Fourth Amendment Rights - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Fourth Amendment Rights

Description:

Fourth Amendment Rights The young man knows the rules, but the old* man knows the exceptions. Oliver Wendell Holmes *Please note that some of us prefer wise ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:126
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: Owne2659
Learn more at: https://www.ldsd.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Fourth Amendment Rights


1
Fourth Amendment Rights
  • The young man knows the rules, but the old man
    knows the exceptions.
  • Oliver Wendell Holmes
  • Please note that some of us prefer wise or
    perhaps experienced.

2
Boyd v. United States (1886)
  • The Good Forcible removal of ones papers to be
    used as evidence is not permitted under the
    Fourth Amendment.
  • The Bad Only applied to searches involving
    forcible and compulsory extortion and only
    applied to evidence used in criminal trials.

3
Weeks v. United States (1914)
  • The Good This decision established the
    exclusionary rule, which prohibited police from
    using illegally obtained evidence in trials.
  • The Bad This ruling only applied the
    exclusionary rule to federal officials. The
    decision was not applied to states.

4
Wolf v. Colorado (1949)
  • The Good The Court made the due process clause
    of the Fourteenth Amendment applicable to the
    states, which then made the Fourth Amendment
    applicable as well.
  • The Bad The Court said specifically that the
    exclusionary rule WAS NOT applicable to the
    states because it was not expressly stated as a
    remedy for a bad search.

5
Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
  • The Good Fixed the Wolf decision and applied the
    exclusionary rule to the states.
  • Police must have reasonable suspicion or
    probable cause and follow rules in gathering
    evidence.
  • The Bad Many gray areas and exceptions remain,
    such as

6
New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1985)
  • ". . . The warrant requirement, in particular, is
    unsuited to the school environment . . . The
    legality of a search of a student should depend
    simply on the reasonableness, under all the
    circumstances, of the search . . . Such a search
    will be permissible in its scope when the
    measures adopted are reasonably related to the
    objectives of the search and not excessively
    intrusive in light of the age and sex of the
    student and the nature of the infraction.
    "Justice Byron White, speaking for the majority
  • Translated The Court established more lenient
    standards for reasonableness in school searches.

7
U.S. v. Leon (1984)Good Faith Exception
  • An exception to the exclusionary rule.
  • Illegally gathered evidence can be admitted at
    trial if police officers have reason to believe
    they have a valid warrant or reason to search.
  • Previously, police were responsible for bad
    searches.
  • So far the new rule has been confined to errors
    made by judges or legislatures. Example if a
    judge makes a mistake in issuing a warrant, the
    police officer is not responsible if she had good
    reason to believe that the warrant was valid.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com