Title: Discussion of outstanding
1Cottonwood Mutual Water Company
- Discussion of outstanding
- Issues with regard to the Wilkinson Farm LLC.
2Class C Shares
- The water company is comprised of several classes
of Shares - Class A 712 shares
- Class C 7000 shares
- Class C share are Ownership or Control shares
3Class C Shares Cont.
- Class C to Maintain control during interim period
- Deeded over to Gardner Development as part of the
land sale contract - Gardner agreed to allow Wilkinson's to retain
half voting power - Both agreed to never use Class C vote during
shareholder meeting to avoid throwing the vote.
4Class C. Shares Cont.
- Class C ownership unclear
- Control of company unknown
- Difficult to manage
- Water company desires to rid company of Class C
shares so it can move forward - Tax incentives
- Decision making power
- Control over future
5Class C. Shares cont
- Gardner Development agrees to relinquish interest
in Class C shares in exchange for a development
agreement - GCC will deed over all infrastructure and provide
easements - Water company agree to continue service
development - Great.
6Class C. Shares cont
- Wilkinson Family agrees to relinquish interest in
Class C shares in exchange for a master
agreement. - Wilkinson current proposal
- Will eliminate all legal concerns
- Allow the company to move forward
- Particulars of agreement are of concern.
7Methods to deal with disagreement
- 1) Both parties come to a mutually acceptable
agreement - 2) Mediation (non-binding)
- 3) Arbitration (binding)
- 4) Litigation
8Wilkinson Proposal
- ( 1. Cottonwood Mutual Water Company will pay
to the Wilkinson Family LLC 116,000.00 past due
on the Loan note, either in a lump sum or by
payments to be agreed uponstarting Sept. 1 of
2011. - A. WFLLC will retain 86 thousand gallons of
storage water.
9Wilkinson Proposal cont.
- (2. Wilkinson Family will expect a contract
from the Water Company stating that they will
supply Will Serve Letters for the build-out of
the rest of the farm. - (3. The Water Company will not pursue the
supposed 54K payback
10Wilkinson Proposal cont.
- (4. The Water Company will not charge the
Wilkinson Family (questionable) 35 K legal fees
or any other past legal fees. - (5. The Wilkinson Family will retain the
fifty acre feet.
11Wilkinson Proposal cont.
- (6. There will be a binding contract between
WFF and CMWC stating that neither party will
pursue legal (or otherwise) action concerning
these matters after there is an agreement and
settlement.
12Wilkinson Proposal cont.
- ( 7. A document stating that the C shares held
in Escrow will be signed by Rulon Gardner and the
Wilkinsons releasing said shares to the
Wilkinsons so they can then be turned over to
the Cottonwood Mutual Water Company thereby
giving control of the Company to the rest of the
share holders.
13Wilkinson Proposal cont.
- For this the water company will get
- A company worth 1.5 million dollars. To include
- All remaining Wilkinson C Shares
- Ground under 500k tank worth 100,000
- All infrastructure-tanks-pipelines-easements-reser
voir, ect. - The reservoir (silver lake)
14Utah State Law
- R746-330-6
- There is a rebuttable presumption that the value
of original utility plant and assets has been
recovered in the sale of lots in a development to
be served by a developer-owned water or sewer
utility.
15Standard Procedure for new development
- Developer builds required infrastructure
- Developer acquires water rights
- Developer deeds infrastructure/water rights to
water company free of charge - Water company services new development.
- No cost to new or existing customers
16Item 1 Wilkinson Loan
- 1997 Babcock and Wilkinson's jointly build a
250,000 tank - Wilkinson Proportion 146,000 gallons.
- Engineers estimate of all improvements for
Wilkinson Portion. - 135,925.40
- Actual cost unknown
- Proportion of costs for new vs old dev. unknown
17Wilkinson Loan Cont.
18Concerns with Wilkinson Loan
- Water company forced to buy infrastructure to
support future development - Major PSC Failure
- Undesirable loan term.
- No connection fees associated
- No known actual costs.
- Only engineers estimate
- How much of costs was required to maintain
existing system vs. support new development.
19Concerns with Wilkinson Loan
- Interest accrued between 1997 and 1999
- 22,106
- Not enough money in company to pay for loan
- PSC did not grant rate increase to pay for full
loan. - Interest balloons over course of loan.
20Concerns with Wilkinson Loan
- 1999 Water company sells storage back to
Wilkinson family - 54,180
- Where did this figure come from?
- 0.37/gal, undervalued?
- No credit for interest paid
- Bad business deal for water company
21Concerns with Wilkinson Loan
- 2003 Wilkinsons sell back extra storage to water
company - 109,500 0.75/gal
- Going rate for new construction
- No PSC approval
- PSC audited books, PSC FAIL
22Concerns with Wilkinson Loan
- Water company sold to GCC as part of land sale
- 2008 payments stopped
- Lack of funds
- Concerns over loan
-
23Concerns with Wilkinson Loan
- Paid approx 186,000 in principal plus interest
- Loan Balance 100,464
- Original estimated costs 135,000
- Wilkinsons charging 18 interest between 2008
and 2011
24Wilkinson proposal to company
- Wilkinsons to buy back 86,000 of storage at
0.75/gal (same as 2003) - Company charged interest between 2003 and 2011.
- Estimated over 60,000
- Leaves loan at approximately 100,000 248/con.
- Going rate 1.10
- Total gain to Wilkinson's, 151,000 plus 86,000
gallons/storage - 286,000 paid minus estimate cost of 135,000 for
60,000 gal storrage
25Water company proposed Position
- PSC approval of 1998 rate increase
- 90,526 capacity held for expansion
- 1997 Rate based loan adjusted to 44,474
- Apply same payments/Loan Terms
- Wilkinsons retain extra storage
- Accept 2003 buy of 146,000 gal of tank storage at
0.75 - Apply same payments/Loan Terms
26Water company proposed Position
- Accept Purchase of Extra Tank Storage
- Fulfill new fire suppression standards
- 60,000 gal
- Retire old tanks
- Minimize amount due to water company
- Shows overpayment of loan
- Approximately 7,200
27Item 354,000 payment to Wilkinson's
- Company Files for PSC exemption
- April 21, 2006 Board approves to pay Wilkinson's
for Infrastructure - September 16, 2006 Board amends April 21, 2006
minutes to state 1,000/lot for 70 lots - 54,000 paid out by October 16, 2006
2854,000 payment to Wilkinson's
- October 16, 2006 Memo indicates payment is for
Rose hill sub. Infrastructure. - No proof of expenditures
- R746-330-6 Law
- PSC said NO to Wayne for many years
2954,000 payment to Wilkinson's
- Drained Companys savings
- Company collects connection fees for a reason.
- Company ran out of money.
- Potentially an illegal distribution of funds to
share holders. - Wilkinsons settlement asking for remaining
16,000 or 174/connection for 70,000
30Water company proposed position
- Water company requesting written documentation
showing expenses and validating expenses as an
appropriate water company expense. Ie. Not to
support new development (Rosehill), or - Pay back the 54,000
31Item 4 Additional costs to perfect water rights
- In addition to the 50 acre feet there were other
water rights not in the company after the sale. - Water company expended 35,273.26 to correct
them. 87/connection.
32Item 4,5Proving of water rights
- Important to understand that ability to develop
consists of providing - Source of Water
- Storage / Infrastructure
- Water Right
33Proving of Water Right
- Missing 50 Acre feet to supply homes built
between 1986 and 1999 (52 Total) - Streets affected include
- Garnet Drive
- Cottonwood Canyon Road
- Old Highway
- Lilac Lane
- Daisy Drive
- Tulip Drive
- Iris Avenue
34Hearing Report
35LotsServed
36Proving of Water Right
- Company currently whole through Weber Basin Water
Right leases - Cost to company
- 245.32 per acre foot
- 50 acre feet costs water company 12,266 per year
- Cost to you
- 30.36 per active connection per year, or
- 2.53 per active connection per month
37Proving of water rights
- Change application on right 35-5791 filed June
11, 1992 - Original Place of Use SW¼ Sec. 30 T5 NR 2E
- Use Changed to N ½ of SE ¼ Sec. 25 T5 NR 1E, S½
NW, W½ of SW Sec. 30 T5 NR 2 E - Purpose
- Applying for additional water for use in
Wilkinson Water Companys Culinary System
38T 5 N R 2 E
T 5 N R 1 E
25
30
SW 1/4
39T 5 N R 2 E
T 5 N R 1 E
25
30
S ½ NW, W ½ of SW
N ½ of SE ¼
40Proving of water rights
- Change Application Approved
- January 13, 2006
- Change Application Authorized
- 53 Domestic Connections
- 9 Irrigated acres between May 1 and Oct 31
41Wilkinson Proposal
- Retain the 50 acre-feet of water.
- Require water company to acquire and maintain
water right to supply Wilkinson development
(Rosehill).
42Water Company position
- Require the transfer of the 50 acre feet, water
right 35-5791
43Proposed Water Company Action
- Cancel all will serves for Remaining Wilkinson
Land - Will not offer new Will Serves until all issues
resolved
44Water Company Proposed Compromise
- Give Credit for Wilkinsons voluntarily
relinquishing interests in Class C Shares - These Issues are fuzzy, not sufficient
documentation to fully support either side. - Give benefit of doubt on some issues
- Let the past be the past and move forward.
45Water Company Proposed Compromise
- Wilkinson's Relinquish all interest in the water
company except for Class A Shares - Wilkinson's transfer over water right 35-5791
- Water company recognize all other issues
resolved, estimated over 100,000. - Both sides give up right for future recourse.
46Summary of Wilkinson Proposal
- Pay Additional 116,000 or approximately
288/active connection. - Accept liability to acquire water rights for
Rosehill sub, with annual 12,226/year - Accept ownership of well 2. (High nitrates)
47Summary of Wilkinson Proposal
- Class C shares are gone!!
- Legal issues resolved
- Full control given to community