Muscle invasive bladder cancer - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 87
About This Presentation
Title:

Muscle invasive bladder cancer

Description:

Muscle invasive bladder cancer Amar Mohee, Jen Graham Prof. Noel Clarke 21/03/14 (utilising amended s from S. Bromage/S. Maddineni) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:412
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 88
Provided by: Stephen908
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Muscle invasive bladder cancer


1
Muscle invasive bladder cancer
  • Amar Mohee, Jen Graham
  • Prof. Noel Clarke
  • 21/03/14
  • (utilising amended slides from S. Bromage/S.
    Maddineni)

2
Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
  • Case study
  • Diagnosis/staging
  • Prognosis
  • Treatment
  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • Cystectomy
  • Extent in men/women
  • Lymph node dissection
  • Viva question Consent for cystectomy/ileal
    conduit/neobladder
  • Viva question types of urinary diversion and
    their problems
  • Radiotherapy
  • Adjuvant/palliative chemotherapy
  • Follow-up after radical treatment

3
Case Study - SM
  • A 47 yrs male presents as an emergency with
    visible haematuria
  • PMH nil
  • Previous heavy smoker
  • CT-U
  • Normal upper tracts
  • Filling defect in bladder
  • Flexible cystoscopy shows a large solid-looking
    bladder tumour on the posterior wall

4
Risk factors
  • Much the same as NMIBC
  • Smoking, occupational exposure, chemotherapy
  • ?particularly relevant to MIBC
  • Chronic infection (particularly SCC)
  • Foreign bodies including indwelling catheters
  • Gender
  • women more likely to be diagnosed with a primary
    MIBC (85 vs 51)
  • ?hormonal role
  • And present at older age
  • ?due to late diagnosis haematuria mistaken for
    PV bleeding etc

5
MIBC
  • 20-30 of bladder cancer is muscle invasive at
    initial diagnosis
  • 15-20 of non-muscle invasive disease progresses
    to become muscle invasive
  • 80 of MIBC have no history of NMIBC
  • CIS may be pre-invasive lesion
  • 80 progress to invasive TCC without treatment
  • lt15 of patients with MIBC survive 2 yrs if left
    untreated

6
Pathogenesis
7
Diagnosis
  • Requires a good TURBT with a second TUR in
    indicated cases
  • Careful documentation of tumour site, size,
    number and appearance
  • Biopsy of prostatic urethra or bladder neck
    recommended if
  • considering neobladder
  • or in suspicion of involvement
  • bladder neck tumour, CIS present or multiple
    tumours
  • But, frozen section analysis of urethral margin
    at time of cystectomy may be more accurate

8
Staging (TMN 2009)
9
Staging
  • Understaging is a major problem (34-64 of cases)
  • 1/3 of patients with MIBC have undetected
    metastasis at time of treatment for the primary
    tumour
  • 25 undergoing radical cystectomy are found to
    have lymph node involvement at the time of
    surgery
  • 27 of T1 tumours upstaged after cystectomy
    (Chang et al 2001)
  • Herr et al (2007)
  • 701 patients with T1 disease on first TUR, 30
    had T2 disease on second TUR
  • 40 upstaged if no muscle in the original
    specimen
  • 15 upstaged if muscle present

10
Staging pathology
  • In MIBC all cases are high grade
  • Morphological subtype can help assess prognosis
  • Urothelial carcinoma
  • Urothelial carcinoma with squamous/glandular
    differentiation
  • Nested variant
  • Rare but aggressive
  • Micropapillary differentiation
  • Frequently associated with lymphovascular
    invasion
  • Doesnt respond well to neoadjuvant chemo
  • Trophoblastic differentiation
  • Small cell carcinoma
  • May be associated with paraneoplastic symdromes
  • Very sensitive to chemotherapy
  • Spindle cell carcinoma
  • Differentiation between pT2a/b not possible on
    TUR specimens
  • important to note after cystectomy
  • predictive of risk of recurrence in node
    negative disease

11
Staging MCQ
  • Which of the following is NOT true with regard to
    staging of invasive bladder cancer?
  • Bimanual exam is highly predictive for
    extravesical disease if a mass is palpable after
    TUR
  • CT and MRI are equivalent for prediction of nodal
    involvement
  • Bone scanning is useful for screening
    asymptomatic patients with clinically
    organ-confined disease
  • PET scanning is limited by concentration of
    fluorodeoxyglucose in the lumen of the bladder
  • Answer c

12
Staging Radiology
  • Aims to determine
  • Extent of local disease
  • Evaluate upper tracts
  • Lymph node involvement
  • Exclude metastasis to distant organs
  • Lung, liver, bones, peritoneum etc
  • Gives prognostic information
  • Aids appropriate treatment selection

13
Staging local extent
  • Ideally before TUBRT
  • Difficult to differentiate tumour and post-op
    change
  • MRI reported to be more accurate than CT for
    local tumour assessment
  • Both limited in detecting T3a disease so
    principal aim to detect T3b
  • Accuracy for MRI 73-96
  • Accuracy for CT 55-92

14
Staging lymph nodes
  • CT/MRI generally equivalent
  • Sensitivity 48-87
  • Assessment based on size
  • Poor for assessing metastasis in minimally
    enlarged nodes
  • Suspicious if max short axis diameter
  • gt8mm for pelvic nodes
  • gt10mm for abdominal nodes
  • Role for FDG-PET/CT
  • Sensitivity of 70, specificity 96 (Kibel, 2009)
    in patients with negative CT scans

15
Staging upper tracts/distal mets
  • Excretory phase CT-U highest accuracy for
    diagnosing upper tract disease
  • Sensitivity 67-100
  • Specificity 93-99
  • CT/MRI generally equivalent for distal abdominal
    mets but CT may be better for lung mets
  • Bone scan
  • Useful in highest risk disease
  • If symptomatic of bony pain
  • Raised Alk phos
  • But MRI may be better for detecting bony disease
  • Role for FDG-PET/CT?
  • Mertens et al, BJUI 2013
  • 19.8 upstaged
  • 8/96 found to have second primary
  • Additional info influenced treatment option in
    20
  • Not recommended by EAU at present

16
Case study - MS
  • Histology confirms G3 muscle invasive urothelial
    carcinoma
  • CT chest/abdo/pelvis
  • Normal except for thickening of bladder wall
  • What next?

17
Treatment
18
Basic principles
  • Aim for
  • Long term survival
  • Prevention of pelvic recurrence or metastatic
    bladder cancer
  • Excellent QoL
  • 2 concepts of curative treatment
  • Radical cystectomy /- systemic chemotherapy
  • Bladder conserving therapy TURBT, radiotherapy,
    systemic chemotherapy

19
Treatment
  • Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy

20
Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy
  • Evidence
  • Neoadjuvant cisplatin-containing combination
    chemotherapy improves overall survival.
  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has its limitations
    regarding
  • patient selection
  • current development of surgical technique
  • current chemotherapy combinations.
  • Recommendations
  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for
  • T2-T4a, cN0M0 bladder cancer
  • and should always be cisplatinum-based
    combination therapy.
  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not recommended in
    patients with PS gt 2 and/or impaired renal
    function.

21
Background
  • Cystectomy alone 50 OS in 5 years
  • Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy
  • Better tolerated preop
  • Burden of micromets less
  • Improve pathological status (less positive
    margins and nodes)

22
Nordic Trial 1neoadjuvant chemoRx?cystectomy
  • 311 patients locally advanced bladder cancer
    (G3T1-T4NxM0)
  • 2 cycles comprising cisplatindoxorubicin, with a
    3-week interval between cycles 1 and 2 vs no
    chemo
  • 4Gy for 5 consecutive days, then cystectomy
  • 18/12 FU (47/12 for alive patients)
  • Results in chemotherapy group (vs no chemo)
  • Downstaging in T1 group (p0.002)
  • OS improved in all groups but not statistically
  • Better OS in responders than non-responders

Scand J Urol Nephrol. 199327(3)355-62.
23
Nordic Trial 2neoadjuvant chemo ? cystectomy
  • 317 patients (T2-4aNxM0)
  • 3 courses of cisplatin-methotrexate vs no chemo
  • 5.3 years FU
  • Results
  • OS 53 vs 46
  • pT0 (26 vs 11) p0.001
  • No statisitical survival benefit but significant
    downstaging

Scand J Urol Nephrol. 200236(6)419-25.
24
Cochrane Review 2005neoadjuvant chemo? cystectomy
  • 3005 patients from 11 RCTs (T2-T4a)
  • Platinum based combination chemotherapy
    significant benefit on OS
  • 14 reduction in the risk of death
  • 5 absolute benefit at 5 years (95 CI 1 to 7)
  • OS increased from 45 to 50.
  • Effect was observed irrespective of the type of
    local treatment and did not vary between
    subgroups of patients
  • Combination platinum based chemo better than
    single platinum based agent

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr
18(2)CD005246.
25
BA06 30894 trialneoadjuvant chemo ?cystectomy or
Rx
  • 967 patients,
  • 8 years follow-up
  • CMV Cisplatin, methotrexate and vinblastine
  • 16 reduction in the risk of death
  • corresponding to an increase in 10-year survival
    from 30 to 36) after CMV

J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 129(16)2171-7. doi
10.1200/JCO.2010.32.3139. Epub 2011 Apr 18.
26
Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy
  • Assessing responders
  • PET, MRI, biomarkers
  • No definite modality
  • Disadvantages
  • Who are responders?
  • Surgical morbidity?

N Engl J Med 2003 Aug349(9)859-66.
27
Treatment
  • Radical Cystectomy

28
Radical Cystectomy
  • Good outcome requires
  • Appropriate indication
  • Standard of treatment for localised MIBC (T2-T4a,
    N0-Nx, M0)
  • Also indicated for
  • High risk and recurrent NMIBC
  • Failed BCG
  • Salvage treatment after non-response or
    recurrence after bladder-sparing therapy
  • Optimisation of patient
  • Adequate surgery
  • Combination with chemotherapy

29
Patient selection
  • Treatment choice guided by
  • Performance status
  • Biological age
  • Data from SEER registry shows that while stage is
    important for cancer-specific death, age carries
    highest risk of other-cause mortality but not for
    increased cancer-specific death
  • Pre-existing co-morbidities
  • Radical cystectomy (RC) may be preferred to
    radiotherapy if
  • Presence of CIS
  • Upper tract obstruction
  • Severe irritative urinary symptoms
  • Presence of inflammatory bowel disease

30
Treatment timing
  • Several studies show worse outcome if time
    between initial diagnosis and cystectomy gt12
    weeks
  • More advanced pathological stage
  • Decreased survival

Sanchez-ortiz et al, J urol, 2003 Gore et al,
Cancer 2009
31
Oncological outcomes
  • Survival is dependent on pathological stage and
    lymph node involvement
  • 86 of recurrences occur within 3yrs
  • 25 local pelvic
  • 75 distant
  • Stein et al,
  • J Clin Oncol
  • 2001

5yr recurrence free survival 5 yr overall survival
All patients (n1054) 68 60
Organ confined
N - 85 78
N 46 45
Extravesical
N - 58 47
N 30 25
32
Oncological outcomes
  • Overall 5 yrs disease-free survival of 55
  • Ghoneim et al,
  • J Urol, 2008

33
Extent of surgery
  • Standard surgical technique for curative RC
  • Removal of bladder and all macroscopically
    visible and resectable bladder-perforating tumour
    extensions
  • removal of adjacent distal ureters
  • Lymphadenectomy
  • Plus
  • In men
  • Prostatectomy
  • (urethrectomy)
  • In women, standard pelvic exenteration includes
  • Entire urethra
  • Adjacent vagina
  • Uterus
  • Technical variations aim to improve QoL (preserve
    continence/sexual function)

34
Back to SM...
  • Young, fit, recently married , doesnt like the
    idea of a stoma
  • T2N0M0
  • Should have a preoperative bone scan
  • Is not a candidate for bladder preservation on
    the basis of age
  • Has approx 5 risk of positive lymph nodes at the
    time of cystectomy
  • Should have ureteral frozen section analysis at
    the time of cystectomy
  • Answer (according to Campbells) d

35
Ureteric margins
  • Traditionally ureteric margins sent for frozen
    section
  • Sensitivity of 74 and specificity 99.8
  • Further ureteric resection in presence of
    positive margins
  • Some small series suggest that there is little
    gained by resection back to normal urothelium
  • Schoenberg J.Urol 1996
  • Therefore ureteric margins only sent if specific
    indication

36
Urethrectomy - men
  • Urethral recurrence in 6-8
  • Usually within 14-24 months of RC
  • Historically, indications for urethrectomy
  • multifocality, diffuse CIS, bladder neck, and
    prostate involvement
  • But CIS and multifocality NOT associated with ?
    risk
  • Risk ? if prostatic involvement
  • 5 risk if no involvement
  • 12/18 if superficial/invasive involvement
  • ?risk in orthotopic diversion compared with
    cutaneous diversion (independent of prostatic
    involvement)
  • Best predictive parameter is frozen section
    analysis at time of cystectomy
  • Positive urethral margin indication for
    urethrectomy

Stein et al J.Urol 2005
37
Urethrectomy - women
  • Urethral recurrence in 0.8-4.3
  • Stein et al, Urology 1998
  • Bladder neck involvement is the most important
    risk factor for urethral involvement
  • Frozen section analysis shows 100 sensitivity
    and specificity for detection of a positive
    urethral margin compared with final pathology
  • ?role for preserving uterus/vagina to provide
    improved anatomical support for the neobladder
    and preservation of autonomic nerves

38
Prostate/sexual-function sparing cystectomy
  • Theorectical advantage of retained sphincter and
    erectile mechanisms
  • Usually constitutes prostate capsule sparing
    (TURP or Millens)
  • Vallencien, J Urol 2002
  • Excellent results for continence (gt90) and
    potency (gt80)
  • But, concerns over 10-15 increased oncological
    failure rate (Hautmann, Stein, Urol Clin North
    Am, 2005)
  • Careful patient selection needed
  • Incidental prostate cancer found in 28 of men
    undergoing cystoprostatectomy
  • 20 of these Gleason 7 (Abdelhady, BJUI 2007)

39
Cystectomy
  • Lymphadenectomy

40
Lymphadenectomy in GU Cancers
  • Is it curative or diagnostic for staging
    purposes?
  • Curative
  • Penile
  • Testicular
  • Rarely curative
  • Prostate
  • Bladder
  • Probably not curative (?prognostic)
  • Renal
  • Renal pelvis
  • Ureteric

41
Lymphadenectomy Questions
  • Does lymphadenectomy improve survival?
  • What are the Indications for lymphadenectomy?
  • What should the extent of lymphadenectomy be?
  • Does limited or extended lymphadenectomy impact
    on morbidity?
  • Is there a role for frozen section in
    lymphadenectomy?

42
Lymphadenectomy
  • No improvement of PLND on survival
  • Poulsen et al., J Urol, 1998
  • Vieweg et al., J Urol, 1999
  • Leissner et al., BJU Int 2000
  • Significant improvement of PLND on survival
  • Skinner, J Urol, 1982
  • Poulsen et al., J Urol, 1998
  • Leissner et al., BJU Int, 2000
  • Mills et al., J Urol, 2001
  • Herr et al., J Urol, 2002

43
Lymph Node where?
  • Autopsy study
  • 215 patients with MIBC
  • 92 peri-vesical LN
  • 72 retroperitoneal LN
  • 35 abdominal LN
  • 47 Nve and Mve
  • Pelvic nodes neg no disease outside pelvis

Urol Int 199962(2)69-75.
44
Lymph Nodes and staging
  • 25 of cystectomy specimens contain pos. nodes
  • Node positivity correlates closely with T-stage
  • T1 lt 10
  • T3-T4 33
  • But
  • Is survival in extended lymphadenectomy increased
  • directly (surgery) or
  • indirectly (chemotherapy)?

45
Extent of lymphadenectomy
  • Gold Standard Surgery
  • Standard lymphadenectomy
  • common iliac bifurcation, with the ureter being
    the medial border, and including the internal
    iliac, presacral, obturator fossa and external
    iliac nodes
  • An extended lymphadenectomy
  • aortic bifurcation
  • Genitofemoral N (lat) to Obturator N (med)
    Inguinal ligament (Inf) to Aortic bifurcation
    (Sup)
  • Peri-operative mortality lt3

Stein et al J.Clin.Oncol. (2001) 19 666
46
Standard v. extended pelvic lymph node dissection
1 Para-caval 2 Inter-aorto-caval 3
Para-aortic 4 Common iliac 5 Common iliac 6
Ext iliac 7 Ext Iliac 8 Pre-sacral 9
Obturator 10 Obturator 11 Int iliac 12 Int Iliac
IMA
47
Optimal extent of lymphadenopathy(Mansoura,
Egypt)
  • Prospective study 400 consecutive patients
  • 200 (50) received extended LN dissection (ELN)
  • No neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy
  • 50/12 FU
  • 96 patients (24.0) had lymph node metastases
  • 5-yr disease-free survival ELN group
  • 66.6 vs 54.7 (p 0.043)
  • In LN Pos patients
  • 5-yr disease-free survival (48.0 vs 28.2 p
    0.029)

Eur Urol. 2011 Sep60(3)572-7. doi
10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.062. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
48
Evidence for extent of lymphadenectomy
  • Leissner et al. J.Urol, 2004
  • Prospective study between 1999-2002
  • x6 centres
  • 290 pts with invasive bladder cancer
  • TCC 76, SCC 19, Adeno 3.4
  • Radical cystectomy and extended PLND
  • No prior neoadjuvant chemo
  • All surgery performed by 2 surgeons only in each
    centre

49
(No Transcript)
50
Site of lymph node involvement
  • Abol-Enein J.Urol, 2004
  • Prospective study between 1999-2002
  • 200 pts with invasive bladder cancer
  • TCC 115, SCC 68, Adeno 17
  • Radical cystectomy and extended PLND
  • No prior neoadjuvant chemo
  • Pre-op staging with contrast CT
  • All surgery performed by 2 surgeons

51
Nodal Statistics
  • 10,122 nodes examined
  • 48 (24) pts had pos. LNs
  • Mean number of pos. nodes/involved case 8.08
    13.2 (range 1-56)

52
LYMPH NODE INVOLVEMENT AND BLADDER CANCER
Anatomical distribution of retrieved and positive
nodes
53
Extent of lymphadenectomy
  • Dhar et al, march 2008, J.Urol
  • Compared 2 institutions 1987-2000
  • Cleveland clinic limited lymphadenectomy (336)
  • University of Bern Extended (322)
  • All staged N0M0 prior to surger
  • CIS/pT1 and T4 excluded

54
Extent of lymphadenectomy
  • Dhar et al, march 2008, J.Urol
  • Results
  • Overall positive rate
  • 13 for limited vs 26 for extended
  • 5 year recurrence free survival rate for N
  • 7 for limited vs 35 for extended
  • 5 year recurrence free survival rate for T3N0-2
  • 19 for limited vs 49 for extended
  • Extended dissection -
  • more accurate staging
  • improved survival with non organ confined node
    positive disease

55
Morbidity of lymphadenectomy
  • Does extended lymph node dissection bear more
    morbidity than limited dissection?
  • Controlled trial n 92, 46 standard, 46 extended
  • Extended node dissection adds an hour to
    procedure.
  • No difference in morbidity
  • Broessner et al BJUI (2004) 93 64

56
Summary Extended PLND
  • Requires increased technical expertise
  • Increases the operative time by 60min
  • Consequently, probably does impact on morbidity
  • How many?
  • Around 10-15
  • Cancer. 2008 Jun112(11)2401-8
  • Increases the identification of LN pts
  • (common iliac and presacral nodes)

57
Viva Questions...
  • Consent SM for radical cystectomy and urinary
    diversion/neobladder

58
Complications after RC
  • 3 perioperative mortality (Stein, 2001)
  • Morbidity (Ramani et al, BJUI 2009)
  • Early complications 38.6
  • Late (gt30day) 26.9
  • Surgical complications can relate to cystectomy,
    LN dissection, bowel anastomosis or diversion
  • Paralytic ileus is common
  • SBO or anastomotic leak lt8.7
  • Symptomatic lymphocoele lt5
  • Transfusion rate can be up 66
  • Medical complications
  • PE/DVT lt5
  • Also cardiac, respiratory, infectious
  • Gakis et al, Eur Urol 2013

59
Mortality and case volume
  • McCabe et al Postgrad Med J 2007
  • Significant inverse correlation between case
    volume and mortality rate
  • Minimum case load of 8 procedures per year to
    achieve the lowest mortality
  • NICE recommend centres perform a combined total
    of 50 cystectomies/prostatectomies per year
  • (Improving outcomes in urological cancers, 2010)

60
Minimally invasive surgery
  • Lin, Br J cancer 2014
  • Prospective randomised control trial of open vs
    LAP-assisted cystectomy
  • 35 patients in each group
  • Significant differences in
  • Operative time, estimated blood loss , analgesic
    requirement, time to resumption of oral intake
  • No difference in
  • Length of stay, complications, lymph node yield
  • Nix Eur Urol 2010
  • Prospective randomised control trial of open vs
    ROBOTIC-assisted cystectomy
  • Significant differences in
  • Operative time, time to return of bowel function,
    analgesic requirement
  • Non-inferior for lymph node yield

61
Long term complications
  • May vary according to the type of urinary
    diversion
  • Viva question
  • Tell me different options for reconstruction
    following cystectomy. What problems can occur?

62
Radiotherapy
63
Neo-adjuvant radiotherapy
  • Conclusions
  • No data exist to support
  • There are suggestions in older literature that
    pre-operative radiotherapy decreases local
    recurrence of muscle-invasive bladder cancer
  • Recommendations
  • Pre-operative radiotherapy is not recommended to
    improve survival
  • Pre-operative radiotherapy for operable
    muscle-invasive bladder cancer results in tumour
    downstaging after 4-6 weeks.

64
Neo-adjuvant radiotherapy
  • Retrospective studies
  • pre-operative radiotherapy at doses of 40-50 Gy,
    followed after 4-6 weeks by cystectomy
  • downstaging of the tumour stage (40-65 of
    patients)
  • lower risk of local recurrence (10-42)
  • improved survival (11-12)

Cancer 1994 Nov74(10)2819-27 Int J Radiat Oncol
Biol Phys 1995 May32(2)331-40.Cancer 1988
Jan61(2)255-62 Cancer 1982 Mar49(5)869-973 J
Urol 1997 Mar157(3)805-7
65
Neo-adjuvant radiotherapy
  • Prospective studies
  • X6 RCTs (Rx vs cystectomy alone)
  • SWOG, Mansoura, other small ones
  • No increase in toxicity
  • A meta-analysis
  • odds ratio for the difference in 5-year survival
    of 0.71
  • ?bias largest trial, majority did not receive
    the planned treatment.
  • Results of the largest trial were excluded,
  • the odds ratio became 0.95 (95 CI 0.57-1.55)

Anticancer Res 1998 May18(3b)1931-4.
66
External beam radiotherapy (EBRT)
  • Bladder with 2cm safety margin
  • Target dose 60-66 Gy, divided daily 1.8-2.0 Gy
  • 6-7 weeks max, to prevent repopulation of tumour
    cells
  • Cochrane review(Cochrane Database Syst Rev
    2002(1)CD002079)
  • NMIBC 5 year OS30-60 , Cancer specific
    survival 20-50
  • Cystectomy has survival benefit over EBRT
  • Chung et al (Urol Oncol 2007 Jul-Aug25(4)303-9)
  • 340 patients with MIBC
  • EBRT, ERBTchemo, neoadj chemo then EBRT
  • At 10 years, cancer free survival 35, OS 19
  • EBRT alone only in select patients
  • No CIS, 2 year disease recurrence bad prognosis)

67
Chemotherapy
  • Evidence
  • Adjuvant chemotherapy is under debate.
  • Neither randomised trials nor a meta-analysis
    have provided sufficient data to support the
    routine use of adjuvant chemotherapy.

68
Adjuvant Chemotherapy
  • For T3/4 Nve M0 disease
  • X6 trials
  • Poorly designed
  • No obvious benefit
  • At the time of recurrence vs straight after
    surgery?
  • No benefit
  • Clinical trials will provide data

69
Multimodality bladder-preserving treatment
70
Tri-modality bladder-sparing therapy
  • Optimal candidate is T2Nx or N0MO without
  • Extensive CIS
  • Tumour-associated hydronephrosis
  • Tumour invasive into prostatic stroma
  • Need to be motivated and undergo frequent
    cystoscopies with cystectomy if necessary for
    recurrence
  • Complete response rate in 60-80
  • 3 series show similar 5/10yr survival to
    cystectomy BUT
  • Results confounded by clinical staging only
  • Prompt use of cystectomy when neccessary

Gaskis et al, Eur Urol 2013.
71
Predictors of outcome
72
Outcome predictors
  • Tumour grade and stage
  • Prostatic stromal involvement
  • 20 5 year survival
  • Hydronephrosis pre-op
  • Molecular markers
  • Tumour associated antigens
  • Oncogenes (c-H-ras, c-myc, c-erbB2)
  • Cellular adhesion molecules (E-Cadherin)
  • Blood group antigens
  • Proliferating antigens
  • Epidermal growth factor receptor
  • Angiogenesis inhibitors

73
Quality of life
  • Evidence
  • The use of validated questionnaires is
    recommended to assess HRQoL in patients with
    MIBC.
  • Unless a patients comorbidities, tumour
    variables and coping abilities present clear
    contraindications, a continent urinary diversion
    should be offered.

74
Quality of life
  • Validated questionnaires
  • Concerning physical, emotional, social functions
  • e.g. FACT (Functional Assessment of Cancer
    Therapy )
  • Bladder reconstruction scores higher
  • not always significant
  • Also used to show improvements with palliative Rx

75
QOL after urinary diversion
  • Patients with continent diversion generally score
    better on-
  • Body image, social activity and physical function
  • Lack of significance ? Due to response shift
  • Najari et al. 2007, J.Urol
  • Compared 116 patients- radical cystectomy
  • Neobladder (81)
  • Continent cutaneous diversion (26)
  • Ileal conduit (9)
  • Erectile dysfunction, urinary and bowel functions
  • ED improved irrespective of diversion
  • Neobladder significantly more leakage and worse
    function at night

76
QOL bladder preservation
  • Perdona et al 2008 Cancer
  • 1994-2002
  • 121 patients T2-T4
  • TUR and 2 cycles of chemotherapy
  • Then radiotherapy
  • Survival rates at 5 years
  • Overall 68
  • Bladder intact 51
  • Distant mets in 38

77
Follow-up
78
Follow-up
79
Follow up
  • Normograms not recommended
  • Most recurrences within 24 months after
    cystectomy
  • 10-15 pelvic recurrence
  • Up to 50 distant mets lung, liver, bones
  • 1.8-6.0 upper tract recurrence
  • 1/3 diagnosed by surveillance, 2/3 by symptoms
  • ve margin, multi-focality, NMIBC
  • 1.5-6.0 urethral recurrence in male
  • Risk is lower in orthotopic diversion (?normal
    urine flow)
  • Asymptomatic better survival than symptomatic

Eur Urol 2012 Aug 62(2) 290-302.
80
Follow-up of renal function
  • Ileal conduit
  • 29 have renal deterioration in the long term
  • No surgical cause for deterioration in 18
  • Important predisposing factors
  • Hypertension
  • recurrent urinary sepsis
  • GFRlt 50 ml/min
  • 11 with deterioration due to upper tract
    obstruction
  • identifiable using renography and GFR
  • A type IIIb curve was an early indicator of
    obstruction.
  • (Samuel et al. J.Urol, vol 176, 2006)

81
Palliative Management
82
Control of Symptoms - Inoperable tumours (T4b)
  • Palliative cystectomy
  • Not curative
  • Last resort for relief of debilitating symptoms
  • Increase mortality and morbidity
  • BJU Int. 2005 Jun95(9)1211-4

83
Control of Symptoms
  • Obstructive symptoms
  • Mechanism mechanical, invasion leading to
    altered peristalsis
  • Diversion ( palliative cystectomy),
  • BL nephrostomies (easiest)
  • Stenting (patient choice but gets blocked and may
    migrate, frequent change)
  • Urology 2005 Sep66(3)531-5
  • Bleeding and pain
  • Stop anticoagulation
  • 1 Silver nitrate, 1-2 alum, 4 formalin
    (painful)
  • J Urol 1985 Jun133(6)956-7
  • Rx improvement pain 59, bleeding 73
  • Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 19946(1)11-3
  • Embolisation?up to 90 success
  • Urol J 2009 Summer6(3)149-56

84
(No Transcript)
85
Summary
  • Prognosis
  • Similar for radiotherapy vs radical cystectomy
  • 5 year survival
  • T2 64
  • T3/4 39
  • Cystectomy
  • 30 day mortality lt3
  • Morbidity 33
  • Ureteric margins frozen section not needed
  • Urethra positive frozen section only
    contraindication to neobladder
  • BUT practice varies

86
Summary
  • Lymph node dissections
  • Gold standard extended
  • Skip lymph node mets
  • Curative in small number
  • Adds an hour no evidence of increased morbidity
  • Send packets separately
  • Variable sentinel node position
  • Quality of life
  • Type of diversion tailored to individual
  • Follow-up after radical treatment variable
  • 86recurrences occur in first 3 years

87
The end
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com