Island biogeography - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Island biogeography

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation - Islands Author: Ian Hutchinson Last modified by: ian hutchinson Created Date: 3/14/2001 5:56:54 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:184
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: IanH67
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Island biogeography


1
Island biogeography
What controls the number of plant and animal
species on this island?
Does size matter? Isolation? Habitat
variation? Environmental history?
Island in the Bay of Fundy
2
Species - area relationships
Johann Reinhold Forster (1729-98) served as a
botanist with Captain Cook. After exploring the
islands of the southern Pacific he
observed Islands only produce a greater or
less number of species as their circumference
is more or less extensive. Small islands
harbour fewer species.
The Forsters (father son) collecting
specimens in Tahiti
3
Species-area relationships
Arrhenius (1921) Species and Area Gleason
(1922) On the relation between species and
area. Ecology, 3.
Gleason censused the plants in 240 1m2 plots in
an aspen wood in northern Michigan. He found 27
species in total, with an average of 4 species
per quadrat.
4
Species-area relationships
Preston (1962) The canonical distribution of
commonewss and rarity. Ecology, 43.
Preston introduced the Arrhenius equation
S cAz where S is number
of species, A is plot area, and c and z are
constants.
5
Applying the Arrhenius equation to Gleasons data
z slope
c
c intercept
6
Variations in value of c
e.g. insects
plants
e.g. mammals
7
Variations in the value of z
real world cases (0.26- 0.33)
8
What controls the species-area curve?
9
What do these have in common?
1
3
2
4
10
West Indian avifaunas
11
Avifaunal evidence from oceanic islands
1000
100
12
MacArthur and WilsonsTheory of Equilibrium
Island Biogeography (1967)
equilibrium species number
13
The effects of island size
14
Species-area curve, Galapagos Islands
15
Galapagos plant diversity and microclimate area
is a proxy for habitat variability
lt300 m
gt500 m
16
Plant diversity in the south Pacific is the
variability controlled by habitat variation?
17
The effects of island distance
18
Probability of success with target distance
(metaphor)
19
Dispersal probability with island distance
20
Avifaunal diversity in the south Pacific the
effects of distance from PNG
21
Real-world variations
22
Testing the MacArthur and Wilson theory
A. Natural experiments - Krakatau/Rakata
23
Bird and mammaldiversity on the remnant islands
of Krakatau vs. the biodiversity of neighbouring
islands
Rakata
remnants neighbours
Rakata
24
Rakata bird colonization
McArthur Wilsons equilibrium predictions from
nearby islands 30 bird species 40 yrs to
equilibrium turnover 1 species/yr.
?
Survey dates
25
Rakataplant colonization
26
Rakata plant immigration and extinction
27
Testing the theoryartificial experimentsI
defaunation and colonization
Small mangrove islands in the Florida keys
28
Testing the theoryartificial experimentsII
colonization of artificial substrates
Fouling panels
29
Variations in turnover rate at equilibrium
30
Extending the theory
Insularity is moreover a universal feature of
biogeography. Many of the principles graphically
displayed in the Galapagos Islands and other
remote archipelagos apply in lesser or greater
degree to all natural habitats e.g.
mountain-top alpine areas islands of trees at
the arctic treeline, urban parks, lakes, bogs,
desert oases, clearcuts, islands of fragmented
habitat, and even individual rocks, plants, etc.
31
Lake and bog islands
32
Mountain islands
  • Distribution of alpine tundra ecosystems in BC
    an archipelago formed by hundreds of discrete
    islands separated by forest and prairie in the
    neighbouring valleys.

33
Mountain islands
34
Vacant urban lots
Vacant urban lot, Philadelphia
Crowe, L. M. 1979. Lots of weeds insular
phytogeography of vacant urban lots. J.
Biogeography 6 169-181.
35
Fragmented habitat islands
1830 1882
the breakup of a large landmass into smaller
units would necessarily lead to the extinction or
local extermination of one or more species and
the differential preservation of others
Alphonse de Candolle, 1855
True for all habitats e.g. Wisconsin woodlands
1902 1950
36
Urban parksbreeding birds, Madrid (Spain)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com