Authoritarian and Totalitarian Regimes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Authoritarian and Totalitarian Regimes

Description:

Authoritarian and Totalitarian Regimes Authoritarianism Authoritarianism is a belief in, or practice of government from above , in which authority is ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:221
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: Alexan113
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Authoritarian and Totalitarian Regimes


1
Authoritarian and Totalitarian Regimes
2
Authoritarianism
  • Authoritarianism is a belief in, or practice of
    government from above, in which authority is
    exercised regardless of popular consent.
    Authoritarianism thus differs from authority.
    Authority rests on legitimacy and in that sense
    it arises from below. Authoritarian regimes
    therefore emphasize the claims of authority over
    those of individual liberty.

3
Totalitarianism
  • Totalitarianism is an all-encompassing system of
    political rule that is typically established by
    pervasive ideological manipulation and open
    terror and brutality. Totalitarianism differs
    from both autocracy and authoritarianism in that
    it seeks total power through the politicisation
    of every aspect of social and personal
    existence.
  • Totalitarianism thus implies the outright
    abolition of civil society the abolition of the
    private.

4
Friedrich and Brzezinski, 1963The six-point
syndrome
  • an official ideology
  • a one-party state usually led by an all-powerful
    leader
  • a system of terroristic policing
  • a monopoly of the means of mass communication
  • a monopoly of the means of armed combat
  • state control of all aspects of economic life

5
What is the difference between both?
  • Authoritarianism is usually distinguished from
    totalitarianism. The practice of government from
    above associated with monarchical absolutism,
    traditional dictatorships, and most forms of
    military rule is concerned with the repression of
    opposition and political liberty rather than with
    the more radical goal of obliterating the
    distinction between the state and civil society.
    Authoritarian regimes may thus tolerate a
    significant range of economic religious and other
    freedom.

6
Study by Paul Sondrol
  • Totalitarian and Authoritarian Dictators A
    Comparison of Fidel Castro and Alfredo
    Stroessner Journal of Latin American Studies ,
    Vol. 23, No. 3 (Oct., 1991), pp.
    599--620Published by Cambridge University
    Press
  • Article Stable URL http//www.jstor.org/stable/15
    7386
  • Alfredo Stroessner was a Paraguayan military
    officer and dictator from 1954 to 1989.

7
Sondrol argues that while both authoritarianism
and totalitarianism are forms of autocracy, they
differ in "key dichotomies"
8
Charisma
  • Unlike their bland and generally unpopular
    authoritarian brethren, totalitarian dictators
    develop a charismatic 'mystique' and a
    mass-based, pseudo-democratic interdependence
    with their followers via the conscious
    manipulation of a prophetic image.

9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
Role conception
  • Concomitant role conceptions differentiate
    totalitarians from authoritarians. Authoritarians
    view themselves as individual beings, largely
    content to control and often maintain the status
    quo (current state of affairs). The tyrant is
    less a person than an indispensable 'function' to
    guide and reshape the universe.

13
(No Transcript)
14
  • Consequently, the utilisation of power for
    personal aggrandisement is more evident among
    authoritarians than totalitarians. Lacking the
    binding appeal of ideology, authoritarians
    support their rule by a mixture of instilling
    fear and granting rewards to loyal collaborators,
    engendering a kleptocracy (rule by thieves).
  • Thus, compared to totalitarian systems,
    authoritarian systems may also leave a larger
    sphere for private life, lack a guiding ideology,
    tolerate some pluralism in social organization,
    lack the power to mobilize the whole population
    in pursuit of national goals, and exercise their
    power within relatively predictable limits.

15
(No Transcript)
16
Authoritarian regimes today (Freedom House)
  • WORST OF THE WORST
  • 47 Countries are designated as not free.
  • 9 of these have been given the surveys lowest
    possible rating of 7 for both political rights
    and civil liberties. These worst-rated countries
    represent a narrow range of systems and cultures.

17
  • North Korea is a one-party, Marxist-Leninist
    regime.
  • Turkmenistan and Uzbekistanare Central Asian
    countries ruled by dictators with roots in the
    Soviet period.
  • Libya is an Arab country under the sway of a
    secular dictatorship, while Sudan is ruled by a
    leadership that has elements of both radical
    Islamism and a traditional military junta.
  • The remaining worst-rated states are Burma, a
    tightly controlled military dictatorship
  • Equatorial Guinea, a highly corrupt regime with
    one of the worst human rights records in Africa
  • Eritrea, an increasingly repressive police state
    and
  • Somalia, a failed state.

18
  • Source

http//www.freedomhouse.org/images/File/fiw/FIW_20
11_Booklet.pdf
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com