FY 09 Mission/Program Support Sub-Goal Program Plan William F. Broglie November 16, 2006

1
FY 09 Mission/Program Support Sub-GoalProgram
PlanWilliam F. BroglieNovember 16, 2006
Workforce Management
Administrative Services
Acquisition Grants
Financial Services
IT Services
Facilities
2
Overview

• FY 09 Program Plan Vision for 2013
• Cost effective, value-added service
  provider-of-choice for workforce management,
  acquisition and grants, facilities, financial, IT
  and administrative services.
• Long range plans identifying future requirements
  for
• Facilities
• Information Technology
• Workforce Management

NEP/NEC Guidance Requested Require IT
Long-Range Plan to be Developed for FY 10-14 PPBES
NEP/NEC Recommendation
3
Overview

• FY09 FY13 Program Plan Objectives
• Programs and services comply with legal,
  regulatory and departmental mandates and enable
  NOAA and its partners to efficiently accomplish
  NOAA mission objectives.
• Process improvements enhance quality,
  cost-effectiveness and timeliness of services and
  reflect best management practices
• Acquisition and Grants timely awards, aligned
  with NOAAs mission effective oversight and
  administration to maximize outcomes.
• Financial and Administrative Services and
  systems compliance with legal/regulatory
  requirements enable informed management
  decision-making.
• Facilities safe, sustainable, and modern with
  increased opportunities for collaboration and
  integration within NOAA and with NOAAs partners.
• IT Secure, sound, and robust infrastructure and
  processes to advance NOAA mission leverages
  NOAA-wide economies of scale enhances workforce
  collaboration and sharing of data and knowledge.
• Workforce Management value-added systems and
  processes promoting both a highly-skilled
  workforce and Merit System principles in support
  of NOAA mission goals.

4
Overview

• FY09-FY13 Program Plan Achievements
• Acquisition and Grants Integrated and sustained
  BPR improvements
• Administrative Services Compliance with
  requirements HSPD-12, deemed exports,
  competitive sourcing, personal property.
• Facilities Completion/occupancy of major
  facility projects (Pacific Region Center and La
  Jolla) facility condition index improved through
  targeted restoration investments long-range
  planning process.
• Financial Services End-to-End Resource
  Management System implemented Budget BPR
  recommendations fully implemented/integrated.
• Information Technology Security/Certification
  Accreditation services integrated across NOAA
  NOAA Enterprise MIS implemented.
• Workforce Management WFM BPR recommendations
  partially implemented systems promote employee
  competency aligned with NOAA business
  requirements e-OPF implemented.

5
Overview

• FY09-FY13 Program Plan Shortfalls/Excesses
• NO EXCESSES!
• Program-Specific Shortfalls
• Administrative Services Unfunded/under-funded
  mandates with rising expectations/ requirements
  deemed exports, HSPD-12, personal property, and
  security/guard services.
• Facilities Inadequate recapitalization funding
  stream to support sustained execution of facility
  long term plan.
• Financial Services Unfunded requirements for
  Working Capital Fund full contribution and CBS
  system enhancements.
• Information Technology Unfunded requirements
  for redundancy in critical infrastructure (e.g.,
  single points of failure, network
  infrastructure, public web services, and
  electronic mail services). Need for
  fully-compliant CA and IT Security program.
  Inadequate resources to develop and execute
  long-range IT recapitalization/modernization plan
  and transformation of NOAAs web.
• Workforce Management Sustained funding stream
  for systems and programs (e.g., integrated human
  resources management system, learning management
  system and competency models).

6
Funding

• NOTES
• Fiscal and programming guidance concerning
  facility projects Pacific Region Center, La
  Jolla, Fairbanks BIGELOW homeporting
  improvements.
• Fiscal and programming guidance concerning
  transfer of funding from Leadership Sub-Goal to
  the Program Support Sub-Goal (Information
  Technology Services Program).

7
Details

• Strategy to Meet Sub-Goal Objectives and
  Fiscal/Programming Guidance
• Funds allocated in accordance with fiscal and
  programming guidance and in consideration of
  Annual Guidance Memo and Strategic Plan.
• Identified significant, extensive Gaps with no
  excess capacity and no capabilities that could be
  eliminated in out-years.
• Utilized the Program Operating Plans (POPs) to
  evaluate to what extent priorities could be
  accomplished within the Current Program and
  Revised Program funding detailed in Serial 3.
• Above Core requirements identified and
  prioritized.
• Reallocate resources and funding from Line
  Offices and Mission Goals to support major
  projects PRC and La Jolla.
• Maintain required programs and services to meet
  or exceed legal, regulatory and departmental
  mandates.
• Implement BPR recommendations, and create a
  climate of continuous process assessments that
  supports end-to-end business process improvements.

8
Details Desired End State (FY 09 and FY 13)and
Ability to Meet
Acquisition/Grants FY 09 FY 13
Sustainment of Grants on Line and Grants BPR G G
Fully implemented Acquisitions BPR Y Y
Integrated planning processes for acquisitions and grants AGO and NOAA customers Y Y
Rational work environment for AGO employees R Y
Administrative Services
Implement competitive sourcing feasibility study plan G G
Comply with deemed exports requirements G Y
Comply with HSPD-12 requirements Y Y
Comply with personal property program requirements Y Y
9
Details Desired End State (FY 09 and FY 13)and
Ability to Meet
Facilities FY 09 FY 13
Integrated long-range facility modernization planning G G
Sustained funding strategy to support long-term facility modernization requirements R R
Pacific Region Center, La Jolla, BIGELOW homeporting completed G G
Complete Pribilofs cleanup ongoing monitoring G G
Initiate redevelopment of Beaufort, WRC, Montlake, Norfolk, Miami R R
Financial Services FY 09 FY 13
Maintain clean audit opinion, no material findings G G
Implementation of E2E resource mgmt system G Y
CBS enhancements supported R R
10

Details Desired End State (FY 09 and FY 13)and
Ability to Meet
Information Technology FY 09 FY 13
Integrated Enterprise-level IT Security, including CA Y Y
Phased implementation/development of MIS G G
Sound, secure (and redundant) network/infrastructure R R
Long-range IT capital planning process R R
Implemented OneNOAA Web presence R R
Workforce Management
Robust workforce planning (including competency development) capabilities Y Y
Implementation of BPR recommendations (hiring training development) Y Y
Fully implemented HSPD-12 and e-OPF Y Y
11
Details

• How Program Capabilities Were Prioritized
• Priorities identified in NOAA 2006-2011 Strategic
  Plan, April 2005
• Recognized AGM and Fiscal/Program Guidance
  Priorities
• Emphasized need to sustain/maintain current
  capacities (assumes inflation increases to
  sustain capacities will be budgeted separately).
• Utilized POPs to evaluate capabilities and
  capacities across Mission Support at current and
  100 level.
• Items eliminated in FY08 DOC Passback
  re-evaluated.
• Evolving program requirements (Deemed Exports,
  HSPD-12, competitive sourcing feasibility
  studies) addressed.
• Integrated Priority Lists items evaluated for (a)
  applicability to Program Support and (b) priority
  against current program.

12
Details

• How Program Capabilities Were Integrated Across
  Programs
• Program capabilities analyzed for duplication,
  low priority services and/or availability of more
  cost effective methods of providing services.
• Integration across Program Support programs for
  select initiatives HSPD-12, personal
  property/Laptops/PII
• Facility requirements integrated with other
  program directions (fleet modernization, etc.)
  and balanced against other competing program
  priorities to ensure integration.

13
Compliance with Guidance
ISSUE Compliance
Provide recommendation for annual funding level for real property recapitalization. Include analysis and rationale for proposed level. Based on recommended funding level, develop recommendation for projects with start dates, to be funded ?
In coordination with Weather and Water and the National Weather Service, fund Weather Forecast Office (WFO) lease costs. Provide a plan for the WFO Facilities Management Staff. ?
Working with the Satellite sub-goal, provide plan for permanent solution to facility requirements for Fairbanks Command and Data Acquisition Station (CDAS). ?
Fund homeporting requirement for the Bigelow. ?
Provide details on impact of not implementing and cost to eliminate single points of failure for network infrastructure (ITS) ?
Mission Support goal to provide recommendation on the Commerce Business System (CBS) funding shortfall. ?
Various technical adjustments (inter-program realignments) ?
14
Compliance with Guidance
ISSUE Compliance
Working with all goals and subgoals who fund personnel who will occupy the PRC and La Jolla, transfer funding consistent with the proportion of the requirement generated by the goal from that goal to Mission support for the revised requirements. (Climate Goal is Above Core Satellite not discussed) ?
Fund IT Security Centralized Certification Accreditation (CA) (Listed in Above Core) ?
Complete implementation of e-OPF as mandated by OPM. (Listed in Above Core) ?
Implement Homeland Security Presidential Directive-12. (Listed in Above Core) ?
Develop competency models to develop/validate competencies in NOAA mission-critical occupations. (Listed in Above Core) ?
15
Compliance with Guidance Facility
Recapitalization Level

• Background Previous recommendation for
  sustained funding strategy for facility
  recapitalization/modernization was supported by
  NEP/NEC and reflected in Program Guidance.
• Serial 3 Guidance requires recommendation of (1)
  annual funding level, with rationale and
  analysis and (2) specific projects to be funded
  under this level (projects listed in backup).
• Recommendation of Methodology
• Adjusted Facility Recapitalization Rate (FRR)
  methodology Annual funding requirements
  calculated as aggregate Current Replacement Value
  (CRV) of NOAA owned facility portfolio divided by
  facility life.
• Research indicates 50 years average facility life
  as an accepted target---used by DoD and NASA.
• NOAA aggregate CRV (for owned facilities) is
  approximately 1.77B based on 2005 portfolio
  valuation.
• FRR (CRV) / 50 (years average facility life)
  35M for 2005.
• FRR must be adjusted annually based on
  re-valuation of aggregate CRV of NOAA-owned
  facility portfolio.
• Design and Engineering (DE) requirements also
  must be included to yield adjusted FRR.

16
Compliance with Guidance Facility
Recapitalization Level

• Total Facility Recapitalization Rate for program
  years

Phased implementation recommended FY 09 10.
See next slide

• Recapitalization methodology assumes that there
  is adequate funding available to address the
  sustainment and restoration requirements.
  Inadequate sustainment and restoration reduces
  facility life, accelerating need for
  recapitalization.

NEP/NEC Guidance Requested Accept Adjusted
Facility Recapitalization Rate (FRR) as
methodology for calculating recapitalization
requirements.
NEP/NEC Recommendation
17
Compliance with Guidance Facility
Recapitalization Projects

• Phased Implementation of Recapitalization
  Funding FY 09-10
• Projects previously identified in NOAA Facility
  Modernization Plan--Long-Range Facility Plan FY
  2008-2017

NEP/NEC Guidance Requested Approve phased
funding strategy and recommended projects to be
funded under strategy.
NEP/NEC Recommendation
18
Compliance with Guidance Single Points of
Failure

• Elimination of Single Points of Failure
• The elimination of single points of failure will
  improve NOAAs Silver Spring Metro Center (SSMC)
  network infrastructure, public web services
  (PWS), and electronic mail services.
• Not implementing will negatively impact NOAAs
  ability to accomplish its corporate priorities.
  Reduction of key services will impact NOAAs
  ability to deliver data products resulting in the
  inability for programs to meet their goals.
• Lack of or reduced Internet service will impact
  NOAAs ability to deliver its data products to
  all customers and the general public. This
  includes, but is not limited to, Life and
  Property data made available to the public via
  the Internet. For example, Hurricane Xs
  tracking data would not be available to the
  public.
• The reduction in tier 3 support will impact the
  Line Office local area networks (LANs) and
  increase the IT security risk to all NOAA
  systems, including networks.

19
Major Program Adjustments

• Major Program Adjustments (Compliance with
  Fiscal/Program Guidance)

20
Major Program AdjustmentsFunding for PRC
LaJolla Projects

• Program Guidance
• transfer funding consistent with the proportion
  of the requirement generated by the goal from
  that goal to Mission support for the revised
  requirements
• Benefit/Risk PRC Consolidates programs and
  replaces inadequate facilities large
  requirement impacts Mission Goal capability.
• La Jolla Provides safe facility,
  sustains programs and strategic program
  relationships large requirement impacts Mission
  Goal capability.
• Transfers from Mission Goals and satellite
  sub-goal based on planned occupancy (people) of
  facilities by Goal/Program

21
Major Program AdjustmentsFunding for PRC
LaJolla Projects (contd)

• Transfers to Program Support for PRC and La Jolla
  projects

PROPOSED ADJUSTMENTS
(M) FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13
Pacific Regional Center (PRC) (6.0) 61.3 68.9
La Jolla SW Fisheries Science Ctr (31.0) 50.0
TOTAL (37.0) 111.3 68.9
NEP/NEC Guidance Requested Accept proposed
adjustments to fund PRC and La Jolla projects as
approved by NEP/NEC.
NEP/NEC Recommendation
22
Major Program AdjustmentsFairbanks CDAS

• Fairbanks Command and Data Acquisition Station
• Background DoC Passback eliminated funding,
  based on no long-term primary use for facility
  beyond 2013. Alternative solution approved by
  NEP/NEC Temporary, modular buildings with
  shorter life span.
• Benefit/Risk Alternative most likely to get DoC
  support, but is only a temporary solution.
• Out-year costs (current estimate 20M-25M)
  beyond 2013 to shut down and dispose facility.
• Fund development of detailed implementation plan
  and refined cost estimates in FY07 through NESDIS
  PAC funding.
• PROPOSED ADJUSTMENT

(M) FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13
Fairbanks CDAS (10.0) 15.0
NEP/NEC Guidance Requested Accept proposed
adjustment to fund Fairbanks temporary solution.
NEP/NEC Recommendation
23
Major Program AdjustmentsBIGELOW Homeporting

• BIGELOW Homeporting
• Background BIGELOW commissioned in FY2006
  larger vessellonger, wider, and with a deeper
  draftthan ship replaced. Deeper draft requires
  dredging of the existing Woods Hole berthing area
  and channel. Existing pier and bulkhead need to
  be replaced to safely support ship operations.
• Benefit/Risk Leverages existing facilities and
  collaboration opportunities will require
  out-year, periodic dredging (1.5M every 10
  yrs.).
• PROPOSED ADJUSTMENT

(M) FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13
BIGELOW Homeporting 6.3 8.2
NEP/NEC Guidance Requested Accept proposed
adjustment to fund BIGELOW homeport improvements
(dredging and pier replacement).
NEP/NEC Recommendation
24
Above Core

• Rationale for Prioritization of Above Core
  Requirements
• Responsiveness to fiscal and program guidance
• Impact on accomplishment of program mission
  sustainment of capabilities vs. enhancement
• Current clarity of requirements
• Methodology for Prioritization
• Segregated ORF vs. PAC
• ORF 4 Tiers (1) Required to Comply with
  Fiscal/Program Guidance (2) - (4) based on
  mission impact and clarity of requirements
• PAC 2 Tiers based on mission impact and
  requirements clarity
• Impact and Risk of Not Funding Above Core
  Requirements Addressed in Individual Quad
  Charts in Backup Information
• Potential Unfunded Requirements (Not Currently
  Fully Defined)
• HSPD-12 (IT and Facility impacts)
• IT Recapitalization

25
Above Core RequirementsPrioritized ListORF

1. TIER ONE Compliance with Fiscal and Programming
   Guidance

NEP/NEC Guidance Requested Fund Tier One Above
Core items required for Compliance with
Fiscal/Programming Guidance.
NEP/NEC Recommendation
26
Above Core RequirementsPrioritized ListORF

1. TIER TWO Sustain Current Program Capabilities

NEP/NEC Guidance Requested Fund Tier Two Above
Core items required to sustain current program
capabilities.
NEP/NEC Recommendation
27
Above Core RequirementsPrioritized ListORF

1. TIER THREE Improve Current Program Capabilities

28
Above Core RequirementsPrioritized ListORF

• TIER FOUR Priorities

NOTE Requirements identified in this tier do
not necessarily mean the requirement itself is
lower priority, but may indicate additional
analysis is required, or other alternatives to
support capability exist.
29
Above Core RequirementsPrioritized ListPAC

• TIER ONE

1. TIER TWO

NEP/NEC Guidance Requested Fund Tier One (PAC)
Above Core level to support Facility
Recapitalization requirements.
NEP/NEC Recommendation
30
Backup Information
31
Above Core Quads Tier OneORF
Investments Required to Comply with Fiscal and
Programming Guidance
32
Compliance with Guidance -- ABOVE CORE
Electronic Official Personnel Files (e-OPF)
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING

• GOAL Program Support
• PROGRAM Workforce Management
• CAPABILITY HR Programs
• REQUIREMENT OPM (e-Gov Initiative)
• DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT
• Funding for annual licensing fees
• PERFORMANCE MEASURES
• Compliance with OPM milestones

BENEFITS AND RISKS

• If Adjustment made, employees have immediate
  access to personal data from any web browser
  NOAA has superior retrieval capability for COOP
  time for transfer of records reduced from weeks
  or months to near real time potential to free up
  FTE for higher priority HR activities.
• If Adjustment not made, e-OPF has no consistent
  funding source which could result in OPFs being
  inaccessible to HR staff and other NOAA
  employees. Funding would then be needed to print
  and reestablish paper OPFs to meet legal
  requirements and conduct HR operations.
• Risk LOs may not fund 100 back-file
  conversions prior to FY 2009 this would require
  Programs to make up the difference to meet OPM
  timeline of 50 by FY 08, 20 in FY 09-10, and
  10 in out years

ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES

• Annual licensing fee (272K) requires consistent
  funding source
• FY 06 Infrastructure established for e-OPF from
  01/01/06 forward
• FY 06 funds contributed by LO/SOs are sufficient
  to scan 44 of existing folders during FY 07-08
• US, COs, PPI, OAR, NMAO fully funded
• NMFS is 73 funded (56K needed to fully fund)
• NOS (79K), NWS (317K) (or appropriate Programs)
  must provide funding to meet OPM requirements
  between FY 07 and FY 11

33
Compliance with Guidance -- ABOVE
CORECentralized Certification Accreditation
(CA) Services
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING

• GOAL Program Support
• PROGRAM Information Technology Services
• CAPABILITY IT Security
• REQUIREMENT Centralized Certification
  Accreditation (CA) Services
• DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT Implement centralized
  CA team to ensure consistency in the review of
  CA packages, complete certification, and provide
  controls testing for each system prior to
  submission to Commerce
• PERFORMANCE MEASURES IT Security Incidents

BENEFITS AND RISKS
ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES

• If program adjustment is made
• Compliance with Federal Information Security
  Management Act (FISMA) and Commerce IT Security
  Policy
• Maintain 100 of NOAA IT systems that have a
  current CA
• If program adjustment is not made
• Out of compliance with July 12, 2006 OMB memo
  M-06-19 from Karen Evans (Ofc of E-Gov IT) that
  requires agencies to meet existing security
  requirements (e.g., correct security weaknesses
  in stead-state investments) before new funds are
  spent on system development, modernization, or
  enhancement
• Restrict public access to hazardous weather
  warnings and hurricane tracking information
  during peak demand periods when capability of
  enterprise security systems is exceeded
• Retain IT Security material weakness (DOC OIG)
• Delay implementation of IT Security Architecture
  by 2 to 3 years

• Standardize CA process throughout NOAA
  Oct 2007
• Capability of providing a suite of CA services
  Oct 2007
• Automate CA process Oct 2008
• Provide CA dashboard capability
  Mar 2009

34
Compliance with Guidance -- ABOVE CORE Develop
Competency Models
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING

• GOAL Program Support
• PROGRAM Workforce Management
• CAPABILITY Strategic Management of Human Capital
• REQUIREMENT 5 U.S.C. 1103(c) Human Capital
  Initiative of PMA E.O. 13352 (Cooperative
  Conservation)
• DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT
• Fund development of competency models for 25 of
  NOAAs highest priority and/or most populous job
  series and work roles to support workforce
  planning
• PERFORMANCE MEASURES
• Number of valid competency models developed

ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES

• FY 07- 08 WFMO works with contractor and LO/COs
  to develop/validate NOAA foundational competency
  model, DOC-assigned competency models, and other
  high-priority models using existing interagency
  agreement with OPM complete skills gap
  assessments for priority models
• FY 09 WFMO works with contractor and LO/COs to
  validate competency model for Cooperative
  Conservation Competencies and develop/validate an
  additional 5 competency models complete skills
  gap assessments for priority models
• FY 10-13 WFMO works with contractor and LO/COs
  to develop/validate an additional 5 competency
  models each year complete skills gap assessments
  for priority models
• Ease of using models for skills gap assessments
  and workforce planning dependent on nature of
  automated competency management system available

BENEFITS AND RISKS

• If Adjustment made, NOAA will be able to add 26
  validated competency models to those developed in
  FY 07 FY 08 increasing our ability to determine
  skills gaps and develop workforce plans to fill
  those gaps
• Filling skills gaps helps meet the AGM guidance
  for A more flexible, diverse and mobile
  workforce with minimal skill gaps
• Validated competency models can serve as a basis
  for valid QuickHire and interview questions,
  training needs assessments, succession planning,
  and other HR processes.
• If Adjustment not made, NOAA not having valid
  data to use for workforce planning (closing
  skills gaps), recruitment, training, other HR
  processes
• Barriers to implementation include the time
  resources required of NOAA managers employees
  to develop and validate models

35

Compliance with Guidance -- ABOVE CORE HSPD-12
(Workforce Management)
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING

• GOAL Program Support
• PROGRAM Workforce Management
• CAPABILITY Human Resources Programs
• REQUIREMENT Homeland Security Presidential
  Directive (HSPD)-12
• DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT
• 5 FTE and funding to support the human resource
  requirements created by HSPD-12
• PERFORMANCE MEASURES
• Timely security clearances
• Error rates
• Hiring cycle time

ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES

• FY09, Q2 Fill 5 ZS-IV personnel security
  positions
• Positions will
• Initiate and monitor process for all levels of
  security clearance requests for new employees
• Review and adjudicate pre-employment suitability
  investigation results with LO hiring officials
  (new with HSPD-12 post-employment suitability
  has been an on-going responsibility)
• Serve as PIV sponsor for all new hire actions
• Ensure that the appropriate on-line training is
  completed
• Complete appropriate activities related to
  badging and re-badging
• Other NOAA players include the IT Services,
  Administrative Services, and Facilities Programs

BENEFITS AND RISKS

• If adjustment made, MS-WMP able to process 100
  of new security requirements timely while
  carrying out on-going workload
• If adjustment not made, security-related work
  likely to be delayed while current staff works to
  keep up with volume and still carry out other HR
  activities quality and accuracy of all work
  suffers other HR activities (e.g., hiring)
  already being delayed to focus on security
• New employees may not be able to enter on duty in
  a timely fashion until all required security
  clearances are completed. High potential to lose
  candidates to other positions or agencies if
  process too slow
• In mid-1990s, MS-WMP gave up 6 FTE to DOC for
  security-related work. Work has returned with
  HSPD-12, but not the FTEs
• No direct dependencies on other programs

36
Compliance with Guidance -- ABOVE CORE HSPD-12
(Administrative Services)
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING

• GOAL Program Support
• PROGRAM Administrative Services
• CAPABILITY Logistics
• REQUIREMENT HSPD-12 Credentialing
• DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT Implementation of a
  new standardized credentialing process to comply
  with OMB-05-24
• PERFORMANCE MEASURES
• Number/percentage of employees and equipment
  processed annually to remain compliant

BENEFITS AND RISKS
ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES

• The program is designed to enhance security,
  reduce identity fraud, and protect personal
  privacy
• Personnel security at risk, identity fraud not
  deterred
• Risks/barriers to implementation interfaces to
  legacy systems

• DOC has selected the GSA Managed Service Office
  to implement the Program NOAA retains specific
  abjudication responsibilities
• Smartcards, background checks, card readers,
  servers, installation and maintenance, training
• Card implementation begins in October 2006 full
  implementation by October 2008
• FY09-FY13 primarily for ongoing maintenance,
  annual employee rebadging, logical access for
  computers, and equipment replacement and upgrades
  

37
Above Core QuadsTier OnePAC

• Investments
• Required to Fund Facility Recapitalization
  Requirements
• (using Facility Recapitalization Rate)

38
ABOVE CORE (PAC T-1) Facility Recapitalization
Requirements
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING

• GOAL Program Support
• PROGRAM Facilities
• CAPABILITY Construction
• REQUIREMENT Facility Recapitalization
• DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT Implementation of a
  sustained funding strategy to address NOAA
  facility recapitalization requirements
• PERFORMANCE MEASURES
• Improved portfolio facility condition index
• Elimination of substantial backlog of repair
  projects (50-60M)

BENEFITS AND RISKS
ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES

• Enables NOAA to replace owned facilities that
  have reached the end of their useful life.
• Provides modern, state-of-the-art, and safe
  working conditions
• Risks
• Funding level is substantial and will face severe
  budget challenge.
• Unclear where possible offsets would come, and at
  what expense.

• Phased implementation of funding level in FY
  09-10.
• Initial years funding supports (1) delineation
  of program of requirements and analysis of
  alternatives, and (2) design.
• Specific schedules and milestones for each
  project still need to be developed. High level
  implementation schedule reflected on next slide.

39
ABOVE CORE (PAC T-1) Facility Recapitalization
Requirements

• Projects Recommended Under Recapitalization
  Funding Projects previously identified in NOAA
  Facility Modernization Plan--Long-Range Facility
  Plan FY 2008-2017

Background
40
Above Core Quads Tier TwoORF
Investments Required to Sustain Current
Services/Capabilities
41
Sustain Current Capabilities--Above Core Guard
Service Contract
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING

• GOAL Program Support
• PROGRAM Administrative Services
• CAPABILITY Logistics
• REQUIREMENT NOAA-wide Guard Services Contracts
• DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT
• Funding to pay for three Guard Service contracts
  covering NCR, Boulder and Seattle
• PERFORMANCE MEASURES
• Proper physical security for NOAA facilities and
  staff
• Timely payment of contracts

BENEFITS AND RISKS
ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES

• Actual funding was previously provided through
  the Working Capital Fund, and was first requested
  in FY07. FY06 funding came via a reprogramming
  and a DOC subsidy. FY07 funding will be short
  by over 2.0M.
• Services to NOAA Programs will be reduced or
  Direct Billed, causing unacceptable loss of
  capability
• Required payments produce a shortfall for other
  critical Program Support requirements

• Contracts require funding in first quarter each
  year
• Guard Service is Must Pay for NOAA

42
Sustain Current Capabilities--Above Core
Working Capital Fund (Financial)
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING

• GOAL Program Support
• PROGRAM Financial Services
• CAPABILITY NOAA Centralized Payments
• REQUIREMENT Centralized Payments/WCF
• DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT
• Funding mechanism to process NOAA centralized
  payments
• PERFORMANCE MEASURES
• Accurate on-time end of year close out
• Timely allocation of appropriation

BENEFITS AND RISKS
ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES

• Actual funding for assessments have not kept pace
  with the bill
• Services to NOAA Programs will be reduced or
  Direct Billed, causing loss of capability
• Required payments produces a shortfall for other
  Common Services requirements as well

• DOC requires funding in first quarter each year
• WCF is Must Pay for NOAA

43
Sustain Current Capabilities--Above Core
Learning Management System
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING

• GOAL Program Support
• PROGRAM Workforce Management
• CAPABILITY Strategic Management of Human
  Capital
• REQUIREMENT 5 CFR BPR implementation
• DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT
• Fund the NOAA portion of the DOC Learning
  Management System including a competency
  management functionality
• PERFORMANCE MEASURES
• Compliance with OPM reporting requirements

BENEFITS AND RISKS
ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES

• If Adjustment made, NOAA will be able to fully
  support the new Training and Development business
  process to meet new OPM training data reporting
  requirements, provide cost-effective training to
  employees, and support the competency assessment
  and skills gap analysis required for workforce
  planning.
• If Adjustment not made, NOAA will not be assured
  of a having a business process and system to meet
  OPM data reporting requirements or to efficiently
  support workforce planning via competency
  management functionality funding would be
  dependent on direct bill.
• No dependencies on other programs

• FY 2007 Q1-Q2 DOC competition for LMS develop
  requirements for competency management module
• FY 2007 Q3-Q4 Implement new LMS
• FY 2008 Implement competency management module
• FY 09-13 Maintain LMS licenses

44
Program Support Above Core Commerce Business
SystemOracle Licenses
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING

• GOAL Program Support
• PROGRAM Financial Services
• CAPABILITY Accounting Services and Funds
  Management
• REQUIREMENT Commerce Business System
• DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT
• Oracle license renewal
• PERFORMANCE MEASURES
• Improved funds control
• Accurate and timely financial information

BENEFITS AND RISKS
ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES

• Supports new DOC Web Enabled CBS Application to
  NOAA
• Enables term purchases of Oracle Internet
  Application Server Licenses
• System at risk with obsolete software
• Above Core request serves as place holder until
  accurate costing is received from OCIO

• FY 2009 - 2013
• Two year term purchase of Oracle internet
  application server licenses to support NOAA users
  of CBS and Grants On Line

45
Sustain Current Capabilities--Above Core End to
End Resource Management System
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING

• GOAL Program Support
• PROGRAM Financial Services
• CAPABILITY PPBES Management Information System
• REQUIREMENT End to End Resource Management
  System
• DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT
• Maintenance and sustainment costs
• PERFORMANCE MEASURES
• Accurate and timely financial information for
  program managers

BENEFITS AND RISKS
ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES

• Provides improved budget development and
  production including budget justification and
  all necessary exhibits
• Enables interface with Commerce Business System
  and consolidates Reporting System
• Eliminates separate system inefficiency and
  costly labor-intensive processes
• Leverages integrated investment by connecting to
  mission support system support architecture for
  NOAAs planning, programming, budgeting and
  execution processes
• Fewer unlinked systems support all phases of
  PPBES

• FY 2009-FY 2013
• System Maintenance
• Implementation of operational system
• Improves the availability and quality of data
  available for PPBES

46
Sustain Current Capabilities--Above Core
Elimination of Single Points of Failure (SSMC
Network Infrastructure Public Web Services)
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING

• GOAL Program Support
• PROGRAM Information Technology Services
• CAPABILITY Enterprise Network Operations
• REQUIREMENT Elimination of Single Points of
  Failure in Silver Spring Metro Center (SSMC)
  Network Infrastructure and Public Web Services
  (PWS)
• DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT Implement
  fully-redundant SSMC network backbone with
  built-in failover, and mirrored web clusters at 7
  U.S. locations
• PERFORMANCE MEASURES Network and Application
  Services Availability

BENEFITS AND RISKS

• If program adjustment is not made
• NOAA data products (provided via SSMC and/or
  other locations) will become unavailable during a
  power failure or when construction/utility
  equipment (e.g., backhoe) severs the SSMC
  internet connection. For example, Hurricane Xs
  tracking data would not be available to the
  public during the time of need.
• Customers and the general public will become
  displeased with the data unavailability, which in
  turn becomes front-page, above-the-fold news in
  the Washington Post for weeks. Can NOAA afford
  the bad press and management of the resulting
  triage?
• Lack of or reduced Internet service will impact
  NOAAs ability to deliver its data products to
  all customers and the general public. This
  includes, but is not limited to, Life and
  Property data made available to the public via
  the Internet. Reduction of key services will
  impact NOAAs ability to deliver data products
  resulting in the inability for programs to meet
  their GPRA or corporate performance targets.
• IT security risks will increase on all NOAA
  systems, including networks.
• Dependency Public Web Services within the
  Weather Water Goal (via the Web Consolidation
  Initiative in NWS)

ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES

• Complete implementation of a 10 Gigabit Ethernet
  SSMC backbone 10 Gigabit Ethernet Wash DC
  metropolitan area network (MAN) 2011
• Complete hardening of the SSMC backbone in order
  to produce a 99.99 uptime network 2013

47
Supplemental Information
Information Relevant to Fiscal/Programming
Guidance
48
Compliance with Guidance -- ABOVE CORE HSPD-12
Proposed Five-Year Budget
HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget
ITEM Unit Cost FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Comments
Smartcard w/ PKI Credential - 17,600 (card replacement) Direct Bill? 110 0 0 1,936,000 0 0 Assumes initial issuance of all cards in FY2008 full replacement in FY2011 on 3-year refresh cycle
Smartcard w/ PKI Credential - 17,600 (card maintenance fee) Direct Bill? 51 897,600 897,600 897,600 897,600 897,600 NOAA Employee count (Feds, Commissioned Contractors) changed to 17,600 based on 10/17/06 MOC figures
Reissued cards Direct Bill? (10 of 17,600 per year 1,760) 110 193,600 193,600 0 193,600 193,600 10 employee turnover / lost cards
System Certification and Accreditation (ea) Required once every 3 years 250,000 250,000 0 0 250,000 0 CA on 3 year cycle. FY09 Initial CA 300,000. FY2010-2011 no CA costs. FY2012 Re-CA 200,000 (i.e., 67 of initial CA). FY2013 no CA costs.
49
Compliance with Guidance -- ABOVE CORE HSPD-12
Proposed Five-Year Budget
HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget (Continued) HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget (Continued) HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget (Continued) HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget (Continued) HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget (Continued) HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget (Continued) HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget (Continued) HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget (Continued) HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget (Continued)
ITEM Unit Cost FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Comments
Additional FTEs Administrative Services 144,000 432,000 432,000 432,000 432,000 432,000 3 additional FTEs needed for HSPD-12 support - NCR, Seattle and KC.
Additional FTEs - WFM 75,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 5 additional WFM FTEs will be required
TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS   2,148,200 1,898,200 3,640,600 2,148,200 1,898,200  
Cost per NOAA/ Contractor Employee   122 108 207 122 108
50
Compliance with GuidanceFacility
Recapitalization Level
Also measure and use facility utilization, OM
costs, and mission dependency.
51
Compliance with GuidanceFacility
Recapitalization Level

• Other budget development methods researched.
  Most are more applicable for estimating
  sustainment and restoration requirements rather
  than recapitalization.
• National Research Council (NRC) Recommended
  Percentage (2-4 of CRV)
• Facility Condition Index (FCI) (can lead to a
  recapitalization estimate)
• Deferred Maintenance/Repair Backlog
• Validated Repair Needs
• Facility Sustainment Model (FSM)
• Life Cycle Component Management (can lead to a
  recapitalization estimate)
• Other methods primarily used for project
  prioritization

52
Compliance with GuidanceElimination of Single
Points of Failure

• Action Item Eliminate Single Points of Failure
  Provide details on the impact of not
  implementing and cost to eliminate single points
  of failure
• Scope The elimination of single points of
  failure will improve NOAAs Silver Spring Metro
  Center (SSMC) network infrastructure, public web
  services (PWS), and electronic mail services.
• Impact of Not Implementing
• It will negatively impact NOAAs ability to
  accomplish its corporate priorities. Reduction of
  key services will impact NOAAs ability to
  deliver data products resulting in the inability
  for programs to meet their goals.
• The IT Services Program will be forced to
• Reduce the plans for email system redundancy and
  provide replication of email only for priority
  users
• Reduce the hardening of the SSMC backbone
• Abandon the optimal solution of providing a
  common infrastructure, redundancy, and diversity
  
• Extend the project timelines and scale back the
  functional requirements for current projects
• Extend system lifecycle refresh periods, thereby,
  limiting our ability to implement the 10 Gigabit
  Ethernet SSMC backbone and MAN networks or new
  requirements
• Reduce the implementation of PWS hardware and
  staff supporting the NOAA Continuity of
  Operations (COOP) Plan requirements
• Abandon the implementation of mirrored clusters
  (i.e., consolidated set of servers and storage
  devices) at 7 locations throughout the U.S.
• Lack of or reduced Internet service will impact
  NOAAs ability to deliver its data products to
  all customers and the general public. This
  includes, but is not limited to, Life and
  Property data made available to the public via
  the Internet. For example, Hurricane Xs
  tracking data would not be available to the
  public.
• The reduction in tier 3 support will impact the
  Line Office local area networks (LANs) and
  increase the IT security risk to all NOAA
  systems, including networks.
• Cost

Activity Project Managers or Subject Matter Experts Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Each Outyear
Elimination of Single Points of Failure in NOAAs Silver Spring Metro Center (SSMC) Network Infrastructure John Kyler, Bob Brunner 0.8M 0.8M 1.0M 1.0M 1.0M 1.0M
Elimination of Single Points of Failure in Public Web Services John Unekis, John Kyler, Chi Kang 1.2M 1.4M 0.9M 0.9M 0.9M 0.9M
Elimination of Single Points of Failure in Electronic Mail Services (including migration to Commerce-wide common email system) John Unekis, Don Holtzer 13.0M 4.8M 4.8M 4.8M 4.8M 4.8M
53
Compliance with GuidanceTransfer of LO CIO
Operating Funds
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING

• GOAL Program Support
• PROGRAM Information Technology Services
• CAPABILITIES IT Security, Enterprise Network
  Operations, Enterprise Architecture, IT Support
  for Administrative Systems, IT Administration and
  Regulation
• REQUIREMENT Transfer of Line Office (LO) CIO
  Operating Budgets from LO Headquarters Program to
  IT Services Program
• DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT Transfer of funding
  will allow the IT Services Program to improve
  performance through the IT Administration and
  Regulation, IT Security, Enterprise Network
  Operations, Enterprise Architecture, and IT
  Support for Administrative Systems capabilities.
• PERFORMANCE MEASURES IT Security Incidents
  Network and Application Services Availability,
  Capability Maturity Model Score

ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES
BENEFITS AND RISKS

• Provide CA dashboard capability 2009
• NEMIS data storage acquisition, product
  inventories, analysis, Suite 2 dashboard
  instruments 2009
• Complete phase 2 of the consolidated electronic
  mail system, including complete redundancy and
  replication of data for all users 2010
• Complete hardening of the SSMC backbone and
  NOAAnet in order to produce a 99.99 uptime
  network 2013

• If program adjustment is made Provide
  centralized administration and management of IT
  Services across NOAA

54
Compliance with GuidanceTransfer of Funding
from OCIO to PS/ITS
Information Technology Services Program (MS-ITS) CURRENT PROGRAM - FUNDING (K)including Transfer of LO CIO Operating Funds CURRENT PROGRAM - FUNDING (K)including Transfer of LO CIO Operating Funds CURRENT PROGRAM - FUNDING (K)including Transfer of LO CIO Operating Funds CURRENT PROGRAM - FUNDING (K)including Transfer of LO CIO Operating Funds CURRENT PROGRAM - FUNDING (K)including Transfer of LO CIO Operating Funds CURRENT PROGRAM - FUNDING (K)including Transfer of LO CIO Operating Funds CURRENT PROGRAM - FUNDING (K)including Transfer of LO CIO Operating Funds CURRENT PROGRAM - FUNDING (K)including Transfer of LO CIO Operating Funds Amount from LO CIO
Capability FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 Amount from LO CIO
MS-ITS-ADI IT Administration and Regulation 1650 1650 1650 4052 4052 4052 4052 4052 2402
MS-ITS-SEI IT Security 1000 3050 3050 7637 7637 7637 7637 7637 2587
MS-ITS-NET Enterprise Network Operations 5123 5123 5123 9760 9760 9760 9760 9760 4637
MS-ITS-ARC Enterprise Architecture 216 216 216 2263 2263 2263 2263 2263 1047
MS-ITS-SPT IT Support for Administrative Systems 15961 16132 16132 20515 20515 19661 19661 19661 4201
TOTAL FUNDING 23950 26171 26171 44227 44227 43373 43373 43373 14874
55
Compliance with GuidanceRecommendation on CBS
Funding Shortfall

• CBS Current Shortfall

CBS Requirements ( in millions) FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Comments
Server Consolidation 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5 0.0 - Supports NOAA contribution to Census - Cost of software license maintenance - Telecommunication cost to Census
New Accounting System .9 .9 5.9 27.0 34.0 - Supports study for new system - Conversion of Data Training - Implementation of new system
Enhancements to System 3.5 2.0 2.0 1.3 1.3 -HS-PD12 (modifying CBS, Data warehouse, Travel Manager, etc to accept authorization from this card) - NOAA Integration and Data Storage - Full implementation of Commitment Accounting - Migration to DOC web portal
Total CBS Shortfall 6.8 5.3 10.4 30.8 35.3
56
Compliance with GuidanceRecommendation on CBS
Funding Shortfall

• Recommendations for Funding CBS Shortfall

CBS Requirement Alternatives for Funding Shortfall
Server Consolidation Reduce services to NOAA customers Reduce funding to the Information Technology Center (ITC)
New Accounting System CBS Base Funding Increase -Transitional cost associated with moving to new DOC consolidated accounting system exceed the current CBS base funding Eliminate current services to NOAA customers - Stop funding for all maintenance and administrative efforts, help desk support, system testing and training efforts on the current system
Enhancements to System Eliminate support for HS-PD12 within CBS suite of applications - Suspend modification to accommodate security verification Reduce services to NOAA customer - Decrease access to timely financial data
57
Compliance with GuidanceUpdate Capabilities
ProfileFinancial Services
Current Capabilities Profile
ITEM FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 TOTALS
MS-FIN Accounting Services and Funds Management 23,347 23,347 23,347 23,347 23,347 23,347
MS-FIN Develop and Defend Budget 1,638 1,638 1,638 1,638 1,638 1,638
MS-FIN NMA Resource Management 9,831 9,831 9,796 9,796 9,796 9,796
MS-FIN PPBES Management Information System 4,380 4,380 4,380 4,380 4,380 4,380
MS-FIN NOAA Centralized Payments 34,425 34,425 34,425 34,425 34,425 34,425
Total Current Program 73,621 73,621 73,586 73,586 73,586 73,586
Updated Current Capabilities Profile
ITEM FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 TOTALS
MS-FIN Accounting Services and Funds Management 26,411 26,411 26,411 26,411 26,411 26,411
MS-FIN Develop and Defend Budget 1,743 1,743 1,743 1,743 1,743 1,743
MS-FIN NMA Resource Management 9,040 9,040 9,040 9,005 9,005 9,005
MS-FIN PPBES Management Information System 2,002 2,002 2,002 2,002 2,002 2,002
MS-FIN NOAA Centralized Payments 34,425 34,425 34,425 34,425 34,425 34,425
Total Current Program 73,621 73,621 73,586 73,586 73,586 73,586
58
Above Core QuadsTier 3 4 (ORF) Tier 2 (PAC)
59
Program Support Above Core (T-3) Business
Process Reengineering
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING

• GOAL Program Support
• PROGRAM Administrative Services
• CAPABILITY Office of the NOAA Chief
  Administrative Officer
• REQUIREMENT Business Process Reengineering (BPR)
• DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT Designate continuing
  direct funding for the Business Process
  Reengineering effort. BPR depends on personnel
  detailed from the Line and Staff Offices, and
  direct billing of the LO/SO programs for staffing
  and funding. This adjustment would provide direct
  funding for contract support. 
• PERFORMANCE MEASURES
• As Is evaluations completed
• To Be evaluations completed
• Recommendations implemented

BENEFITS AND RISKS
ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES

• Would provide the ability to
• Complete the reengineering effort on any
  remaining financial and administrative service
  areas
• Conduct continuous improvement for financial and
  administrative processes already reengineered.
• BPR activities risk delay during Government
  Continuing Resolution due to reliance on
  contractor funding in 1st quarter

• FY09 Financial Services Phase 3
  Information Technology Phase 4
• FY10 Financial Services Phase 4
• FY11-FY13 No projects scheduled
• The assumption is that the Safety and Facilities
  Programs have already completed internal BPR
  activities.

60
Program Support Above Core (T-3) Commerce
Business System (CBS)Server Consolidation
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING

• GOAL Program Support
• PROGRAM Financial Services
• CAPABILITY Accounting Services and Funds
  Management
• REQUIREMENT Commerce Business System
• DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT
• Server Consolidation Project
• PERFORMANCE MEASURES
• Improved funds control
• Accurate and timely financial information

BENEFITS AND RISKS
ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES

• FY 2008
• Commerce Business System moves from IT Services
  to Census Data Center
• FY 2009
• Consolidation of CBS technology architecture
• Supports NOAA contribution to Census facility
• Ensure software license maintenance for software
  installed at Census

• Ensures software license maintenance for software
  installed at Census location
• Consolidates CBS technology architecture
• Without enhancements to the current CBS system,
  NOAA managers will not have access to timely
  financial data necessary to make informed
  programmatic decisions
• Supports the NOAA contribution to Census facility
  and includes telecommunications cost for
  developers and administrators

61
Program Support Above Core (T-3) Commerce
Business System Funds Control Enhancements
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING

• GOAL Program Support
• PROGRAM Financial Services
• CAPABILITY Accounting Services and Funds
  Management
• REQUIREMENT Commerce Business System
• DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT
• Enhancement to Commerce Business System
• PERFORMANCE MEASURES
• Improved funds control
• Accurate and timely financial information

BENEFITS AND RISKS
ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES

• To improve management of funding, NOAA needs to
  implement commitment accounting
• Implementation of E-Travel will enable NOAA to
  meet the PMA requirement, which will simplify
  Federal travel management
• Without enhancements to the current CBS system,
  NOAA managers will not have access to timely
  financial data necessary to make informed
  programmatic decisions

• FY 2009 FY 2013
• Implementation of commitment accounting
• Staffing will be increased to meet accelerating
  reporting requirements
• Migration to DOC Business web portal
• Implementation of Reimbursable module to monitor
  and control Reimbursable funding
• Development of an automated accounting module

62
Program Support Above Core (T-3) Technology
Refresh Desktop Management
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING

• GOAL Program Support
• PROGRAM Information Technology Services
• CAPABILITIES IT Security, Enterprise Network
  Operations, Enterprise Architecture, IT Support
  for Administrative Systems, IT Administration and
  Regulation
• REQUIREMENT Technology Refresh Desktop
  Management
• DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT Technology Refresh
  Desktop Management for NOAA Computer Incident
  Response Team, Information Technology Center,
  Network Operations Center, Web Operations Center,
  Messaging Operations Center, OS LAN / Systems
  Support, and OCIO
• PERFORMANCE MEASURES IT Security Incidents,
  Network and Application Services Availability,
  Capability Maturity Model Score

BENEFITS AND RISKS
ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES

• If program adjustment is made Meet recommended
  system lifecycle refresh requirements
• If program adjustment is not made
• Extend system lifecycle refresh period from 3
  years to 5 years
• Extend timelines and scale back functional
  requirements for current projects

• Technology Refresh Oct 2008 Sep 2013
• Desktop Management Oct 2008 Sep 2013

63
Program Support Above Core (T-3) Human
Resources Information System
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING

• GOAL Program Support
• PROGRAM Workforce Management
• CAPABILITY HR Programs
• REQUIREMENT BPR recommendation e-Gov
  Initiative
• DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT
• HRIS is an enhancement to the current NFC payroll
  system that supports automated processing of HR
  actions (e.g., SF-52-s)
• PERFORMANCE MEASURES
• of actions resulting in processing errors
• Hiring cycle time

BENEFITS AND RISKS
ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES

• If Adjustment made, HR actions can be initiated
  in LO/COs, automatically routed for approval and
  action, and automatically fed into the NFC
  system. This will reduce hiring cycle time, lost
  paperwork, processing errors due to rekeying and
  use of drop-down menus.
• If Adjustment not made, BPR recommendations will
  not be maximized and current situation will
  continue.
• No dependencies on other programs

• FY 07-08 Work with DOC and NFC on systems
  requirements and develop implementation plan
• FY 09 Implement HRIS
• FY 10-13 Maintain system license

64
Program Support Above Core (T-3) Mandated
Administrative Services
PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING

• GOAL Program Support
• PROGRAM Administrative Services
• CAPABILITY CAO, AICIM, LOG
• REQUIREMENT Mandated Administrative Services
• DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT A number of unfunded
  mandates have been imposed on MS-ADS that have
  strained existing resources to the point where
  other critical services are being degraded.
  Dedicated funding and FTE for these activities
  are required 
• PERFORMANCE MEASURES
• Deemed Export requirements are met.
• Personal Property program and audit requirements
  are met.
• FOIA requirements are met.
• Audit Liaison requirements are met.

BENEFITS AND RISKS
ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE MILESTONES

• Failure to provide additional FTE and funding
  will result in continued degradation of existing
  services, many of which are critical.
• Dedicated FTE and resources will ensure NOAAs
  ability to meet legal and regulatory mandates,
  both timely and effectively, and achieve clean
  audits.

• Contracts requir