Philosophy of Science - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Philosophy of Science

Description:

Philosophy of Science The last fifty years Divergence Questioning methods, validity, facts Realism/Antirealism Incommensurability The emergence of relativism in ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:115
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: Adrian234
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Philosophy of Science


1
Philosophy of Science
  • The last fifty years

2
Divergence
  • Questioning methods, validity, facts
  • Realism/Antirealism
  • Incommensurability
  • The emergence of relativism in epistemology and
    antirealism in ontology.

3
Paul Feyerabend
  • Two false assumptions
  • - the first is that there is a theory-independent
    observation language with respect to which
    theories may be evaluated
  • the second false assumption is that it is
    possible for a theory to agree with all the known
    facts in its domain
  • Return to the sources (history of science)
  • Anything goes (?)

4
The Strong Programme
  • Edinburgh University
  • Challenging the internal/external division in the
    the writing of history of science
  • The main principle the interpreter of science
    should uncover the scientists beliefs by
    invoking the same types of cause to explain both
    rational (true, successful) belief and irrational
    (false, unsuccessful) beliefs
  • Causal analysis the causes are produced by
    social structures the roles of the sociologists
    and philosophers of science

5
The social construction of a scientific fact
  • Bruno Latour (S. Woolgar)
  • anthropological approach
  • social constructivism
  • the task of the sociologist of science is to
    give a debunking account of scientific practice,
    showing how scientists delude themselves into
    believing that they discover a reality rather
    than constructing it

6
Realism
  • Ontologically, realism is committed to the
    mind-independent existence of the world
    investigated by the sciences.
  • Semantically, realism is committed to a literal
    interpretation of scientific claims about the
    world realists take theoretical statements at
    face value.
  • Epistemologically, realism is committed to the
    idea that theoretical claims (interpreted
    literally as describing a mind-independent
    reality) constitute knowledge of the world.

7
Arguments for realism
  • The no-miracles argument realism is the only
    philosophy that doesn't make the success of
    science a miracle (H. Putnam).
  • The basic explanation our best theories are true
    (or approximately true, or correctly describe a
    mind-independent world of entities, properties,
    laws, structures).

8
Arguments for realism (contd.)
  • Corroboration the same entity or property is
    conceivably capable of being detected by not just
    one, but rather two or more different means of
    detection this may serve as the basis of a
    significantly enhanced argument for realism.

9
Arguments for Realism (contd.)
  • Selectivity entailing an epistemically positive
    attitude towards those aspects of theories that
    are most worthy of epistemic commitment.

10
Antirealism
  • Antirealism doubts the existence of unobservable
    entities posited by theories (electrons, quarks),
    claiming that these entities are used in an
    instrumental way in order to develop particular
    explanations or accounts of phenomena

11
Varieties of antirealism
  • The pessimistic induction on the history of
    science) large numbers of past successful
    theories have proved false to the conclusion that
    successful contemporary theories are also
    incorrect (L. Laudan)

12
Varieties of Antirealism (contd.)
  • Constructive empiricism scientists build
    models that are designed to save the phenomena
    by yielding correct predictions about
    observables, but there is no need to grant a real
    existence to these entities (B. Van Fraasen)

13
Science Wars
  • - standpoint epistemology
  • - values, judgments, politics
  • - postmodernism and science
  • - who has the rights to speak about science?
  • Alan Sokal, Transgressing the boundaries. Toward
    a transformative hermeneutics of quantum
    gravity, Social Text, 46-47 (1996).

14
Descriptive philosophies of science
  • The modest version
  • aiming at a historical reconstruction of actual
    evaluative practice
  • uncovering the evaluative standards whose
    application lead scientists to prefer one theory
    to antoher (e.g. Newtons rejection of the
    Cartesian Vortex Theory)

15
  • The robust version derives from the conclusions
    of modest descriptivism, a theory about
    evaluative practice this theory is put forward
    as a contribution to our understanding of science

16
Conceptual Evolution
  • - an application of the Darwinian Theory of
    Evolution to the historical development of
    science
  • - recommendation that philosophers of science
    shift attention from logical relations between
    propositions to the progressive modification of
    concepts (Toulmin).

17
Selection
  • The General Theory of Selection Processes
  • The surviving concepts are called replicators
    and individual scientists or groups are called
    interactors. Interactors compete within an
    environment, while replicators are entities of
    which copies are made and transferred.

18
Epigenetic rules
  • Evolutionary-Origins View (opposing the
    Evolutionary Analogy View) scientific inquiry is
    directed by the application of epigenetic rules
    that have been encoded in homo sapiens during
    evolutionary adaptation, namely
  • - possessing certain capacities and dispositions
    because it was advantageous for our ancestors to
    have them.

19
Concluding Remarks
  • Questioning the search for laws of nature
  • Alternatives
  • searching for symmetries in physics
  • using approximate generalizations in biology
  • deploying models in other areas of the sciences
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com