Introduction to - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 52
About This Presentation
Title:

Introduction to

Description:

Title: ACCOUNTING Financial and Organisational Decision Making Author: Antonie Van Eekelen Last modified by: Doris Merkl-Davies Created Date: 5/5/1999 10:47:51 AM – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:146
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 53
Provided by: homew4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Introduction to


1
Lecture 1
  • Introduction to
  • Accounting Theory

2
Doris Merkl-Davies
Division Financial Studies Location Room 1.08,
Hen Goleg Telephone 01248 38 2120 Email
d.m.merkl-davies_at_bangor.ac.uk
Reader in Accounting MA, PGCE (Vienna
University), MBA, PhD (Bangor University) Office
hours Mon. 9.00-10.00 Wed. 2.00-3.00 (Hen
Goleg, Room 1.08)
3
Doris Merkl-Davies
  • Research interests
  • Corporate narrative reporting
  • Impression management
  • CSR reporting
  • Accounting theory

4
Doris Merkl-Davies
  • Cant live without
  • Motto

5
BBS film club
  • Venue Alun A0.01, 3.00-5.00pm
  • WEEK 3 (WEDNESDAY 15 OCTOBER)Wall Street
    (discussant Doris Merkl-Davies)
  • WEEK 5 (WEDNESDAY 29 OCTOBER)Office Space
    (discussant Tony Dobbins)
  • WEEK 9 (WEDNESDAY 26 NOVEMBER)Citizen Kane
    (discussant Bernardo Batiz-Lazo)

6
Module format
  • Lectures Mon. 10-12 in Drama Rehearsal Room
  • Tutorials
  • Group A Mon, 13.00-14.00 LR5
  • Group B Tue, 9.00-10.00 LR1

7
Recommended Textbooks
  • Deegan, C. and Unerman, J. (2011). Financial
    Accounting Theory. European edition. 2nd ed.
    McGraw-Hill. (DU) Main text I
  • Rankin, M., Stanton, P., McGowan, S., Ferauto,
    K., Tilling, M. (2012). Contemporary Issues in
    Accounting. 2nd ed. Wiley. (R) Main text II
  • Godfrey, J., Hodgson, A., Holmes, S. and Tarca,
    A. (2010). Accounting Theory. 7th ed. Wiley.
    (GHHT) additional reading
  • Additional journal articles will be posted on
    blackboard for you to download.

8
Background reading for Lecture 1
  • DU Chapter 1
  • Rankin et al. Chapter 1 Chapter 5, pp. 131-134
  • GHHT Chapts. 13

9
Overview of Lecture 1
  • Definition of accounting theory
  • Types of accounting theories
  • Accounting theory development over time
  • Relationship between theory and research
  • Evaluation of theories

10
Exercise 1 What is a theory?
  • In groups of 6 find an example of a famous theory
  • Discuss the main features of the theory
  • What does this theory do?
  • What do we use it for?
  • Nominate a group member to report back to the
    class

11
What is a theory?
  • An organized way of thinking about a subject
  • A set of ideas that explains something
  • a scheme or system of ideas or statements held
    as an explanation or account of a group of facts
    or phenomena (Oxford English Dictionary)
  • theory is a statement of concepts and their
    interrelationships that shows how and/or why a
    phenomenon occurs (Corley Gioia, 2011 12)

12
What is the purpose of theories?
  • To make sense of the world (physical, social,
    psychological phenomena) and communicate that
    understanding to others
  • To make sense of (financial) accounting
    information
  • Financial statements, corporate annual reports
  • Accounting info is compiled and interpreted by
    people

13
Types of theory
Type of theory Users Example
Common-sense theory Lay people (personal experience) It is not what you know, but who you know http//www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10137928/Its-still-who-you-know-not-what-you-know-that-matters-say-two-thirds-of-Britons.html
Working theory Managers, investors, auditors (Generalisations made in particular professions) Crisis communication should prioritise key stakeholders http//www.bernsteincrisismanagement.com/articles/10-steps-of-crisis-communications.html
Scholarly theory Academics Accounting choice is driven by managerial self-interest Positive Accounting Theory
14
Scholarly theory
  • Has undergone systematic research
  • Provide more thorough, accurate, and abstract
    explanations for financial accounting than
    common-sense or working theories

15
What is the purpose of theories?
  • Theories are used to
  • Describe what people do Descriptive theories
  • Suggest the best way (i.e., prescribe) to deal
    with specific types of human behaviour
    prescriptive or normative theories
  • Explain and predict what people do predictive
    or positive theories

16
1. Descriptive theories
  • Describe what people do
  • Based on common practice
  • Describe
  • Common practise of bringing up children
  • Common practises for dealing with underage binge
    drinking in various countries
  • Describe accounting practice
  • Common practise of accounting for fixed assets
  • Future accountants are trained by practising
    accountants

17
Descriptive theories
  • Advantage
  • Tends to be accepted by majority
  • Disadvantage
  • Does not entail critical evaluation
  • Does not allow for change

18
2. Prescriptive ( normative) theories
  • Also called normative theories
  • What people should do
  • Suggest best way to
  • Bring up children, i.e., authoritarian,
    laissez-faire style, etc.
  • Prescribe particular accounting practices
  • Account for fixed assets, i.e., historical cost,
    current cost, exit price, etc.
  • Advantage
  • Can improve accounting practises
  • Disadvantage
  • Assumes that there is one best way

19
3. Predictive ( positive) theories
  • Also called positive theories
  • Concerned with explaining reasons for behaviour
    and predicting future behaviour
  • Explain characteristics of children are most
    likely to engage in binge drinking, i.e., social
    class, gender, parenting style
  • Predict what effect a change in licensing laws
    will have on underage teenage drinking
  • Explain and predict accounting method choice
  • Characteristics of companies most likely to
    revalue their assets
  • What effect a change in accounting standards on
    leases will have on the way firms finance their
    assets

20
Comparison of descriptive, prescriptive and
predictive theories
21
Examples of uses of accounting theories
  • Theories might
  • prescribe how assets should be valued
  • predict why managers will choose particular
    accounting methods
  • explain how an individuals cultural background
    affects accounting information provided
  • prescribe what accounting information should be
    provided to particular classes of stakeholders
  • predict that the relative power of a stakeholder
    group will affect the accounting information it
    receives
  • predict that accounting information is used to
    present organisations as legitimate

22
Accounting theories
  • Accounting is a human activity
  • Explain the behaviour of people within and
    outside of organisations with respect to
    accounting information
  • Theories of accounting consider
  • Why people within organisations elect to provide
    particular information (preparer perspective)
  • Peoples behaviour with respect to accounting
    information (user-perspective)
  • Peoples needs for accounting information
    (user-perspective)

23
Accounting theories
  • Accounting is a social phenomenon
  • Accounting theories are theories about human
    behaviour
  • Borrow from disciplines dealing with human
    behaviour
  • Psychology, sociology

24
Exercise 2
  • Which of the following is NOT an assumption used
    in normative theory construction?
  • A. Profit and value can be measured precisely
  • B. Financial accounting is useful for making
    economic decisions
  • C. There are multiple available profit measures
  • D. Markets are inefficient and can be fooled by
    'creative accountants
  • E. All of the above

25
Why do we need accounting theories?
  • Accounting is viewed as a practical discipline
  • Learning how to apply accounting rules
  • Theories are necessary to understand the (social)
    world we live in
  • They provide a basis for the decisions we make,
    e.g. whether to include an item in the financial
    statements or not (materiality and recognition
    criteria)

26
Why do we need accounting theories?
  • We can make better predictions and decisions if
    we get the contradictions out of our thinking, if
    we consider what is known on the many sides of
    the issue
  • i.e. the various theories which exist on
  • The regulation of accounting, e.g. whether we
    need regulation or not
  • The provision of financial information, e.g. Why
    accountants choose particular accounting methods
  • The way financial information is received, e.g.
    How people react to particular accounting numbers

27
Why study accounting theories to understand
  • Motivation for individuals to support or lobby
    regulators for some accounting methods in
    preference to others (? Regulatory theories)
  • How and why the capital markets react to
    particular information (? Positive accounting
    theory)
  • Whether there is a true measure of income (?
    Asset valuation theories)

28
Overview of theories of accounting
  • Many theories of financial accounting exist
  • No universally accepted theory of accounting
  • Different perspectives about the central
    objective, role and scope of financial accounting
  • No universally accepted perspective about the
    role of accounting theory
  • Different researchers have different perspectives
    of the role of accounting theory

29
Accounting Theory Timeline
30
Early development of accounting theory
  • Descriptive theories
  • Relied upon the process of induction
  • Development of ideas or theories through
    observation
  • 1920s to 1960s theories developed from observing
    what accountants did in practice
  • Codified as doctrines or conventions of
    accounting

31
Criticisms of inductive method
  • concentrates on the status-quo, is reactionary
    in attitude, and cannot provide a basis upon
    which current practice may be evaluated or from
    which future improvements may be deduced. (Gray,
    Owen and Maunders 1987, p. 66)
  • Assumes what is done by the majority is the most
    appropriate practice
  • Perspective of accounting Darwinism

32
Example of inductive approach to theory
development
  • Grady (1965) undertook research commissioned by
    the AICPA
  • Formed the basis of APB Statement No. 4 Basic
    Concepts and Accounting Principles Underlying the
    Financial Statements of Business Enterprises
  • Reflected generally accepted accounting
    principles at the time

33
Theory development - 1960s and 1970s
  • Sought to prescribe particular accounting
    practices
  • Known as normative theories
  • Not driven by existing practices
  • Theories critical of historical cost accounting
  • Sought to provide improved approaches to asset
    valuation in a time of widespread inflation

34
Example of prescriptive theory
  • 1961 and 1962 studies by Moonitz, and Sprouse and
    Moonitz commissioned by the Accounting Research
    Division of the AICPA
  • Authors proposed that accounting measurement
    systems be changed from historical cost to a
    system based on current values
  • Not supported by AICPA as too radically different
    from current practice

35
Theory development - mid to late 1970s
  • Research aimed at explaining and predicting
    accounting practice rather than prescribing
    particular practices
  • Known as positive theories

36
Positive theories
  • Seek to predict and explain particular phenomena
  • Begins with assumption(s), and through logical
    deduction enables prediction(s) to be made
  • If predictions are sufficiently accurate when
    tested against observations of reality, they are
    regarded as having provided explanation of why
    things are as they are

37
Positive theories - continued
  • Positive Accounting Theory
  • Developed by Watts and Zimmerman
  • Seeks to predict and explain why accountants
    elect to adopt particular accounting methods in
    preference to others
  • Based upon rational economic person assumption
  • Individuals motivated by self-interest tied to
    wealth maximisation

38
Relationship between theory and research
  • Theories are used to understand accounting
    practice better
  • Accounting researchers use theories
  • Theories are used in empirical research (i.e.,
    research based on data, such as financial
    statements, annual reports, share prices) to
    explain phenomena and make predictions
  • Theories help us to critically evaluate a
    phenomenon (i.e., accounting method choice)

39
Relationship between theory and research
  • "... all research emanates from the researcher s
    implicit or explicit theory of the phenomenon
    under investigation" (Rocco Plakhotnik, 2009
    121).

40
Testing a Theory in Research
Theory plane
1. Identify research problem
Observation plane
41
Testing a Theory in Research
  • Identify research problem
  • Bias in corporate narrative documents
  • Develop theoretical framework
  • Agency theory assumptions
  • Information asymmetry between managers and
    investors managers are self-interested (want to
    maximise their compensation) managers manipulate
    presentation of information in corporate
    narrative documents (e.g., annual report)

42
Testing a Theory in Research
  • State research question/hypothesis
  • Managers in firms with negative financial
    performance are more likely to introduce
    reporting bias (in the form of pro-forma earnings
    number into corporate narrative documents than
    managers of firms with positive financial
    performance
  • Construct research design
  • Sample of firms split into two groups based on
    positive/negative percentage change in earnings
    chairmens statements (pro-forma earnings vs.
    GAAP earnings)

43
Testing a Theory in Research
  • Observe/Analyse
  • Conduct statistical association tests
  • Evaluate
  • Do findings confirm/disconfirm hypothesis
    compare with findings of prior research
  • Assess limitations/constraints
  • E.g., small sample size

44
Criteria for evaluating theories
Area of evaluation What to look for
Accuracy Has research supported that they theory works the way it says it does?
Practicality Have real-world applications been found for the theory?
Succinctness Has the theory been formulated with the appropriate number (fewest possible) of concepts or steps?
Consistency Does the theory demonstrate coherence within its own premises and with other theories?
Acuity To what extent does the theory make clear and otherwise complex experience?
45
Evaluation of theories
  • Theories of accounting are only abstractions of
    reality
  • The choice of one theory in preference to another
    is based on value judgements
  • Cannot expect to provide perfect explanations or
    predictions of human behaviour or assess what
    types on information users actually need

46
Evaluating theories of accounting
  • When evaluating theories need to consider
  • Assumptions whether you agree with the central
    assumptions/premises of the theory
  • Logic whether the argument supporting the theory
    is logical
  • Research methods Whether the research methods
    are appropriate
  • Evidence whether you accept any supporting
    evidence provided
  • Rhetoric the use of rhetoric used for persuasion

47
The role of assumptions
  • Even though an argument is logical we might only
    accept the argument if we accept any critical
    assumptions being made
  • If we reject any central assumptions we may
    reject the prediction

48
Logical deduction
  • Acceptance of an argument must be based upon the
    accuracy of the premises
  • An argument is logical to the extent that if the
    premises on which it is based are true, then the
    conclusion will be true
  • To determine the logic of an argument we do not
    need to refer to real world observations

49
Research methods
  • Generalizing theories from the testing of samples
  • Methods borrowed from sciences ? phenomena will
    behave the same in all situations
  • Not possible when dealing with human behaviour
  • Sample selection (firm size, industry, country of
    origin, listed/unlisted, etc.)
  • Keep in mind not only how the argument is
    developed, but also how it is tested!!!

50
Evidence
  • Is there enough evidence to support the theory?
  • Is there conflicting evidence?

51
Rhetoric
  • Thouless (1974) identifies 38 dishonest tricks
    some writers use to support their argument
    including
  • emotionally toned words
  • statements where all is implied but some is
    true
  • diversion to another question or to a side issue
  • use of speculative argument
  • prestige by false credentials
  • appeal to mere authority

52
Any questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com