Ken Sejkora - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Ken Sejkora

Description:

Impact of License Extension on Radionuclide Buildup Assumptions Ken Sejkora Entergy Nuclear Northeast Pilgrim Station Presented at the 18th Annual RETS-REMP Workshop – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:89
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: kse77
Learn more at: http://hps.ne.uiuc.edu
Category:
Tags: forage | ken | sejkora

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ken Sejkora


1
  • Ken Sejkora
  • Entergy Nuclear Northeast Pilgrim Station
  • Presented at the 18th Annual RETS-REMP Workshop
  • Charlotte, NC / 23-25 June 2008

2
Reason for Concern
  • Regulatory Guide 1.109 accounts for buildup of
    radioactivity for the following exposure
    pathways
  • Waterborne Nuclides in Shoreline Deposits
  • Waterborne Nuclides in Irrigated Foods
  • Deposition of Airborne Nuclides on Ground Plane
  • Deposition of Airborne Nuclides on Soil and
    Crops forage, produce, vegetables, milk, meat

3
Reason for Concern (continued)
  • Regulatory Guide 1.109 assumes buildup period
    (tb) of 15 years
  • approximate midpoint of facility operating
    life per Equations A-4 and C-1
  • Many facilities have operated for well beyond 15
    years, and many are pursuing license extension
    for an additional 20 years of operation total
    span of up to 60 years

4
Reason for Concern (continued)
  • What is the impact on dose calculations of
    assuming buildup during entire duration of
    40-year license?
  • What is the impact on dose calculations of
    assuming 20 years of additional operation?

5
Buildup Equation
  • Used in RG-1.109 equations 3, 4, A-4, A-6, A-7,
    A-8, A-13, C-1, and C-5
  • General form of equation

Where ?i nuclide decay constant, yr -1
tb buildup period, yr
6
Buildup Factor by Nuclide
Nuclide Half-life years Lambda Buildup Factor by Buildup Period Buildup Factor by Buildup Period Buildup Factor by Buildup Period
Nuclide Half-life years Lambda 15-yr 40-yr 60-yr
Mn-54 0.856 8.10E-01 1.24E00 1.24E00 1.24E00
Fe-59 0.122 5.67E00 1.76E-01 1.76E-01 1.76E-01
Co-60 5.271 1.32E-01 6.55E00 7.56E00 7.60E00
Zn-65 0.669 1.04E00 9.65E-01 9.65E-01 9.65E-01
Sr-90 28.600 2.42E-02 1.26E01 2.56E01 3.16E01
I-131 0.022 3.15E01 3.18E-02 3.18E-02 3.18E-02
Cs-134 2.062 3.36E-01 2.96E00 2.97E00 2.97E00
Cs-137 30.170 2.30E-02 1.27E01 2.62E01 3.26E01
7
Buildup Factor Ratio by Nuclide
Nuclide Ratio to 15-yr Buildup Factor Ratio to 15-yr Buildup Factor Ratio to 15-yr Buildup Factor
Nuclide 15-yr 40-yr 60-yr
Mn-54 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fe-59 1.00 1.00 1.00
Co-60 1.00 1.16 1.16
Zn-65 1.00 1.00 1.00
Sr-90 1.00 2.04 2.51
I-131 1.00 1.00 1.00
Cs-134 1.00 1.01 1.01
Cs-137 1.00 2.06 2.57
8
Clarification of Buildup Equation for Vegetation
Pathways
Equation for Buildup in Vegetation
External Surface Contamination Term Short-term
weathering
Internal Plant-Soil Uptake Term Long-term
metabolism
Affects equations for irrigated crops, produce,
vegetables, and forage (which in turn affects
milk and meat)
9
Vegetation External Contamination Term
Where r fraction of deposited activity
retained on leaf/plant surface ?Ei
weathering removal rate constant, 14-day
half-life nuclide half-life te exposure
time to deposition fallout forage 30d, crops
60d Yv vegetation yield forage 0.7 kg/m2,
crops 2 kg/m2 The external contamination term
from deposition fallout typically accounts for 75
to 100 of the total radionuclide activity in and
on vegetation. Not dependent on duration of
buildup period.
10
Vegetation Internal Plant-Soil Uptake Term
Where fI fraction of year forage/crops are
growing or irrigated (exposed) Biv
soil-to-plant uptake factor for nuclide i P
effective surface soil density, 240 kg/m2 The
metabolic uptake term from soil typically
accounts for less than 10 of the total
radionuclide activity in and on forage (cow-milk
pathway), and less than 20 in the crop pathway.
11
Forage Concentration Terms
Nuclide Deposition Term Uptake Term Uptake Term Uptake Term
Nuclide Deposition Term 15-yr 40-yr 60-yr
Mn-54 1.04E02 1.31E00 1.31E00 1.31E00
Fe-59 9.04E01 4.25E-03 4.25E-03 4.25E-03
Co-60 1.07E02 2.25E00 2.60E00 2.61E00
Zn-65 1.04E02 1.41E01 1.41E01 1.41E01
Sr-90 1.07E02 7.80E00 1.59E01 1.96E01
I-131 2.48E02 2.32E-02 2.32E-02 2.32E-02
Cs-134 1.06E02 1.08E00 1.09E00 1.09E00
Cs-137 1.07E02 4.63E00 9.55E00 1.19E01
12
Forage ConcentrationBuildup Factor Ratio by
Nuclide
Nuclide Ratio to 15-yr Buildup Factor Ratio to 15-yr Buildup Factor Ratio to 15-yr Buildup Factor
Nuclide 15-yr 40-yr 60-yr
Mn-54 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fe-59 1.00 1.00 1.00
Co-60 1.00 1.00 1.00
Zn-65 1.00 1.00 1.00
Sr-90 1.00 1.07 1.10
I-131 1.00 1.00 1.00
Cs-134 1.00 1.00 1.00
Cs-137 1.00 1.04 1.06
13
Crop Concentration Terms
Nuclide Deposition Term Uptake Term Uptake Term Uptake Term
Nuclide Deposition Term 15-yr 40-yr 60-yr
Mn-54 4.43E01 1.31E00 1.31E00 1.31E00
Fe-59 3.61E01 4.25E-03 4.25E-03 4.25E-03
Co-60 4.57E01 2.25E00 2.60E00 2.61E00
Zn-65 4.39E01 1.41E01 1.41E01 1.41E01
Sr-90 4.59E01 7.80E00 1.59E01 1.96E01
I-131 8.84E01 2.32E-02 2.32E-02 2.32E-02
Cs-134 4.53E01 1.08E00 1.09E00 1.09E00
Cs-137 4.59E01 4.63E00 9.55E00 1.19E01
14
Crop ConcentrationBuildup Factor Ratio by Nuclide
Nuclide Ratio to 15-yr Buildup Factor Ratio to 15-yr Buildup Factor Ratio to 15-yr Buildup Factor
Nuclide 15-yr 40-yr 60-yr
Mn-54 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fe-59 1.00 1.00 1.00
Co-60 1.00 1.01 1.01
Zn-65 1.00 1.00 1.00
Sr-90 1.00 1.15 1.22
I-131 1.00 1.00 1.00
Cs-134 1.00 1.00 1.00
Cs-137 1.00 1.10 1.14
15
Summary
  • Extended buildup period has negligible impact on
    ingestion pathway concentrations and doses from
    irrigated crops, produce, vegetables, milk, and
    meat less than 25 increase for worst-case
    nuclide (Sr-90) for 60-year buildup period most
    nuclides exhibit lt1 increase

16
Summary (continued)
  • Ground plane or sediment exposure can be affected
    up to 2-times the 15-year assumption, but these
    exposure pathways typically contribute less than
    0.05 of the total dose
  • Buildup equations assume uniform release rates
    (Ci/yr) over duration of buildup period. Current
    and future release rates are likely much lower
    than those when plants began operation

17
Conclusion
  • Increased buildup time posed by license extension
    carries negligible impact for affecting effluent
    dose calculations.
  • There is no need to modify RG-1.109 equations or
    buildup assumptions to account for additional
    buildup from additional years of operation.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com