Research Paper Critical Analysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Research Paper Critical Analysis

Description:

Research Paper Critical Analysis 10 ways to look at a research paper systematically for critical analysis. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:182
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: smo139
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Research Paper Critical Analysis


1
Research Paper Critical Analysis
  • 10 ways to look at a research paper
    systematically for critical analysis.

2
NUR 599T Human Factors In Healthcare Engineering
  • Dr. Vincent Duffy
  • Research Paper Analysis
  • Submitted by
  • RuthAnn Smolen, RN, MS Ed, HNP,
  • July 19, 2007

3
STUDY CRITIQUE Title Assessment of
Clinical Performance during Simulated Crises
Using Both Technical and Behavioral
RatingsAuthors Gaba, D., Howard, S.,
Flanagan B., Smith, B., Fish, K., Botney, R.
4
Research Ideas or Question(Study and Purpose)
  • Study Assessment in clinical performance Gaba,
    et.al.)
  • The purpose is clearly identified in the
    introduction -
  • to evaluate ratings of performance (technical
    and behavioral), and variability of ratings made
    by multiple independent observers viewing
    videotapes of simulated crises
  • The use of human patient simulators (HPS) in
    health-care training is increasing to gain
    knowledge, teach technical skills, complete drill
    training, and human factors training for single
    or multidisciplinary groups

5
2. Background
  • Anesthesiology is recognized as the leading
    medical specialty in addressing patient safety
    with HPS
  • Pioneered development of computer screen and
    mannequin based interactive patient simulators
    and training plans (Schwid, 1987 Small, Wuetz,
    Simon, Shapiro, Conn, Setnik, 1999).
  • A persistent initiative in graduate education is
    to find more effective methods to assess
    specialists skills
  • Techniques are needed to assess
    anesthesiologists performance when responding to
    critical events (Gaba, 1998)
  • Traditionally there has been concern about the
    potential subjectivity of expert raters.

6
3. Theoretical Basis/Hypothesis
  • Helmreich, RI Theory underlying CRM training
    Psychological issues in flight crew performance
    and crew coordination (NASA, 1986) in teams
  • Behavioral psychologists and learning theories
    were used originally
  • In anesthesia, patient safety depends on a
    complex interaction between a skilled
    practitioner and technology
  • A human patient simulator may reduce the risk of
    learning-curve error in anesthesiologists
    technical and behavioral clinical performance
    without subjecting patients to risk

7
4. Literature Search
  • 13 reports published between 1980 2000 4 were
    designed to investigate validity or reliability
    of HPS systems overview of existing evidence of
    the problem is addressed in follow-up searches of
    today
  • In this study the literature review is supportive
    of purpose and results, current for 1998, and
    thorough
  • Summaries of other comparative studies are
    discussed, relevant to the study and includes
    strengths and weaknesses
  • Chopra, et al. (pg. 13)
  • Devitt, et al. (pg. 13)
  • Law and Sherman (pg. 15)

8
5. Applicability
  • The aviation industrys commitment to simulation
    and similarities between anesthesia and aviation
    was a key rationale for developing courses in
    crisis management and using simulation in
    anesthesia education
  • Generalization among various acute events in
    simulation teaching and evaluation environments
    across healthcare disciplines is a reality today

9
6. Methodologies
  • Raters scored the videotapes of 14 different
    teams that were managing two scenarios malignant
    hyperthermia (MH) and cardiac arrest. Technical
    performance and crisis management behaviors were
    rated.

10
7. Statistical Analyses Assumptions
  • Using three observers, the study shows good
    interrater reliability in scoring technical
    achievement with less agreement between five
    raters scoring ACRM behaviors.
  • The authors analyze the statistics of interrater
    reliability in depth and note that the scoring
    system requires further development before it can
    be used for assess clinical competence for
    residency/graduation, or board certification

11
8. Presentation of Results
  • What do the results really mean?
  • Team performance varied and correlations among
    interraters were better for technical markers
    than for behavioral markers

12
9. Conclusions (are they reasonable?)
  • The rating system needs refinement before it can
    be used to assess clinical competence for
    residency/graduation, or board certification
  • This study suggests that simulation can be used
    to measure more complex skills expected in
    specialty training
  • Similar to other studies assessing complex
    technical and behavioral performance multiple
    encounters are needed to estimate skill
    effectively and accurately

13
10. Future Work/Research Direction
  • Studies emphasize the cognitive and social
    aspects of designing and operating advanced
    technologies yet to be developed
  • The behavioral rating system can be improved
    difficulty aggregating a single rating that
    fluctuated with time
  • Human Factors and ergonomics link quantitative
    skills to the integrated systems and make sure
    design of systems act in accordance with
    requirement of users includes interactions with
    technologists
  • Questions
  • Is there a need for simulation in assessment of
    clinical performance?
  • Do current simulators match the fidelity of a
    real-live clinical setting? Are they realistic?
  • What are the potential uses of clinical
    simulation in medical/healthcare education?
  • What role exists for simulation in healthcare
    professional training and assessment?
  • Do collaborative opportunities exist?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com