Title: Global DNA Databasing Policy: Annual Legislative Update
1 Global DNA Databasing Policy Annual
Legislative Update DNA Interoperability Policy
Presented by Tim Schellberg, President
GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL Governmental
Affairs Washington, DC (202)
258-2301 Tacoma, WA (253) 620-6500
Asian Forensic Sciences Network 2010 Annual
Meeting SymposiumBrunei1-3 June 2010
2Washington, DC Tacoma, Washington
3Why Offender DNA Databases?
- SOLVE MORE CRIME
- PREVENT MORE CRIME
- EXONERATE THE INNOCENT
- COST / BENEFIT
4Have Your Lawmakers Created Robust Database
Policy?Offender Database Size Controls the Hit
Rates
- Estimates
- Sex offenders 5
- Sex offenders Violent offenders
10 - Sex offenders, Violent offenders and Property
crimes 20 - All crimes 45
- All arrestees 60
5Politics of DNA Databases
- Decisions controlled by top Government officials.
Legislation required in most countries. - Crime Control vs. Privacy
6The World is Positioning for Explosive Growth of
Offender DNA Database Programs
- 2000 6 of the worlds population has passed
and implemented offender DNA database
legislation/policy (United States and United
Kingdom) -
- 2010 30 of the worlds population has passed
and implemented offender DNA database
legislation/policy - Largest countries added between 2000 and 2010
China, Germany, France and Spain - 2015 60 of the worlds population will have
passed and implemented offender DNA database
legislation/policy. - Largest countries with offender DNA database
Legislation/Policy positioned to be passed and
implemented by 2015 India, Brazil, Russia, and
many Asian countries - How many total samples will there be in 2015 or
2020? - 2010 20 million 50 from the US and UK
7????North America Central America South
America Europe Middle East Africa
Asia Australia Oceania????
Global Legislative Update
8 International.DNAresource.com
- Comprehensive and up-to-date information on DNA
database programs worldwide. - Color-coded for easy recognition of database
status - Country profiles include DNA database criteria
and technical specifics - Continuously updated resources to include laws,
amendments, news articles, and other external
information
9NORTH AMERICA
10United States
Legislative focus on changing laws from convicted
offenders to arrestees
- Until recently the United States focused just on
convicted offenders - In 2004 only 3 states collected DNA from arrested
criminals - Today, 23 states collected DNA from arrested
criminals - Laws allow for profile destruction if not
convicted Compare to the United Kingdom law. - President Obama announces support of arrestee
testing. New federal legislation to promote
arrestee testing in the states
http//link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid70
069263001?bclid69917219001bctid70456124001
11EUROPE
12Europe
- Legislation passed in the last 12 months
- Italy - Convicted offenders Passed June 2009
- Greece Convicted offenders Passed August 2009
- Macedonia - Convicted and arrested offenders
Passed August 2009 - Whos Next?
- Ireland
- Belarus
- Czech Republic
- Lithuania
13- Arrestee policy
- European Court of Human Rights strikes down UK
policy of permanent retention - New coalition government in UK is headed towards
destruction policy - Big implications for all other European
Countries - Prüm
- Implementation of Prüm is primary focus in Europe
UK Prime Minister, David Cameron Deputy Prime
Minister Nick Clegg
European Court
14ASIA
15Asia
- Aggressive expansion in offender DNA databasing
- Large Countries have begun or will soon begin
offender testing - China (20 of world population), India (17 of
world population), Japan (1.9 of world
population), South Korea (.73 percent of world
population) - Who is next?
- India
- Legislation positioned to pass in 2010
- Priority for new leadership
- Thailand
- Legislation being drafted.
- CODIS being Considered
- Vietnam
- Offender database policies being developed
- CODIS being considered
16AFRICA
17Africa
- Mauritius
- Passed June 2009
- Who is next?
- South Africa
- Nigeria
- Kenya
- Ghana
18SOUTH AMERICA
19South America
- Chile - Legislation passed in 2009
- Limited to violent convicted offenders
- Implementation expected soon
- Brazil
- Worlds second largest installation of CODIS (16
locations) - May 17, 2010 - Databasing legislation expected in late 2010
-
20Summary of Key International DNA Database Policy
Issues
- Arrestee Databases
- Arrestee Sample Profile Destruction
- Familial Searching
- Significant benefits - UK has used it 185 times
and has solved 33 serious crimes - Privacy concerns causing limited use
-
21The Prüm Treaty A lesson in International
Forensic Cooperation
Prüm, Germany (Western Germany)Treaty signed
May, 2005
22What Is the Prüm Treaty?
- Cross-Border Cooperation to Automate the Exchange
of - DNA
- Fingerprints
- Vehicle registrations
- Policy Objectives
- Increase cross-border cooperation
- Combat terrorism
- Reduce illegal migration
23What is the Prüm Treaty (Contd)
- No central database will exist
- Each national database will only be compared
against each other - Policy The EU is organized to maintain a strong
sense of independent national sovereignty in
criminal justice matters. -
- Hits in Prüm
- Daily hit report No personal data
- Personal data only shared after going through
legal assistance procedures - Policy
- Governments very protective of citizen data
- Law enforcement and judicial difference between
countries
24Who Will Participate?
- Treaty Originally signed by
- Austria, Germany, the Netherlands, Luxemburg,
Belgium, France, and Spain - Early cross-border tests between Netherlands,
Austria and Germany established the momentum for
Prüm - European Union (EU) coverts Prüm Treaty into EU
mandate - Council Decision 2008/615616/JHA -
June 2008 - All 27 Countries of the EU
- Implementation mandate by August, 2011
- Non-EU European Countries Switzerland, Norway,
Liechtenstein and Iceland permitted to join Prüm - FBI Develops CODIS 7.0 with Prüm in mind
25How Prüm Works
Joint development by Germany, Austria, and the
Netherlands
Credit Dr. Kees van der Beek
26How Prüm Works (Contd)
TESTA Network
Credit Dr. Kees van der Beek
27Prüm Inclusion Rules
- At least 6 of the 7 ESS-Loci for known persons
- ESS European Standard Set European agreement
to use 7 common Loci adopted by the European
Network of Forensic Science Institutes (ENFSI) in
1999 Expanded to 12 loci in 2009 - At least 6 loci for crime scene stains
- No mixed profiles (only 2 values per locus)
- No profiles that a country does not want to make
available (e.g. Elimination samples, suspect
samples, etc.)
Credit Dr. Kees van der Beek
28Prüm Matching Rules
- At least 6 fully matching loci
- 1 mismathcing allele allowed (near match)
- 1 basepair difference allowed (microvariants)
Credit Dr. Kees van der Beek
29Adventitious Matches An expected consequence of
Prüm
- ESS of 7 loci was created for smaller separate
individual DNA database searches - Prüm creates searching in multiple databases that
could exceed tens of millions - Result Numerous adventitious matches will occur
Example Netherlands - Germany Search Comparing
20,000 Dutch casework samples against 500,000
German database samples will lead to over 100
adventitious matches many more when compared to
all of Europe
30Adventitious Matches (Contd)
- Long-Term Fix
- ESS for loci raised from 7 to 12
- Little impact on adventitious matches in the
short-term - EU policy
- Expect adventitious matches.
- Do not assume a true hit unless other types of
evidence exists
31Prüm Lessons Learned for Asia
- ENFSI EU have a long history of collaborating
and developing forensic standards. - HOWEVER, ENFSI or the EU did not envision large
automated European wide sharing when choosing 7
loci as the original ESS.
- ASIA ADVANTAGE
- Large scale databasing is just now starting.
- Asian Forensic Science Network, and the Regional
East Asia Forensic DNA Workgroup have organized
to create the forum for discussion.
- PRÜM AS A MOTIVATOR
- How cross-border automated sharing can work.
- Caution - Plan for the future
- Collect from a large standard set of loci.
- Develop database standards that make future
cross-border searching interoperable and
efficient.
32Acknowledgements
- We would like to thank the following individuals
- Dr.Ir. C.P. (Kees) van der Beek, MBA
- Custodian, Dutch DNA-databaseEuropean Network
of Forensic Science Institutes - Peter SchneiderInstitute of Legal
MedicineUniversity Hospital of Cologne, Germany
33Thank You
www.dnaresource.com tims_at_gth-gov.com