Title: Product Liability
1Product Liability
- SAI KRISHNA CHARY KUMBOJU
- SRIKANTH BANDARU
- DAVID DRISKO
2Introduction
- Estimated that 50 million product accidents occur
annually - Costs businesses and organizations 50 billion
(U.S.) - Causes increase in insurance costs
- Large companies can pass the expenditure to the
customers - Small businesses often go bankrupt
3Product Liability
- the responsibility of manufacturers, distributors
and sellers of products to the public, to deliver
products free of defects which harm an individual
or numerous persons and to make good on that
responsibility if their products are defective
43 Main Areas of Product Liability
- Behavior and knowledge of the user
- Environment where the product is used
- Design flaws
- The first two are difficult to mitigate
- Design flaws is the area that TQM has the
greatest control over
5Brief History
- Ancient Times
- Sample of grain covers whole harvest
- 14th Century
- Very difficult to sue manufacturer, simple
products - Mid 1700s
- Caveat emptor was the prevailing legal mindset
6Caveat Emptor
- Buyer Beware based on Smiths economy policies
- Privacy of contract
- Allowed lawsuits only one step
- Fostered Industrial Revolution by limiting
manufacturers liability
- Step of Products
- Manufacturer
- Wholesaler
- Retailer
- Customer
- Customer refers to the person who actually
bought the item
7Government Steps In
- Inherent or imminently dangerous products need
regulation - 1906 Congress passes Federal Food and Drug Act
- Creates government oversight of food and drugs
- Allows product liability lawsuits to be brought
against drug manufacturers
8MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.
- 1916 Landmark case for products liability
- Made manufacturer liable to final customer
- This case is the reason tires are not covered
under car warrantees
9Product Safety Law
- Consumer Product Safety Act 1972
- Protects consumers from unreasonable risk
- Establishes uniform safety standards
- Research and investigation into cause and
prevention of related deaths, injury, or illness - Only covers products used in or around household
and schools and for recreation - Exemptions
- Cars, boats, planes, food, drugs, tobacco, and
poison
10Product Liability Law
- Tort of negligence
- Tort of strict liability
- Contract law of sales or warranty
11Tort of Negligence
- Classic theory of products liability
- Must prove manufacturer was careless
- Focuses on manufacturers conduct
- Varies from state to state
- Most states going away from allowing product
liability under negligence
12Tort of Strict Liability
- One who sells a product in a defective condition
that is unreasonably dangerous to a consumer is
liable for harm caused to the user or the users
property - Product Liability sued under this tort in many
states - Allows the injured party to sue all the way
through the steps of products - Allows user of product to sue not just purchaser
of product
13Contract Law of Sales or Warranty
- Express Warranty
- Material statement made voluntarily by a
manufacturer or merchant in sales brochures or
sales talk to induce sales - Implied Warranty
- Implies that the product is reasonably fit for
the general purpose for which the product was
designed - Cannot be waived required by law
14Defenses to Product Liability
- Defendant tries to prove
- Plaintiffs bad judgment
- Plaintiffs failure to maintain the product
properly - Plaintiffs improper use of product
- Comparative Negligence
- Assumption of Risk
- Misuse
- Statutes of Repose
15Financial Loss
- Product Liability suits cost a lot of money
- Court judgment is larges financial loss
- Attorneys fees
- Technical expert fees
- Investigation fees
- Other costs
- Increased liability insurance
- Recall, replacement, or repair of product
- Damage to reputation and customer base
- Hold or delay in production due to potential
defect - Increased quality efforts for prevention appraisal
16Prevention
- 17 Areas for Prevention
- Organization
- Education
- New-Product Review
- Initial Production Review and Periodic Production
Audits - Control of Warranties, Advertisements,
Agreements, and the Like - Warning Labels and Instructions
- Complaints and Claims
- Retention of Records and Document Control
- ISO 9000 Documents
- Product-Recall Plan
- Subrogation, Risk Criteria, Standards, Audits,
Customer Service, Redress
17Organization
- Organizational structure must specify
responsibilities and have the necessary authority
to achieve those responsibilities - Formal product-safety committee should be
established - Organization should have a safety engineer,
either hired or selected from within
18Education
- Cornerstone of effective program
- Emphasize the importance of product safety to all
employees - Ensure education of new or transferred employees
- Continuing education is part of a plan of action
19New-Product Review
- Establish product review team that has no
preconceived notions about the product - Should check for the following
Crushing Hazards Shearing Hazards Cutting
Hazards Entanglement Hazards Drawing-in or
Trapping Hazards Impact Hazards Puncture
Hazards Abrasion Hazards
Exposed live part electrical hazards Electrostat
ic Exposure Thermo Hazards (exposed high
temperature parts) Noise Hazards (exposed to high
sound frequencies) Exposure to gases or fumes
hazards
Fire or explosion hazards Unexpected start-up
hazards
Attorneys have won many cases because
organizations did not consider reasonably
foreseeable uses of the product
20Initial Production Review
- Usually conducted on prototype
- The review evaluates the manufacturing plan to
determine adequacy of
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) Tooling
and work-holding devices Production
machinery Materials handling Test
Equipment Inspection system Sampling plan
Packaging and Shipping Operating
instructions Safety warnings Advanced service
information for distributors and dealers
Inherently hazardous products should have a
limited production run and controlled
distribution to collect better information
Periodic audits should be conducted to verify or
validate quality control systems as part of ISO
9000 requirements
21Control of Warranties, Advertisements,
Agreements, and the Like
- Product Safety Committee must continually review
all literature and publications for the product - Check to determine that terms and conditions of
sale are limited to statements of
merchantability, product is of good material and
workmanship. Avoid phrases like Safe or
Ensures the safety of the operator - All literature should be reviewed by legal
counsel - Examination of purchase orders to determine any
special warranty provisions - Analyze dealer distributorship and franchise
agreements to determine the handling of
defective items - Determine that words like nonconformity and
nonconforming units have been used where
appropriate - Evaluate cost problems of warranties
22Warning Labels and Instructions
- Largest cause of manufacture negligence is
inadequate or non-existent warnings - Warnings and Instructions are separate items
- Should be written by someone with no technical
knowledge along with a product engineer - ANSI has developed standards for warning labels
- Avoid overuse of warnings as that may detract
form the importance of the warnings
23Complaints and Claims
- Complaints and claims alert the manufacturer to
the need for corrective action - Immediately investigate any claim or complaint
involving bodily injury, property damage, or
product safety - Product Safety Engineer should determine the
following - The appropriate departments should be notified of
the findings of the complaint or claim
the cause of claim or complaint nature and
seriousness of injury, if one occurred the
failure mode that caused the situation, if there
was one the age of the defect and whether it was
present when the product was sold the negligence
of the parties
24Retention of Records and Document control
- Records and documents will be required if an
organization ever has to defend its product - Types of records that should be kept are
- Product development and test records
- Results of process, product, and system
inspections and audits - Original design data
- Service-life data
- Acceptance and approvals from government agencies
or independent testing organizations - Critical Raw material acceptance letters
- Documents should be centrally located and
protected from loss
25ISO 9000 Documents
- A product liability lawsuit represents the
ultimate quality failure of a product - A manufacturer without a formal quality program
is viewed as negligent in its internal efforts to
prevent product defects - ISO 9000 documents should be prepared carefully
26Product-Recall Plan
- An effective recall contingency plan helps
minimize the recall costs and the products
liability risk - Three factors must be considered when determining
if a recall is needed - The maximum exposure to personal injury or
property damage if the product is not recalled.
This determination will be based on pattern of
defect, the quantity involved, the severity of
risk, and the cost of the recall - The form of communication (radio, TV, newspaper,
telephone, and registered letter) used to contact
the users of the product - Determining if the product will be repaired or
replaced or if the customer will be reimbursed
27Subrogation, Risk Criteria, Standards, Audit,
Customer Service, and Redress
- Visit the supplier plant and audit its prevention
program - A degree of prevention control is based off the
degree of potential liability loss - Manufacturers should develop design and
manufacturing standards - Periodic audits are useful tools for measuring
progress and providing feedback to improve the
prevention program - An effective customer service may reduce the
likelihood of a lawsuit. Customer service should
report observations on how the product is being
used or misused and any near misses - Customers will usually accept failures if redress
covers them with - A warranty policy that responds to customer needs
- The availability of information concerning the
redress procedure - Prompt handling of complaints, returns, and
claims - Repair facilities that give prompt, skilled, and
fair-priced service
28TQM Principles
- Leadership
- Establishes formal product safety committees
- Customer Satisfaction
- Ensures a safe reliable product for all customers
- Employee Involvement
- Effective education that allows employees to
catch potentially defective products - Continuous Process Improvement
- All products must be regularly audited to ensure
they are defect free - Supplier Partnership
- Ensure that all supplied products are of the
highest quality to prevent defects - Performance Measures
- Allows for redesign before a product goes to
market and during production. Allows for safety
recall plans
29Break Time
30Activity Time
- Product warnings
- but first some examples
31Good Examples
32More Examples
33Bad Examples
34Different Laws
35 36Quiz Time
37Benedi v. McNeil-P.P.C.
- Benedi consumed 3 or 4 glasses of wine a night.
Benedi began taking Extra Strength Tylenol for
flu like symptoms. Benedi was admitted to the
hospital in a coma and near death. He underwent
an emergency liver transplant and will have to
undergo kidney dialysis for the rest of his life.
Blood tests revealed that Benedi suffered from
acetaminophen toxicity.
38Results
- McNeil-P.P.C., Inc. found guilty for failure to
warn and ordered to pay Benedi 7,850,000 for
negligence
39Lakin v. Senco Products, Inc.
- Senco Products produces pneumatic nail guns. The
SN325 discharges special 3.25 in. nails produced
and sold by Senco. John Lakin was using a SN325
while building a new home. While using the SN325
it double fired causing it to recoil violently
backward and discharging a third nail through the
cheek and into the brain of Lakin. Lakin now
suffers permanent brain damage, can no longer
work, and can no longer live with his family.
40Results
- Lakin received 3.6 million, his wife received
457,000, and Senco paid 4 million in punitive
damages. Evidence disclosed that the SN325 double
fired 1 out of every 15 firings. Senco modified
an existing model to fire longer nails but did
not conduct further testing because it rushed the
product to market to maintain its position. This
was a design defect.
41Elsroth v. Johnson Johnson
- Diane Elsroth was visiting her boyfriend and
complained of a headache. Her boyfriend got a new
bottle of Extra Strength Tylenol open the sealed
box, removed the shrink wrap seal, and removed
the foil seal under the lid and gave Elsroth a
couple of them. The next morning Elsroth was
dead. The autopsy showed she had been murdered.
The Tylenol capsules were contaminated with
potassium cyanide. John Elsroth sued on behalf of
Diane Elsroths estate. He sued for defective
packaging.
42Result
- Johnson Johnson was found not liable, even
though J J knew that its product was not tamper
resistant to sophisticated means of tampering.
This is considered exotic tampering and no
organization can make a product 100
tamper-proof. Under a utility/risk assessment J
J determined the packaging was not unreasonably
dangerous for its intended use. No packaging can
boast that it is tamper-proof only
tamper-resistant.
43Any Questions?