March 2005 SBE Issues Session: Exit Standards - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 45
About This Presentation
Title:

March 2005 SBE Issues Session: Exit Standards

Description:

Title: Arts Education Author: cmhowell Last modified by: New Hanover County Schools Created Date: 10/8/2003 9:07:44 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:112
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: cmh77
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: March 2005 SBE Issues Session: Exit Standards


1
March 2005SBE Issues Session Exit Standards
  • Sarah McManus
  • Marvin Pittman
  • Jackie Colbert
  • Lou Fabrizio
  • Wandra Polk

1
2
Discussion Items
  • The Framework and Development of Details
  • Regional Meetings
  • Online Survey Results
  • R3 Committee Feedback
  • Next Steps

2
3
  • The Framework and Development of Details

Sarah McManus
3
4
Current High School Graduation Requirements
Exit Standards
  • Students must meet the following requirements
  • attain passing scores on competency tests adopted
    by the SBE per GS 115C-174.11 and administered
    by the LEA
  • successfully complete 20 course units in grades
    9-12 (22 course units for Occupational Course of
    Study)
  • successfully complete one of the following four
    courses of study Career Preparation, College
    Technical Preparation, College/University
    Preparation, or Occupational Course of Study and
  • demonstrate computer proficiency

4
5
The Framework for the New Exit Standards
  • At the October 2004 State Board of
  • Education meeting, the board approved the
  • framework of using performance on the five
  • required end-of-course (EOC) assessments
  • and a senior project.

5
6
NCDPI Internal Committee
  • Division of School Improvement
  • Division of Instructional Services
  • Division of Accountability Services
  • Division of Communications and Information

6
7
Input from Advisory Groups
  • Exceptional Children Directors and Coordinators
  • Limited English Proficiency Coordinators
  • Parents
  • Teachers
  • Principals
  • Superintendents
  • Test Coordinators

7
8
The Details of the Framework
  • Special considerations for students enrolled in
    the Occupational Course of Study
  • Meeting the senior project requirement (which can
    include service-based learning or work-based
    learning experience)
  • Special considerations for students transferring
    into North Carolina public schools
  • Meeting the EOC assessment requirement involving
    the five required end-of-course assessments
  • Remediation opportunities and retesting
    opportunities
  • A review process

8
9
Special Considerations for Students Enrolled in
the Occupational Course of Study
  • Students following the Occupational Course of
    Study are required to meet rigorous exit
    standards as outlined in State Board of Education
    policy HSP-N-004 (16 NCAC 6D .0503). The NCDPI
    recommends that the new exit standards will only
    apply to students following the Career
    Preparation, College Technical Preparation, or
    College/University Preparation courses of study.

9
10
Meeting the Senior Project Component
  • One component of the new high school exit
    standards
  • Performance-based component developed, monitored,
    and scored locally using state adopted rubrics
  • Can include service-based learning or work-based
    learning experiences
  • LEAs may have some flexibility to incorporate
    senior project requirements already in place

10
11
Special Considerations for Students Transferring
into North Carolina Public Schools
  • Transfer Students and Senior Project Proposal
  • All students, including transfers, must
    complete the senior project. However, special
    consideration must be given to transfer students
    arriving in the second semester of the senior
    year. If a student transfers in the second
    semester of the senior year, the LEA should
    adjust the scope of the project based on the time
    available to the student to complete the project.
    The senior project can include information or
    material previously used by the student in
    another state or private school.

11
12
Meeting the End-of-Course (EOC) Assessments
Component
The NCDPI explored several approaches.
  • Pass/Fail
  • Weighting
  • Compensatory Model

Based on input from advisory committees, the
Weighting and Compensatory Model approaches were
eliminated.
12
13
Meeting the End-of-Course (EOC) Assessments
Component
  • Proposal 1 Students should be required to
    pass all five required EOC assessments (Algebra
    I, Biology, English I, Civics Economics, and
    U.S. History).

13
14
Meeting the End-of-Course (EOC) Assessments
Component
  • Proposal 2 Students should be required to
    pass at least four out of five required EOC
    assessments (Algebra I, Biology, English I,
    Civics Economics, and U.S. History).

14
15
General Overview of the Proposed Retesting and
Review Process
  • 1. The student takes the regularly scheduled
    end-of-course assessment.
  • 2. If a student passes the course and fails the
    assessment, the student is administered a retest
    within a reasonable time from the receipt of test
    results.
  • 3. If the student does not pass the retest, the
    student receives focused intervention/remediation
    (tutorial sessions, extended school day, Saturday
    school, summer school instruction, etc.).

15
16
Proposed Retesting and Review Process (continued)
  • 4. The second retest occurs.
  • 5. If the student does not pass the second
    retest, documentation of the student's
    performance in the EOC course is placed on file.
  • 6. The student's documentation is reviewed by an
    external review committee to determine if the
    exit standards have been met.
  • 7. The principal makes the final decision for
    meeting the exit standards.

16
17
Retesting Opportunities to Meet the New Standards
  • Retesting Proposal 1 Consistent with the
    current retesting opportunities for end-of-grade
    assessments at grades 3, 5, and 8, students
    should be given a maximum of two retest
    opportunities. The second retest opportunity
    must be preceded by focused intervention/remediati
    on.

17
18
Retesting Opportunities to Meet the New Standards
  • Retesting Proposal 2 Consistent with the
    current retesting opportunities for the
    competency and computer skills assessments,
    students should be given at least one retest
    opportunity per year. Each retest opportunity
    must be preceded by focused intervention/remediati
    on.

18
19
Exit Standards Review Process
  • Review Process Proposal 1 On a
    course-by-course basis, if a student does not
    meet the passing criteria for the EOC assessment
    but passes the course, the review of the
    students documentation begins after the second
    retest.

19
20
Exit Standards Review Process
  • Review Process Proposal 2 If a student does
    not pass an EOC assessment but passes the course,
    interim reviews will take place throughout the
    students high school experience and a final
    review of documentation related to all the EOC
    assessments that were not passed occurs in the
    senior year.

20
21
Special Considerations for Students Transferring
into North Carolina Public Schools
  • Transfer Students and EOC ProposalIf a
    student transfers into a North Carolina public
    high school and the principal awards the student
    credit for a course associated with one of the
    five required end-of-course assessments, the
    student would not need to meet the EOC assessment
    requirement for that course.

21
22
Input and Media Sessions
  • Jackie Colbert
  • Marvin Pittman

22
23
Input Sessions
  • Six sites approximately 400 participants 64
    LEAs represented
  • Gaston County
  • Jackson County
  • Guilford County
  • Wake County
  • Bertie County
  • Cumberland County

23
24
Summary of Comments
  • Schools currently using senior projects are very
    positive about the benefits but wonder how State
    standards will impact what is already in place in
    LEAs.

24
25
  • Participants were concerned that senior projects
    would become an unfunded mandate.
  • Some schools/LEAs are concerned about recruiting
    and retaining highly-qualified teachers and the
    impact this would have on exit standards.

25
26
  • A number of questions were raised and comments
    shared about exit standards
  • Will there be funding for this?
  • Will there be intervention plans for students who
    fail?
  • How does this fit Leandro?
  • What is the time line for senior projects?
  • How will the current stress and demands on AP
    students be addressed with the addition of
    another requirement?

26
27
Questions/Comments (continued)
  • How will this affect the dropout rate?
  • What considerations will be given limited English
    proficient students and students with
    disabilities?
  • Can writing be added as one of the required
    tests?
  • Can students begin the senior project prior to
    the senior year?

27
28
Questions/Comments (continued)
  • Are elementary and middle school students being
    adequately prepared for high school?
  • How do we ensure consistency in senior projects
    across the state?
  • It is important to have parental involvement if
    the projects are to be successful.
  • Separate the senior project from English IV.

28
29
Questions/Comments (continued)
  • Ensure that students in all school systems have
    the opportunity to succeed.
  • Include an appeals process.

29
30
Media Representation
  • Approximately 20 media representatives attended
    the media briefing and/or input sessions.
  • Newspapers, television stations and one radio
    station were represented.

30
31
High School Exit Standards Online Survey Results
Wandra Polk
31
32
  • Online Survey
  • December 7, 2004 January 24, 2005
  • 2,209 Respondents

32
33
Survey Results By Respondent
  • Parents/Guardians/Community Members
  • Teachers/Instructional Staff
  • School Administrators
  • Central Office/NCDPI
  • Superintendents

33
34
High School Exit Standards Survey Part I
Meeting the End-of-Course (EOC) Assessments and
Senior Project Components Proposal 1
Students should be required to pass all five
required EOC assessments (Algebra I, Biology,
English I, Civics Economics, and U.S. History)
and the senior project. The senior project will
be developed, monitored, and scored at the local
level using rubrics developed or endorsed by the
NCDPI. Proposal 2 Students should be required
to pass at least four out of five required EOC
assessments (Algebra I, Biology, English I,
Civics Economics, and U.S. History) and the
senior project. The senior project will be
developed, monitored, and scored at the local
level using rubrics developed or endorsed by the
NCDPI.
34
35
High School Exit Standards Survey
EOC Assessments and Senior Project Results
Proposal Total of Responses Percent
1 957 43.32
2 1069 48.39
No Preference 183 8.28
Total 2209  
35
36
High School Exit Standards Proposals Survey
Part II Retesting and Review Process for
students who do not pass the first administration
of the EOC assessment. Retesting Proposal 1
Consistent with the current retesting
opportunities for end-of-grade assessments at
grades 3, 5, and 8, students should be given a
maximum of two retest opportunities. The second
retest opportunity must be preceded by focused
intervention/remediation. Retesting Proposal 2
Consistent with the current retesting
opportunities for the competency and computer
skills assessments, students should be given at
least one retest opportunity per year. Each
retest opportunity must be preceded by focused
intervention/remediation.
36
37
High School Exit Standards Survey
Retesting Proposal Results
Proposal Total of Responses Percent
1 1025 46.40
2 920 41.65
No Preference 264 11.95
Total 2209  
37
38
High School Exit Standards Proposals Survey
Review Process Review Process Proposal 1 On a
course-by-course basis, if a student does not
meet the passing criteria for the EOC assessment
but passes the course, the review of the
students documentation begins after the second
retest. Review Process Proposal 2 If a student
does not pass an EOC assessment but passes the
course, interim reviews will take place
throughout the students high school experience
and a final review of documentation related to
all the EOC assessments that were not passed
occurs in the senior year.
38
39
High School Exit Standards Survey
Review Process Results
Proposal Total of Responses Percent
1 1275 57.72
2 609 27.57
No Preference 325 14.71
Total 2209  
39
40
Next Steps
  • Lou Fabrizio

40
41
Next Steps
  • Implementing these new exit standards
  • would require changes to State Board of
  • Education policy HSP-N-004 (16 NCAC 6D
  • .0503) regarding state graduation
  • requirements and GS 115C-174.11 (b) regarding
  • the use of competency tests must be amended.

41
42
Next Steps
  • SBE/DPI meets with legislative leadership on
    proposed exit standards
  • Use legislative report on exit exams as vehicle
  • Return to SBE with implementation plan
    particularly for the Senior Project

42
43
Next Steps
  • G.S. 115C-12(9b) called for exit exam(s)
  • General Assembly suspended development pending
    report on compliance with NCLB
  • SB 1115, SL 2002-126 Exit Exam
  • The Board shall not adopt any revisions prior
    to reporting themto the Joint Legislative
    Education Oversight Committee (JLEOC).

43
44
Next Steps
  • Report on Exit Exam must include US Department of
    Education approval of using Algebra I, and
    English I and grade 10 Writing, for AYP
    determinations at the high school level.

44
45
  • Questions?

45
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com