Growing evidence for the effectiveness of FXa inhibition - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Growing evidence for the effectiveness of FXa inhibition

Description:

Title: No Slide Title Author: Novo Nordisk A/S Last modified by: STIENON 4 Created Date: 9/16/1998 1:36:46 PM Document presentation format: Diapositives 35 mm – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:122
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: Novo57
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Growing evidence for the effectiveness of FXa inhibition


1
Growing evidence for the effectiveness of FXa
inhibition
Professor Cedric HERMANS MD, MRCP(UK),
PhD Division of Haematology Cliniques
universitaires Saint-Luc 1200 Brussels
2
Conflicts of interests
  • Participation in advisory
  • boards and consulting activities for anti-Xa and
    anti-IIa anticoagulants
  • (Bayer Schering Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim)

3
Coagulation cascade
Thrombin (IIa)
Fibrinogen
Fibrin
4
Classic theory of the coagulation cascade
Contact Phase - FXII
Tissue Factor FVIIa
FXI
FIX FVIII
Extrinsic pathway
Intrinsic pathway
FX
Common pathway
FV
Thrombin
FIBRIN CLOT
5
Steps in blood coagulation


Steps in coagulation

Inhibition

TFPI
Initiation
TF/
VIIa
X
IX
Amplification
VIII
IXa
Xa
Antithrombin PC/PS
Va
II

Propagation
IIa
Antithrombin

Fibrinogen
Fibrin
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
Sites of action of new anticoagulants
FT/VIIa
PARENTERAL
ORAL
X
IX
IXa
VIIIa
DIRECT
INDIRECT
Va
Antithrombin
Rivaroxaban and others
Fondaparinux Idraparinux
Xa
II
DIRECT
Dabigatran and others
IIa
Fibrinogen
Fibrin
9
Pentasaccharide (Arixtra - Fondaparinux)
Extrinsic pathway
Intrinsic pathway
3
1
2
Xa
Xa
ATIII
ATIII
ATIII
Arixtra
IIa
II
Fibrin clot
Fibrinogen
Pentasaccharide sequence of heparin (present in
UFH and LMWH) binds to AT causing conformational
change at its reactive centre accelerating
1000-fold its interaction with factor Xa.
Olson ST, et al. J. Biol. Chem. 1992
2671252812538.
10
Coagulation cascade and targets of new oral
anticoagulants
11
Rivaroxaban (XARELTO Bayer Schering) Anti-Xa
  • Direct, specific, competitive Factor Xa inhibitor
  • Inhibits free and fibrin-bound Factor Xa activity
    and prothrombinase activity
  • Inhibits thrombin generation
  • No direct effect on platelet aggregation, and
    thus, on primary haemostasis
  • Bioavailibility 80100
  • Cmax at 24 h
  • one-third excreted as unchanged active
    substance in urine
  • Of the two-thirds metabolized half eliminated
    renally, half eliminated by faecal route


Roehrig S et al. J Med Chem 20054859008
Perzborn E et al. J Thromb Haemost 2005351421.
12
Dabigatran etexilate (Pradaxa Boehringer
Ingelheim) Anti-IIa (Thrombin)
  • After oral administration, the prodrug dabigatran
    etexilate is rapidly converted to dabigatran, a
    potent reversible Direct Thrombin Inhibitor (DTI)
  • Absolute bioavailability 6.5
  • Fast onset of action (Cmax within 2h)
  • Not metabolized by CYP450 / Renal excretion 80
  • Half life 12-17 hours
  • Low potential for drug-drug interactions, no
    drug-food interactions
  • Potent antithrombotic effects are achieved by
    specifically blocking the activity of thrombin
    (both free and clot-bound)

13
NEW versus OLD anticoagulants
LMWH Vitamin K Antagonist
Pradaxa
Xarelto
Synthetic Per os One or two tablet(s) / day No
monitoring No or little food/drug interaction
14
Anti-Xa versus Anti-IIa
15
Many targets for new anticoagulants Why target
Factor Xa?
Oral
Parenteral
TF/FactorVIIa
TFPI (tifacogin)
TTP889
X
IX
IXa
APC (drotrecogin alfa) sTM (ART-123)
VIIIa
RivaroxabanApixabanYM150 LY517717 Edoxaban
(DU-176b)Betrixaban (PRT054021)
Va
AT
Factor Xa
FondaparinuxIdrabiotaparinux
DX-9065aOtamixaban
II
XimelagatranDabigatran
Factor IIa
Fibrin
Fibrinogen
Adapted from Weitz Bates. J Thromb Haemost
2005 Gross Weitz. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc
Biol 2008 Carriero Ansell. Expert Opin
Investig Drugs 2008
16
Oral, direct FXa inhibitors in development
  • Rivaroxaban Bayer and Scios
  • LY517717 Lilly
  • YM150 Astellas
  • DU-176b Daiichi Sankyo
  • Apixaban BMS et Pfizer
  • 813893 GSK
  • PRT-054021 Portola

17
Why is FXa an attrative target for new
anticoagulants?
  • LOCATION of FXa in the coagulation cascade
  • Arixtra gt LMWH gt UFH (degree of inhibition of
    FXa)
  • Inhibition of thrombin deleterious consequences
  • Larger therapeutic window with Xa inhibition ?
  • Results of clinical trials ?
  • BUT no head-to-head comparison (anti-Xa versus
    anti-IIa)

18
InitiationAmplificationPropagation
Reason 1 Central role of FXa in the coagulation
cascade
19
Targets of new anticoagulants FXa or FIIa
(Thrombin)
Fibrinogen
TF
Thrombus
Thrombin
FVIIa
FXa
FVa
20
Inhibition of 1 unit of Xa prevents generation of
1000 units of thrombin
Wessler Yin. Circ 197347671
21
X
Initiation phase
II
Xa
Amplification phase
IIa
IX
II
Fibrinogen
XIa
IIa
X
Va
Xa
Fibrin monomer
Crosslinked fibrin
IXa
Activated platelet
VIIIa
XIII
XIIIa
22
Reason 2Specificity of FXa inhibtion and
antithrombotic activity
  • Higher selectivity for FXa inhibition with
    heparins is associated with a more potent
    anticoagulant effect
  • Fondaparinux gt LMWH gt UFH

Fondaparinux anti-Xa LMWH anti-FXa gt
anti-IIa UFH anti-FXa anti-IIa
23
Fondaparinux vs enoxaparinin orthopedic surgery
Enoxaparin better
Fondaparinux better
Exact 95 CI
Hip replace n 3,411
59.0 27.6
45.4
Hip fracture n 1,250
73.4 45.0
61.6
Knee replace n 724
75.5 44.8
63.1
Overall odds reduction
p lt 0.001
63.2 45.8
55.3
0
100
-80
-60
-40
-20
20
40
60
80
-100
odds reduction
Turpie AGG. Arch Intern Med 20021621833
24
Factor Xa inhibitors Success in clinical trials
  • Venous thrombo-embolic disease
  • Fondaparinux reduced the risk of VTE compared
    with enoxaparin in patients undergoing hip
    fracture surgery and hip and knee arthroplasty
  • Rivaroxaban reduced the risk of VTE compared with
    enoxaparin regimens in patients undergoing
    elective total hip and knee replacement surgery
    (RECORD programme)
  • Acute Coronary Syndrome
  • Fondaparinux lowered long-term morbidity,
    improved survival and reduced the risk of
    bleeding compared with enoxaparin
  • Atrial Fibrillation
  • None published ongoing trials ARISTOTLE
    apixaban (vs warfarin), AVERROES (vs ASA),
    ROCKET AF rivaroxaban (vs warfarin)

25
Reason 3Inhibition of thrombin could in theory
have detrimental consequences, even outside the
clotting system
26
Procoagulant Thrombin formation PAI 1
release
Cell Prolif / Inflammation Cytokine release
Smooth muscle cell proliferation
The limited functions of Factor Xa
From J. Ansell 2007
27
Thrombin
28
Procoagulant Fibrin formation Platelet
activation Feedback activation TAFI
activation
Anticoagulant Protein C activation
Prostacyclin formation
The many functions of Thrombin
Inflammation P-selection expression Cell
adhesion Chemotaxis
Cellular Proliferation Tissue repair Growth
factor secretion Angiogenesis
29
Multiplicity of thrombins functions
Fibrin clot and platelet plug Feedback activation
of coagulation
Protein C activation Prostacyclin formation
Procoagulant
Anticoagulant
Thrombin
Cellular proliferation
Inflammation
EC P-selectin expression Neutrophilmonocyte
adhesion Chemotactic for PMNs Endothelial PAF
formation
Direct mitogen for fibroblasts PDGF and TGFß
from platelets PDGF formation in endothelium
Esmon Thromb Haemost 2008
30
Factor Xa an attractive target for inhibition
  • The only known functions of Factor Xa are either
    procoagulant or proinflammatory
  • Thrombin has both of these activities and
    indirect anticoagulant, anti-inflammatory and
    anti-apoptotic activities

31
Thrombin anticoagulant
  • Thrombin is essential for the activation of
    protein C.
  • Activated protein C inactivates FVa and FVIIIa.
  • Inhibition of thrombin impairs the activation of
    protein C and thereby the inhibition of FVa and
    FVIIIa.

Esmon Thromb Haemost 2008
Furugohri et al. Eur J Pharmacol 200551435
Morishima et al. Blood 2006108274a
32
Thrombin anticoagulant
  • Inhibition of FXa does not interfere with the
    PC/PS anticoagulant pathway.
  • Direct inhibition of FXa allows the generation of
    small amount of thrombin and the activation of
    protein C into activated protein C.
  • Is the protein C anticoagulant pathway still
    needed when thrombin procoagulant activity is
    inhibited ???

Esmon Thromb Haemost 2008
33
Factor Xa an attractive target for inhibition
  • Inhibition of thrombin in the large vessels
    reduces clotting activity and facilitates the
    ability of blood flow to carry thrombin to the
    microcirculation.
  • In the microcirculation, thrombin binds to
    thrombomodulin and activates protein C.
  • The efficacy of Factor Xa inhibitors should not
    depend on the health of the vasculature unlike
    thrombin inhibitors.

34
Thrombin potent platelet agonist
  • FIIa is a potent platelet agonist.
  • FXa does not activate platelets.
  • Thrombin inhibition could increase the risk of
    bleeding.
  • Direct FXa inhibitors allow the generation of
    small amounts of thrombin necessary to activate
    platelets and preserve primary haemostasis

Ieko et al. J Thromb Haemost 20042612
35
Reason 4 Therapeutic window of anti-Xa inhibiton
36
Dose Response Xa vs IIa
Clotting Time vs. Enzyme Concentration
120
100
Thrombin
80
FXa
Clotting Time(s)
60
40
20
0
0
50
100
150
200
250
Enzyme dilution in 14 Human Plasma
C. Esmon
37
Choice of Doses
BISTRO II
Safety
Efficacy
Major clinically relevant non-major bleeding ()
Total VTE ()
Dabigatran etexilate total daily dose
Dabigatran etexilate total daily dose
Optimal Efficacy / Safety Balance
Eriksson et al. J Thromb Haemost 2005 3103
38
(No Transcript)
39
Factor Xa an attractive target for inhibition
  • Factor Xa has a shallower doseresponse curve
    than thrombin
  • This suggests that maintaining the appropriate
    dose range for Factor Xa inhibitors should be
    easier than for thrombin inhibitors

40
Clinical studies
41
Pooled Analysis Major VTE and VTE-Related Death
in major orthopaedic surgery
Study Dabigatran 150 mg Dabigatran 220 mg Enoxaparin
RE-NOVATE (THR) 4.3 3.1 3.9
RE-MODEL (TKR) 3.8 2.6 3.5
RE-MOBILIZE (TKR) 3.0 3.4 2.2
Pooled 3.8 3.0 3.3
Absolute risk difference 0.5 -0.2
(Dabigatran Enoxaparin) 95 CI -0.6 to 1.6 -1.3 to 0.9
42
Pooled Analysis Bleeding Events
Bleeding event Dabigatran etexilate Dabigatran etexilate Enoxaparin N2716
Bleeding event 150 mg N2737 220 mg N2682 Enoxaparin N2716
Major Bleeding Event 1.1 1.4 1.4
95 CI (0.7 , 1.4) (1.0, 1.9) (1.0, 2.0)
43
RECORD3 summary
Rivaroxaban head-to-head comparison with
enoxaparin in patients undergoing total knee
replacement
Total VTE
20
RRR 49
15
Incidence ()
10
Major VTE
SymptomaticVTE
Major bleeding
5
RRR 62
RRR 66
0.5
0.6
2.6
1.0
2.0
18.9
9.6
0.7
0
Total VTE any DVT, non-fatal PE and all-cause
mortality Major VTE proximal DVT, non-fatal PE
and VTE-related death
Rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily
44
Comparison of three upcoming novel specific oral
anticoagulants
Drug Class Company Half-life Bioavaila-bility Elimination Dosage(oral)
Apixaban antiXa BMS/Pfizer 8-15 50-85 25 renal75 liver b.i.d.
RivaroxabanantiXa Bayer/JJ 5-13 gt80 33 renal (unchanged)33 renal(inactive metabolites)33 biliary o.d.
DabigatranDTI B-I 14-17 5 80 renal20 biliary o.d./b.i.d.
45
Conclusions
  • Several reasons suggest that factor Xa might be a
    more appopriate target than IIa.
  • The reasons are theoretical and speculative.
  • Recent clinical studies in orthopaedic surgery
    indirectly support experimental observations.

46
Conclusions
  • Clinical trials with oral FIIa and FXa inhibitors
    are ongoing and following parallel paths.
  • Which class of drugs will be better ?
  • This question will remain unanswered until the
    appropriate head-to-head clinical trials are
    performed.
  • At the moment, both classes appear promising.

47
Head-to-head comparison between anti-IIa and
anti-Xa inhibitors
Even if we have a study which shows that the
cost-benefit ratio is superior with one compound
versus another one, this will be true a)
only for these two particular drugs b) and only
in one well-defined clinical situation
48
Old versus new anticoagulantsAnti-Xa versus
anti-IIa ?
LMWH Vitamin K Antagonist
Pradaxa
Xarelto
Synthetic Per os One or two tablet(s) / day No
monitoring No or little food/drug interaction
49
Anti-Xa versus Anti-IIa ????
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com