H A C C P - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

H A C C P

Description:

H A C C P WHO & ICD ILSI Europe Inneke Hantoro Introduction: Traditional QC vs Preventive System Traditional QC programs spot-checked manufacturing conditions, and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: Presa150
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: H A C C P


1
H A C C P
  • WHO ICD
  • ILSI Europe

Inneke Hantoro
2
Introduction Traditional QC vs Preventive System
  • Traditional QC programs spot-checked
    manufacturing conditions, and randomly sampled
    and tested final products to ensure safe food.
  • If the finished product met the specifications,
    it was approved otherwise, the product was held,
    reprocessed, or destroyed.

Reactive inefficient
3
Introduction Traditional QC vs Preventive System
  • An HACCP program is about preventive systems to
    eliminate a problem before it happens.
  • The actions that these systems provoke are
    essentially preclusive they are designed to
    prevent problems rather than solve them after
    they have occurred.
  • QC checks occur during the process so that a
    finished product is deemed consistently safe.

4
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP)
  • The HACCP system has grown to become the
    universally accepted method for food safety
    assurance.
  • A major focus of the HACCP program is from farm
    to table. ? HACCP is a concept as well as a
    method of operation, applied to all phases of
    food production, including agricultural
    production, food handling, food processing, food
    services, food distribution, and consumer use.

Everyone is responsible for safe food products
5
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP)
  • The Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point
    (HACCP) system is a science-based system created
    to identify specific hazards and actions to
    control them in order to ensure food safety and
    quality.
  • A hazard is a biological, chemical or physical
    agent in, or condition of, food with the
    potential to cause an adverse health effect
    (Codex Alimentarius, 1997).

6
The need for an effective food safety assurance
method
  • Foodborne disease are a widespread public health
    problem.
  • Emergence of foodborne disease.
  • Increased knowledge and awareness of the serious
    and chronic health effects.
  • New food technologies and processing methods.
  • Increased awareness of the economic consequences
    of foodborne disease.

7
The need for an effective food safety assurance
method
  • Increase in the number of vulnerable people.
  • Industrialization and mass production.
  • Urbanization and changing lifestyle.
  • Increase tourism and international trade in
    foodstuffs.
  • Increase consumer awareness of food safety.

8
Food Safety Assurance
  • Good Manufacturing practices (GM)
  • and
  • Good Hygiene Practices (GHP)
  • necessary
  • But not always sufficient

9
(No Transcript)
10
The History of HACCP
  • The HACCP concept was developed in the early
    1970s as a system to assure food safety
  • 1983 WHO Europe recommends HACCP
  • 1991 Codex HACCP draft
  • 1998 FAO/WHO provide guidance for regulatory
    assessment of HACCP
  • 2006 Increased worldwide use of HACCP in food
    safety legislation

11
Stake holders involved in HACCP
12
The objectives HACCP application
  • Focuses on identifying and preventing hazards
    from contaminating food, based on sound science.
  • Permits more efficient and effective government
    oversight, primarily because record keeping
    allows investigators to see how well a firm is
    complying with food safety laws over a period,
    rather than how well it is doing on any given
    day.
  • Places responsibility for ensuring food safety on
    the food manufacturer or distributor.
  • Helps food companies to compete more effectively
    in the world market.
  • Reduces barriers to international trade.

13
HACCP Concept
  • Identifying potential food safety problems
  • Determining how and where these hazards can be
    controlled or prevented
  • Describing what to do and training the personnel
  • Implementation and recording

14
HACCP Program Prerequisites
  • Traceability and recall
  • Pest control
  • QA procedures
  • SOP and SSOP
  • Glass control
  • Procedures for receiving, storage and shipping
  • Labeling
  • Employee food and ingredient handling
  • Facilities
  • Supplier control
  • Specifications for all ingredients, products and
    packaging materials
  • Production equipment
  • Cleaning and sanitation
  • Personal hygiene
  • Training
  • Chemical control
  • Receiving, storage, shipping

GMP
15
Preliminary Tasks of HACCP Program
  • Choosing the HACCP team
  • Description of the food product and its
    distribution
  • Description of the intended use and consumer of
    the product
  • Development of a flow diagram describing a food
    product manufacturing process
  • Verification of the flow diagram

16
The principles of HACCP
  • 1. Conduct a hazard analysis
  • 2. Determine the CCPs
  • 3. Establish critical limit(s)
  • 4. Establish a monitoring system
  • 5. Establish corrective actions
  • 6. Establish verification procedures
  • 7. Establish documentation
  • Source CODEX

17
1. Hazard Analysis
  • The process of collecting and evaluating
    information on hazards and conditions leading to
    their presence to decide which are significant
    for food safety and should be addressed in the
    HACCP plan.

18
Information needed for hazard analysis
  • the agents that could be present in the food
    under study
  • the severity of the effects and the likelihood of
    their occurrence
  • the levels that could cause adverse health
    effects
  • the conditions that could lead to unacceptable
    levels

19
Areas to consider in Hazard Analysis
  • Raw materials and ingredients
  • Product formulation
  • Processing conditions
  • Packaging
  • Storage and distribution
  • Preparation and use
  • Target groups

20
Probability - Severity
Probabilitas Severity/ Keparahan/Keakutan Severity/ Keparahan/Keakutan Severity/ Keparahan/Keakutan Severity/ Keparahan/Keakutan
Probabilitas Kritikal Serius Mayor Minor
Probabilitas Signifikan Signifikan Signifikan Tidak Signifikan
Probabilitas Signifikan Signifikan Tidak Signifikan Tidak Signifikan
Probabilitas Signifikan Tidak Signifikan Tidak Signifikan Tidak Signifikan
NACMCF
21
Probability - Severity
  • Probabilitas
  • Tinggi mungkin terjadi
  • Medium dapat tejadi
  • Rendah tidak mungkin terjadi
  • Keparahan/Keakutan
  • Kritikal akan otomatis mengakibatkan makanan
    tidak aman
  • Serius kemungkinan mengakibatkan makanan tidak
    aman
  • Mayor dapat mengakibatkan makanan tidak aman
  • Minor kemungkinan tidak mengakibatkan makanan
    tidak aman

22
Hazard Determination
23
2. Determination of CCPs
  • Critical control point decision tree
  • Questions to be asked for each raw material used

24
Questions to be asked for each process step
25
(No Transcript)
26
3. The establishment of critical limits
  • A criterion which separates acceptability from
    unacceptability
  • Critical limits can be
  • Values of pH, aw, temperature, time
  • Absorbed radiation dose
  • Levels of disinfectant or antimicrobial agents
  • Level of cleanliness
  • Limits of residues
  • Limits of contaminants
  • Limits of microbiological criteria

27
  • When is deviation from normality unacceptable?
  • ( i.e. establishment of Critical Limits )

28

4 5. Monitoring and Corrective Action
  • The key document
  • Holding all the essential details about the
    steps or stages
  • in the process where there are CCPs
  • The HACCP Control Chart

29
  • Control measure
  • Any factor or activity which can be used to
    prevent, eliminate, or reduce food safety hazards
    to an acceptable level
  • Critical limit
  • The safety boundaries (criteria that separate
    safe from unsafe)
  • Sources of information literature, regulation,
    experiment, etc
  • Contain safety buffer zone

30
  • Monitoring
  • Observation or measurement to ensure that the
    process is operating within the critical limit
  • Based on some form of inspection and testing
  • The frequency depends on the nature of the CCP
    and the type of monitoring procedure
  • Clarify to all personnel involve (what to do and
    how to do it)

31
  • Corrective action
  • The action should be taken when the result shows
    a deviation from the critical limit
  • Adjust the process to bring it back under control
  • Deal with the material produced under the
    deviation period
  • Hold on the product
  • Rework
  • Release product after sampling and testing
  • Direct into less sensitive products, e.g. animal
    feed
  • Clarify to all personnel involve (what to do and
    how to do it)

32
6. Verification
  • The application of methods, procedures, tests,
    and other evaluations, in addition to monitoring,
    to determine conformity with the HACCP plan.
  • This is primarily the responsibility of the
    industry, however some verification activities
    can be undertaken during regulatory assessments
  • Conformity
  • Activities are carried out according to the
    established procedures
  • e.g. the HACCP plan and prerequisites

33
7. Establishment of the record - keeping
procedures
  • An HACCP program should be thoroughly documented
    and implemented establishing procedures for the
    identification, storage, retrieval maintenance,
    protection, and disposition of documents.
  • The documentation generated must be formal
    written records providing factual evidence that
    an activity has been performed in a timely manner
    in accordance with established procedures.
  • Information contained in corrective action
    records provides a description of the deviation
    and an evaluation of the corrective action taken,
    as well as a notation as to final disposition of
    the affected product.
  • The name of the individual responsible for taking
    the corrective action should be included.

34
Example of documentation about HACCP system
deviation report
35
Example of documentation about corrective action
report
36
References
  • Arvanitoyannis, I.S. 2009. HACCP and ISO 22000
    Application to Foods of Animal Origin. Blackwell
    Publishing Ltd.
  • Vasconcellos, J. A. 2004. Quality Assurance for
    the Food Industry A Practical Approach. CRC
    Press, Boca Raton.
  • van Schothorst, M. 2004. A simple guide to
    understanding and applying the hazard analysis
    critical control point concept 3rd Ed. Belgium.
    ILSI Europe.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com