Product Liability - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 43
About This Presentation
Title:

Product Liability

Description:

Product Liability SAI KRISHNA CHARY KUMBOJU SRIKANTH BANDARU DAVID DRISKO Introduction Estimated that 50 million product accidents occur annually Costs businesses and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:243
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: DavidD224
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Product Liability


1
Product Liability
  • SAI KRISHNA CHARY KUMBOJU
  • SRIKANTH BANDARU
  • DAVID DRISKO

2
Introduction
  • Estimated that 50 million product accidents occur
    annually
  • Costs businesses and organizations 50 billion
    (U.S.)
  • Causes increase in insurance costs
  • Large companies can pass the expenditure to the
    customers
  • Small businesses often go bankrupt

3
Product Liability
  • the responsibility of manufacturers, distributors
    and sellers of products to the public, to deliver
    products free of defects which harm an individual
    or numerous persons and to make good on that
    responsibility if their products are defective

4
3 Main Areas of Product Liability
  • Behavior and knowledge of the user
  • Environment where the product is used
  • Design flaws
  • The first two are difficult to mitigate
  • Design flaws is the area that TQM has the
    greatest control over

5
Brief History
  • Ancient Times
  • Sample of grain covers whole harvest
  • 14th Century
  • Very difficult to sue manufacturer, simple
    products
  • Mid 1700s
  • Caveat emptor was the prevailing legal mindset

6
Caveat Emptor
  • Buyer Beware based on Smiths economy policies
  • Privacy of contract
  • Allowed lawsuits only one step
  • Fostered Industrial Revolution by limiting
    manufacturers liability
  • Step of Products
  • Manufacturer
  • Wholesaler
  • Retailer
  • Customer
  • Customer refers to the person who actually
    bought the item

7
Government Steps In
  • Inherent or imminently dangerous products need
    regulation
  • 1906 Congress passes Federal Food and Drug Act
  • Creates government oversight of food and drugs
  • Allows product liability lawsuits to be brought
    against drug manufacturers

8
MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.
  • 1916 Landmark case for products liability
  • Made manufacturer liable to final customer
  • This case is the reason tires are not covered
    under car warrantees

9
Product Safety Law
  • Consumer Product Safety Act 1972
  • Protects consumers from unreasonable risk
  • Establishes uniform safety standards
  • Research and investigation into cause and
    prevention of related deaths, injury, or illness
  • Only covers products used in or around household
    and schools and for recreation
  • Exemptions
  • Cars, boats, planes, food, drugs, tobacco, and
    poison

10
Product Liability Law
  • Tort of negligence
  • Tort of strict liability
  • Contract law of sales or warranty

11
Tort of Negligence
  • Classic theory of products liability
  • Must prove manufacturer was careless
  • Focuses on manufacturers conduct
  • Varies from state to state
  • Most states going away from allowing product
    liability under negligence

12
Tort of Strict Liability
  • One who sells a product in a defective condition
    that is unreasonably dangerous to a consumer is
    liable for harm caused to the user or the users
    property
  • Product Liability sued under this tort in many
    states
  • Allows the injured party to sue all the way
    through the steps of products
  • Allows user of product to sue not just purchaser
    of product

13
Contract Law of Sales or Warranty
  • Express Warranty
  • Material statement made voluntarily by a
    manufacturer or merchant in sales brochures or
    sales talk to induce sales
  • Implied Warranty
  • Implies that the product is reasonably fit for
    the general purpose for which the product was
    designed
  • Cannot be waived required by law

14
Defenses to Product Liability
  • Defendant tries to prove
  • Plaintiffs bad judgment
  • Plaintiffs failure to maintain the product
    properly
  • Plaintiffs improper use of product
  • Comparative Negligence
  • Assumption of Risk
  • Misuse
  • Statutes of Repose

15
Financial Loss
  • Product Liability suits cost a lot of money
  • Court judgment is larges financial loss
  • Attorneys fees
  • Technical expert fees
  • Investigation fees
  • Other costs
  • Increased liability insurance
  • Recall, replacement, or repair of product
  • Damage to reputation and customer base
  • Hold or delay in production due to potential
    defect
  • Increased quality efforts for prevention appraisal

16
Prevention
  • 17 Areas for Prevention
  • Organization
  • Education
  • New-Product Review
  • Initial Production Review and Periodic Production
    Audits
  • Control of Warranties, Advertisements,
    Agreements, and the Like
  • Warning Labels and Instructions
  • Complaints and Claims
  • Retention of Records and Document Control
  • ISO 9000 Documents
  • Product-Recall Plan
  • Subrogation, Risk Criteria, Standards, Audits,
    Customer Service, Redress

17
Organization
  • Organizational structure must specify
    responsibilities and have the necessary authority
    to achieve those responsibilities
  • Formal product-safety committee should be
    established
  • Organization should have a safety engineer,
    either hired or selected from within

18
Education
  • Cornerstone of effective program
  • Emphasize the importance of product safety to all
    employees
  • Ensure education of new or transferred employees
  • Continuing education is part of a plan of action

19
New-Product Review
  • Establish product review team that has no
    preconceived notions about the product
  • Should check for the following

Crushing Hazards Shearing Hazards Cutting
Hazards Entanglement Hazards Drawing-in or
Trapping Hazards Impact Hazards Puncture
Hazards Abrasion Hazards
Exposed live part electrical hazards Electrostat
ic Exposure Thermo Hazards (exposed high
temperature parts) Noise Hazards (exposed to high
sound frequencies) Exposure to gases or fumes
hazards
Fire or explosion hazards Unexpected start-up
hazards
Attorneys have won many cases because
organizations did not consider reasonably
foreseeable uses of the product
20
Initial Production Review
  • Usually conducted on prototype
  • The review evaluates the manufacturing plan to
    determine adequacy of

Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) Tooling
and work-holding devices Production
machinery Materials handling Test
Equipment Inspection system Sampling plan
Packaging and Shipping Operating
instructions Safety warnings Advanced service
information for distributors and dealers
Inherently hazardous products should have a
limited production run and controlled
distribution to collect better information
Periodic audits should be conducted to verify or
validate quality control systems as part of ISO
9000 requirements
21
Control of Warranties, Advertisements,
Agreements, and the Like
  • Product Safety Committee must continually review
    all literature and publications for the product
  • Check to determine that terms and conditions of
    sale are limited to statements of
    merchantability, product is of good material and
    workmanship. Avoid phrases like Safe or
    Ensures the safety of the operator
  • All literature should be reviewed by legal
    counsel
  • Examination of purchase orders to determine any
    special warranty provisions
  • Analyze dealer distributorship and franchise
    agreements to determine the handling of
    defective items
  • Determine that words like nonconformity and
    nonconforming units have been used where
    appropriate
  • Evaluate cost problems of warranties

22
Warning Labels and Instructions
  • Largest cause of manufacture negligence is
    inadequate or non-existent warnings
  • Warnings and Instructions are separate items
  • Should be written by someone with no technical
    knowledge along with a product engineer
  • ANSI has developed standards for warning labels
  • Avoid overuse of warnings as that may detract
    form the importance of the warnings

23
Complaints and Claims
  • Complaints and claims alert the manufacturer to
    the need for corrective action
  • Immediately investigate any claim or complaint
    involving bodily injury, property damage, or
    product safety
  • Product Safety Engineer should determine the
    following
  • The appropriate departments should be notified of
    the findings of the complaint or claim

the cause of claim or complaint nature and
seriousness of injury, if one occurred the
failure mode that caused the situation, if there
was one the age of the defect and whether it was
present when the product was sold the negligence
of the parties
24
Retention of Records and Document control
  • Records and documents will be required if an
    organization ever has to defend its product
  • Types of records that should be kept are
  • Product development and test records
  • Results of process, product, and system
    inspections and audits
  • Original design data
  • Service-life data
  • Acceptance and approvals from government agencies
    or independent testing organizations
  • Critical Raw material acceptance letters
  • Documents should be centrally located and
    protected from loss

25
ISO 9000 Documents
  • A product liability lawsuit represents the
    ultimate quality failure of a product
  • A manufacturer without a formal quality program
    is viewed as negligent in its internal efforts to
    prevent product defects
  • ISO 9000 documents should be prepared carefully

26
Product-Recall Plan
  • An effective recall contingency plan helps
    minimize the recall costs and the products
    liability risk
  • Three factors must be considered when determining
    if a recall is needed
  • The maximum exposure to personal injury or
    property damage if the product is not recalled.
    This determination will be based on pattern of
    defect, the quantity involved, the severity of
    risk, and the cost of the recall
  • The form of communication (radio, TV, newspaper,
    telephone, and registered letter) used to contact
    the users of the product
  • Determining if the product will be repaired or
    replaced or if the customer will be reimbursed

27
Subrogation, Risk Criteria, Standards, Audit,
Customer Service, and Redress
  • Visit the supplier plant and audit its prevention
    program
  • A degree of prevention control is based off the
    degree of potential liability loss
  • Manufacturers should develop design and
    manufacturing standards
  • Periodic audits are useful tools for measuring
    progress and providing feedback to improve the
    prevention program
  • An effective customer service may reduce the
    likelihood of a lawsuit. Customer service should
    report observations on how the product is being
    used or misused and any near misses
  • Customers will usually accept failures if redress
    covers them with
  • A warranty policy that responds to customer needs
  • The availability of information concerning the
    redress procedure
  • Prompt handling of complaints, returns, and
    claims
  • Repair facilities that give prompt, skilled, and
    fair-priced service

28
TQM Principles
  • Leadership
  • Establishes formal product safety committees
  • Customer Satisfaction
  • Ensures a safe reliable product for all customers
  • Employee Involvement
  • Effective education that allows employees to
    catch potentially defective products
  • Continuous Process Improvement
  • All products must be regularly audited to ensure
    they are defect free
  • Supplier Partnership
  • Ensure that all supplied products are of the
    highest quality to prevent defects
  • Performance Measures
  • Allows for redesign before a product goes to
    market and during production. Allows for safety
    recall plans

29
Break Time
  • 10 minutes

30
Activity Time
  • Product warnings
  • but first some examples

31
Good Examples
32
More Examples
33
Bad Examples
34
Different Laws
35
  • Now it is your turn

36
Quiz Time
37
Benedi v. McNeil-P.P.C.
  • Benedi consumed 3 or 4 glasses of wine a night.
    Benedi began taking Extra Strength Tylenol for
    flu like symptoms. Benedi was admitted to the
    hospital in a coma and near death. He underwent
    an emergency liver transplant and will have to
    undergo kidney dialysis for the rest of his life.
    Blood tests revealed that Benedi suffered from
    acetaminophen toxicity.

38
Results
  • McNeil-P.P.C., Inc. found guilty for failure to
    warn and ordered to pay Benedi 7,850,000 for
    negligence

39
Lakin v. Senco Products, Inc.
  • Senco Products produces pneumatic nail guns. The
    SN325 discharges special 3.25 in. nails produced
    and sold by Senco. John Lakin was using a SN325
    while building a new home. While using the SN325
    it double fired causing it to recoil violently
    backward and discharging a third nail through the
    cheek and into the brain of Lakin. Lakin now
    suffers permanent brain damage, can no longer
    work, and can no longer live with his family.

40
Results
  • Lakin received 3.6 million, his wife received
    457,000, and Senco paid 4 million in punitive
    damages. Evidence disclosed that the SN325 double
    fired 1 out of every 15 firings. Senco modified
    an existing model to fire longer nails but did
    not conduct further testing because it rushed the
    product to market to maintain its position. This
    was a design defect.

41
Elsroth v. Johnson Johnson
  • Diane Elsroth was visiting her boyfriend and
    complained of a headache. Her boyfriend got a new
    bottle of Extra Strength Tylenol open the sealed
    box, removed the shrink wrap seal, and removed
    the foil seal under the lid and gave Elsroth a
    couple of them. The next morning Elsroth was
    dead. The autopsy showed she had been murdered.
    The Tylenol capsules were contaminated with
    potassium cyanide. John Elsroth sued on behalf of
    Diane Elsroths estate. He sued for defective
    packaging.

42
Result
  • Johnson Johnson was found not liable, even
    though J J knew that its product was not tamper
    resistant to sophisticated means of tampering.
    This is considered exotic tampering and no
    organization can make a product 100
    tamper-proof. Under a utility/risk assessment J
    J determined the packaging was not unreasonably
    dangerous for its intended use. No packaging can
    boast that it is tamper-proof only
    tamper-resistant.

43
Any Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com