Property and decentralization - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Property and decentralization

Description:

Property and decentralization Property Property is a bundle of rights telling what you can do with something and what other people are prevented to do with it ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:105
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: Sash86
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Property and decentralization


1
Property and decentralization
2
Property
  • Property is a bundle of rights telling what you
    can do with something and what other people are
    prevented to do with it
  • Property ? possession
  • car or house as a collateral for the loan
  • intellectual property is non-rival and
    non-excludable without regulations

3
Modern version of the Coase theorem
  • Clear property rights are absolutely essential
    for economic activities
  • if transaction costs (TC) are zero (not realistic
    assumption), then it does not matter who has
    property rights
  • if TC are not zero (in reality TC are
    substantial), then it is important who has
    property rights (i.e. Grossman and Hart)

4
Questions
  • To what property to assign rights
  • land (Mongolia vs. Europe)
  • clean air
  • When and who
  • new minerals
  • radio spectrum
  • internet and file sharing
  • How property rights to be secured
  • property rules vs. liability rules
  • Public vs. private
  • what is more efficient
  • under what circumstances (institutions)

5
Public vs. private Historical overview
  • 1800s gt issued aroused with the development of
    capitalism
  • 1850 gt left wing view public property could be
    more efficient (Marx)
  • 1920s-1940s Market socialist debates
  • Austrians (Von Mises, Hayek) importance of
    capital market for efficient allocation of
    resources, decentralized information
    (informational argument)gt socialists economy is
    inefficient
  • Neo classical (Lange, Lerner) resource
    allocation argument about Pareto optimalitygt get
    socialist managers behave as if maximizing
    problems (no info and capital market problems)

6
Historical overview
  • 1950s and 1960s Shumpetrians
  • evolutionary economics (natural selection)
  • role of business cycles in selection (creative
    destruction)
  • role of innovations, new organization of
    production processes, new products
    disequilibrium
  • flawed, patched-up private enterprise still
    better then socialist enterprise

7
Private enterprise
  • Three virtues
  • administrative parsimony (poor managers have less
    resources, less influence on the economy self
    selection process)
  • responsiveness (incentives, rewarding those who
    doing well)
  • innovativeness of the market (diversity of ideas
    generated by market gt choose best in the process
    of evolution)
  • Uncertainty, incomplete information, high
    transaction costs are inputs
  • Firms are routines, only the fittest routines
    survive in the process of selection

8
Private enterprise and market economy
  • Paradox how rigid organizations (firms) generate
    flexible economic system
  • Solution natural selection throws away bad firms
    (creative destruction). Shumpeters view on
    business cycles as a cure for the economy
  • Question what institutional structure is the
    best for the natural selection process?

9
Public vs. private?
  • Very much conditional on the institutions
  • economic theories (1930s resource allocation,
    now transaction costs)
  • surrounding economic events
  • empirical e.g. GB privatization
  • failure of the Soviet socialism influences views
    on public property
  • Size and corporate governance
  • small, closely held firm (ownermanager)gt
    private is better
  • large firms
  • separation of ownership from control
  • direct government regulation
  • gt no conclusive evidence

10
Politicians and firms
  • Beginning of transition in the Soviet Union
  • need for privatization
  • quickly or slowly?
  • which firms to privatize first?
  • was it for institutions to be constructed first
    or privatize immediately and create institutions
    later?
  • Washington consensus simple strategy of reforms
    that fits all countries
  • stabilization
  • price liberalization
  • privatizations
  • institutions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com