Cancer%20Molecular%20Epidemiology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Cancer%20Molecular%20Epidemiology

Description:

Title: Cancer Molecular Epidemiology Author: ZUOFENG Last modified by: zzhang Created Date: 3/10/2002 7:47:55 AM Document presentation format: On-screen Show (4:3) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:309
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 74
Provided by: ZUOFENG
Learn more at: http://www.ph.ucla.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cancer%20Molecular%20Epidemiology


1
Cancer Molecular Epidemiology
  • Epidemiology 242
  • 2009

2
Numbers of Papers/Year Published with Subject
Words Molecular Epidemiology Using Pubmed Search
3
Evolution of Epidemiology in History
  • Systematic collection and analysis of vital
    statistics
  • Defined triad of agent-host-vector for both
    infectious and chronic disease
  • Refine exposure assessment such as job-exposure
    matrix, dietary and nutritional analysis
  • Defined study design such as case-control and
    cohort study
  • Use of the advance of statistical and
    computational capacities (MLE, Logistic
    regression, poission regression)

4
Evolution of Epidemiology
  • Now, it is the time to add biological variables
    (physiologic, cellular, subcellular, molecular
    levels), which can be assayed by technically
    powerful biological methods
  • Molecular epidemiology is the use of these
    biological markers in epidemiology research.

5
Epidemiology and Molecular Sciences Epidemiology
Molecular
Sciences
  • Health effects in grouped people
  • Observation and inference of association between
    variables
  • Macro
  • Assessment of the individual at the component
    level
  • Experimental proof of cause and effects
  • Micro

6
Molecular Epidemiology and Traditional
Epidemiology
  • These capacities provide additional tool for
    epidemiologists studying questions on etiology,
    prevention and control of diseases
  • Although molecular epidemiology can be viewed as
    an evolution step of epidemiology, it generally
    dose not represent a shift in the basic paradigm
    of epidemiology

7
Traditional and Molecular EpidemiologyTraditiona
l Molecular
  • Association
  • High exposure and single outcome
  • Prevention through control of exposure is
    feasible without understanding cellular process
  • Mechanisms
  • Smaller and mixed exposures multicausal
  • Intervention through cellular process has the
    need to understand mechanisms of the process

8
Basics of Molecular Epidemiology
  • The term of molecular epidemiology indicates the
    incorporation of molecular, cellular, and other
    biological measurements into epidemiologic
    studies

9
Molecular Epidemiology
  • studies utilizing biological markers of exposure,
    disease and susceptibility
  • studies which apply current and future
    generations of biomarkers in epidemiologic
    research.

10
Functional Definition of Molecular Epidemiology
  • The use of biologic markers or biologic
    measurements in epidemiologic research.
    Biological markers (or biomarkers) generally
    include biochemical, molecular, genetic,
    immunologic, or physiologic signals of events in
    biologic system.

11
Molecular Epidemiology
  • The goal of molecular epidemiology is to
    supplement and integrate, not to replace,
    existing methods
  • Molecular epidemiology can be utilized to enhance
    capacity of epidemiology to understand disease in
    terms of the interaction of the environment and
    heredity.

12
Capacities of Molecular Epidemiology
  • Identification of Exposure at the smaller scale
  • Identification of events earlier in the nature
    history of disease
  • Evaluation of gene-environment interaction
  • In addition, it can be used to reduce
    misclassification, to indicate mechanisms, and
    enhance risk assessment

13
(No Transcript)
14
Study of Black Box
  • The concept of a continuum of events between
    exposure and disease provide opportunities
  • To ensure that epidemiologic research has a
    biological basis for hypothesis
  • To provide the analysis to test these ideas
  • To generate new epidemiological methods to deal
    with new challenges

15
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 200716(10).
October 2007
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
Measurement of Biomarkers
  • Biomarkers can be measured quantitatively or
    qualitatively by biochemical, immunochemical,
    cytogentic, molecular and genetic techniques.

19
Materials for Biomarker Measurement
  • Biomarkers can be measured in human biological
    materials including normal and tumor tissues,
    blood and urine sample, etc.. Their biological
    nature can be DNA, RNA, and protein, etc.

20
Study Questions Exposure Markers
  • How reliable are the exposure data obtained by
    questionnaire and what type of misclassification
    bias result?
  • How are the carcinogens metabolized? What are
    the dynamics and distribution of carcinogen
    metabolization?
  • What is the concentration of carcinogens in
    peripheral blood? What is the exposure level in
    the target tissue? Can we employ the exposure
    markers measured in peripheral blood to predict
    the concentrations of exposure at the target
    tissue?

21
Exposure Measurements
The powerful tools of molecular biology,
analytical chemistry, and related
disciplines allow measure smaller amounts of
exposures (10-18 -10-21) Reconstruct past
exposure doses using molecular measurements
(biologic dosimetry)
22
Exposure Biomarkers
Mutagenesis vol. 24,117125, 2009
23
Exposure Markers DNA Adducts
  • Exposure markers are a group of biomarkers, which
    can indicate the environmental exposures and can
    be measured in tumor tissues, or blood or urine
    specimens.
  • The presence or concentration of specific
    environmental carcinogens or other agents can be
    measured in biological specimens, for example,
    blood levels of cotinine, polycyclic aromatic
    hydrocarbon (PAH) -DNA adducts, 4-aminobiphenyl
    (4-ABP) hemoglobin adducts.

24
Exposure Markers DNA Adducts
  • exposure markers measure biological effective
    dose, that is, the amount of carcinogens bound to
    DNA in the target tissue such as DNA-adducts, or
    surrogate measurements which can represent the
    exposure levels of the target tissue such as
    hemoglobin adducts

25
Exposure Markers
  • Aromatic Amines and 4-ABP DNA-Adducts. The human
    bladder carcinogens 2-naphtylamine and
    4-aminobiphenyl, as well as the suspected
    carcinogen o-toluidine, are present in tobacco
    and certain occupational exposures. DNA adducts
    of 4-aminobiphenyl were found in tumor samples
    from smokers indicating that this agent may
    account for some of the carcinogenicity of
    tobacco smoke

26
Exposure Markers
  • Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) and PAH
    DNA-Adducts. PAHs are produced by incomplete
    combustion of organic materials and the sources
    of environmental PAH include industrial and
    domestic furnaces, gasoline and diesel engines
    and tobacco smoke. PAHs are carcinogens requiring
    metabolic activation to react with cellular
    macromolecules, the initial step in tumorigenesis

27
PHIP DNA Adducts
28
P32 postlabeling
29
(No Transcript)
30
Limitations of Exposure Markers
  • These markers have to be measured in biological
    materials, which requires the collection of
    biological specimens
  • Some of exposure markers such as
    hemoglobin-adducts and blood level of cotinine
    only represent the current exposure status
  • The costs for measurement of exposure markers are
    generally more expensive than that of
    questionnaire data.

31
Study Questions Susceptibility Genes
  • Which gene or enzymes are involved?
  • Is there any metabolic phenotype related to the
    risk of cancer?
  • Are there any high risk individuals who are
    susceptible to cancer and how can we identify
    them?

32
Susceptibility Markers
  • Susceptibility markers represent a group of tumor
    markers, which may make an individual susceptible
    to cancer.
  • These markers may be genetically inherited or
    determined.
  • They are independent of environmental exposures.

33
Susceptibility Markers
  • Tumor susceptibility markers such as P450s, GSTs,
    and NATs, act in enzymatic pathways related to
    metabolizing and eliminating carcinogens.

34
Susceptibility Markers
  • The phase I enzymes such as p450 enzyme
    superfamily metabolize exogenous or endogenous
    agents or carcinogens to intermediates, which can
    result in DNA damages and act as risk factors for
    cancer.
  • The phase II enzymes such as glutathione
    S-transferase (GST) system are dealing with
    detoxification of oxygenated intermediates by
    conjugation process, acting as a protective
    factors for cancer.

35
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3
Case 4 Case 5
GST T1
beta-globin
GST M1
Figure. GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotyping from buccal
cell DNA. Case 5 is null for the GSTT1 genotype.
Case 2 is null for the GSTM1 genotype
36
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5
Case 6 Case 7 Case 8
ile/val ile/val ile/ile
val/val ile/val ile/ile
ile/val ile/ile
Figure. GSTP1 polymorphism
37
14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6
5 4 3 2 1
PCR P450 2E1 after Using Pst1 RFLP
38
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5
Arg/Arg Arg/Arg Pro/Pro Arg/Arg
Arg/Pro
Figure. P53 polymorphism at codon 72 from buccal
cell DNA.
39
Interactions between smoking and GST M1(odds
ratios and 95 confidence intervals)
5.29 (1.81, 15.4)
2.79 (0.97, 7.99)
1.13 (0.32, 3.95)
1.00
Adjusted for age, sex, race, and level of
education
40
Kingsmore, 2008
41
Issues in GWAS Studies
  • False positive (multiple comparison)
  • False negative (very small p-value)
  • Population stratification
  • Gene-Environmental Interaction

42
Background
  • In 2006 and 2007 GWAS studies identified
    associations between SNPs in the 8q24 region and
    prostate cancer among Icelandic, Swedish,
    European American, African American, and the
    Multiethnic Cohort populations.

43
(No Transcript)
44
Research Questions Genetic and Molecular
Alterations
  • What kinds of damages do the carcinogens make,
    and is the damage specific?
  • Does the DNA repair capacity affect risk and how
    can we measure it?
  • Is there any gene-gene interaction and is there
    any gene-environment interaction?

45
Identification of Earlier Events
  • Identification of the patients at a very early
    stage - for better treatment and prognosis to
    improve the survival of cancer
  • Identification of pre-malignant lesions - for
    intervention and early treatment to reduce the
    incidence of cancer

46
Early Biological Response Molecular Genetic
Alterations
  • Molecular genetic markers are defined as a group
    of markers which can be induced by certain
    carcinogens or by some intermediate end-point

47
Early Biological Response Molecular Genetic
Alterations
  • cytogenetic markers such as chromosome
    abnormalities by karyotyping
  • oncogenes such as RAS family
  • tumor suppressor genes such as TP53 and p16 genes.

48
P53 Gene Mutations
  • TP53 Mutations as DNA Fingerprints of
    Environmental Exposures. The wide range of
    involvement of TP53 in human tumors and the broad
    spectrum of mutations make this gene a good
    candidate for molecular epidemiological studies

49
(No Transcript)
50
(No Transcript)
51
(No Transcript)
52
(No Transcript)
53
Case 607 Exon 8
Case 644 Exon 7
1 2 3
1 2 3
Mutant
Wild Type
Mutant
Wild Type
G A T C G A T C
G A T C G A T C
A
A
C
C
C/G
G
G
G
A
A/G
A
G
Arg
Thr
Gly
Ser
A C/G A
A/G G C
Codon 280
Codon 244
54
Figure 8-1. IHC Analysis of p53, p21, and mdm2
55
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3
(unmethylated) (unmethylated)
(methylated)
Figure 11. GST P1 methylation from lung cancer
tissue. (Uunmethylated, Mmethylated) Case 3 is
unmethylated.
56
Age and TP53 Mutations
Age P53 No. () P53- No. () Total No. ()
lt50 6 (8.7) 11 (10.0) 17 (9.5)
50-59 16 (23.2) 18 (16.4) 34 (19.0)
60 47 (68.1) 81 (73.6) 128 (71.5)
57
Gender and TP53 Mutations
Gender TP53 No () TP53- No () Total No ()
Male 47 (71.2) 89 (81.7) 136 (77.7)
Female 19 (28.8) 20 (18.4) 39 (22.3)
58
Race and TP53 Mutations
Race TP53 No () TP53- No () Total No. ()
White 60 (87.0) 100 (90.9) 160 (89.4)
Non-White 9 (13.0) 10 (9.1) 19 (10.6)
59
Education and TP53 Mutations
Education (years) TP53 No. () TP53- No. () Total No. ()
lt12 2 (2.9) 4 (3.6) 6 (3.4)
12-16 58 (84.1) 76 (69.1) 134 (74.9)
gt16 9 (13.0) 30 (27.3) 39 (21.8)
60
TP53 Mutations in Bladder Cancer
BP changes Reported, n200 Current study
Transitions
GC ?AT 41.0 37.5
(at CpG) 14.0 12.5
AT?GC 10.0 15.0
Transversions
GC?TA 13.0 12.5
GC?CG 19.0 10.0
AT?TA 3.0 0.0
AT?CG 2.0 2.5
Deletion/Insert. 12.0 10.0
61
Smoking and TP53 Mutations in Bladder Cancer
Smoking TP53 TP53- OR 95CI
No 8 24 1.00
Yes 58 83 6.27 1.29-30.2
Adjusted for age, gender, and education
62
Cigarettes/day and TP53 Mutations in Bladder
Cancer
Cig/day TP53 TP53- OR 95CI
No 8 24 1.00
1-20 8 21 2.07 0.22-19.9
21-40 36 47 5.50 1.08-28.2
gt40 17 18 10.4 1.90-56.8
Trend P0.003
Adjusted for age, gender, and education
63
Years of Smoking and TP53 Mutations in Bladder
Cancer
Years of smoking TP53 TP53- OR 95CI
No 8 24 1.00
1-20 5 10 5.64 0.82-38.7
21-40 42 58 6.45 1.24-33.4
gt40 14 18 6.20 1.17-32.8
Trend P0.041
Adjusted for age, gender and education
64
Reduction of Misclassifications
  • Better classification of exposures by using
    markers of internal and biological effective
    doses.
  • More homogeneous disease grouping by using marker
    of effect such as specific mutations.
  • Reduced misclassification may lead to increased
    validity and precision of point estimates

65
Indication of Mechanisms
  • Test association between mechanistic events in a
    defined continuum
  • Knowledge of the mechanisms can guide future
    research and intervention applications

66
Variability and Effect Modification
  • Individual variability of susceptibility may be
    related to host factors such as genetic factors
  • Effect modification can be evaluated between
    genetic susceptibility markers and exposure on
    the risk of cancer

67
Enhanced Individual and Group Risk Assessment
  • Providing more person-specific information
  • allowing extrapolation of risk from one group to
    another, from animal species to humans, and from
    one group to individuals

68
(No Transcript)
69
Example Smoking and Lung Cancer
  • Internal Dose (ID). The amount of a xenobiotic
    substance or its metabolites found in a biologic
    medium e.g., Serum cotinine as an indicator of
    nicotine.
  • Biologic Effective Dose (BED). The integration of
    exposure and effect modification by the host
    e.g., DNA adducts of PAH in lung tissue.

70
Example Smoking and Lung Cancer
  • Early Biologic Effect (or biological response)
    are biological or biochemical changes in target
    cells or tissues that result from the action of
    the chemical and are thought to be a step in the
    pathologic process toward disease, e.g., tumor
    suppressor gene TP53 mutations in lung cancer.

71
(No Transcript)
72
(No Transcript)
73
(No Transcript)
74
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com