Interactive Object Recognition Using - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Interactive Object Recognition Using

Description:

Interactive Object Recognition Using Proprioceptive Feedback Taylor Bergquist, Connor Schenck, Ugonna Ohiri, Jivko Sinapov, Shane Griffith and Alexander Stoytchev – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:190
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: jsi102
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Interactive Object Recognition Using


1
Interactive Object Recognition Using Proprioceptiv
e Feedback
Taylor Bergquist, Connor Schenck, Ugonna Ohiri,
Jivko Sinapov, Shane Griffith and Alexander
Stoytchev Developmental Robotics Lab Iowa State
University, Ames, IA, U.S.A. E-mail knexer
cschenck ucohiri jsinapov shaneg alexs
_at_ iastate.edu
2
What is Proprioception?
  • It is the sense that indicates whether the
    body is moving with required effort, as well as
    where the various parts of the body are located
    in relation to each other.
  • - Wikipedia

3
The Importance of Proprioception
Empty
Full
4
The Importance of Proprioception
Hard
Soft
5
Exploratory Behaviors in Children
  • Power, 2000

6
Lifting Weight, Gravity, Effort
http//www.subflux.com/blog/index.php?cat8
7
Shaking Weight, Inertia, Contents
8
Dropping Gravity and Physics
9
Pushing Physics and Objects
10
Crush Compliance, Flexibility
11
Five Exploratory Behaviors
Lift
Crush
Shake
Push
Drop
12
Robot Platform
13
Objects Used in the Experiments
  • 50 household objects
  • Different materials metal, paper, plastic, wood,
    etc.
  • Some objects have contents inside of them (e.g.,
    pill bottle)
  • All are graspable by the Barrett Hand

14
(No Transcript)
15
Experiment Scale
  • 50 objects
  • 5 exploratory behaviors
  • 10 repetitions
  • 50 5 10 2500 joint torque records

16
Torque Data Preprocessing
  • Joint torque data was sampled and recorded at 500
    Hz using the robots API
  • The raw data was filtered to remove outliers

J1J7
17
Feature Extraction
  • Joint torque data (500 samples/second in R7)
  • Some way is needed to compress the data
  • Discretize to obtain a sequence Pi of tokens
    from a finite alphabet

J1 J7
SOM
18
Training the Self-Organizing Map
19
Problem Formulation
Proprioceptive sequence
Object Recognition Model
20
Predictive Models
  • k-NN and global alignment
  • Emphasizes temporal structure of the
    proprioceptive sequences
  • Multinomial Naïve Bayes and n-gram
  • Emphasizes distributional structure of the
    sequences

21
k-NN
  • k-NN memory-based learning algorithm

With k 3
2 neighbors
1 neighbors
Test point
?
Therefore, Pr(red) 2/3 Pr(blue)
1/3
  • Uses Needleman-Wunsch global alignment as a
    measure of similarity between two sequences
  • A guided tour to approximate string matching,
    by Navarro, G. in ACM Computing Surveys, v.33,
    2001

22
Multinomial Naïve Bayes (N-grams)
Sample Sequence
2-grams
1-grams
23
Multinomial Naïve Bayes (2-grams)
Sample Sequence
2-grams
where n(wt, di) is the number of occurrences of
word wt V in the feature vector di.
24
Multinomial Naïve Bayes (2-grams)
Sample Sequence
2-grams
where n(wt, di) is the number of occurrences of
word wt V in the feature vector di.
25
Evaluation
  • Ten-fold cross validation
  • 2500 total interactions, 250 per fold
  • Evaluated on recognition accuracy, where
  • Chance accuracy 1/50 2

correct predictions
x 100
Accuracy
total predictions
26
Recognition from a Single Behavior
27
Recognition from Multiple Behaviors
  • How to combine predictions from multiple
    behaviors?
  • assume that all behaviors are equally useful
  • weight behaviors according to their accuracy

28
Object Recognition Results
  • What happens when the robot uses information
    from multiple interactions with the same object?

29
Multimodal Recognition
Behaviors
Single Multiple
Single
Multiple
Modalities
30
Multimodal Recognition
Behaviors
Single Multiple
Single
Multiple
Modalities
  • This paper (proprioception only)

31
Multimodal Recognition
Behaviors
Single Multiple
Single
Multiple
Modalities
Follow up paper (proprioception audio)
Interactive Object Recognition Using
Proprioceptive and Auditory Feedback
Submitted to IEEE Robotics and Automation
Magazine (under review).
32
Audio Data (for the same dataset)
  • Audio data was recorded during data collection
    and transformed into spectrograms

Raw Sound
Discrete Fourier Transform
33
Multimodal Training (Two SOMs)
Training a self-organizing map (SOM) using
sampled joint torques
Training an SOM using sampled frequency
distributions
34
Multimodal Feature Extraction
Discretization of joint-torque records using a
trained SOM
Discretization of the DFT of a sound using a
trained SOM
is the sequence of activated SOM nodes over
the duration of the interaction
is the sequence of activated SOM nodes over
the duration of the sound
35
Multimodal Recognition
Audio sequence
Proprioception sequence
Proprioceptive Recognition Model
Auditory Recognition Model
Weighted Combination
36
Multimodal Recognition Results
37
Related Work
  • Audition
  • Kubus, Kröger, and Wahl, 2007
    (3 objects)
  • Richmond and Pai, 2000 (4 objects)
  • Torres-Jara, Natale, and Fitzpatrick, 2005 (4
    objects)
  • Sinapov, Weimer, Stoytchev, ICRA 2009 (36
    objects)
  • Proprioception
  • Natale, Metta, and Sandini, 2004 (7 objects)

38
Accuracy vs. Number of Objects
39
Multiple Modalities Multiple Behaviors
40
Conclusions and Future Work
  • Conclusions
  • Robots can and should use proprioception as a
    source of information about the world
  • Better results can be obtained by combining
    multiple interactions and multiple modalities
  • Future Work
  • More complex behaviors and more objects
  • Integrate proprioception with more modalities
    (vision, haptics, etc.)

41
Take Home Message
  • Number of objects recognition accuracy
  • Number of behaviors recognition accuracy
  • Number of modalities recognition accuracy

42
Thank you
Any questions?
43
THE END
44
Object Recognition Results
  • The dotted lines show the best and worst case
    for the weighted and unweighted combination.

45
Recognition from Multiple Behaviors
  • How to combine predictions from multiple
    behaviors?
  • Previous work (Sinapov, Weimer, Stoytchev, ICRA
    2009)
  • assume that all behaviors are equally useful
  • Choose the object Oi that maximizes
    ?B P(Oi PB), where B is an exploratory behavior
    performed on the object.
  • This assumption fails to hold for this work
  • weight behaviors according to accuracy instead
  • Choose Oi to maximize ?B P(Oi PB) wB,
    where wB is the estimated reliability of the
    model given a sequence from behavior B.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com