Atomos: Not to Be Cut - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Atomos: Not to Be Cut

Description:

... a student of Rutherford s. ... A good video on the Rutherford model can be seen at: ... If electrons gain energy (become energized) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: lew145
Learn more at: http://www.strongnet.org
Category:
Tags: atomos | become | cut | good | student

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Atomos: Not to Be Cut


1
Atomos Not to Be Cut
  • The History of Atomic Theory

2
Atomic Models
  • At right is the image most people have of what an
    atom looks like. It shows a nucleus of protons
    and neutrons with electrons occupying various
    orbits around the nucleus.
  • Models use familiar ideas to explain unfamiliar
    facts observed in nature. Models can be changed
    as new information is collected.
  • So, is this the most accurate model of the atom?
    Or is it far from reality?
  • This presentation discusses six major models of
    what we call atoms. Each new model was
    developed based on new discoveries at the time.
  • The Six Atomic Models are
  • The Greek Model
  • Daltons Model
  • Thomsons Model
  • Rutherfords Model
  • Bohrs Model
  • Wave-Mechanical Model

3
1. The Greek Model
  • Democritus was a Greek philosopher who began
    the search for a description of matter more than
    2400 years ago (around 400 BC).
  • He asked could matter be divided into smaller
    and smaller pieces forever, or was there a limit
    to the number of times a piece of matter could be
    divided?

4
Its only logical!
  • Democritus knew this question could not be easily
    answered directly. Lets say you were breaking
    up a piece of rock -- how would you know when the
    smallest piece of rock was actually reached?
  • Democritus logically concluded that a piece of
    matter could not be divided into smaller pieces
    forever. Eventually the smallest possible piece
    would be obtained.
  • Since this piece is the smallest possible it
    would be indivisible, meaning it could not be
    further divided.

5
  • He named the smallest possible piece of matter
    atomos, which means not to be cut.
  • To Democritus, atoms were small, hard particles
    that were all made of the same material but were
    different shapes and sizes. They were infinite
    in number, always moving, and capable of joining
    together.
  • However, Democritus theory was ignored and
    forgotten for more than 2000 years! Why?
  • The ancient Greeks did not experiment, but tried
    to win arguments through logic and debate. This
    would cause a problem for Democritus.

6
  • The famous philosopher Aristotle had a different
    theory of matter. He proposed that matter was
    composed of four elements earth, fire, air and
    water. These four elements were supposedly
    blended in different proportions to make up all
    the various types of substances in the world.
  • Aristotle had such a great reputation as a
    debater and logical thinker that many of his
    ideas were simply accepted as true without any
    sort of experimental evidence.
  • Aristotle may have been a great thinker and
    philosopher, but his theory of matter was not
    scientifically based, to say the least.
  • Democritus had the right idea about the nature of
    matter, but it was ignored. His theory of the
    atom was not popular again until the 19th
    century.

7
2 Daltons Model
  • John Dalton proposed his modern atomic theory in
    1803, about 2000 years after Democritus.
  • Daltons atomic theory explained several
    observations about matter that became known since
    the time of Democritus
  • Most natural materials are mixtures of pure
    substances .
  • Pure substances are either elements or compounds.
  • A given compound always contains the same
    proportions (by mass) of the elements, no matter
    where it came from known as the Law of Constant
    Composition.

John Dalton 1766-1824
See Sec 4.3 of text.
8
Daltons Atomic Theory
  1. All elements are composed of atoms.
  2. Atoms of the same element are identical.
  3. Atoms of a given element are different from those
    of another element.
  4. Compounds are formed by the joining of atoms of
    two or more elements. A given compound always
    has the same relative number and types of atoms.
  5. Atoms are indivisible and may not be created or
    destroyed in chemical reactions. Chemical
    reactions simply rearrange how atoms are grouped
    together.

9
  • Dalton thought of atoms as little more than very
    tiny spheres much like billiard balls. He knew
    nothing about any subatomic parts.
  • However, do the points of Daltons theory sound
    familiar?
  • They should! Daltons atomic theory became the
    foundation of modern chemistry.

10
3 Thomsons Plum Pudding Model
  • See section 4.5 in text.
  • In 1897 the English scientist J.J. Thomson
    proposed that atoms themselves are made of even
    smaller, sub-atomic, particles.
  • Thomson (among others) experimented with cathode
    ray tubes. When such a tube is evacuated of air
    and an electric current is passed through it, a
    glowing region (called cathode rays) was
    observed.

11
  • Cathode rays are so named because they are
    emitted at the negative (cathode) end and travel
    to the anode (positive) end of the tube.
  • Cathode rays are deflected towards a positively
    charged plate which showed they are composed of
    negatively-charged particles that have mass.
  • Regardless of the type of metal used at the
    cathodes and anodes of the vacuum tubes, the
    cathode rays were seen and had the same
    properties.

12
  • From these observations Thomson concluded that
    cathode rays were actually a stream of negatively
    charged particles that came from within the atom.
  • If particles smaller than the atom existed, then
    atoms themselves were divisible, not indivisible.
  • Thomson called these negatively-charged particles
    corpuscles. We, of course, know them today as
    electrons.
  • Since atoms were neutral he reasoned that there
    must also be positively-charged parts in the
    atom, but he could never identify them.
  • Check out the video at
  • https//www.youtube.com/watch?vIdTxGJjA4JwlistP
    LD6A43875B9DEC57Eindex24

13
  • Thompson proposed a model of the atom that became
    popularly known as the Plum Pudding model.
  • Atoms were made from a positively-charged
    substance with negatively-charged electrons
    scattered about, like raisins in a pudding.
  • The Plum Pudding model was also proposed around
    1900 by William Thompson (better known as Lord
    Kelvin), who was no relation to J. J. Thompson.

14
4 Rutherfords Model
  • See sections 4.5, 10.1 in text
  • In 1910, New Zealand physicist Ernst Rutherford
    performed a series of experiments to study the
    structure of atoms.

15
  • Rutherfords experiment (see next slide) involved
    firing a stream of positively () charged
    bullets called alpha particles (actually,
    helium nuclei) -- at a thin sheet of gold foil
    about 2000 atoms thick.
  • Most of the positively charged alpha particle
    bullets passed nearly straight through the gold
    atoms in the sheet of foil.
  • However, some of the alpha particles bounced away
    from the gold sheet as if they had hit something
    solid.
  • How could something like this be explained given
    the current model of what atoms were?

16
(No Transcript)
17
  • Rutherford concluded that the gold atoms in the
    sheet were mostly open space, and not like a
    solid pudding.
  • He further concluded that both the mass and the
    positive charge of an atom are concentrated
    within a tiny fraction of the atoms volume,
    which he called the nucleus.
  • The few alpha particle bullets that were
    deflected were bouncing off the tiny, dense
    nucleus at the center of the mostly empty atom.
    Those not deflected were passing through empty
    space!

18
What Rutherford expected alpha particle paths
virtually uninterrupted as they went through the
atom because at the time it was believed that
atoms had the same consistency throughout.
19
  • What he observed scattering of some alpha
    particles as they
  • bounced off the dense nucleus at the center of
    the atom.
  • Most of the alpha particles simply passed through
    the empty
  • space of the atoms.

20
  • These observations certainly changed the idea of
    how atoms could be pictured.
  • Rutherfords atomic model contained positive
    charges in a very tiny, very dense nucleus.
  • The negatively charged electrons filled the
    remaining much larger volume of the atom and
    orbited outside the nucleus.

21
  • By 1920 Rutherford established that the nucleus
    of an atom consisted of positively charged
    particles, called protons, and, for stability,
    must contain neutral particles with the same mass
    as protons.
  • The neutral particle, called the neutron, was
    eventually discovered in 1932 by James Chadwick,
    a student of Rutherfords.
  • Neutrons are found in the nuclei of all atoms
    except hydrogen, which has a single proton in its
    nucleus. (The isotope of hydrogen with a single
    proton accounts for 99.98 of all hydrogen in the
    universe. There are rare isotopes of hydrogen
    that have one and two neutrons, respectively.)
  • Rutherfords model, however, could not explain
    how negatively-charged electrons could maintain
    stable orbits around a positively-charged
    nucleus. Since opposite charges attract, the
    orbiting electrons should be drawn into the
    nucleus. But this is not observed. So what was
    keeping electrons in stable orbits and atoms in
    existence?

22
  • Another example of the Rutherford model of the
    atom in which electrons can orbit the atom in an
    infinite number of paths.
  • A good video on the Rutherford model can be seen
    at
  • https//www.youtube.com/watch?vYz1WIKPLXLQt

23
5 Bohr Model
  • See section 10.5 in text.
  • In 1913, the Danish scientist Niels Bohr proposed
    that electrons are restricted to certain fixed
    (quantized) orbits around the nucleus. This
    appeared to solve the problem with Rutherfords
    model of how electrons stay in orbit around the
    nucleus.

24
  • These orbits, or energy levels (n1, n2, n3,
    etc.), are only located at specific distances
    from the nucleus.
  • If electrons gain energy (become energized) they
    can jump to a higher fixed energy level.
  • When electrons lose energy they drop back down to
    a lower energy level. The energy lost is
    released (emitted) as a photon of light of a
    specific frequency (color).

25
  • A quantum (fixed amount) of energy is required to
    move electrons to the next highest level.
    Likewise, the same fixed amount of energy is
    emitted when an electron drops to a lower energy.
  • Bohrs model explained the observed emission
    spectrum data for hydrogen (see fig 10.11, pg
    286).

26
  • In Bohrs model, the position of electrons around
    the nucleus is analogous to the steps of a stair
    (or rungs of a ladder).
  • Electrons cannot exist between energy levels,
    just like you cant stand between steps on a
    stair (or rungs on ladder).

27
6 The Wave Mechanical Model
  • See sections 10.6, 10.7, 10.8 in text.
  • Also called the quantum mechanical model, or
    cloud model.
  • By the mid-1920s the Bohr model was shown to be
    incorrect because it only worked well for the
    hydrogen atom. Any model of the atom has to work
    well for all atoms, not just hydrogen.
  • A new model suggested that electrons exhibit
    wave-like as well as particle-like behavior (just
    as photons do).
  • Electrons do not orbit the nucleus as in the
    Bohr model, but are located within regions of
    space around the nucleus.

28
  • Scientists responsible for the model
  • Louis de Broglie was the first to support the
    idea that electrons exhibit wave characteristics.
  • Erwin Schrodinger developed a mathematical wave
    formula that described electrons as waves.
  • Werner Heisenberg showed that it is impossible to
    know both the exact location and the exact speed
    of an electron (the Uncertainty Principle).

29
  • Summary of wave-mechanical model
  • The nucleus remains as defined by Rutherford.
  • Electron states are described as orbitals, not
    orbits.
  • Orbitals are regions around a nucleus where
    electrons have a probability of being found. The
    precise location and speed of electrons within
    orbitals cannot be accurately determined (see
    firefly example on pg 289).
  • Schrodingers wave equations describe orbitals of
    various shapes such as spherical or dumbbell
    (see pg 291 in text).

30
  • Orbitals are also described as electron cloud
    regions.
  • Electron clouds are visual models that map the
    possible location of electrons in an atom.
  • The edge of an orbital or cloud is fuzzy,
    meaning it does not have an exact size.
  • Electron clouds are denser closer to the nucleus
    where electrons are more likely to be found.

Electrons can only be present in certain regions
around the nucleus, not just anywhere.
not here
here
31
  • Location of an electron depends upon how much
    energy the electron has.
  • Electrons closer to the nucleus have less energy
    than those further away.
  • Energy states of electrons correspond to orbitals
    with different shapes s, p, d, f (see below).

32
Some links to videos on the web
  • Atomic timeline video
  • http//www.youtube.com/watch?vNSAgLvKOPLQ
  • A good short history of Dalton to Bohr
  • https//www.youtube.com/watch?v-4Us5PTb4J8
  • Lots of interesting videos! Pick the ones that
    interest you.
  • http//www.youtube.com/watch?vbw5TE5o7JtElist
    PLD6A43875B9DEC57Eindex1

33
Summary of the Six Models
  • Greek Model
  • Dalton Model
  • Thompson Model (Plum Pudding)

34
  • Rutherford Model
  • Bohr Model
  • Wave-Mechanical Model
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com