Title: Temporary Employment Services in South Africa
1Temporary Employment Services in South
Africa Submission to the Parliamentary Portfolio
Committee on Labour 26 August 2009
2Business Unitys position
- Labour broking must be seen in the context of
South Africas national priorities - 4.1 million South Africans cannot find work
- 1.5 million South Africans have given up hope of
finding work - South Africa is currently experiencing the
highest rate of job losses since 1991 -
- Labour brokers are pivotal facilitators and
enablers of employment - they are a speedy means of access to properly
recruited employees - they facilitate temporary and permanent
employment, especially for unemployed youth - they facilitate skills development, especially
for school-leavers who cannot get work experience -
- Some forms of labour broking can give rise to
abuse, and BUSA does not support such practices - However Do the proposed regulations strengthen
what is positive, - and eradicate what is negative?
3Contract employment around the world
Extent of Contract Employment in OECD Countries
Growth of Contract Employment in OECD Countries
4South African contract employment statistics
Contract employment by sector
Contract employment vs. Sector volatility
5Just plain wrong DoLs model of employment
patterns
6The national importance of the labour broking
industry
7The national importance of the labour broking
industry
No. Services Provided Outcome Reported Benefit
1 Recruitment services Continuous availability of large numbers of qualified candidates (i.e. competent, skilled and/or experienced) at market-related wages Reduced recruitment lead times training success rates Improved fit and customer service
2 Training services Continuous competency development for entry-level, intermediate and experienced employees Reduced competency gaps Improved customer service
3 Payroll services Outsourced payroll and related administration (timesheets, absenteeism, etc.) Reduced unit costs due to scale Reduced management and administrative burden
4 Attendance management services Controlled absenteeism Just-in-time replacement of absent employees Proactive planning and initiatives calendar Reduced absenteeism Reduced absenteeism-related customer service crunches, improved adherence, less disruption of customer service
5 Performance management services Retention of high achievers Recognition of consistent performers Improvement or exit of low achievers Improved on-the-job performance and productivity Reduced staff costs, and improved customer service
6 Scheduling and rostering services Dynamic adjustment of staffing levels to match business volumes Improved customer service during peak periods Reduced staff costs during valley periods, maximum productivity when shifted optimally
7 Career management services Multi-skilled and up-skilled employees that can be cross utilised or progressed based on personalized career paths Reduced training costs Reduced ongoing recruitment costs High on-the-job performance High employee retention
8 Labour relations services Risk mitigation through defensibility and standardization of labour practices Managerial support, especially related to on-the-job performance
9 Workforce optimization services Optimization of labour costs through advanced analytics, software, technology, and other methods Increased performance and productivity Reduced total staff costs Increased employee tenure and retention
8Legislative and regulatory options
- Business has grave concerns about the Dept. of
Labours Discussion Document tabled at NEDLAC - The proposed regulations have been hastily
developed using little or no industry data - The proposed regulations have not considered
international research and options - The proposed regulations have not considered
unintended consequences - The proposed regulations have not considered
enforcement mechanisms - The proposed regulations impose a heavy penalty
on compliant operators and make it - likely that underground operators and associated
abuse will increase -
- Business Unitys position in summary
- Existing laws and regulations are sufficient to
address abuses - Enforcement is lacking and specific enforcement
institutions need to be bolstered - Partial or piecemeal regulation will give rise
to unintended consequences - A co-regulatory/co-determination framework is
the only workable option -