Uncertainty - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Uncertainty

Description:

Uncertainty lessons from air pollution Jon Ayres Chair, ACP – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:80
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: Andrea446
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Uncertainty


1
Uncertainty lessons from air pollution
  • Jon Ayres
  • Chair, ACP

2
Fog The London Incident 1952
4 000 excess deaths
3
Clean Air Act, 1956
4
The Six Cities Study
Risk of Death 1.1 10 increased
risk compared to Portage
5
Concerns..
  • Essentially one study
  • and that from the USA
  • Effect sizes were small
  • Although
  • Good (we thought) exposure measures
  • although not personal exposures
  • And outcomes seemed clear (and logical)
  • Pressure from NGOs (and others) to heed Tom
    Lehrer
  • dont breathe the air!
  • Or at least do something about it

6
Concerns..
  • Essentially one study
  • and that from the USA
  • Effect sizes were small
  • Although
  • Good (we thought) exposure measures
  • although not personal exposures
  • And outcomes seemed clear (and logical)
  • Pressure from NGOs (and others) to heed Tom
    Lehrer
  • dont breathe the air!
  • Or at least do something about it

Are these associations causal?
7
Bradford Hill and CausalityBradford Hill Proc
Roy Soc Med 196558295-300
  • 1 Strength e.g. cigarette smokers have a 10 fold
    increased risk of lung cancer
  • 2 Consistency i.e. same effects across different
    studies
  • 3 Specificity i.e. disease virtually unique to
    exposure
  • 4 Temporality i.e. the exposure must precede the
    effect
  • 5 Biological gradient i.e. a dose response effect
  • 6 Plausibility N.B. judged in the light of
    knowledge of the day
  • 7 Coherence i.e. fits in with what is known
    already
  • 8 Experiment i.e. a change in exposure leads to
    a change in disease
  • 9 Analogy e.g. thalidomide other feto-toxic
    drugs

8
Bradford Hill and CausalityBradford Hill Proc
Roy Soc Med 196558295-300
  • 1 Strength e.g. cigarette smokers have a 10 fold
    increased risk of lung cancer
  • 2 Consistency i.e. same effects across different
    studies
  • 3 Specificity i.e. disease virtually unique to
    exposure
  • 4 Temporality i.e. the exposure must precede the
    effect
  • 5 Biological gradient i.e. a dose response effect
  • 6 Plausibility N.B. judged in the light of
    knowledge of the day
  • 7 Coherence i.e. fits in with what is known
    already
  • 8 Experiment i.e. a change in exposure leads to
    a change in disease
  • 9 Analogy e.g. thalidomide other feto-toxic
    drugs

Confounders
9
Reducing uncertainty
  • Population based studies
  • Human exposure studies
  • Animal studies
  • Lab studies (cells largely)

10
UK Governments response
  • To set up a committeeor three
  • MAAPE - reports on episodes (1990)
  • COMEAP - wider advisory remit (1991)
  • EPAQS - AQ standards
    recommendations (1991)

11
Problems..differing opinion and inadequate data
  • Variable methodology
  • Personal exposures
  • Imprecise metrics
  • Confounding
  • meteorology
  • other pollutants
  • co-exposures
  • Thresholds
  • Lags
  • Transferability
  • quantitative qualitative
  • But outcomes more clear
  • Deaths/HAs
  • Heart and lung disease

12
Respiratory mortality and PM10 (n47)
13
Continuing uncertainties
  • For instance
  • Particles appear to be more toxic
  • But have we got the right metric ?
  • Gases might also act in concert
  • Individual susceptibility
  • Mechanisms
  • Management
  • Effects of long term exposures

14
Quantification of the health impact of air
pollution in the UK
  • QUARK report (COMEAP 1998)
  • GB urban
  • Deaths brought forward (all cause)
  • PM 8,100 pa
  • SO2 3,500 pa
  • O3 12,500 pa (no threshold)
  • Respiratory hospital admissions brought forward
    additional
  • PM 10,500 pa
  • SO2 3,500 pa
  • O3 9,900 pa (no threshold)

15
Estimates of the range of costs of air pollution
in the UK
  • EAHEAP
  • Total benefits (net of NHS costs of saved
    morbidity/mortality)
  • PM10 0.93 - 540m pa
  • SO2 0.45 - 440m pa
  • O3 0.31 - 315m (summer only)
  • DH, 1999

16
The time line of reducing uncertainty?
17
The time line of reducing uncertainty?





18
The time line of reducing uncertainty?

6 Cities study




19
The time line of reducing uncertainty?
Govt Cttees formed

6 Cities study




20
The time line of reducing uncertainty?
QUARK report
Govt Cttees formed

6 Cities study




21
The time line of reducing uncertainty?
EU stds
QUARK report
Govt Cttees formed

6 Cities study




22
The time line of reducing uncertainty?
EU stds
QUARK report
Govt Cttees formed

6 Cities study


O
O


x 1st EPAQS report (ozone) x last EPAQS
report (halides)
23
The time line of reducing uncertainty?
EU stds
QUARK report
Govt Cttees formed

6 Cities study



O
O


x 1st EPAQS report (ozone) x last EPAQS
report (halides)
24
Dealing with uncertainty lessons from air
pollution
  • Work together
  • multi-disciplinarity
  • Assess the data for quality
  • address causality
  • where data are absent/inadequate - fill the gaps
  • Try and quantify potential effects
  • of both short- and long-term exposures
  • Communicate
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com