Title: Evaluation of South Carolina
1Evaluation of South Carolinas Reading First
(SCRF) Initiative
- Achievement and Survey Results from the First
Three Years - Presented at the American Educational Research
Associations Annual Meeting - March 27, 2008
2Diane M. Monrad, PhD Sarah J. Gareau,
MEd Jennifer Gay Diana Mindrila Anita Rawls
- Tammiee S. Dickenson, PhD
- Robert L. Johnson, PhD
- Heather L. Bennett, MSW
- Katie A. Sesso-Dahlke, MSW
- Brett Ermer
- Mugdha Galande
- Joanna Gilmore
- Jessalyn Smith
Pam Wills Patricia Branham Becca Driggers Diane
Dunham, EdS
3Overview
- SCRF evaluation
- Data sources
- Achievement data
- Participant group survey results
- Conclusions
4SCRF Evaluation
5Participants
- 2004-2005 served 52 schools in 24 districts
(approximately 12,000 students) - 2005-2006 served 51 schools in 23 districts
(approximately 11,000 students) - 2006-2007 served 49 schools in 23 districts
(approximately 10,500 students)
6Data Sources
- Stanford Reading First assessment
- Palmetto Achievement Challenge Test (PACT)
- Participant group surveys
- School Leadership Team (SLT) surveys
- Professional development workshop surveys
7Annual SLT Presentation
- Results presented from previous year
- Stanford Reading First assessment results
- Cohort analysis of all students in previous year
- Matched analysis of students in all years
- Individual school reports provided
- Participant group survey results
- Formative feedback for program improvement
8Stanford Reading First Assessment
- Measures achievement in grades 1 through 3
- Sections
- Multiple choice (components phonemic awareness
phonics vocabulary development reading fluency
and reading comprehension strategies) - Oral fluency (components speaking vocabulary
and oral reading fluency)
9Results At Grade Level (AGL) Grade 1
Percentage of SCRF Grade 1 Students Scoring At
Grade Level (AGL) on Stanford Reading First and
Annual Gains
Fall Spring Annual Gain
Year 1 17.0 48.2 31.2
Year 2 18.8 51.2 32.4
Year 3 21.1 54.3 33.2
10Results At Grade Level (AGL) Grade 2
Percentage of SCRF Grade 2 Students Scoring At
Grade Level (AGL) on Stanford Reading First and
Annual Gains
Fall Spring Annual Gain
Year 1 30.8 35.5 4.7
Year 2 35.7 40.4 4.7
Year 3 38.0 44.6 6.6
11Results At Grade Level (AGL) Grade 3
Percentage of SCRF Grade 3 Students Scoring At
Grade Level (AGL) on Stanford Reading First and
Annual Gains
Fall Spring Annual Gain
Year 1 21.0 41.5 20.5
Year 2 25.2 46.2 21.0
Year 3 27.6 49.0 21.4
12Average NCE Scores on Stanford Reading First for
SCRF Students with AGL Reference Line
13Average Scale Scores on Stanford Reading First
for SCRF Students and the Norm Group
14Participant Group Surveys
- Respondent groups interventionists, literacy
coaches, principals, and teachers - Sections implementation, level of support, roles
and responsibilities, professional development,
and program effectiveness - Comparison across years (2005-2006 compared to
2006-2007)
15Results Participant Group Surveys
- Better understanding of program goals
- Reported a high rate of involvement in
professional development activities and found
those activities helpful - Decrease in the need for professional development
about the program and use of assessments - Increased need for professional development on
effective instructional strategies to use for
students below grade level
16Implementation Survey Items
17Implementation Survey Items (Cont.)
18Describe One Benefit of the SCRF Initiative
- Commonly cited benefits across groups
- Focus on assessment
- Increased awareness of students
needs/strengths/weaknesses - Progress monitoring Dominie
- Improved use of assessments use of assessment
data to guide instruction - Resources
- Additional books and materials
- Extra funding/money
- Professional development study groups
- Increased collaboration
- Learned new strategies
19Results Participant Recommendations
20Results Effectiveness Ratings
83.1 of teachers rated SCRF as effective or very effective. 88.1 of interventionists rated SCRF as effective or very effective. 81.8 of literacy coaches rated SCRF as effective or very effective. 90.9 of principals rated SCRF as effective or very effective.
21Conclusions Achievement
- Students performed better on the Stanford Reading
First assessment in the 2006-2007 school year as
compared with the 2005-2006 school year. - Students scores on the Stanford Reading First
assessment improved from fall to spring in all
three years for all grade levels. - The largest gains were made by students in grade
1 and the lowest gains occurred in grade 2 in
2006-2007, which is also consistent with the last
two years.
22Conclusions Participant Groups
- Program participants have a better understanding
of program goals. - Participant groups find professional development
useful. - Over 80 of each participant group rated the
initiative as either effective or very effective
in Years 2 and 3.
23Recommendations
- More time for sustained reading for students in
grade 2 - Additional strategies for working with students
below grade level - Participant groups suggestions regarding study
groups
24Contact Information
- South Carolina Educational Policy Center
- University of South Carolina, College of
Education - Wardlaw Suite 010, Columbia, SC 29208
- P 803-777-8244
- F 803-777-0220
- E dmonrad_at_gwm.sc.edu (Diane Monrad)
- Office of Program Evaluation
- University of South Carolina, College of
Education - Wardlaw Suite 023, Columbia, SC 29208
- P 803-777-3402
- F 803-777-8838
- E tsdicken_at_gwm.sc.edu (Tammiee Dickenson)