A Model of the Chromosphere: Heating, Structures, and Convection - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

A Model of the Chromosphere: Heating, Structures, and Convection

Description:

A Model of the Chromosphere: Heating, Structures, and Convection P. Song1, and V. M. Vasyli nas1,2 Center for Atmospheric Research and Department of Environmental ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: Dr23269
Learn more at: https://ulcar.uml.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Model of the Chromosphere: Heating, Structures, and Convection


1
A Model of the Chromosphere Heating, Structures,
and Convection
  • P. Song1, and V. M. Vasyliunas1,2
  • Center for Atmospheric Research and Department of
    Environmental, Earth Atmospheric Sciences,
    University of Massachusetts Lowell
  • 2. Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung,3
    7191 Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany

2
Abstract
  • We propose a model of local convection in the
    chromosphere, with scale size of supergranules.
    The strong heating required in order to balance
    the radiative losses in the chromosphere is
    provided by strong damping, through
    plasma-neutral collisions, of Alfvén waves that
    are driven by motions below the photosphere. On
    the basis of a self-consistent plasma-neutral-elec
    tromagnetic one-dimensional model, we derive the
    vertical profile of wave spectrum and power by a
    novel method, including the damping effect
    neglected in previous treatments. The
    high-frequency portion of the source power
    spectrum is strongly damped at lower altitudes,
    whereas the lower-frequency perturbations are
    nearly undamped and can be observed in the corona
    and above. As a result, the waves observed above
    the corona constitute only a fraction of those at
    the photosphere and, contrary to supposition in
    some earlier Alfvén-wave-damping models, their
    power does not represent the energy input.
    Calculated from parameters of a semi-empirical
    model for quiet-Sun conditions, the mechanism can
    generate sufficient heat to account for the
    radiative losses in the atmosphere, with most of
    the heat deposited at lower altitudes. When the
    magnetic field strength varies horizontally, the
    heating is likewise horizontally nonuniform.
    Since radiative loss is a strong function of
    temperature, the equilibrium temperature
    corresponding to local thermal balance between
    heating and radiation can be reached rapidly.
    Regions of stronger heating thus maintain higher
    temperatures and vice versa. The resulting uneven
    distribution of temperature drives chromospheric
    convection and circulation, which produces a
    temperature minimum in the chromosphere near 600
    km altitude and distorts the magnetic field to
    create a funnel-canopy-shaped magnetic geometry,
    with a strong field highly concentrated into
    small areas in the lower chromosphere and a
    relatively uniform field in the upper
    chromosphere. The formation of the transition
    region, corona, and spicules will be discussed.

3
Conditions in the Chromosphere
  • General Comments
  • Partially ionized
  • Strong magnetic field
  • Similar to thermosphere
  • -ionosphere
  • Motion is driven from below
  • Heating can be via collisions between plasma and
    neutrals
  • Objectives to explain
  • Temperature profile, especially a minimum at 600
    km
  • Sharp changes in density and temperature at the
    Transition Region (TR)
  • Spicules rooted from strong field regions
  • Funnel-canopy-shaped magnetic field geometry

Avrett and Loeser, 2008
4
Radiative Losses/Required Heating
  • Total radiation loss from chromosphere (not
    including photosphere) 1067 erg cm-2 s-1 .
  • Radiative loss rate
  • Lower chromosphere 10-1 erg cm-3 s-1
  • Upper chromosphere 10-2 erg cm-3 s-1
  • Power carried by solar wind 105 erg cm-2 s-1
  • Power to ionize small compared to radiation
  • Observed wave power 107 erg cm-2 s-1 .

5
Plasma-neutral Interaction
VA
  • Plasma (red dots) is driven with the magnetic
    field (solid line) perturbation from below
  • Neutrals do not directly feel the perturbation
    while plasma moves
  • Plasma-neutral collisions accelerate neutrals
    (open circles)
  • Longer than the neutral-ion collision time, the
    plasma and neutrals move nearly together with a
    small slippage. Weak friction/heating
  • In very long time scales, the plasma and neutrals
    move together no collision/no heating

6
Damping as function of frequency and altitude
1000 km
200 km
Reardon et al., 2008
7
Observation Range
8
Total Heating Rate from a Power-Law Source
Logarithm of heating per km, Q, as function of
field strength over all frequencies in erg cm-3
s-1 assuming n5/3, ?0/2p1/300 sec and F0 107
erg cm-2 s-1.
9
Heating Rate Per Particle
  • Heating is stronger at
  • lower altitudes for weaker field
  • higher altitudes for stronger field

Logarithm of heating rate per particle Q/Ntot in
erg s-1, solid lines are for unity of ?in/?i
(upper) and ?e/?e (lower)
10
Local Thermal Equilibrium Condition
  • Energy Equation
  • Time scale lifetime of a supergranulegt 1
    day105 sec
  • Heat flux negligible (see next page)
  • Lower chromosphere Optically thick medium
  • R 10-1 erg cm-3 s-1 (Rosseland approximation)
  • Q 100 erg cm-3 s-1
  • Convection 100 erg cm-3 s-1 (for p105 dyn/cm2)
  • If RltltQ
  • Upper chromosphere Optically thin medium
  • Q/NNi? 10-26 erg cm3 s-1
  • Convection, r.h.s., 10-28 erg cm3 s-1
  • (for NNi1011 cm-3, p10-1 dyn/cm2)
  • Convection is negligible in the upper
    chromosphere Q/NNi?
  • Convection in the lower chromosphere may be
    important
  • Temperature T increases with increasing heating
    rate per particle Q/N

11
Heat Transfer via Thermal Conduction
  • Perpendicular to B very small
  • Parallel to B
  • Thermal conductivity
  •  
  • Conductive heat transfer (L1000 km, T 104 K)
  • Thermal conduction is negligible within the
    chromosphere the smallness of the temperature
    gradient within the chromosphere and sharp change
    at the TR basically rule out the significance of
    heat conduction in maintaining the temperature
    profile within the chromosphere.
  • Thermal conduction at the Transition Region
    (T106 K, L100 km)
  • Qconduct 10-6 erg cm-3 s-1 (comparable to
    greater than the heating rate) important to
    provide for high rate of radiation

12
Horizontal Force Balance
  • Momentum equation
  • Force imbalance is mitigated by sound or fast
    waves
  • Time scales
  • Sound wave 1.5x104 km/10 km/s 103 sec
  • Alfven speed in the upper region 104 km/s, 100
    sec
  • Compared with the time scales of the pressure
    imbalance creation by heating (from energy
    equation)
  • 105 sec in the lower chromosphere
  • 103 sec in upper chromosphere
  • Lower chromosphere horizontally pressure
    balanced
  • Upper chromosphere pressure in higher heating
    region may be higher

13
Vertical Force Balance
  • Momentum equation
  • or
  • Average over horizontal dimensions (steady state)
  • Vertical acceleration
  • Upward TgtTm
  • Downward TltTm
  • Vertical flow produces additional pressure
    imbalance because of the different temperature
    and density the flow carries

14
Upper cell vertical flow speed estimate
  • Steady state momentum equation
  • Estimate the upflow in upper cell strong B region
  • With sub m measured and corresponding values
  • without sub strong field upper cell.
  • _at_1000 km, Tm6200, from radiation function table
    Nim?m2x10-27x2x1011. (From our model, Qm/Nm
    10-18 since Qm cannot be used quantitatively),
    assume Ni?/Nim?mNmQ/NQm
  • Since Q/N6Qm/Nm, ?TX6?mTmXm, where XNi/N, from
    radiation function T 6600. T/Tm1.06,
    T/Tm-10.06
  • _at_2000 km Tm6700
  • Nim?m1.2x10-26x4x1010, Q/N6Qm/Nm, T7100,
    T/Tm1.06
  • g274m/s2
  • Vzsqrt(2x274m/s2x0.06x106m)sqrt(33x106)6 km/s,
    a number within possible range, but maybe too big
    if Vx is LVz/H30000/2/200Vz450km/s,
    supersonic. Cs10 km/s

15
Circulation Connecting the Vertical Flow with
Horizontal Flow
  • Continuity equation
  • 2-D Cartesian coordinates
  • Horizontal momentum equation

16
Inhomogeneous Heating Chromosphere Circulation
17
Chromospheric Circulation Distortion of
Magnetic Field
18
Conclusions
  • Based on the 1-D analytical model that can
    explain the chromospheric heating
  • The model invokes heavily damped Alfvén waves via
    frictional and Ohmic heating
  • The damping of higher frequency waves is heavy at
    lower altitudes for weaker field
  • Only the undamped low-frequency waves can be
    observed above the corona (the chromosphere
    behaves as a low-pass filter)
  • More heating (per particle) occurs at lower
    altitudes when the field is weak and at higher
    altitudes when the field is strong
  • Extend to 2-D when the magnetic field strength is
    horizontally nonuniform
  • The temperature is higher in higher heating rate
    regions.
  • The nonuniform heating drives chromospheric
    convection/circulation
  • The observed temperature profile, including the
    temperature minimum at 600 km, is consistent with
    the convection/circulation without invoking
    thermal conduction
  • Temperature minimum occurs in the place where
    there is a change in heating mechanism electron
    Ohmic heating below and ion frictional heating
    above.

19
Preprints
  • Name email Institution

20
Lower cell vertical flow speed estimate
  • Energy Equation
  • Vertical velocity
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com