12.215 Modern Navigation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

12.215 Modern Navigation

Description:

12.215 Modern Navigation Thomas Herring (tah_at_mit.edu), MW 11:00-12:30 Room 54-322 http://geoweb.mit.edu/~tah/12.215 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:135
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: Thomas965
Learn more at: http://chandler.mit.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 12.215 Modern Navigation


1
12.215 Modern Navigation
  • Thomas Herring (tah_at_mit.edu),
  • MW 1100-1230 Room 54-322
  • http//geoweb.mit.edu/tah/12.215

2
Summary of Last Class
  • GPS measurements
  • Basics of pseudorange measurements
  • Phase measurements (allow millimeter level
    position with GPS and cm in real-time)
  • Examine some GPS data.
  • Positioning modes
  • Dilution of precision numbers

3
Todays Class
  • Atmospheric propagation.
  • Basic structure of the atmosphere
  • Refractive index of atmospheric air
  • Accounting for atmospheric delays in precise GPS
    navigation
  • Hydrostatic and wet delays
  • Use of GPS for weather forecasting

4
Basic atmospheric structure
Troposphere is where the temperature stops
decreasing in the atmosphere. (10 km altitude)
5
Troposhere
  • Lots of examples of web-based documents about the
    atmosphere See for example.
  • http//www-das.uwyo.edu/geerts/cwx/notes/chap01/t
    ropo.html
  • Tropopause is where temperature stops decreasing.
    Generally at pressure levels of about 300 mbar
    but can be as low as 500 mbar.
  • Sometimes term tropospheric delay used but this
    is only about 70 of delay.
  • Generally by height of 50-100km all of
    atmospheric delay accounted for.
  • Troposphere is where weather system occur and
    aircraft fly on the tropopause.

6
Refractivity of air
  • Air is made up of specific combination of gases,
    the most important ones being oxygen and
    nitrogen.
  • Each gas has its own refractive index that
    depends on pressure and temperature.
  • For the main air constituents, the mixing ratio
    of the constituents is constant and so the
    refractivity of a packet of air at a specific
    pressure and temperature can be defined.
  • The one exception to this is water vapor which
    has a very variable mixing ratio.
  • Water vapor refractivity also depends on
    density/temperature due to dipole component.

7
Refractivity of air
  • The refractivity of moist air is given by
  • For most constituents, refractivity depends on
    density (ie., number of air molecules). Water
    vapor dipole terms depends on temperature as well
    as density

8
Refractivity in terms of density
  • We can write the refractivity in terms of
    density
  • Density r is the density of the air parcel
    including water vapor. R is universal gas
    constant, Md and Mw are molecular weights. Zw is
    compressibility (deviation from ideal gas law)
    See Davis, J. L., T. A. Herring, and I.I.
    Shapiro, Effects of atmospheric modeling errors
    on determinations of baseline vectors from VLBI,
    J. Geophys. Res., 96, 643650, 1991.

9
Integration of Refractivity
  • To model the atmospheric delay, we express the
    atmospheric delay as
  • Where the atm path is along the curved
    propagation path vac is straight vacuum path, z
    is height for station height Z and m(e) is a
    mapping function. (Extended later for
    non-azimuthally symmetric atmosphere)
  • The final integral is referred to as the zenith
    delay

10
Zenith delay
  • The zenith delay is determined by the integration
    of refractivity vertically.
  • The atmospheric is very close to hydrostatic
    equilibrium meaning that surface pressure is
    given by the vertical integration of density.
    Since the first term in refractivity depends only
    on density, its vertical integration will depend
    only on surface pressure. This integral is
    called the zenith hydrostatic delay (ZHD).
    (Often referred to as dry delay but this is
    incorrect because has water vapor contribution).

11
Zenith hydrostatic delay
  • The Zenith hydrostatic delay is given by
  • Where gm is mean value of gravity in column of
    air (Davis et al. 1991)gm9.8062(1-0.00265cos(2f)
    -3.1x10-7(0.9Z7300)) ms-2
  • Ps is total surface pressure (again water vapor
    contribution included)
  • Since Ps is 1013 mbar at mean sea level typical
    ZHD 2.3 meters

12
Zenith wet delay
  • The water vapor delay (second term in
    refractivity) is not so easily integrated because
    of distribution of water vapor with height.
  • Surface measurements of water vapor pressure
    (deduced from relative humidity) are not very
    effective because it can be dry at surface and
    moist above and visa versa.
  • Only effective method is to sense the whole
    column of water vapor. Can be done with water
    vapor radiometer (WVR) which infers water vapor
    delay from thermal emission from water vapor
    molecules and some laser profiling methods
    (LIDAR). Both methods are very expensive (200K
    per site)

13
Zenith wet delay
  • In meteorology, the term Precipitable water
    (PW) is used. This is the integral of water
    vapor density with height and equals the depth of
    water if all the water vapor precipitated as rain
    (amount measured on rain gauge).
  • If the mean temperature of atmosphere is known,
    PW can be related to Zenith Wet Delay (ZWD) (See
    next page)

14
PW and ZWD
  • Relationship
  • The factor for conversion is 6.7 mm delay/mm PW
  • This relationship is the basis of ground based
    GPS meteorology where GPS data are used to
    determine water vapor content of atmosphere.
  • ZWD is usually between 0-30cm.

15
Mapping functions
  • Zenith delays discussed so far how to relate to
    measurements not at zenith
  • Problem has been studied since 1970s.
  • In simplest form, for a plain atmosphere,
    elevation angle dependence would behave as
    1/sin(elev). (At the horizon, elev0 and this
    form goes to infinity.
  • For a spherically symmetric atmosphere, the
    1/sin(elev) term is tempered by curvature
    effects.
  • Most complete form is continued fraction
    representation (Davis et al., 1991).

16
Continued fraction mapping function
  • Basic form of mapping function was deduced by
    Marini (1972) and matches the behavior of the
    atmosphere at near-zenith and low elevation
    angles. Form is

17
Truncated version
  • When the mapping function is truncated to the
    finite number of terms then the form is

Davis et al. 1991 solved problem by using tan for
second sin
18
Mapping functions
  • Basic problem with forming a mapping function is
    determining the coefficient a,b, c etc for
    specific weather conditions.
  • There are different parameterizations
  • Niell mapping function uses a, b,c that are
    latitude, height and time of year dependent
  • MTT (MIT Temperature) model uses temperature as
    proxy for atmospheric conditions.
  • Recent Niell work uses height of 500mbar surface
    (needs to be determined from assimilation
    models).

19
Coefficients in mapping function
  • The typical values for the coefficients are
  • Hydrostatic
  • a1.232e-3, b3.16e-3 c71.2e-3
  • Wet delay
  • a 0.583e-3 b1.402e-3 c45.85e-3
  • Since coefficients are smaller for wet delay,
    this mapping function increases more rapidly at
    low elevation angles.
  • At 0 degrees, hydrostatic mapping function is
    36. Total delay 82 meter

20
Effects of atmospheric delay
  • If atmospheric zenith delay not estimated, then
    when data is used to 10 degree elevation angle,
    error in height is 2.5 times zenith atmospheric
    delay error (see Herring, T. A., Precision of
    vertical position estimates from
    verylongbaseline interferometry, J. Geophys.
    Res., 91, 91779182, 1986. 
  • A simple matlab program can reproduce these
    results
  • Herring Kalman filter paper also discusses
    effects of process noise value in height estimate
    uncertainty.

21
Parameterization of atmospheric delay
  • Given the sensitivity of GPS position estimates
    to atmospheric delay, and that external
    calibration of the delay is only good to a few
    centimeters atmospheric zenith delays and often
    gradients are estimated high-precision GPS
    analyses.
  • Parameterization is either Kalman filter or
    coefficients of piece-wise linear functions
    (GAMIT)

22
Example using NCEP analysis field
Blue is GPS estimates of delay, red is NCEP
calculation
23
Summary
  • Atmospheric delays are one the limiting error
    sources in GPS
  • In high precision applications the atmospheric
    delay are nearly always estimated
  • At low elevation angles can be problems with
    mapping functions
  • Spatial inhomogeneity of atmospheric delay still
    unsolved problem even with gradient estimates.
  • Estimated delays are being used for weather
    forecasting if latency lt2 hrs.
  • Material today
  • Atmospheric structure
  • Refractive index
  • Methods of incorporating atmospheric effects in
    GPS
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com