Transmission Expansion Cost Drivers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Transmission Expansion Cost Drivers

Description:

Transmission Expansion Cost Drivers NARUC Portland, Oregon David Mead Vice President, Engineering Southern California Edison SCE has one of the nation s largest and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:122
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: mult163
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Transmission Expansion Cost Drivers


1
Transmission Expansion Cost Drivers
  • NARUC
  • Portland, Oregon
  • David Mead
  • Vice President, Engineering
  • Southern California Edison

2
SCE has one of the nations largest and oldest
electrical systems.
  • Operating for 121 years
  • Covering 50,000 square miles of central, coastal
    and Southern California
  • Serving a population of more than 13 million via
    4.8 million customer accounts in 428 cities
  • Added 386,000 new meters over the last five years
    (77.2k/year)
  • 17.6 Billion T D Assets (2006)

First Predecessor Company to SCE Established in
1886 Consolidated Edison (NY) was founded in
1823.
3
What Is Driving The Need For Transmission
  • Replacement of aging infrastructure presents a
    growing challenge
  • New records are continuing to be set for peak
    demand throughout the state
  • In addition to load growth, we are obligated to
    comply with increasing regulatory requirements on
    renewable energy
  • California Renewable Portfolio Standard
  • 20 by 2010
  • Possibly 33 by 2020 (statute under
    consideration)
  • California Greenhouse Gas (GHG) regulation

4
What Are The Cost Escalators To New Transmission
  • State Regulatory processes are lengthy, costly
    and require significant resources
  • Duplicative environmental reviews
  • Federal agencies are difficult to navigate and
    slow to approve
  • BLM
  • US Fish and Wildlife
  • US Forest Service
  • Interstate projects must have sufficient
    benefits to avoid state opposition as
    intrusive
  • Public more engaged and mobilize opposition
    quickly
  • Land availability and changes to California
    Eminent Domain laws
  • Escalating project construction costs

5
Permits And System Constraints Complicate The
Issue
  • Permitting and licensing decisions from
    regulatory/jurisdictional agencies contain
    significant changes impacting project scope and
    schedule
  • Multiple and significant mitigation measures
  • Limits construction methods and hours
  • Routes permitted are often different than
    proposed
  • New routes outside of existing right-of-way
  • Fully utilized electrical systems make
    construction outages even more challenging
  • Outage availability due to peak demand
  • Construction window narrow

6
Execution Has Its Own Set of Challenges
  • Competition for resources
  • Materials
  • International trade/demand
  • Extraordinary inflation
  • Equipment
  • Long lead times and price increases
  • Labor
  • Numerous large expansion projects
  • Replacement of aging utility infrastructure
  • Fuel

7
Public Opposition
  • The public is more engaged and opposition
    mobilizes quickly
  • Creating an unassailable need statement is
    critical to managing public opposition
  • Regulatory/permitting jurisdictions view
    undergrounding as the answer to public concerns
    on visual impacts
  • Costly and only benefits a small percentage of
    ratepayers
  • Communities benefiting should carry the cost
  • Changes to Eminent Domain is example

8
Public Opposition Acronyms A Quiz!
  • NIMBY
  • NOPE
  • BANANA
  • NIMET
  • CAVE
  • NIABY
  • LULU
  • NEIUROW
  • BNMHYMWBS

Not In My Back Yard
Not On Planet Earth
Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anyone
Not In My Elected Term
Citizens Against Virtually Everything
Not In Anyones Back Yard
Locally Unwanted Land Use
Not Even In Utility Right-Of-Way
Build Near My House Your Mama Will Be Sorry
9
Transmission Planned and Under Construction for
Renewable Generation Delivery
  • SCE pursuing numerous renewable transmission
    projects
  • Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project delivers
    4500 MW of primarily wind generation.
  • Acceleration of SCEs construction of the
    California phase of Devers-Palo Verde 2 500 kV
    project to deliver renewable generation from
    Colorado River area to Southern California.
  • Eldorado Ivanpah 230 kV project to deliver 1400
    MW of primarily solar generation.
  • Developing comprehensive transmission plans for
    solar and wind generation integration in several
    other areas of San Bernardino and Riverside
    counties.
  • Above projects in various stages of project
    development with the capability of delivering
    over 7,000 MW of renewable generation.

10
Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project
  • Delivers 4500 MW of renewable generation
  • 2.7 Billion

11
Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project Segment 1
  • The Certificate of Public Convenience and
    Necessity issued by California Public Utilities
    Commission
  • Contained 179 mitigations measures, the
    predominant issues
  • 46 are visual
  • 33 are biology
  • 22 are cultural
  • Contained two major route changes
  • US Forest Service
  • Record of Decision
  • Requires helicopter construction
  • Requires narrow window on construction

12
Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project
  • Segments 4-11 Certificate of Public Convenience
    and Necessity currently in Regulatory review
  • Segment 8 regulatory evaluation is currently
    reviewing the proposed route and 4 alternative
    routes plus an undergrounding option
  • Any of 4 alternates or undergrounding the
    preferred route will add significant costs to the
    project
  • Segment 6 and 11 Double circuit proposal for
    Angeles National Forest
  • Elevation and icing issues

13
If We Build it They Will Come
  • The market will produce the Generators
  • The utilities will provide the Transmission
    access
  • Will it be done in the current proposed
    timetables?
  • Without more creative solutions, it will be
    difficult
  • If we are able to meet the current schedule
    demands
  • Costs are rising and may be higher than necessary
  • Grid quality and reliability is at risk if we
    dont pay attention
  • The process can end up more contentious than it
    should be

14
Conclusions
  • Transmission investment opportunities are
    exciting and unprecedented
  • Southern California Edison 5.5 billion in 5
    years
  • Investments needed to access renewable energy,
    serve growing loads, and replace aging
    infrastructure
  • Obtaining project approvals is a daunting
    challenge weve learned much over the last few
    years
  • Managing the escalating costs will be key for
    utilities and our customers
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com