Labor Exemption from Antitrust - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Labor Exemption from Antitrust

Description:

Title: Labor Exemption from Antitrust Part I: Collective Bargaining Agreements Author: Ross 2d review Last modified by: Steve Ross Created Date – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:134
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: Ross2155
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Labor Exemption from Antitrust


1
Labor Exemption from Antitrust
2
Alternative Ways to Define the Scope of the Labor
Exemption
  • 1) no protection for otherwise anticomp CBAs
  • 2) exempt only those restraints contained in the
    agreement at the behest of the union
  • 3) exempt any agreements actually made by union
    and mgt
  • 4) exempt any employment practices during the
    pendency of a collective bargaining relationship
  • 5) complete protection under literal language of
    6 for any agreement that restrains trade in the
    labor market

3
Eliminating Alternatives
  • Why doesnt the literal language of 6 compel the
    adoption of Option 5?
  • Suppose the union agreed that the standard player
    contract would include a promise not to sign with
    a club in a rival league for 3 years after
    expiration of the contract?
  • Why should multi-employer agreements EVER be
    protected by the labor exemption?
  • Courts are supposed to accommodate antitrust and
    labor policy

4
The Mackey Test
  • 1) Restraint primarily affects only the parties
    to the CBA
  • 2) Topic is a mandatory subject of bargaining
    under the NLRA
  • 3) Restraint is the result of bona fide arms
    length bargaining

5
Applying Mackey
  • Suppose NBA players, as part of revenue sharing/
    salary cap, agreed w/ owners on minimum ticket
    prices or price of jackets?
  • How does Mackeys prong (1) apply if fans are
    injured?
  • Why should the highly restrictive NHL By-law
    challenged in McCourt 230 be exempt, under
    Jewel Teas test 226 that the restriction be
    part of arms length bargaining in pursuit of
    their own union policies?

6
Wood
  • Rookie challenges NBA CBA that limits his salary
    due to the cap 2nd Circuit rejects
  • Agree with Winter J that accepting rookies
    challenge to cap provisions of CBA is
    fundamentally at odds with federal labor policy?
  • Suppose court held rookie cap to be illegal what
    would resulting CBA look like?

7
Clarett
  • Should NFL be required under labor law to
    negotiate with the union about eligibility for
    draft?
  • Should unions be allowed to negotiate on behalf
    of potential members of bargaining unit?
  • Is the NFLs eligibility rule the result of good
    faith bargaining?

8
2nd Cir. approach
  • Rejects Mackey
  • Suggests unionized players should have NO
    antitrust rights

9
When Does the Labor Exemption Expire?
  • NHL has rigid salary cap
  • By barring rich/lousy teams from improving and
    not sharing revenue, harms competitive balance
    and thus violates 1
  • CBA will expire in 60 days and NHLPA is opposed
    to the cap
  • Hypo What would you advise the NHL Before Brown?
  • After Brown?

10
After Brown Options for NFLPA
  • Suppose impasse occurs, and your negotiation
    skills not going to persuade NFL Mgt Council to
    agree to a CBA that does not unreasonably
    restrain trade
  • What are the unions options?

11
/2 Brown
  • Do you agree with Justice Breyer that it would be
    odd to fashion an antitrust exemption that gave
    additional advantages to professional football
    players that transport workers, coal miners, or
    meat packers would not enjoy 246?
  • Has the Court appropriately accommodated
    consumer/fan interests?
  • Suppose a consumer class action challenged a
    labor restraint?

12
Brady claims
  • Lawsuit seeks injunction against lockout,
    correctly noting that an agreement among
    employers to refuse jointly to employer non-union
    workers is a clear Sherman Act violation
  • NFL offers 3 defenses
  • Norris-LaGuardia Act bans federal court
    injunctions
  • Court should stay hand pending resolution of
    unfair labor practice complaint
  • Labor exemption continues where decertification
    is just a tactic

13
Brady 8th Circuit decision
  • Applies literal language of N-LGA Act, depriving
    federal courts of jurisdiction to issue
    injunctions in a case involving or growing out
    of a labor dispute
  • Rejects limit to unionized employees
  • Rejects limit to injunctions against workers
  • Dissent claims this was clear purpose
  • Cf. Mackey interpretation of 6

14
Brady analysis
  • DOJ recently won injunction against agreement
    among Silicon Valley firms not to poach each
    others key tech employees (who had never been
    unionized)
  • Is this inconsistent with Brady?
  • Should players be able to use decertification
    option? When, if ever, should the labor
    exemption expire in professional sports?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com