Keith Budinger Chief Executive - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Keith Budinger Chief Executive

Description:

... the sequence of events provided a telling preview of the way in which stresses can combine to generate difficult situations. ... The critical message here is ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:68
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: Debbie233
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Keith Budinger Chief Executive


1
The Future of Gas and Electricity Storage Gas
Storage latest developments 11th November
2014 Allen Overy LLP One Bishops Square London
  • Keith Budinger Chief Executive

2
Todays presentation
  • State of the Nation
  • The UK gas market as is (4 slides)
  • The UK gas market to be (3 slides)
  • Import dependency
  • Demand fluctuations
  • Deliverability
  • Gas storage new developments (1 slide)
  • The future is fast cycle (1 slide)

3
National Grids winter wish list (source Utility
Week 31st October 2014)
  • Kind weather mild enough to cap demand and windy
    enough to keep renewable generation high.
  • Timely capacity returns November 2014 could
    provide a make or break month, power generation
    units at Ferrybridge, Heysham and Hartlepool will
    return.
  • An end to unexpected disasters the UK has seen
    an unprecedented number of unexpected outages
    this year including three fires at thermal
    generation plants.
  • Fewer Russia-Ukraine headlines the plan for what
    might happen if Russian gas supplies to Europe
    are constrained? Reliance on LNG market will be
    expensive.
  • Similar security for the rest of Europe with
    electricity imports currently around 7 per cent,
    Europes security of supply matters to the UK
    too.

4
The UK gas market at a very high level
  • In many ways, UKs gas market is healthy.
  • The market has responded well (and without the
    need for Government intervention) to the
    reduction in domestic production, and we now have
    a diverse mix of supply sources.
  • Increasingly open access to infrastructure means
    resources including storage can be utilised
    more efficiently between GB and continental
    markets.
  • However, we do have vulnerabilities and these
    leave us prone to price spikes which are costly
    for customers and national headlines (which are
    unpleasant for politicans).
  • Whilst everything worked in March 2013, the
    sequence of events provided a telling preview of
    the way in which stresses can combine to generate
    difficult situations.
  • There will continue to bee political and
    technical uncertainty.

5
The UK gas market one level down on the plus
side
  • GB has very significant gas supply capacity on a
    name-plate basis (around 700 mcm/day relative
    to a 1-in-20 year peak demand of around 500
    mcm/day)
  • We are increasingly dependent on imported gas
    (around 60 percent in 2012/13) which means GB
    is competing for gas with both continental
    markets
  • IUK and BBL flows increasingly driven by hub
    prices in GB v continent
  • Norwegian flexibility to flow either to GB or
    continent on same basis
  • and global markets
  • LNG directed to Asia if price is higher
  • Theoretically this should not present a problem
    where the markets work efficiently, can respond
    quickly, and infrastructure operates as planned

6
The UK gas market one level down but risks
remain
  • Markets are not fully efficient and subject to
    political interference, particularly in regions
    where full competition is less developed than in
    Europe.
  • Whilst interconnectors enable quick physical
    response, the same is not true of LNG, given the
    nature of the supply chain ships can be days
    away, preventing a timely market response in
    terms of supplies into GB for more quickly
    developing supply/demand events.
  • Infrastructure is subject to unplanned outages
    particularly at times of stress or under winter
    conditions. A key difference relative to UKCS
    supplies is the dependence on a few large
    infrastructure elements rather than the diverse
    mix of North Sea production and terminal routes.

7
The UK gas market - March 2013
  • March 2013 was an illustration of how these risks
    can materialise
  • A prolonged cold spell leading to higher demand
    late in winter (when storage supplies are
    naturally at low levels).
  • LNG responding to high prices in Asia, and hence
    low levels in UK terminals and significant lag
    for new shipments.
  • Demand therefore being met by interconnector
    imports and (already depleted storage)
  • As cold spell continued and storage declined
    further, price spikes resulted as LNG could not
    react in time.
  • Exacerbated by (thankfully short) IUK outage.
  • 4-6 weeks of extreme prices and system stress
  • Risks likely to increase
  • Reducing UKCS and increasing LNG reliance
  • Coal retirements limiting fuel-switching options
    in power sector

8
Halite believes the UK gas market is structurally
changing
  • There are two major long term structural shifts
    taking place in the UK gas market
  • Import dependency UK import dependency is
    increasing as domestic gas production declines.
    This is resulting in a greater UK exposure to
    external supply shocks and an increase in
    dependency on key imports.
  • Demand fluctuations Short term fluctuations in
    UK power sector gas demand are increasing, as
    intermittent renewable generation capacity rises.
    This is acting to increase UK gas system stress
    and price volatility.
  • The UK government has openly expressed its
    concerns as to the potential security of supply
    risks associated with these changes
  • Import dependence Our increased exposure to
    international gas markets has also increased the
    range and likelihood of possible sources of
    disruption, including certain shocks that could
    have profound impacts on GB security of
    supply..the potential impact of the closure of
    critical LNG shipping lanes an unexpected
    curtailment of Russian supplies.
  • Intermittency Looking forward, there is likely
    to be an increase in the need for flexibility
    from our gas supplies.to meet larger and faster
    swings in demand from gas-fired electricity
    generators asrenewable generation increases
  • (Source DECC/Ofgem Statutory Security
    of Supply Report 2013).

9
1. Increase in import dependency
  • UK Continental Shelf (UKCS) gas production is in
    steady decline.
  • Major sources of UKCS supply replacement are
  • Norwegian (NCS) imports (plateauing)
  • Imports from the Continent (e.g., Russia)
  • LNG imports
  • All 3 of these sources are price dependent
    contingent on supply chain dynamics
  • This increases UK exposure to external market
    shocks (e.g., Russian gas disruption, NCS
    outages)
  • LNG imports are particularly sensitive, given the
    global gas market there maybe significant
    delays (e.g. 2-4 weeks) before supply can respond
    to system stress.
  • The evolution of the UKs gas supply mix is
    resulting in an increasing dependency on several
    larger supply sources (e.g. NCS fields pipes, 2
    Interconnectors, LNG imports) as opposed to a
    diversified mix of UKCS fields, pipelines
    processing plants.
  • This in turn increases UK exposure to large
    infrastructure failures (e.g. IUK outage Mar 13,
    NCS outages Feb 12, Rough outage 2006).
  • It also increases UK exposure to risk of major
    market and political supply disruptions (e.g.
    Fukushima, Russian disruptions, LNG shipping lane
    disruptions).
  • The UK has ample import infrastructure capacity.
    But there are often time lags in response of
    imports to periods of high gas demand and price
    signals.
  • Fast cycle gas storage plays a key bridging
    role in providing deliverability response to
    cover supply disruption gaps.

10
2. Increase in intermittency
  • The UK governments Energy Market Reform (EMR)
    package is focused on trying to meet a number of
    targets relating to renewable generation build
    and emissions reduction.
  • EMR is supporting strong growth in intermittent
    renewable generation capacity (wind solar),
    which is structurally transforming the UK power
    market.
  • Gas-fired CCGT power plants (which have
    traditionally run base load / mid-merit) are
    increasingly being pushed into a peaking role to
    support fluctuations in wind/solar output and
    system demand.
  • A significant volume of UK coal plant capacity
    (currently predominantly base load) will retire
    by 2023 as a result of EU emissions legislation
    (LCPD, IED).
  • New build of flexible plant will be focused on
    gas fired generation (CCGT / OCGT) supported by
    capacity payments).
  • As UK renewable capacity increases, so to does
    the magnitude of short term fluctuations in
    wind/solar output.
  • These fluctuations are supported by swings in
    gas-fired plant output, which translate into
    swings in power sector gas demand.
  • Fast cycle gas storage plays a key role in
    providing rapid flexibility response to absorb
    these short term swings in demand, dampening
    their impact on price volatility system stress.
  • Fast cycle storage can be thought of as a rapid
    charge and release gas battery that supports
    the role of gas-fired peaking plant in backing up
    renewable intermittency.
  • Fast and medium cycle storage assets play a key
    role in balancing the UK gas market, seasonal
    storage still has a role to play however this
    will be more focused on balancing winter vs.
    summer requirements.

11
Why Halite believes deliverability is critical
  • Increases in import dependency and renewable
    intermittency both drive a requirement for an
    increase in short term gas deliverability (vs.
    longer term seasonal flexibility).
  • In the medium to longer term horizon (e.g. gt 1
    month), a strong price signal and ample import
    infrastructure can respond to pull more gas into
    the UK (DECC reiterated its belief in this in the
    Sept 2013 gas storage intervention decision).
  • The vulnerability of the UK gas market is to
    short term swings in demand, infrastructure
    outages supply chain response delays.
  • In periods of system pressure what is most
    important is the bridging role played by short
    term deliverability (this will increase with
    intermittency), not higher volumes of gas in
    store.
  • The short term requirement for deliverability and
    the longer term effectiveness of the day-ahead
    National Balancing Point (NBP) price signal in
    attracting imports can be seen during periods of
    system stress over the last three winters (e.g.,
    March 2013 Feb 2012 price shocks).

12
Gas storage new developments
  • UKs current gas storage amounts to only 14 days
    worth of gas supply a dangerously low level
    compared with France (87 days), Germany (69) and
    Italy (59) Source UK Commons Select Committee
    2011
  • The UKs storage requirements are commonly
    misunderstood. As well as specific storage sites,
    the UK is very well interconnected with other
    large sources of longer range gas flexibility
    (NCS, Continental Europe, LNG imports).
  • So rather than measuring UK storage based on
    working gas volume, it is more important to focus
    on deliverability (mcm/d).
  • UK storage investment development over the last
    decade has been focused on smaller fast cycle
    salt cavern assets.
  • The ability of fast cycle assets to cycle
    multiple times each year means they provide much
    more system flexibility per unit of working
    capacity.
  • The benefit of fast cycle assets needs to be
    considered based on contribution via
    multi-cycling deliverability, not based on
    working volume.
  • Both the government and National Grid recognise
    the requirement for further investment in storage
    deliverability.
  • DECC / OFGEM point to a large volume of
    consented projects. But the majority of this will
    not be built given poor economics (spread
    weakness), e.g. in 2005 DECC listed 5 bcm (10
    assets) to come online by 2010 vs. only 0.4bcm
    delivered Source DECC/Ofgem Statutory Security
    of Supply Report (Oct 2013)
  • There is a much smaller volume of consented salt
    cavern fast cycle capacity. The development
    incremental investment economics of this capacity
    is favourable given a value skew towards
    volatility. It represents relatively low cost
    deliverability.

13
Why Halite believes the future is fast cycle
storage (fcs)
  • Fcs provides within system deliverability as
    insurance against major import disruptions (e.g.
    outages).
  • Fcs provides reliable and rapid response
    flexibility to support renewable intermittency.
  • Fcs working capacity can be cycled multiple times
    in a year to enhance effective contribution to
    system deliverability.
  • Fcs acts to damper shorter price volatility,
    increase prompt gas market liquidity hence
    reduce supplier cost of managing customer
    portfolio risk.
  • Fcs is a relatively cheap source of
    deliverability (low capex per unit), with
    incremental expansion costs.
  • The UK market has been delivering fast cycle
    capacity (Aldborough, Holford, Stublach)
    reflecting these points.
  • The expansion and/or building of more fast cycle
    storage can make a material contribution to
    security of supply by increasing the volume and
    duration of deliverability to the UK market.
  • The critical message here is that, without
    government intervention, market investment in Fcs
    is key to delivering security of supply for gas
    customers

14
Thank you for listening
  • Any questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com