Chapter 9 Connectivity ??? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter 9 Connectivity ???

Description:

Chapter 9 Connectivity 9.1 Connectivity Consider the following graphs: G1: Deleting any edge makes it disconnected. G2: Cannot be disconnected by deletion ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:71
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: Ftp56
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter 9 Connectivity ???


1
Chapter 9 Connectivity???
2
9.1 Connectivity
  • Consider the following graphs
  • G1 Deleting any edge makes it disconnected.
  • G2 Cannot be disconnected by deletion of any
    edge can be disconnected by deleting its cut
    vertex
  • Intuitively, G2 is more connected than G1, G3 is
    more connected thant G2, and G4 is the most
    connected one.

3
9.1 Cut edges and cut vertices
  • A cut edge of G is an edge such that G-e has
    more components that G.
  • Theorem 9.1 Let G be a connected graph. The
    following are equivalent
  • An edge e of G is a cut edge
  • e is not contained in any cycle of G.
  • There are two vertices u and w such that e is on
    every path connecting u and w.

4
9.1 Cut edges and cut vertices
Let G be a nontrivial and loopless graph. A
vertex v of G is a cut vertex if G-v has more
components than G. Theorem 9.2 Let G be a
connected graph. The following propositions are
equivalent 1. A vertex v is a cut vertex of
G 2. There are two distinct vertices u and w such
that every path between u and w passes v 3. The
vertices of G can be partitioned into two
disjoint vertex sets U and W such that every
path between u?U and w?W passes v.
5
9.1 Vertex cut and connectivity
  • A vertex cut of G is a subset V of V such that
    G-V is disconnected. The connectivity , ?(G), is
    the smallest number of vertices in any vertex cut
    of G.
  • A complete graph has no vertex cut. Define
    ?(Kn)n-1
  • For disconnected graph G, define ?(G) 0
  • G is said to be k-connected if ?(G)?k
  • It is easy to see that all nontrivial connected
    graphs are 1-connected.
  • ?(G)1 if and only if GK2 or G has a cut vertex.

6
9.1 Edge cut and edge connectivity
  • Let G be graph on n?2 vertices. An edge cut is a
    subset E of E(G) such that G-E is
    disconnected.
  • The edge connectivity, ?(G), is the smallest
    number of edges in any edge cut.
  • For trivial and disconnected graph G, define
    ?(G)0
  • G is said to be k-edge-connected if ?(G)?k
  • All nontrivial connected graphs are
    1-edge-connected.

7
9.1 Edge cut and edge connectivity
Find ?(G), ?(G) and ?(G) for the following graphs
  • Theorem 9.3 For any connected graph G
  • ?(G)? ?(G)??(G)
  • where ?(G) is the smallest vertex degree of G.

8
  • ?????(G)??(G),????????????????????????????
  • ?????(G)? ?(G)?
  • ?Ee1,e2,,ek????,?????ei?????????E,?????????
  • E(u,w),(v,x)????,??u,v?????????
  • ????E??????G1, G2, ??v1?V(G1),v2?V(G2),
    v1,v2???(???),????v1,v2,??E?k?????E???????,??u,x,
    ??w,v.

9
9.1 Edge cut and edge connectivity
  • Theorem 9.4 (Whitney) A graph G of order n(?3)
    is 2-connected if and only if any two vertices of
    G are in a common cycle.
  • The theorem can be proved by induction on the
    length of the paths. See the textbook for the
    proof.
  • State it in another way A graph G of order
    n(?3) is 2-connected if and only if any two
    vertices of G connected by at least 2
    vertex-disjoint paths.

10
9.1 Edge cut and edge connectivity
  • Theorem 9.5 (Whitney) A graph G of order n(?3) is
    2-edge-connected if and only if any two vertices
    of G are in a simple closed path.
  • State it in another way A graph G of order n(?3)
    is 2-edge-connected if and only if any two
    vertices of G are connected by at least 2
    edge-disjoint paths.

11
9.1 Edge-disjoint paths
  • Let v and w are two vertices in a graph. A
    collection of paths from v to w are called
    edge-disjoint paths if no two paths in it share
    an edge.

Count the number of edge-disjoint paths from v to
w in the graph above. Find the edge connectivity
of the graph.
12
9.1 Vertex-disjoint paths
Similarly, we can define vertex-disjoint paths.
  • Find the connectivity of the graph and the number
    of vertex-disjoint paths from v to w.

13
9.2 Mengers theorem
  • Theorem 9.6 The maximum number of edge-disjoint
    paths connecting two distinct vertices v and w
    in connected graph G is equal to the minimum
    number of edges whose removal disconnecting v
    and w.

14
9.2 Mengers theorem
  • Theorem 9.6 A graph G is k-edge-connected if and
    only if any two distinct vertices of G are
    connected by at least k edge-disjoint paths.
  • ProofIf there are two vertices which are
    connected by less than k edge-disjoint paths,
    then G is not k-edge-connected. On the other
    hand, if G is not k-edge-connected, there are
    edge cut that contains less than k edges, hence
    there are two vertices which are connected by
    less than k edge-disjoint paths.

15
9.2 Mengers theorem
Theorem 9.7 The maximum number of vertex-disjoint
paths connecting two distinct non-adjacent
vertices v and w of a connected graph G is equal
to the minimum number of vertices whose removal
disconnecting v and w.
  • Theorem 9.7 A graph of order n(?k1) is
    k-connected if and only if any two distinct
    vertices of G are connected by at least k
    vertex-disjoint paths.

16
9.2 Mengers theorem
  • Theorem 9.8 The maximum number of arc-disjoint
    paths from a vertex v to a vertex w in a digraph
    D is equal to the minimum number of arcs whose
    removal disconnecting v and w.

17
9.3 Mengers Theorem implies the Max-flow min-cut
Theorem
  • Proof Assuming the capacity of every arc is an
    integer.
  • The network N can be seen as a digraph D in
    which
  • the capacities represent the number of arcs
    connecting the various vertices.
  • The maximum flow corresponds to the total number
    of arc-disjoint path form s to t in D
  • The capacity of a minimum cut refers to the
    minimum number of arcs in a st-disconnecting set
    of D.

N
18
9.3 The Max-flow min-cut theorem implies Mengers
theorem
  • Lemma 9.9 Let N be a network with source s and
    sink t in which each arc has unit capacity. Then
  • The value of a maximum flow in N is equal to the
    maximum number m of arc-disjoint directed
    (s,t)-paths in N and
  • The capacity of a minimum cut in N is equal to
    the minimum number n of arcs whose deletion
    destroys all directed (s,t)-paths in N.

19
9.3 Mengers theorem
  • Theorem 9.8 (Menger) Let s and t be two vertices
    of a digraph D. Then the maximum number of
    arc-disjoint directed (s,t)-paths in D is equal
    to the minimum number of arcs whose deletion
    destroys all directed (s,t)-paths in D.

20
9.3 Mengers theorem
  • Theorem 9.10 (Menger, undirected version) Let s
    and t be two vertices of a graph G. Then the
    maximum number of edge-disjoint (s,t)-paths in G
    is equal to the minimum number of edges whose
    deletion destroys all (s,t)-paths in G.
  • Proof Apply the directed version of Mengers
    theorem to the associated digraph D(G) of G (an
    edge becomes two directed edges). There is a
    one-one correspondence between paths in G and
    D(G). See Bondy and Murty.

21
9.3 Mengers theorem
  • Theorem 9.11 Let s and t be two vertices of a
    directed graph D such that s is not joined to t.
    Then the maximum number of vertex-disjoint
    (s,t)-paths in G is equal to the minimum number
    of vertices whose deletion destroys all directed
    (s,t)-paths in D.
  • Proof by converting it to the arc-version of
    Mengers theorem.

22
  • Construct a new digraph D from D by splitting
    each vertex v?V-s,t such that v becomes an arc
    v-gtv, arcs leading to v now leading to v and
    arcs leaving v now leaving from v
  • To each edge-disjoint (s,t)-path in D there
    corresponds a vertex-disjoint directed (s,t)-path
    in Dand vice verse and See Bondy and Murty.

23
9.4 Mengers theorem implies Halls Theorem
  • Theorem 9.12 Mengers theorem implies Halls
    theorem.

There is a complete matching from V1 to V2 if and
only if the number of vertex-disjoint paths from
v to w is equal to V1k.
24
9.4 Mengers theorem implies Halls Theorem
  • Proof Let G(V1,V2) be a bipartite graph. We
    have to prove that if A?N(A) for each subset
    A of V1, then there exists a complete matching
    form V1 to V2.
  • We add two extra vertices v and w (see the
    graph on previous page). Using Mengers theorem
    of the vertex form, it is enough to prove that
    every vw-separating set (whose removal disconnect
    v and w) contains at least V1k vertices.
  • Let S be a vw-separating set, consists of
    A?V1 and B ? V2.
  • Since A?B is a vw-separating set, there can
    be no edges joining a vertex of V1-A to a vertex
    of V2-B, that is, N(V1-A)?B. It follows that
    (Halls condition)
  • V1-AltN(V1-A)ltB.
  • so SA?BABgtV1k, as required.

25
9.4 Mengers theorem implies Halls Theorem
  • ?? ?G(V1,V2)??????. ??????V1?????A, A lt
    N(A), ???V1?V2 ?????.
  • ?G???????v,w, ??v?V1???????, w?V2 ???????.
    ??, ??V1?V2?????????v?w???????????V1k.
  • ??V1 ????v,w?????,??,??Menger??,
    ??????v,w???????k. ?S???v,w????,
    ??V1???A?V2???B??.
  • ??A?B???vw???, ???V1-A?V2-B????,
  • ?? N(V1-A)?B, ??? Hall??,
  • V1-AltN(V1-A)ltB.
  • ??, SA?BABgtV1k.

26
9.5 Reliable communication networks
  • A graph representing a communication network, the
    connectivity (or edge-connectivity) becomes the
    smallest number of stations (or links) whose
    breakdown would jeopardise the system.
  • The higher the connectivity and edge
    connectivity, the more reliable the network.
  • Let k be a given positive integer and let G be a
    weighted graph. Determine a minimum-weight
    k-connected spanning subgraph of G.
  • For k1, this is solved by Kruskals algorithm,
    for example. For kgt1, the problem is unsolved.

27
Summary
  • Vertex cut and edge cut
  • Connectivity and edge-connectivity
  • Menger Theorem
  • Equivalence of Menger Theorem and the Max-flow
    Min-cut Theorem
  • Menger Theorem implies Hall Theorem.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com