Title: Personality%20Assessment
1(No Transcript)
2Personality Assessment
3Barnum Effect
- Peoples willingness to interpret vague, general
statements as personally meaningful
interpretations of their personality
4Why do we test?
- Tell us how much of a trait you have.
- Why do we test?
- 1) Clinical
- 2) Employment
- 3) Curiosity
5How do we test?
- 1) Create a test
- 2) Validate the test
- 3) Use the test
6Methods for creating a test
- Rational Method
- Projective Tests
- Factor Analytic Method
- Empirical Method
- Combination of Methods
7Rational Method
8- 1) Enjoy being reckless.Â
- 2) Take risks.Â
- 3) Avoid dangerous situations.
- 4) Seek danger.Â
- 5) Know how to get around the rules.
- 6) Would never make a high risk investment.
- 7) Am willing to try anything once.Â
- 8) Seek adventure.
- 9) Would never go hang-gliding or
bungee-jumping.Â
9- 1) Enjoy being reckless.Â
- 2) Take risks.Â
- 3) Avoid dangerous situations.
- 4) Seek danger.Â
- 5) Know how to get around the rules.
- 6) Would never make a high risk investment.
- 7) Am willing to try anything once.Â
- 8) Seek adventure.
- 9) Would never go hang-gliding or
bungee-jumping.Â
10Rational Method
- Straight forward and obvious items
- Most common method of test construction
- For this to work
- 1) Items must mean the same thing to subjects as
it does to the test creator - 2) Person must be able to self-assess
- 3) Person must be willing to self-assess
- 4) Items must be valid indicators of
characteristic
11Projective Tests
12Inkblots as projective stimuli
- The Rorschach
- Hermann Rorschach (1884 - 1922).
- 10 bilaterally symmetrical inkblots on separate
cards - 5 black and white.
- 2 black, white, and red.
- 3 multicolor.
13Inkblots Initial administration
- What might this be?
- Record response verbatim
- Include time until first response.
- Position of card, spontaneous statements,
nonverbal gestures or body movements.
14InkblotsInterpretation of scores
- Generate hypotheses based on patterns of
response, recurrent themes and interrelationships
among scoring categories
15Assumptions of Projective Tests
- Assumptions
- The more unstructured the stimuli, the more
examinees reveal about their personality. - Every response provides meaning for personality
analysis.
- There is an unconscious.
- Subjects are unaware of what they disclose.
16(No Transcript)
17(No Transcript)
18(No Transcript)
19(No Transcript)
20Thematic Apperception Test (TAT)
- Morgan and Murray (1935).
- Elicit fantasy material from patients in
psychoanalysis. - 31 cards
- 30 black white with scenes
- Describe story.
- 1 blank
- Imagine picture on card and tell related story.
21TAT Conclusions
- Based on
- Stories told by examinee.
- Clinicians notes
- Examinees response to the cards.
- Analysis of story requires special training.
22TAT Interpretation (cont.)
- Basic assumption
- Examinee is identifying with protagonist in the
story. - Examinees concerns, hopes, fears, and desires
are reflected in the protagonists needs,
demands, and conflicts. - That is, the examinees personality is projected
onto the protagonist.
23Projective Tests for Children
- The Adventures of Blacky the Dog
24Blacky Test
25(No Transcript)
26(No Transcript)
27(No Transcript)
28Other Projective Tests
- Draw a person test
- Draw a house test
- Word association
29(No Transcript)
30Factor Analytic Method
- 1) Name different makes of cars
- 2) In groups
- Imagine you work in a car lot and you must
organize these cars in some manner into 4
different groups - 3) Organize the cars and name the groupings
31Factor Analytic Method
- Done in 5 steps
- 1) Create many items
- 2) Give these items to many people
- 3) Correlate items together
- 4) Look for groupings of items
- 5) Name the groupings (i.e. factors)
32Factor Analytic Method
- Limitations
- Only as good as the items
- Sometimes get odd factors
- Still must name the factor (not done by the
computer)
33Factor Analytic Method
1) Automatically take charge. 2) Joke around a lot. 3) Turn plans into actions. 4) Stick up for myself. 5) Act wild and crazy.  6) Am always busy. 7) Follow a schedule. 8) Laugh my way through life. 9) Let myself go. 10) Express childlike joy. 11) Do a lot in my spare time. 12) Disclose my intimate thoughts. 13) Know what I want. 14) Like harmony in my life. 16) Try to lead others. 17) Am open about myself to others. 18) Can easily push myself forward. 19) Am deeply moved by others' misfortunes. Â
34Factor Analytic Method
Factor 1 Automatically take charge. Can easily push myself forward. Try to lead others. Turn plans into actions. Stick up for myself. Am always busy. Do a lot in my spare time. Know what I want. Factor 2 Act wild and crazy. Let myself go. Disclose my intimate thoughts. Laugh my way through life. Express childlike joy. Joke around a lot. Am open about myself to others.Â
Factor 3 Follow a schedule. Like harmony in my
life Am deeply moved by others' misfortunes.
35(No Transcript)
36Empirical Method
- I prefer a shower to a bath
- I sometimes tease animals
- I will sometimes wear a dress
- I like watching football
- I am happy
- I typically open doors for others
- As a child I liked playing with dolls
37Empirical Method
- Done in 3 Steps
- 1) Create items
- Items can be anything!
38Empirical Method
- 2) Administer the items to two groups
- Criterion Group
- Composed of people that possess the trait
- Control Group
- Composed of people that do not possess the trait
39Empirical Method
- 3) Select items that the two groups answered
differently
40Empirical Method
- Basic Logic
- Different kinds of people have distinctive ways
of answering certain questions. - If you answer questions the same way that members
of a diagnostic group did, you might belong to
that group too!
41Empirical Method
- Thus, the content of empirical items does not
matter - I sometimes tease animals
- Not depressed
- I have a great fear of snakes
- Prejudiced
- I do not enjoy detective stories
- Hospitalized hysterics
- I like tall women
- Impulsive males
- I gossip a little at times
- High IQ
42Empirical Method
- Difficult to fake
- Only as good as the groups they were created with
- Do other things make the groups different?
- May not generalize to other people in other areas
43Combination of Methods
- Commonly used
- Combine together
- 1) Rational method (come up with items that make
sense) - 2) Factor Analytic (select items that group)
- 3) Empirical Method (determine if items can
predict types of people)
44Methods for creating a test
- Rational Method
- Projective Tests
- Factor Analytic Method
- Empirical Method
- Combination of Methods
45(No Transcript)
46Basic Steps
- 1) Create a test
- 2) Validate the test
- 3) Use the test
47Statistics
48Correlation
49Positive Correlation
50Positive Correlation
51Positive Correlation
r 1.00
52Positive Correlation
.
.
.
.
.
r .64
53(No Transcript)
54Negative Correlation
55Negative Correlation
r - 1.00
56Negative Correlation
.
.
.
r - .85
.
.
57(No Transcript)
58Zero Correlation
59Zero Correlation
.
.
.
.
.
r .00
60Correlation Coefficient
- The sign of a correlation ( or -) only tells you
the direction of the relationship - The value of the correlation only tells you about
the size of the relationship (i.e., how close the
scores are to the regression line)
61EXCEL
62- Which is a bigger effect?
- r .40 or r -.40
- How are they different?
63Practice
- Do you think the following variables are
positively, negatively or uncorrelated to each
other? - Alcohol consumption Driving skills
- Miles of running a day speed in a foot race
- Height GPA
- Forearm length foot length
64STOP
65Interpreting a Correlation
- What does it actually mean in people words?
- Binomial Effect Size Display (BESD)
66BESD
- 200 subjects (all sick)
- Drug given to 100 of them
- At the end
- 100 live and 100 die
- If the effect of the drug was .00 what does
that mean?
67BESD
When r .00
Alive Dead Total
Drug 50 50 100
No Drug 50 50 100
Total 100 100 200
68BESD
- 200 subjects (all sick)
- Drug given to 100 of them
- At the end
- 100 live and 100 die
- What if the drugs effect was .40 what does that
look like?
69BESD
When r .40
Alive Dead Total
Drug 70 30 100
No Drug 30 70 100
Total 100 100 200
70BESD
Thus, if you take the drug you have a 70 chance
of living compared to only 30 if you do not take
the drug!
When r .40
Alive Dead Total
Drug 70 30 100
No Drug 30 70 100
Total 100 100 200
71BESD
- How to compute
- 200 subjects (all sick)
- Drug given to 100 of them
- At the end
- 100 live and 100 die
- Drugs effect was .30
72BESD
When r .30
Alive Dead Total
Drug 100
No Drug 100
Total 100 100 200
73BESD
1) Compute cell values if r .00
When r .30
Alive Dead Total
Drug 100
No Drug 100
Total 100 100 200
74BESD
1) Compute cell values if r .00
When r .30
Alive Dead Total
Drug 50 50 100
No Drug 50 50 100
Total 100 100 200
75BESD
1) Drop the decimal (30) 2) Divide by 2 (30 / 2
15) 3) Add to number in upper left cell (50 15
65)
When r .30
Alive Dead Total
Drug 50 50 100
No Drug 50 50 100
Total 100 100 200
76BESD
- Plug in value
- Compute other cell values
When r .30
Alive Dead Total
Drug 65 50 100
No Drug 50 50 100
Total 100 100 200
77BESD
- Plug in value
- Compute other cell values
When r .30
Alive Dead Total
Drug 65 35 100
No Drug 50 50 100
Total 100 100 200
78BESD
- Plug in value
- Compute other cell values
When r .30
Alive Dead Total
Drug 65 35 100
No Drug 35 65 100
Total 100 100 200
79BESD Practice
- Create BESDs for the following
- r .10
- r .55
- r .80