BYU Deposition Facility - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

BYU Deposition Facility

Description:

BYU Deposition Facility Previous Turbine Accelerated Deposition Facility (TADF) Design Parameters to match: temp, velocity, angle, materials, particle size, chemistry ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:120
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: BYU1
Learn more at: http://www.et.byu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: BYU Deposition Facility


1
BYU Deposition Facility
Previous Turbine Accelerated Deposition Facility
(TADF)
  • Design Parameters to match temp, velocity,
    angle, materials, particle size, chemistry, and
    concentration
  • Inconel construction allows max jet temperature
    of 1200?C
  • Exit velocities up to 300m/s deposition by
    inertial impaction
  • Target coupons supplied from industry
  • Capability for impingement and film cooling
  • Match net particle throughput

8000 hrs ?? 0.1 ppmw 4 hrs ? 200 ppmw
1
2
BYU Coupon Holder
Cooling Air
Coupon w/cooling holes
Thermocouple
Deposit-ladencombustor exhaustat 1183?C
Deposit-ladencombustor exhaustat 1183?C
Coupons generally held at 45? angle to flow
2
3
BYU Previous Testing
  • Deposition vs. Temperature
  • Deposition increases with gas exit temperature
  • Insulated tests conducted up to 1150?C (i.e., no
    cooling)
  • No deposition below 950?C
  • Deposition vs. Cooling
  • Deposition decreases with increasing coupon
    cooling
  • backside cooling
  • film cooling on surface

3
3
4
Goal 1Increase gas temperatures to 1400?C
  • Why?
  • Mimic H class turbine gas temperatures
  • Investigate mechanism changes at higher
    temperatures
  • Gas temperature affects particle melting
  • Surface temperature affects deposit stickiness
    tenacity
  • Examine deposition threshold temperatures with
    realistic blowing ratios
  • Existing experiments cool surface too much with
    M2
  • Distinguish sweeping effect from surface cooling
    effect
  • How?
  • Build new shell
  • Reaction Bonded SiC
  • Price 4500
  • Modify coupon holder
  • New design
  • Insulate front face

4
5
Temperature Range
New Range
Previous range of experiments
5
6
BYU Facility Modification
I.D. 2.5 cm
  • Redesign For 1400?C
  • Cone and Tube
  • Reaction bonded SiC (previously Inconel)
  • New Max Operating Temp 1500?C
  • No problems with thermal shock on startup and
    shutdown

1.2 m
Clamping Ring
SiC Cone
New Cone and Tube
Connection to base
6
7
BYU New Coupon Holder
  • Redesign For 1400?C
  • Coupon Holder
  • Insulating front plate made of SiO2
  • Redesigned front side to allow insulation to be
    flush with coupon

SiO2 Face Plate
Inconel Holder
Gas Flow
Test coupon
Test Coupon
Gas Flow
Tube exit
Old Holder
New Holder plus SiO2 faceplate
7
8
Deposits in Tube
  • Deposits build up in the tube over successive
    runs
  • Less ash impacts the coupon
  • Affects capture efficiency
  • Some tests were performed after large amounts of
    buildup occurred
  • Data points considered outliers
  • Solution
  • Routine cleaning of tube

Deposits
8
9
Correcting for Ash Deposition in Tube
  • Measured mass of deposit in SiC tube
  • When accounting for the mass deposited in the
    tube, the capture efficiencies of the new
    facility match those of the old facility

9
10
Recent Results
  • Time-Dependent Test Series
  • A test series investigating the time-dependent
    nature of deposit growth was performed
  • Tests conducted for 20, 30, 40, and 60 minutes
  • Tg 1250C
  • Capture efficiency, surface roughness (Ra), and
    deposit thickness are measured and calculated
    with respect to time

10
11
Recent Results
  • Flyash Characterization
  • Two size distributions, with mass mean diameters
    of 13 µm and 4 µm
  • Bulk density 0.99 g/cm3
  • Apparent Density 1.98 g/cm3

11
12
Recent Results Time-Dependent Deposition at
1250C
  • Surface roughness and depositthickness increase
    linearly with time
  • Capture efficiency increases exponentially with
    time
  • 3 ?m tests show much lower capture efficiency and
    roughness than 13 ?m tests

12
13
Recent Results Time-Dependent Deposition at
1250C
  • Sticking Probability
  • Particle sticking probability (Ps) as defined by
    Tafti1
  • Gives the probability that a particle of certain
    temperature will adhere to a surface upon
    impaction
  • µcrit is the viscosity at the ash softening
    temperature and µTp is the viscosity at the ash
    particle temperature, calculated as2
  • A and B are dependent upon ash composition
  • 1. Tafti, D., 2010, Syngas Particulate Deposition
    and Erosion at the Leading Edge of a Turbine
    Blade with Film Cooling Presented at NETL
    University Turbine Systems Research Workshop.
  • 2. Senior, C.L. and Srinivasachar, S., 1995,
    "Viscosity of Ash Particles in Combustion Systems
    for Prediction of Particle Sticking," Energy and
    Fuels, 9pp. 277-283.

13
14
Recent Results Time-Dependent Deposition at
1250C
  • Sticking Probability
  • The model was used to calculate the sticking
    probability of the particles in the hot gas
    stream
  • The model was also applied to the ash particles
    already deposited on the surface of the coupon
  • Sticking probability based upon surface ash
    temperature rather than impacting ash temperature

14
15
Surface Temperature MeasurementTg
1250?CUncooled Coupon
16
Recent Results Time-Dependent Deposition at
1250C
  • Sticking Probability
  • Ps in stream 0.185
  • Based on Tg 1250?C
  • Ps on surface shown in figures
  • Based on measured Tsurface

16
17
Recent Results Time-Dependent Deposition at
1250C
Wyoming Powder River Basin Coal Flyash 1250?C
17
18
Began Temperature-Dependent Tests
  • Investigate the influence of gas temperature (Tg)
    on deposition
  • Vary Tg (1250C - 1400C) while using backside
    cooling to keep the initial surface temperature
    constant
  • Only completed a few tests and low end of Tg
    range
  • Using flyash samples from bituminous and
    subbituminous coals

18
19
Difference in Coal Ash
(from temperature-dependent series) Tg
1250?C Ts,initial 1071 ?C
Subbituminous
Bituminous
19
20
Conclusions
  • Results from the new SiC facility compare well
    with results from the old Inconel facility
  • Surface roughness and deposit thickness both
    increase linearly with time at a given gas
    temperature while capture efficiency increases
    non-linearly
  • The surface sticking probability increases with
    time, contributing to increase in capture
    efficiency

20
21
Conclusions
  • Ash composition affects the manner in which ash
    deposits on the surface
  • Bituminous coal ash (higher melting point)
    deposits less evenly and depends more on a
    localized activation point
  • Subbituminous coal ash (lower melting point)
    deposits fairly evenly

21
22
Future BYU Work
  • Finish current temperature series (varying Tg,
    constant initial Ts)
  • Second temperature series (constant Tg, varying
    surface temperature)
  • Comparison of the first and second temperature
    series will show whether Tg or Ts has a greater
    impact on deposition
  • Study effects of film cooling at Tg up to 1400C
  • Study effects of increasing water vapor levels

22
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com