. 2006 46133-147.
40Economic Outcomes of MTMSThe Asheville Project -
Asthma
Bunting BA, Cranor CW. JAPhA. 2006 46133-147.
41Clinical Outcomes of MTMSThe Asheville Project -
Asthma
Improved Asthma control sustained over 5 years
Bunting BA, Cranor CW. JAPhA. 2006 46133-147.
American Pharmacists Association
42Key Findings Asheville Asthma
- Economic benefit
- Decreased percentage of asthma patients requiring
emergency and hospital care - Clinical benefit
- Improved asthma control sustained over 5 years
- (as evidenced by FEV1 measurements)
43Diabetes Ten City Challenge
- Employer-funded, collaborative health management
program for diabetes using community-based
pharmacists in 10 cities across the USA - Pharmacists were located in
- Independent pharmacies
- Chain pharmacies
- Ambulatory care clinics
- On-site workplace locations
- Participants received waived co-pays for
medications. - 573 patients participated
Fera T., Bluml BM, Ellis WM. JAPhA. 2009
49e52-e60.
44Diabetes Ten City Challenge
- Pharmacists performed the following as part of
this study - Applied a prescribed process of care based on
clinical assessments and progress to goals - Worked with patients to set individualized
self-management goals - Recommended changes in therapy when appropriate
Fera T., Bluml BM, Ellis WM. JAPhA. 2009
49e52-e60.
4510 City Challenge Economic Outcomes after Year 1
Fera T., Bluml BM, Ellis WM. JAPhA. 2009
49e52-e60.
4610 City Challenge Clinical Outcomes after Year 1
HEDIS process measures for patients with diabetes
Fera T., Bluml BM, Ellis WM. JAPhA. 2009
49e52-e60.
47Key Findings 10 City Challenge
- Economic benefit
- Total health care costs were less than predicted
- Prescription costs increased, but overall health
care - costs decreased
- Clinical benefit
- Increased percentage of patients meeting HEDIC
- process measurement goals for patients with
diabetes
48Minnesota Experience Project
- Evaluation of MTMS provided at 6 ambulatory care
clinics over 1 year - 285 patients received MTMS
- HEDIS goals for hypertension and dyslipidemia
were evaluated - Study patients were required to have 1 of 12
study conditions - Return on investment was calculated at 121
Isetts, et al., J Am Pharm Assoc.
200848(2)203-211
49Minnesota Experience Project
- Pharmacists in this study
- Used a consistent and systematic patient care
process - Established goals of therapy in collaboration
with patients and primary care providers - Made recommendations for changes in therapy as
appropriate
Isetts, et al., J Am Pharm Assoc.
200848(2)203-211
50Economic Outcomes from the Minnesota Experience
Project
51Clinical Outcomes from the Minnesota Experience
Project
HTN n 254 p0.03
Dyslipidemia n 254 P0.001
Isetts, et al., J Am Pharm Assoc.
200848(2)203-211
52Key Findings Minnesota Experience Project
- Economic benefit
- A 121 return on investment was seen
- Savings was seen in facilities costs
- Per person per year costs decreased from 11,965
to 8197 - Clinical benefit
- The MTM intervention group had a higher
percentage of patients meeting HEDIS goals for
hypertension and dyslipidemia
53Limitations of Current Evidence
- Most of the data comes from self-insured employer
groups - Individual studies are small
- Ten City Challenge was the largest with 573
participants - Much of the evidence is focused on specific
disease states
54Summary of evidence of Value of MTMS
- Economical
- Multiple studies have shown positive results on
total health care costs, creating a positive
return on investment - Clinical
- Multiple studies have indicated improved in
clinical outcomes, specifically in diabetes,
asthma, hypertension and dyslipidemia - Humanistic
- The Asheville project has demonstrated reduced
employee sick days and increased productivity.
55ELEMENTS OF MTMS BENEFIT DESIGN
56Elements of MTMS Plan Design
- Eligibility
- Reimbursement structure
- Member engagement strategy
- Incentives
57Eligibility
- Eligibility for a MTMS benefit can be based on
- Number of medications
- Specific chronic conditions
- Total amount of prescription expenditures
58Reimbursement Structure
- Recommend utilizing the MTMS CPT billing codes
- May used them as defined as time based codes,
- or use a cross-walk relative value scale
59Example Minnesota Medicaid
- MHCP will reimburse only for face-to-face
encounters and based on the lowest of five
patient need levels, according to the following
qualifying criteria - The number of medications the patient is
currently taking - The number of drug therapy problems the patient
has at present and - The number of medical conditions for which the
patient is currently being treated. - CPT Codes (Time Based Codes)
- Based on adopted Minnesota Medicaid law
- 99605
- 99606
- 99607
60Example MN Medicaid Payment Structure
Level Assessment of Drug-related needs Identification of Drug Therapy Problems Complexity-of-Care Planning FU Evaluation Approx. Face-to-Face Time Bill CPT Code Units
1 Problem-focused-at least 1 medication Problem-focused 0 drug therapy problems Straightforward 1 medical condition 15 min. 99605 or99606 1 unit
2 Expanded Problem-at least 2 medications Expanded Problem at least 1 drug therapy problem Straightforward 1 medical condition 16-30 min. 99605 or99606 and 1 unit
2 Expanded Problem-at least 2 medications Expanded Problem at least 1 drug therapy problem Straightforward 1 medical condition 16-30 min. 99607 1 unit
3 Detailed-at least 3-5 medications Detailed at least 2 drug therapy problems Low complexity at least 2 medical conditions 31-45 min. 99605 or 99606 and 1 unit
3 Detailed-at least 3-5 medications Detailed at least 2 drug therapy problems Low complexity at least 2 medical conditions 31-45 min. 99607 2 units
4 Expanded Detailed-at least 6-8 medications Expanded Detailed at least 3 drug therapy problems Moderate Complexity at least 3 medical conditions 46-60 min. 99605 or 99606 and 1 unit
4 Expanded Detailed-at least 6-8 medications Expanded Detailed at least 3 drug therapy problems Moderate Complexity at least 3 medical conditions 46-60 min. 99607 3 units
5 Comprehensive- gt 9 medications Comprehensive at least gt4 drug therapy problems High Complexity at least gt 4 medical conditions 60 min. 99605 or 99606 and 1 unit
5 Comprehensive- gt 9 medications Comprehensive at least gt4 drug therapy problems High Complexity at least gt 4 medical conditions 60 min. 99607 4 units
61Example Outcomes Pharmaceutical Health Care
Pharmacist Service CPT Codes
Comprehensive Medication Review 99605 99607
Physician Consultation 99606 99607
Patient Compliance Consultation 99606 99607
Patient Education/Monitoring 99606
62Member Engagement Strategy
- May offer copay reductions or waivers
- For all medications
- For medication associated with a targeted medical
condition (i.e., diabetes) - Offer reduced copay (or none) for MTMS
63Whats in it for the payer?
- MTMS results in decreased overall healthcare
costs - Prescription costs will likely increase, but this
is compensated by an overall decrease in costs - Pharmacists can provide MTMS as a member of the
health care team and medical home model - Increased member satisfaction
- Mechanisms for MTMS claims processing are well
established through CPT codes
64Whats in it for the patient?
- MTMS provides patients with improved health
outcomes from optimizing medication use - This includes decrease emergency department
visits and hospitalizations - Increased understanding of medications and
disease management - Improved quality of life
65Summary
- Medications are a standard in the care of chronic
diseases - Pharmacist delivered Medication Therapy
Management Services are well documented to
decrease health care costs while increasing the
quality of health care - High satisfaction rates among participants