Title: Pollution Control
1Pollution Control
2Outline
- Topics from lecture
- Overview
- Problem (the problem from section is posted in
the handout section of the course website and
includes most of the steps) - Technology change
- Uncertainty
3Overview
- Economic efficiency criterion gt benefit-cost
analysis - MCMB (Prior to Midterm)
- More modest criterion cost-effectiveness does
policy accomplish given purpose in the least
costly way? - MC1MC2
4More Criteria for Selecting Environmental Policy
Instrument
- 1. Achieve stated goals/standards?
- 2. Cost-effective?
- 3. Provide government with information it needs?
- 4. Monitoring and enforcement possibilities?
- 5. Flexible in the face of change (in tastes,
technology, or resource use)? - 6. Dynamic incentives for research, development,
adoption, and diffusion of better
pollution-control technologies? - 7. Equitable distribution of financial and
environmental impacts? - 8. Purpose and nature of policy understandable to
general public? - 9. Feasible, in terms of enactment and
implementation?
5Topic 1 Technology Change
- Two questions of interest
- What incentives does the policy give firms to
adopt new technologies? - What incentives does the policy instrument
provide to induce invention and innovation?
6Cost-Effective Pollution Control Allocations
MC /ton
MC1
MC2
T
Pollution Control (tons)
Qtp
Q1
0
15
15
Q2
0
Pollution abated by polluter 2
Pollution abated by polluter 1
7Answer to both questions is
- it depends on how much polluting firms gain from
the new technology. - This has three components
- Reduction in marginal abatement costs and
- Avoided tax payments or
- Reductions in equilibrium permit price.
8Case 1 Tax
MC
MC'
T
Pollution Abated
Q
Q'
9Case 1 Tax
Savings from Tech change
MC
MC'
T
Pollution Abated
Q
Q'
10Case 1 Tax
MC
MC'
T
Q
Q
Q
11Case 2 tradeable permit
MC
MC'
Pollution Abatement
QTP
12Case 2 tradeable permit
MC
MC'
Q
QTP
13Case 2 tradeable permit
MC
MC'
Plus cost savings from cheaper permits
Q
QTP
14Technology change contd
Change in pollution Private gains
Pollution Tax Pollution will decrease Reduced MC avoided tax
Tradable Permit No change Reduced MC cheaper permits
15Technology change bottom line
- Q of pollution will decrease in response to tech
change under tax and remain fixed under TP. - Incentives for adoption and innovation depend on
case-specific factors (avoided tax, savings from
cheaper permits, and related factors).
16Uncertainty
- What are likely sources of uncertainty about
costs and benefits? - Why is there an asymmetry between uncertainty re.
costs and uncertainty re. benefits?
17Conceptually, the slopes measure the cost of
being wrong.
- If the slope of MB is relatively large, then we
want to lock in the quantity of pollutant
(environmental damages are very large if were
wrong) - If the slope of MC is relatively large, then we
want to give firms flexibility (compliance is
very costly if were wrong)
18Example 1
MCE
MB
Q
19Example 1
MCE
MC R
MB
Q
20Example 1
MCE
MC R
T
MB
Q
QTP
Q
Qtax
21Example 1
MCE
MC R
DWL for tax
T
DWL for TP
MB
Q
QTP
Q
Qtax
22Example 2
MB
MCE
Q
23Example 2
MB
MCR
MCE
Q
24Example 2
MB
MCR
MCE
T
Q
Q
Qtax
QTP
25Example 2
DWL TP
MB
MCR
DWL tax
MCE
T
Q
Q
Qtax
QTP
26Benefit Uncertainty
DWL TP DWL Tax
MBR
MBE
MC
T
Q
QTp
Q
QT
27Simultaneous benefit and cost uncertainty
MBR
DWL TP
MBE
MCE
MCR
T
DWL Tax
Q
QTp
QT
Q