Design of PM helicon arrays - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Design of PM helicon arrays

Description:

Slide 1 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 90
Provided by: Franc312
Learn more at: http://seas.ucla.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Design of PM helicon arrays


1
(No Transcript)
2
Design of PM helicon arrays
  1. Optimization of the discharge tube
  2. Design of the permanent magnets
  3. Design of a multi-tube array
  4. Design and construction of a test chamber
  5. Antennas and the RF distribution system
  6. Experimental results
  7. Design of a compact module
  8. Ideas for further improvements to be tested

UCLA
3
A commercial helicon etcher (PMT MØRI)
It required two heavy electromagnets with
opposite currents.
4
Previous experiment with 7 tubes
The stubby tube
It required a large electromagnet
UCLA
5
Plasmas merged density is uniform
High density and uniformity were achieved
UCLA
6
(No Transcript)
7
Optimization of discharge tube HELIC code

Radial profiles are arbitrary, but B and n must
be uniform axially.
HELIC gives not only the wave fields but also R,
the loading resistance.
D. Arnush, Phys. Plasmas 7, 3042 (2000).
UCLA
8
The HELIC user interface
UCLA
9
The Low-field Peak
UCLA
10
Mechanism of the Low Field Peak
Basic helicon relations
UCLA
11
The peak is sensitive to the density profile
12
The peak depends on the boundary condition
13
The peak depends on distance from endplate
14
The peak depends on the type of antenna
Single loop m 0, bidirectional HH
(half-wavelength helical) m 1,
undirectional Nagoya Type III m 1,
bidirectional
15
Typical scan of Rp vs n, B
Each point requires solving a 4th order
differential equation gt100 times. A typical scan
takes 3 hours on a PC.
UCLA
16
Matrices for optimizing discharge tube
Vary the tube length and diameter
Vary the RF frequency
Vary the endplate conductivity
UCLA
Vary the pressure and frequency
17
Vary H (endplate distance) for 3 diam
UCLA
18
Vary diam for H 2 at 100G
UCLA
19
Vary the frequency
UCLA
20
Not much variation with pressure
UCLA
21
Vary the endplate material
Initially, it seems that the conducting endplate
is better. However, it is because the phase
reversal at the endplate has changed, and the
tube length has to be 1/4 wavelength longer to
get constructive interference. By changing H,
almost the same R can be achieved.
UCLA
22
Relation of R to plasma density
Rp ltlt Rc
UCLA
23
Relation of R to plasma density
Rp gt Rc
UCLA
24
Final design
UCLA
25
The New Stubby tube
UCLA
26
Design of PM helicon arrays
  1. Optimization of the discharge tube
  2. Design of the permanent magnets
  3. Design of a multi-tube array
  4. Design and construction of a test chamber
  5. Antennas and the RF distribution system
  6. Experimental results
  7. Design of a compact module
  8. Ideas for further improvements to be tested

UCLA
27
Characteristics of permanent magnet rings
UCLA
28
The B-field of annular PMs
The field reverses at a stagnation point very
close to the magnet.
Plasma created inside the rings follows the field
lines and cannot be ejected.
UCLA
29
Optimization of magnet geometry

actual


Result Field strength ? magnet volume Spacing
improves uniformity slightly
actual
UCLA
30
The field of 4 stacked magnet rings
The internal and external fields at various
radii. The individual rings can be seen at large
radii.
Calibration of the calculated field with a
gaussmeter.
UCLA
31
For the designed tube, B 60G is good
UCLA
32
Proof of principle on 3 diam tube
UCLA
33
Radial density profiles at Z1 and Z2
Upper probe
Lower probe
x 1010 cm-3
Proof of principle discharge in the external
field gives much more plasma downstream.
UCLA
34
The final design for 2 tubes
Material NdFeB Bmax 12 kG Attractive force
between two magnets 2 cm apart 516 Newtons 53
kg
The magnets are dangerous!
UCLA
35
Wooden frame for safe storage
UCLA
36
Single tube, final configuration
Radial Bz profiles at various distances below the
magnet.
Discharge tube
UCLA
37
Design of PM helicon arrays
  1. Optimization of the discharge tube
  2. Design of the permanent magnets
  3. Design of a multi-tube array
  4. Design and construction of a test chamber
  5. Antennas and the RF distribution system
  6. Experimental results
  7. Design of a compact module
  8. Ideas for further improvements to be tested

UCLA
38
Design of array
Radial density profiles at Z1 7.4 cm and
Z2 17.6 cm below discharge.
The density at Z2 is summed over nearest tubes.
UCLA
39
Computed uniformity n(x) for various y
Half-way between rows
1/4-way between rows

Directly under a row
Beyond both rows
40
A tube spacing of 7 is chosen
For a single row, a distance L 17.5 cm between
two tubes gives less than 2 ripple in density.
UCLA
41
Design of PM helicon arrays
  1. Optimization of the discharge tube
  2. Design of the permanent magnets
  3. Design of a multi-tube array
  4. Design and construction of a test chamber
  5. Antennas and the RF distribution system
  6. Experimental results
  7. Design of a compact module
  8. Ideas for further improvements to be tested

UCLA
42
An 8-tube linear test array
Top view
UCLA
43
Possible applications
  • Web coaters
  • Flat panel displays
  • Solar cells
  • Optical coatings

A web coater
UCLA
44
The array source is vertically compact
Side view
Probe ports
The magnets can be made in two pieces so that
they hold each other on an aluminum sheet. Once
placed, the magnets cannot easily be moved, so
for testing we use a wooden support.
UCLA
45
The wooden magnet frame is used in testing
UCLA
46
Water and RF connections
These will be shown in detail later
UCLA
47
An 8-tube staggered array in operation
UCLA
48
Design of PM helicon arrays
  1. Optimization of the discharge tube
  2. Design of the permanent magnets
  3. Design of a multi-tube array
  4. Design and construction of a test chamber
  5. Antennas and the RF distribution system
  6. Experimental results
  7. Design of a compact module
  8. Ideas for further improvements to be tested

UCLA
49
Antennas
The antennas are m 0 loops made of three turns
of 1/8 diam copper tubing.
The reason for m 0 is that m 1 antennas are
too long, and much of the plasma is lost by
radial diffusion before exiting the tube. The
antenna must be close to the exit aperture and be
tightly wound onto the tube.
The helicon wave pattern for m 0 is a peculiar
one but theory is straightforward. The wave
changes from pure electromagnetic to pure
electrostatic in each half cycle.
UCLA
50
The RF system
The critical elements are the junction box and
the transmission lines.
UCLA
51
Antenna connections (1)
The antennas must be connected in parallel with
cables of equal length. The first trial was to
use standard RG/8U cables and N connectors. These
arced and overheated.
UCLA
52
Reason that RF connectors dont work

High voltages and currents occur when there is NO
PLASMA that is, before breakdown or when the
plasma disrupts. Then, if the RF power on a tube
is set for 400W, the peak-to-peak voltage can be
5kV, and the rms current can be 12A. Once the
discharge is on, the RF power goes into the
plasma rather than into the cables and connectors.
UCLA
53
Antenna connections (2)
In the second try, all connections were solidly
soldered, and RG/393 teflon-insulated cable was
used. This method works for CW operation in
experiment but may be marginal for industrial
use.
UCLA
54
Connections (3) a rectangular transmission line
For w gtgt h, we find
UCLA
55
Impedance for various pipe diameters
For Z0 50W, h 3/4, but exactly 50W is not
necessary
UCLA
56
Transmission line construction (1)
UCLA
57
Transmission line construction (2)
UCLA
58
Transmission line construction (3)
UCLA
59
Transmission line (4) water connections
No high voltage is applied along a water line.
UCLA
60
Pictures (1)
UCLA
61
Pictures (2)
UCLA
62
Pictures (3)
UCLA
63
UCLA
Design of the matching circuit
Standard circuit
Alternate circuit
Analytic formulas from Chen. The important part
is that the impedance changes with cable length.
F.F. Chen, Capacitor tuning circuits for
inductive loads, UCLA Rept. PPG-1401
(unpublished) (1992) F.F. Chen, Helicon Plasma
Sources, in "High Density Plasma Sources", ed. by
Oleg A. Popov (Noyes Publications, Park Ridge,
NJ), Chap. 1 (1995)
64
Adapted to N tubes in parallel
The problem with array sources is that the cable
lengths cannot be short. The match circuit
cannot be close to all the tubes.
UCLA
65
C1, C2 for N8, L 0.8mH, Z1 110 cm, Z2 90
cm
UCLA
66
Variation with the number of tubes N
Note that it is not possible to match to 1 or 2
tubes with the same length cables used for 8
tubes.
UCLA
67
Design of PM helicon arrays
  1. Optimization of the discharge tube
  2. Design of the permanent magnets
  3. Design of a multi-tube array
  4. Design and construction of a test chamber
  5. Antennas and the RF distribution system
  6. Experimental results
  7. Design of a compact module
  8. Ideas for further improvements to be tested

UCLA
68
Experimental layout
Staggered configuration
Compact configuration
Four probe positions
UCLA
69
Effect of B-field strength (magnet height D)
Variation of loading resistance with D
Variation of density with D
UCLA
70
Variation with RF power and Ar pressure
Variation of density argon pressure
Variation of density with RF power
UCLA
71
Density jump inside the tube
compared with theory for various circuit
resistances Rc
UCLA
72
Deployment of movable probe array
UCLA
73
An linear array of 15 probes
H. Torreblanca, Multitube helicon source with
permanent magnets, Thesis, UCLA (2008).
UCLA
74
Density profiles across the chamber (1)
Staggered configuration, 3kW Side Langmuir probe
UCLA
75
Density profiles across the chamber (2)
Compact configuration, 3kW Side Langmuir probe
UCLA
76
Density profiles across the chamber (3)
Staggered configuration, 3kW Bottom probe array
UCLA
77
Density profiles across the chamber (4)
Compact configuration, 3kW Bottom probe array
UCLA
78
Density profiles along the chamber (1)
Staggered configuration, 3kW Bottom probe array
UCLA
79
Density profiles along the chamber (2)
Compact configuration, 3kW Bottom probe array
UCLA
80
Calibration of the collector array
UCLA
81
Design of PM helicon arrays
  1. Optimization of the discharge tube
  2. Design of the permanent magnets
  3. Design of a multi-tube array
  4. Design and construction of a test chamber
  5. Antennas and the RF distribution system
  6. Experimental results
  7. Design of a compact module
  8. Ideas for further improvements to be tested

UCLA
82
A compact, 8-tube module
UCLA
83
Stacked modules for large-area coverage
UCLA
84
Match circuit fits on top of module
UCLA
85
Design of PM helicon arrays
  1. Optimization of the discharge tube
  2. Design of the permanent magnets
  3. Design of a multi-tube array
  4. Design and construction of a test chamber
  5. Antennas and the RF distribution system
  6. Experimental results
  7. Design of a compact module
  8. Ideas for further improvements to be tested

UCLA
86
Ferrites for better coupling
The RF energy outside the antenna is wasted.
Perhaps it can be captured with a ferrite cover.
UCLA
87
Untested ideas
One-piece ceramic tube
Ferrite transformer coupling
UCLA
88
(No Transcript)
89
Varying the magnet shapes and spacings

Varying the ID and OD of PMs shows that B depends
mainly on total volume of magnet.


This shows that not much uniformity is lost if
the magnet spacing is zero
UCLA
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com