An attribution model of stigma towards a person with Alzheimer's disease - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

An attribution model of stigma towards a person with Alzheimer's disease

Description:

An attribution model of stigma towards a person with Alzheimer's disease Perla Werner Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences University of Haifa – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:86
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: Faculty154
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: An attribution model of stigma towards a person with Alzheimer's disease


1
An attribution model of stigma towards a person
with Alzheimer's disease
  • Perla Werner
  • Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences
  • University of Haifa
  • Israel

2
Alzheimers disease
  • Incurable, degenerative and progressive disease
  • Affects mental, cognitive
  • and physical functioning

3
AD is the most common type of dementia
6 out of 10 cases of dementia are AD
4
Prevalence
  • There are an estimated 30 million people with
    dementia worldwide.
  • By 2050, it is projected that this figure will
    have increased to over 100 million.

5
Stigma and AD
  • It is widely assumed that AD is associated with
    stigma
  • Scant empirical evidence
  • Theory - driven

6
Attribution modelCorrigan and colleagues
Dangerousness
Attributions of responsibility
Emotional reactions
Discrimination
7
Aim
  • To examine the relationships between causal
    attributions (e.g., responsibility), familiarity
    with the disease, dangerousness, emotional
    responses (pity, anger, fear) and helping and
    discriminatory behaviors (avoidance, segregation,
    coercion) towards AD in the lay public

8
Methods
  • A nationally representative sample of 1,002
    adults
  • Were interviewed using CATI
  • Adapted version of the AQ-27

9
Participants characteristics(n 1,002)
  • 52.6 F
  • Mean age 46.5 (SD 17.7)
  • Mean number of years of education 13.5 (SD
    3.4)
  • Jewish 83.9

10
Cognitive attributions
11
Emotional attributions
12
Behavioral attributions
13
Model for willingness to help (n 1,002)
Responsibility
-.09
Help
-.08
.44
.31
Pity
-.15
Dangerousness
Chi square 7.57 df 3 p 0.56 NFI -
.979 RMSEA .039
-.08
Familiarity
14
Model for discrimination
-.07
Responsibility
Coercion
.31
.12
Dangerousness
.12
.30
Segregation
.64
.14
-.08
Fear
.11
-.08
Avoidance
Familiarity
-.16
Chi square 12.44 df 3 p 0.13 NFI -
.990 RMSEA .024
15
Relationships with gender
16
Relationship with ethnicity
17
Relationship with ethnicity
18
Relationship with ethnicity
19
Summary of findings
  • Low attributions of responsibility and
    dangerousness
  • Low negative feelings
  • High positive feelings
  • Partial support of an extended version of
    Attribution Theory
  • Minority and younger participants reported less
    discriminatory behaviors

20
Theoretical implications
  • The role of other attributions should be examined
  • The role of other emotional reactions should be
    examined
  • The role of ethnicity and culture in the
    attribution model should be elucidated

21
Practical implications
  • Disseminate findings in order to increase early
    diagnosis
  • Develop and implement programs to increase the
    familiarity and knowledge about AD
  • Replicate study in professional samples

22
Thank you
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com