NARUC Energy Regulatory Partnership Program - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

NARUC Energy Regulatory Partnership Program

Description:

Title: The Power to Choose by Michael Dworkin, Chair Vermont Public Service Board Author: Michael H. Dworkin Last modified by: ABishop Created Date – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:66
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: Micha849
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NARUC Energy Regulatory Partnership Program


1
Tariff Development II Rate Design
  • NARUC Energy Regulatory Partnership Program
  • The Georgian National Energy Regulatory
    Commission
  • and
  • The Vermont Public Service Board

by Ann Bishop Vermont Public Service Board June
28, 2008
2
Overview
  • What is rate design?
  • Rate design objectives
  • Steps in developing a rate design
  • Determine customer groups
  • Allocate costs among customer groups
  • Assign costs to individual rate components
  • Issues with tariff design

3
What Is Rate Design?
  • Rate design is the structure of a utilitys
    rates rate design determines the prices
    customers pay for utility services
  • Rate designs vary from utility to utility
  • All rate designs address
  • Customer classes
  • Types of charges (customer, energy, demand)
  • Some rate designs also address
  • Time (real-time, time-of-day, season of year,
    etc.)
  • Rate design is highly technical and detailed, but
    it is more art than science

4
Rate Design Objectives
  • Rate design has a variety of objectives, some of
    which conflict with each other
  • Revenue-related objectives
  • Rates should yield the total revenue requirement
  • Rates should provide stable and predictable
    revenues

5
Objectives of Rate Design
  • Cost-related objectives
  • Rates should be set to promote economically
    efficient consumption
  • Rates should apportion costs fairly among
    customers and customer classes
  • Rates should avoid undue discrimination
  • Rates should promote innovation in supply and
    demand

6
Objectives of Rate Design
  • Practical considerations
  • A rate design should be, to the extent possible,
    simple, understandable, acceptable to the public,
    and easily administered
  • A rate design should provide for rate stability

7
Revenue-Related Issues
  • Rates should give a utility a reasonable
    opportunity to
  • Recover prudently incurred expenses, including
    investment
  • Earn a fair rate of return on the remaining costs
    (the undepreciated portion) of its prudent
    investment
  • Such rates enable a utility to cover its
    debt-service obligation, pay dividends to
    shareholders, and attract new capital investment

8
Cost-Related Issues
  • Will rates set at average cost per unit be
    economically efficient?
  • Average cost vs. marginal cost
  • Long run vs. short run
  • Private financial vs. total social cost
  • Cost of environmental damage from electricity
    production and delivery
  • Who pays what costs?
  • Principle of cost causation

9
Developing a Rate Design
  • Basic principle assign costs to customers who
    cause a utility to incur them
  • Steps
  • Determine customer groups
  • Allocate utility costs among the customer groups
  • For each customer group, assign allocated costs
    to individual rate components (customer, kWh, kW
    charges)

10
Determining Customer Groups
  • Generally based on usage characteristics
  • Number of customer groups varies among utilities
  • Common groups
  • Residential
  • Commercial
  • Industrial
  • Street lighting
  • Agricultural

11
Determining Customer Groups
  • Sometimes groups may be designated for public
    policy reasons
  • For example, low income or elderly
  • Occasionally one customer with very unique usage
    characteristics is a group

12
Class Cost-of-Service Study
  • Utility performs a class cost-of-service study
  • Embedded or fully allocated cost study
  • Incremental or marginal cost study
  • Sometimes a utility performs both studies

13
Embedded Cost Study
  • Uses capital and operating costs that have been
    historically embedded (spent or invested)
  • Built on accounting cost data generated in the
    day-to-day operations of the utility
  • Need fairly detailed accounting records so costs
    can be categorized into generation, transmission,
    distribution, billing, etc.

14
Embedded Cost Study
  • Uses a variety of allocation factors to assign
    costs to each customer group
  • Sample allocation factors winter kWh, system
    peak month coincident peak, average monthly
    customers
  • Some costs cannot be easily allocated (for
    example, administrative)
  • Often allocated in proportion to all other costs
  • Other options include
  • Considering other policy goals
  • Allocating them in some reasonable manner

15
Embedded Cost Study
  • Most simple embedded cost allocation
  • Revenue requirement number of customers rate,
    billed annually, semi-annually or quarterly
  • Complexities arise due to desire to distinguish
    between
  • Types and amount of service
  • Types of customers

16
Embedded Cost Study
  • Advantages
  • Based on actual costs
  • Automatically reconciled with the revenue
    requirement
  • Perceived to be fair
  • Disadvantages
  • Hard to allocate joint and common costs
  • Does not reflect current market trends
  • May produce inefficient prices

17
Marginal Cost Study
  • Allocates the cost of providing additional
    service
  • Based on marginal cost pricing which equals the
    economic costs of providing the next increment of
    service
  • Forward-looking study of resource costs

18
Marginal Cost Study
  • Challenges
  • What is the appropriate increment of output, or
    margin, to measure?
  • Generating capacity costs /kW-yr
  • Energy costs /kWh
  • Transmission and distribution costs /kW-yr
  • How can marginal-cost prices be reconciled with
    the revenue requirement
  • What kinds of pricing distortions are acceptable?
  • Should the incremental costs of environmental
    damage be reflected in rates?

19
Marginal Cost Study
  • Advantages
  • Forward looking, economic costs
  • Promotes economic efficiency
  • Exception The problem of second best
  • Those who cause the costs pay the costs
  • Disadvantages
  • Definitions more contentious
  • Hard to reconcile with revenue requirement
  • Requires forecasted demand and costs
  • Potential for rate volatility

20
Cost Allocation Issues
  • Are all classes equally risky to serve?
  • If cross-subsidies between classes exist, how
    quickly should they be eliminated?
  • Potential for rate shock and irate ratepayers
  • Impact on vulnerable customers (for example, low
    income)

21
Cost Allocation Issues
  • How should public policy considerations be
    factored in to cost allocation?
  • Rates can provide assistance to specific customer
    classes
  • Economic-development or business-retention rates
  • Residential lifeline rate
  • Rates can promote social objectives
  • Conservation/environmental considerations
  • Universal service

22
Designing Tariffs
  • Primary tariff price components
  • Customer charge
  • Energy charge
  • Demand charge
  • Interaction of these components sends price
    signals

23
Tariff Components
  • Customer charge
  • Recover costs that do not vary with consumption
    (for example, metering and billing)
  • Can be fixed amount per day, month, or other
    billing period
  • Energy charge (kWh)
  • Recover costs that vary with consumption (for
    example, energy)
  • Can vary depending on usage patterns

24
Demand Charge
  • Demand charge (kW)
  • Recover cost of building capacity to provide
    energy
  • Reflects fact that utility must have power
    available to serve customer
  • Encourages reduced usage at peak periods
    (especially load shifting)
  • Typically only larger customers pay a demand
    charge
  • Often includes a ratchet

25
Demand Charge
  • Ratchet customers are billed the higher of
    either their highest demand from the current
    month, or some percentage of their highest demand
    from some previous period
  • Advantages encourages customers to reduce their
    peak usage, helping to reduce the need for new
    utility infrastructure
  • Disadvantages if the ratchet does not change
    after the customer reduces demand, the ratchet
    could be a disincentive to the installation of
    on-site generation or energy efficiency measures

26
Usage Patterns
Declining Block Rates
Flat Rates
Price/ Unit
Quantity Consumed
Inclining Block Rates
Time-Based Rates
Price/ Unit
Offpeak Peak Offpeak
27
Usage Patterns
  • Flat
  • Declining block
  • Based on assumptions that it is cheaper to serve
    large customers and that marginal cost is less
    than average cost
  • Encourages consumption, discourages conservation,
    so is particularly important to ensure prices are
    right

28
Usage Patterns
  • Inclining block
  • Marginal cost is greater than average cost
  • Discourages consumption and encourages
    conservation
  • Peak and off-peak rates
  • Encourage customers to use less power during peak
    periods

29
Usage Patterns
  • Time-based rates
  • Can be based on season, time of day, or real-time
  • Provide more accurate price signals
  • Rates that change based on time of day or
    real-time require special metering capabilities
  • Many large customers already have meters with
    these capabilities
  • Most smaller customers do not
  • Board is currently investigating whether
    utilities should provide meters with these
    capabilities to more customers

30
Usage Patterns
  • Customers with their own generation options may
    want utilities to provide stand-by service
  • If generator is down for any reason, utility
    would supply power to customer
  • Considerable debate over what are appropriate
    stand-by tariffs
  • Utility must build capacity to serve customer
  • Least-cost for society might not be least-cost
    for the customer
  • Sometimes customer-owned generation is the
    least-cost option for the utility but, if
    stand-by rates are too high, the customer may opt
    not to install the generation

31
Issues with Tariff Design
  • Uniform tariffs are easier to administer but can
    result in subsidies within rate classes
  • Does the rate design appropriately balance all
    the objectives?
  • Sometimes adjustments are made to better meet
    certain objectives (for example, make the kWh
    price closer to the utilitys marginal cost of
    power)
  • Does the rate design significantly increase rates
    for any customer group?
  • Sometimes the rate design is phased-in over
    multiple years to minimize rate shock

32
Customer-Specific Tariffs
  • Individual customer cost-based tariffs
  • More precise (assuming can identify separate
    costs)
  • Generally not used in VT and most of U.S., except
    where customer has very clear distinguishing
    characteristics
  • Difficult to calculate
  • What are the cost differences in an integrated
    electrical system?
  • For most customers, costs outweigh benefits

33
Other Items in Tariffs
  • Tariffs also include terms and conditions of
    service
  • Some examples
  • Late fees
  • Disconnection policies and fees
  • Line extension policies
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com