Title: Introduction to
1Lecture 1
- Introduction to
- Accounting Theory
2Doris Merkl-Davies
Division Financial Studies Location Room 1.08,
Hen Goleg Telephone 01248 38 2120 Email
d.m.merkl-davies_at_bangor.ac.uk
Reader in Accounting MA, PGCE (Vienna
University), MBA, PhD (Bangor University) Office
hours Mon. 9.00-10.00 Wed. 2.00-3.00 (Hen
Goleg, Room 1.08)
3Doris Merkl-Davies
- Research interests
- Corporate narrative reporting
- Impression management
- CSR reporting
- Accounting theory
4Doris Merkl-Davies
5BBS film club
- Venue Alun A0.01, 3.00-5.00pm
- WEEK 3 (WEDNESDAY 15 OCTOBER)Wall Street
(discussant Doris Merkl-Davies) - WEEK 5 (WEDNESDAY 29 OCTOBER)Office Space
(discussant Tony Dobbins) - WEEK 9 (WEDNESDAY 26 NOVEMBER)Citizen Kane
(discussant Bernardo Batiz-Lazo)
6Module format
- Lectures Mon. 10-12 in Drama Rehearsal Room
- Tutorials
- Group A Mon, 13.00-14.00 LR5
- Group B Tue, 9.00-10.00 LR1
7Recommended Textbooks
- Deegan, C. and Unerman, J. (2011). Financial
Accounting Theory. European edition. 2nd ed.
McGraw-Hill. (DU) Main text I - Rankin, M., Stanton, P., McGowan, S., Ferauto,
K., Tilling, M. (2012). Contemporary Issues in
Accounting. 2nd ed. Wiley. (R) Main text II - Godfrey, J., Hodgson, A., Holmes, S. and Tarca,
A. (2010). Accounting Theory. 7th ed. Wiley.
(GHHT) additional reading - Additional journal articles will be posted on
blackboard for you to download.
8Background reading for Lecture 1
- DU Chapter 1
- Rankin et al. Chapter 1 Chapter 5, pp. 131-134
- GHHT Chapts. 13
9Overview of Lecture 1
- Definition of accounting theory
- Types of accounting theories
- Accounting theory development over time
- Relationship between theory and research
- Evaluation of theories
10Exercise 1 What is a theory?
- In groups of 6 find an example of a famous theory
- Discuss the main features of the theory
- What does this theory do?
- What do we use it for?
- Nominate a group member to report back to the
class
11What is a theory?
- An organized way of thinking about a subject
- A set of ideas that explains something
- a scheme or system of ideas or statements held
as an explanation or account of a group of facts
or phenomena (Oxford English Dictionary) - theory is a statement of concepts and their
interrelationships that shows how and/or why a
phenomenon occurs (Corley Gioia, 2011 12)
12What is the purpose of theories?
- To make sense of the world (physical, social,
psychological phenomena) and communicate that
understanding to others - To make sense of (financial) accounting
information - Financial statements, corporate annual reports
- Accounting info is compiled and interpreted by
people
13Types of theory
Type of theory Users Example
Common-sense theory Lay people (personal experience) It is not what you know, but who you know http//www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10137928/Its-still-who-you-know-not-what-you-know-that-matters-say-two-thirds-of-Britons.html
Working theory Managers, investors, auditors (Generalisations made in particular professions) Crisis communication should prioritise key stakeholders http//www.bernsteincrisismanagement.com/articles/10-steps-of-crisis-communications.html
Scholarly theory Academics Accounting choice is driven by managerial self-interest Positive Accounting Theory
14Scholarly theory
- Has undergone systematic research
- Provide more thorough, accurate, and abstract
explanations for financial accounting than
common-sense or working theories
15What is the purpose of theories?
- Theories are used to
- Describe what people do Descriptive theories
- Suggest the best way (i.e., prescribe) to deal
with specific types of human behaviour
prescriptive or normative theories - Explain and predict what people do predictive
or positive theories
161. Descriptive theories
- Describe what people do
- Based on common practice
- Describe
- Common practise of bringing up children
- Common practises for dealing with underage binge
drinking in various countries - Describe accounting practice
- Common practise of accounting for fixed assets
- Future accountants are trained by practising
accountants
17Descriptive theories
- Advantage
- Tends to be accepted by majority
- Disadvantage
- Does not entail critical evaluation
- Does not allow for change
182. Prescriptive ( normative) theories
- Also called normative theories
- What people should do
- Suggest best way to
- Bring up children, i.e., authoritarian,
laissez-faire style, etc. - Prescribe particular accounting practices
- Account for fixed assets, i.e., historical cost,
current cost, exit price, etc. - Advantage
- Can improve accounting practises
- Disadvantage
- Assumes that there is one best way
193. Predictive ( positive) theories
- Also called positive theories
- Concerned with explaining reasons for behaviour
and predicting future behaviour - Explain characteristics of children are most
likely to engage in binge drinking, i.e., social
class, gender, parenting style - Predict what effect a change in licensing laws
will have on underage teenage drinking - Explain and predict accounting method choice
- Characteristics of companies most likely to
revalue their assets - What effect a change in accounting standards on
leases will have on the way firms finance their
assets
20Comparison of descriptive, prescriptive and
predictive theories
21Examples of uses of accounting theories
- Theories might
- prescribe how assets should be valued
- predict why managers will choose particular
accounting methods - explain how an individuals cultural background
affects accounting information provided - prescribe what accounting information should be
provided to particular classes of stakeholders - predict that the relative power of a stakeholder
group will affect the accounting information it
receives - predict that accounting information is used to
present organisations as legitimate
22Accounting theories
- Accounting is a human activity
- Explain the behaviour of people within and
outside of organisations with respect to
accounting information - Theories of accounting consider
- Why people within organisations elect to provide
particular information (preparer perspective) - Peoples behaviour with respect to accounting
information (user-perspective) - Peoples needs for accounting information
(user-perspective)
23Accounting theories
- Accounting is a social phenomenon
- Accounting theories are theories about human
behaviour - Borrow from disciplines dealing with human
behaviour - Psychology, sociology
24Exercise 2
- Which of the following is NOT an assumption used
in normative theory construction? - A. Profit and value can be measured precisely
- B. Financial accounting is useful for making
economic decisions - C. There are multiple available profit measures
- D. Markets are inefficient and can be fooled by
'creative accountants - E. All of the above
25Why do we need accounting theories?
- Accounting is viewed as a practical discipline
- Learning how to apply accounting rules
- Theories are necessary to understand the (social)
world we live in - They provide a basis for the decisions we make,
e.g. whether to include an item in the financial
statements or not (materiality and recognition
criteria)
26Why do we need accounting theories?
- We can make better predictions and decisions if
we get the contradictions out of our thinking, if
we consider what is known on the many sides of
the issue - i.e. the various theories which exist on
- The regulation of accounting, e.g. whether we
need regulation or not - The provision of financial information, e.g. Why
accountants choose particular accounting methods - The way financial information is received, e.g.
How people react to particular accounting numbers
27Why study accounting theories to understand
- Motivation for individuals to support or lobby
regulators for some accounting methods in
preference to others (? Regulatory theories) - How and why the capital markets react to
particular information (? Positive accounting
theory) - Whether there is a true measure of income (?
Asset valuation theories)
28Overview of theories of accounting
- Many theories of financial accounting exist
- No universally accepted theory of accounting
- Different perspectives about the central
objective, role and scope of financial accounting - No universally accepted perspective about the
role of accounting theory - Different researchers have different perspectives
of the role of accounting theory
29Accounting Theory Timeline
30Early development of accounting theory
- Descriptive theories
- Relied upon the process of induction
- Development of ideas or theories through
observation - 1920s to 1960s theories developed from observing
what accountants did in practice - Codified as doctrines or conventions of
accounting
31Criticisms of inductive method
- concentrates on the status-quo, is reactionary
in attitude, and cannot provide a basis upon
which current practice may be evaluated or from
which future improvements may be deduced. (Gray,
Owen and Maunders 1987, p. 66) - Assumes what is done by the majority is the most
appropriate practice - Perspective of accounting Darwinism
32Example of inductive approach to theory
development
- Grady (1965) undertook research commissioned by
the AICPA - Formed the basis of APB Statement No. 4 Basic
Concepts and Accounting Principles Underlying the
Financial Statements of Business Enterprises - Reflected generally accepted accounting
principles at the time
33Theory development - 1960s and 1970s
- Sought to prescribe particular accounting
practices - Known as normative theories
- Not driven by existing practices
- Theories critical of historical cost accounting
- Sought to provide improved approaches to asset
valuation in a time of widespread inflation
34Example of prescriptive theory
- 1961 and 1962 studies by Moonitz, and Sprouse and
Moonitz commissioned by the Accounting Research
Division of the AICPA - Authors proposed that accounting measurement
systems be changed from historical cost to a
system based on current values - Not supported by AICPA as too radically different
from current practice
35Theory development - mid to late 1970s
- Research aimed at explaining and predicting
accounting practice rather than prescribing
particular practices - Known as positive theories
36Positive theories
- Seek to predict and explain particular phenomena
- Begins with assumption(s), and through logical
deduction enables prediction(s) to be made - If predictions are sufficiently accurate when
tested against observations of reality, they are
regarded as having provided explanation of why
things are as they are
37Positive theories - continued
- Positive Accounting Theory
- Developed by Watts and Zimmerman
- Seeks to predict and explain why accountants
elect to adopt particular accounting methods in
preference to others - Based upon rational economic person assumption
- Individuals motivated by self-interest tied to
wealth maximisation
38Relationship between theory and research
- Theories are used to understand accounting
practice better - Accounting researchers use theories
- Theories are used in empirical research (i.e.,
research based on data, such as financial
statements, annual reports, share prices) to
explain phenomena and make predictions - Theories help us to critically evaluate a
phenomenon (i.e., accounting method choice)
39Relationship between theory and research
- "... all research emanates from the researcher s
implicit or explicit theory of the phenomenon
under investigation" (Rocco Plakhotnik, 2009
121).
40Testing a Theory in Research
Theory plane
1. Identify research problem
Observation plane
41Testing a Theory in Research
- Identify research problem
- Bias in corporate narrative documents
- Develop theoretical framework
- Agency theory assumptions
- Information asymmetry between managers and
investors managers are self-interested (want to
maximise their compensation) managers manipulate
presentation of information in corporate
narrative documents (e.g., annual report)
42Testing a Theory in Research
- State research question/hypothesis
- Managers in firms with negative financial
performance are more likely to introduce
reporting bias (in the form of pro-forma earnings
number into corporate narrative documents than
managers of firms with positive financial
performance - Construct research design
- Sample of firms split into two groups based on
positive/negative percentage change in earnings
chairmens statements (pro-forma earnings vs.
GAAP earnings)
43Testing a Theory in Research
- Observe/Analyse
- Conduct statistical association tests
- Evaluate
- Do findings confirm/disconfirm hypothesis
compare with findings of prior research - Assess limitations/constraints
- E.g., small sample size
44Criteria for evaluating theories
Area of evaluation What to look for
Accuracy Has research supported that they theory works the way it says it does?
Practicality Have real-world applications been found for the theory?
Succinctness Has the theory been formulated with the appropriate number (fewest possible) of concepts or steps?
Consistency Does the theory demonstrate coherence within its own premises and with other theories?
Acuity To what extent does the theory make clear and otherwise complex experience?
45Evaluation of theories
- Theories of accounting are only abstractions of
reality - The choice of one theory in preference to another
is based on value judgements - Cannot expect to provide perfect explanations or
predictions of human behaviour or assess what
types on information users actually need
46Evaluating theories of accounting
- When evaluating theories need to consider
- Assumptions whether you agree with the central
assumptions/premises of the theory - Logic whether the argument supporting the theory
is logical - Research methods Whether the research methods
are appropriate - Evidence whether you accept any supporting
evidence provided - Rhetoric the use of rhetoric used for persuasion
47The role of assumptions
- Even though an argument is logical we might only
accept the argument if we accept any critical
assumptions being made - If we reject any central assumptions we may
reject the prediction
48Logical deduction
- Acceptance of an argument must be based upon the
accuracy of the premises - An argument is logical to the extent that if the
premises on which it is based are true, then the
conclusion will be true - To determine the logic of an argument we do not
need to refer to real world observations
49Research methods
- Generalizing theories from the testing of samples
- Methods borrowed from sciences ? phenomena will
behave the same in all situations - Not possible when dealing with human behaviour
- Sample selection (firm size, industry, country of
origin, listed/unlisted, etc.) - Keep in mind not only how the argument is
developed, but also how it is tested!!!
50Evidence
- Is there enough evidence to support the theory?
- Is there conflicting evidence?
51Rhetoric
- Thouless (1974) identifies 38 dishonest tricks
some writers use to support their argument
including - emotionally toned words
- statements where all is implied but some is
true - diversion to another question or to a side issue
- use of speculative argument
- prestige by false credentials
- appeal to mere authority
52Any questions?