Title: Large Scale Dynamo Action in MRI Disks
1Large Scale Dynamo Action in MRI Disks
- Role of stratification
- Dynamo cycles
- Mean-field interpretation
- Incoherent alpha-shear dynamo
- Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Stockholm)
2Unstratified MRI turbulence
5123 w/o hypervisc. Dt 60 2 orbits
- No large scale field
- Too short?
- No stratification?
3Vorticity and Density
See poster by Tobi Heinemann on density wave
excitation!
4Small scales dominate
5Animated spectra
Red EM
Black EK
6Old stratified runs
ltBy gt
Brandenburg et al. (1995)
7Different boundary conditions
8Tall disk withpotential field b.c.
2p x 2p x 8p
9z-t diagram
10Longer and bigger
Parity not always well defined
11Mean-field interpretation
turbulent emf
a effect and turbulent aagnetic diffusivity
- Correlation method
- MRI accretion discs (Brandenburg Sokoloff 2002)
- Galactic turbulence (Kowal et al. 2005, 2006)
- Test field method
- Stationary geodynamo (Schrinner et al. 2005,
2007) - Shear flow turbulence (Brandenburg 2005)
12Calculate full aij and hij tensors
Original equation (uncurled)
Mean-field equation
fluctuations
Response to arbitrary mean fields
13Test fields
Example
14Validation Roberts flow
SOCA
SOCA result
normalize
15(i) Turbulence kinematic a and ht independent of
Rm
Galloway-Proctor
16Full alpha tensor for MRI
ayy negative, as before (Brandenburg et al. 1995)
17Full eta tensor
hxx and hxx the same and positive (new)
hyx always positive (new)
18(ii) Shear turbulence
Growth rate
Use Slt0, so need negative h21 for dynamo
19Case with just shear
Similar to G. Lesurs plot of yesterday!
20Dependence on Sh and Rm
Again, hyx always positive
21Gaussian fluctuations
22Fluctuations of aij and hij
Incoherent a effect (Vishniac Brandenburg
1997, Sokoloff 1997, Silantev 2000, Proctor 2007)
23Onset and saturation of incoherent alpha-shear
dynamos
24Conclusions
- Cycles w/ stratification
- Test field method robust
- Even when small scale dynamo
- a ? a0 and h ? ht0
- Rotation and shear hij
- WxJ not (yet?) excited
- Incoherent a works