Research Techniques Made Simple: Antibody Phage Display - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Research Techniques Made Simple: Antibody Phage Display

Description:

Research Techniques Made Simple: Antibody Phage Display Christoph M. Hammers and John R. Stanley Dept. of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:299
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: Elizab139
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Research Techniques Made Simple: Antibody Phage Display


1
Research Techniques Made SimpleAntibody Phage
Display
  • Christoph M. Hammers
  • and John R. Stanley
  • Dept. of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania,
    Philadelphia, PA, USA

2
Antibody Phage Display I
  • Development closely related to production of
    monoclonal antibodies
  • Initially described by Smith in 1985 further
    developed by other groups (e.g., Winter,
    McCafferty, Lerner, Barbas)
  • Based on genetic engineering of bacteriophages
    and repeated antigen-guided selection

3
Antibody Phage Display II
  • Allows in vitro selection of monoclonal
    antibodies (mAb in form of scFv or Fab) of
    virtually any specificity
  • Enables research to study genetics and function
    of antigen-specific mAb
  • Facilitating dissection of immunological
    processes in microbiology/virology and in
    autoimmune diseases

4
Library Construction
5
Panning
6
Analysis I
7
Analysis II
8
Peculiarities and Limitations I
  • Sufficient depth of coverage to find
    antigen-specific mAb even from rare ab-producing
    clones
  • Ease of constructing and screening antibody
    libraries, many well-established protocols
  • Various systems that facilitate production of
    soluble mAbs

9
Peculiarities and Limitations II
  • Random pairing of variable heavy and light chains
    during construction (however, in PF, scFvs bind
    the same epitopes on Dsg as polyclonal patient
    IgGs do)
  • Not all phage clones of a given library will
    display a protein (toxicity, interference with
    phage assembly)
  • Clones of interest may be missed due to
    significant loss of DNA material during library
    construction and/or due to undersized sampling of
    monoclonals after panning
  • Potent contamination sources (infective phages,
    plasmids) and gt100 individual working steps per
    screen (probability of human error)

10
Comparison with Other Methods
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com