Cryogenic Efficiency - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Cryogenic Efficiency

Description:

Cryogenic Efficiency & Losses in AC Power Machines Dr. Philip Sargent MIM MBCS CDipAF CEng. Diboride Conductors Ltd. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:167
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: Philip470
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cryogenic Efficiency


1
Cryogenic Efficiency Losses in AC Power Machines
  • Dr. Philip Sargent MIM MBCS CDipAF CEng.
  • Diboride Conductors Ltd.

2
Power Superconductors
3
Power Superconductors
4
Cost of Capital when the superconductor is
costly
Lower capital costs, Expensive capital
Lower running costs, Cheap capital, Cheap
superconductor
5
Constraint Liquid Cryogens
Optimal Range
LOX!
6
Engineering Needs
  • Generators, Transformers, Cables, FCLs, Motors,
    Grid conditioning, power storage
  • Capital cost is most important for all of these
    in deregulated power markets
  • Why superconductors?
  • Higher power density, 100x the current
  • Smaller
  • Lighter (MgB2 is 1/3 the density of Copper)
  • Cheaper to buy and install
  • Cheaper to operate
  • Entirely new capabilities (FCLs)

7
HyperTech CTFF for MgB2
CONTINUOUS TUBE FORMING AND FILLING (CTFF)
8
Boron Chemistry
  • Pyrometallurgy Mg B heat
  • Powder in tube in situ
  • Powder in tube ex situ
  • Powder in tube ex situ Mg
  • Powder in tube HIP
  • CVD Mg diborane
  • Electrochemistry Mg-borates in KCL
  • Other chemical routes ??

9
Materials Requirements
  • Magnetic Fields 2-5 T (except cables)
  • AC use requires T gt 20 K (cryogenic cost)
  • Materials parameters
  • Low cost 10 /kA.m
  • Practical volumes Je (Jc 105 A/cm2 )
  • Low AC losses W/kA.m at 50Hz.
  • Flexible, low Je / strain sensitivity

10
Targets
  • Copper 6 22 /kA.m (400 to 100 A/cm2)
  • Bi2223 100 25 /kA.m (2002 2005)

Device kA/cm2 T /kA.m
Motor 105 4 10
Generator 105 4 10
Transformer 8.104 0.5 - 2 lt10
FCL 8.104 0.2 10
Cable 7.104 lt0.5 10-100
Dick Blaugher, NREL
11
Market Segmentation
12
Competitive Costs
Wire /kA.m Cost Driver
NbTi (4.2 K, 2 T) 0.90 Materials (Nb)
Nb3Sn (4.2 K, 10 T) 10 Materials (Nb)
Bi-2223 (25 K, 1 T) 25 Materials (Ag)
Y-123 (25 K, 1 T) 4 Capital Plant
MgB2 (25 K, 1 T) 0.8 3.6 ? Capital Plant
Paul Grant EPRI
13
Comparative Performance
"Sokolowski Plot" of HTSC Wire Performance and
Cost
10000
10
1 /kAm
100
NbTi
4.2K, 2T
1,000
1000
Nb
Sn
3
4.2K, 12-15 T
Operating Current, Ic (A)
100
Y-123 IBAD 77K, 0T
Bi-2223 77K,0T ASC 50
Bi-2223
77K, 0T
10
NKT Target
1
1000
100
10
1
0.1
Cost (/m)
Paul Grant EPRI
14
Transformers a big prizeCost of Ownership in
/kW
Cu (300 K) _at_ 300 A/cm2 HTS (68 K) MgB2 (25 K)
Losses 60
Cryo -
Wire 5
Total 65
2000 ABB SPI Phase I Analysis
Paul Grant EPRI
15
First Major Applications
  • Current Leads? No.
  • FCLs ? New capabilities!
  • Transmission Cables ?
  • Distribution Cables ?
  • Dielectric thermal AC lossses
  • Transformers ? 98 efficient.
  • Generators ?
  • Power stations,Wind turbines?
  • Non-Utility Power Applications
  • Motors
  • 68 of industrial power
  • Half of that over 750kW
  • Power electronics Cryogenics

16
Materials Changeovers
Materials Changeovers
17
Technology S Curves
18
Power Technologies
75y
16y
MgB2
Performance
HTCs
Copper-Iron
2002
Effort
19
Conclusions
  • Necessary Partner Technologies
  • Cryogenics, not 99.999 reliable
  • Power electronics, why use AC if DC can do it?
  • Motors
  • Higher power density, 100x the current
  • Smaller, Lighter
  • Cheaper to buy and install
  • Transport ships, trains
  • Environmentally friendly
  • Prefer wire not tape!

12 April 2002
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com