Texas Healthcare Transformation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Texas Healthcare Transformation

Description:

* Category 1 foundation for delivery system transformation investing/improving technology ... engaged with the ... approved thru DY 5 Initial approval ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:111
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: mtr97
Learn more at: https://www.utsystem.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Texas Healthcare Transformation


1
Texas Healthcare Transformation Quality
Improvement ProgramMedicaid Section 1115
DemonstrationAka The WaiverLeslie Carruth,
MBAOffice of Health Affairs
  • CSE
  • September 26, 2013

2
Through the Storm
Public Policy

Health Care Reform
3
Medicaid
  • State-federal partnership enacted in 1965 to
    provide health insurance coverage to eligible
    persons
  • CMS issues policy rules for State Plans
  • Minimum guidelines for eligibility, services
  • States may expand coverage
  • FMAP average 57 Texas 58.5
  • Texas Medicaid agency is HHSC

4
Texas Perspective
  • Escalating cost burden
  • Highest rate of uninsured in US
  • Frayed or non-existent safety net
  • Political philosophy

5
Federal perspective
  • Escalating cost burden
  • Affordable Care Act - March 2010
  • Expanding Medicaid eligibility in 2014
  • Supreme Court decision June 2012
  • Medicaid expansion is optional for states

6
Health Care ReformTriple Aim
  • Improving the patient experience of care
  • Including quality satisfaction
  • Improving the health of populations
  • Reducing the per capita cost of health care
  • Dr. Don Berwick
  • CMS Administrator, July 2010 to December 2011

7
Medicaid waivers
  • Section 1115 Research Demonstration Projects
  • Section 1915(b) Managed Care Waivers
  • Section 1915(c) Home Community-Based Services
    Waivers
  • Texas has a 1915(b) and 8 1915(c) waivers
  • All states about 400 current/pending waivers

8
Section 1115 Demonstrations
  • HHS Secretary may approve demonstration projects
    that give States additional flexibility to design
    improve their programs
  • Purpose demonstrate evaluate policy approaches
    such as
  • Expanding eligibility to individuals who are not
    otherwise Medicaid or CHIP eligible
  • Providing services not typically covered by
    Medicaid
  • Using innovative service delivery systems that
    improve care, increase efficiency, and reduce
    costs
  • Must be budget neutral to the federal
    government

9
HHSC Proposal to CMS
  • Dual purpose
  • Expand existing Medicaid managed care programs,
    STAR and STARPLUS, statewide
  • Establish two funding pools to assist providers
    with uncompensated care costs and promote health
    system transformation
  • Improve care delivery systems and capacity while
    emphasizing accountability and transparency, and
    requiring demonstrated improvements at the
    provider level for the receipt of such payments
  • No mention of expanding coverage

10
Budget Neutral Proposal June 2011
  • Projected Texas Medicaid Costs FY 2012-2016
    (Billions)

11
Budget Neutral?
12
CMS Approves Texas 1115
  • HHSC gets the news December 12, 2011
  • Waiver period is Oct 1, 2011 to Sept 30, 2016
  • Planning Year, DY 1, ends Sept 30, 2012
  • Develop new UC tools based on cost reporting
  • Organize into RHPs
  • Program Funding Mechanics Protocol August 2012
  • DSRIP Planning Protocol (projects menu)

13
DSRIP and UC Pools
14
RHPs
  • 20 Regional Healthcare Partnerships
  • Vary in size 2 to 47 counties
  • Tier 1 to 4
  • DSRIP allocated by formula
  • Anchor
  • Not the Banker
  • Guides, coordinates, administers
  • Critical variance in IGT capacity

15
Players
  • Performing Providers
  • IGT Entities
  • Inherent conflicts
  • Transformation by Hospitals?
  • Public vs Private Entities
  • Integrating primary and behavioral care
  • Who leads?
  • Critical variance in IGT capacity (worth saying
    twice)

16
DSRIP Categories
  • Category 1 Infrastructure development
  • Category 2 Program innovation and redesign
  • Category 3 Population-focused improvement
  • Category 4 Clinical improvements in care

17
Project Design
  • Responsive to community need
  • Strategic
  • Sustainable
  • Impact on target population
  • Medicaid and low-income uninsured

18
Milestones Metrics
  • Primarily menu driven in Category 1, 2 3
  • Standardized for Category 4
  • Pay for reporting data from HHSC

19
Quality Issues
  • Metrics appropriateness, baselines
  • Process or Outcome
  • Time Horizon

20
Project Valuation
  • NOT cost-based reimbursement
  • Incentive payments
  • Project impact on waiver aims
  • Quantifiable Patient Impact (summer 2013)
  • Art rather than science

21
Learning Collaboratives
  • Added requirement by CMS
  • RHP level and state-wide
  • Implications for CSE
  • Your expertise will be an asset

22
UTs Role
  • Convened Academic Medicine/HHSC meetings
  • Code Red 2012
  • UTMB and UTHSC Tyler serve as Anchors
  • UTHSCSA in South Texas
  • White paper to include GME projects
  • Participated in UC Tools development

23
UTs DSRIP Participation
Theres no such thing as a free lunch.
24
Progress report
  • DY 2 ends Monday. Time to report metrics
  • Projects are not yet fully approved thru DY 5
  • Initial approval received May 2013
  • QPI required in July
  • Resubmissions approved a few weeks ago
  • Category 3 metrics not yet clearly defined
  • Bright spot late achievement allowable

25
  • Questions?
  • Thank you!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com