Title: PBL and educational innovation
1PBL and educational innovation
Problem based Learning in Engineering and Science
Development of Facilitator
Lars Peter Jensen Associate profesor Department
of Control Engineering lpj_at_es.aau.dk
Xiangyun Du Associate professor Department of
Education, Learning and Philosophy xiangyun_at_learni
ng.aau.dk
2Overview
- Reflection on university teaching and learning
- Why PBL - Challenges and changes
- PBL history and related theories
- Diversity and ongoing change
- Reflection and discussions
3Reflection on own learning stories
4The way I was educated Big class, little room
for individual ideas
http//www.cnsphoto.com/
5Same materials year after year
6Memory is more important than application skills
for high scores
7Transferred knowledge will be returned after exams
8Your learning stories
- Please spend 3 minutes sharing your learning
stories with your neighbours
9- Am I teaching the same way I was taught?
- Need for Innovation in Engineering Education
10Room for innovation?
11Can innovation be facilitated in this way?
125 minutes discussion
- What is your understanding of learning?
- Based on your own experiences, what are the roles
of university teaching in relation to learning?
13Teaching Learning ?
14Teaching learning?
Yes, its actually true you can get a degree by
repeating everything the teacher says.
We pretend that there is co-incidence between
what is being taught and what is being learned
(Knud Illeriis, 1998)
15Teaching Learning?
Teaching does not mean transferring knowledge
but creating opportunities for producing and
constructing it. (Paulo Freire)
(Karl Smith, UMN)
16Learning is it only about how brain works?
17Theories related to PBL
- Constructivism
- Knowledge and learning is created by the
students not given to them
18Life Long Learning and professional identity
development
Original figure in Wenger 2004
19Learning in Communities of Practice
Participation Informal Unintended Knowledge
sharing
20Experiential learning - Kolbs learning cycle
Concrete Experience
Active Experiment
Reflective Observation
Abstract conceptualisation
Learning is the process whereby knowledge is
created through the transformation of experiences
- David Kolb 1984
21Experiential learning the Cowan loopy diagram
on
action
Reflection
for
in
Time
22Blooms taxonomy 1956
Competence Skills demonstrated
1. Knowledge Observation and recall of information (describe, identify, who, when, where)
2. Comprehension Understanding information Translate knowledge into new context
3. Application Use information, methods, concepts, theories in new situations
4. Analysis Seeing patterns, organization of parts, rcognition of hidden meanings
5. Synthesis Use old ideas to create new ones. Generalize from given facts. Draw conclusions
6. Evaluation Compare and discremininate between ideas. Assess value of theories. Make choices based on reasoned arguments. Verify value of evidence
23PBL Learning Principles
Learning Principles (Graff Kolmos 2003)
24A conceptualisation of PBL
- PBL can be conceptualised as three central
dimensions or processes that are stretched
between teacher and participant control - Problem who defines and re-formulate?
- Work Process who chooses theory, methods and
ways of working? - Solution who owns the solution?
25 Why change? Why PBL ? NEW Competencies
Scientific knowledge
- Process and professional competencies
- Project management
- Communication
- Teamwork
- Organization
Technical competencies
26Need for change accreditations
Diverse capabilities
- National Academy of Engineering, The Engineer of
2020, 2004 - EUR-ACE (Accreditation of European Engineering
Programmes and Graduates, http//www.feani.org/EUR
_ACE/EUR_ACE_Main_Page.htm - - ABET http//www.abet.org/
- Â
27Need for change industry expectations Comparaison
of capabilities taught at universities and
required in professional life by young
profesionals - Germany
(Becker 2006)
28Ranking of capabilities important in professional
life by young electrical engineers five years
after graduation - Germany
(Becker 2006)
29Change of profession and interdisciplinarity
- Changes in the medical education system in many
countries have been endorsed aiming to reduce the
volume of factual knowledge taught didactically
and to increase students abilities to direct and
maintain their own learning through methods such
as Problem Based Learning
30Educational changes in Denmark
- New study programs enriched engineering
disciplines - New expectations broadened engineering skills
and competences - New study forms implementing student centred and
work place-imitated learning environment (for
example, PBL as an educational strategy)
New challenges and tasks for educators
31PBL as a strategy for change development and
diversity of practice
McMaster 1968 Maastricht 1972 Linkoping
1972 Roskilde 72 Aalborg 74
- Problem orientation
- Interdisciplinarity
- Exemplary learning
- Participant directed
- Group work
- Problems as focus and stimulus for learning
- Self directed learning
- Student-centred and tutors as facilitators/guides
- Team work
32- Objectives of PBL (Barrows 1986)
- Structuring of knowledge and clinical context
- Clinical reasoning
- Self directed learning skills
- Intrinsic motivation
- Motivation and drivers (Barrows 1996)
- Failure of conventional teaching methods in
improving students the clinical reasoning and
problem-solving ability - Students dissatisfaction
- Need for involving medical practice into
curriculum
PBL literature theories
- Five major characteristics (Vernon and Blake
1993,550-551) - real or hypothetical clinical cases
- small discussion groups
- collaborative independent study
- hypothetico-deductive reasoning
- Focus on group process rather than provision of
information
- Evaluation (quantitative studies)
- Effectiveness (Albanese and Mitchell 1993, Vernon
and Blake 1993) Norman and Schmidt (1992),
Barrows (1996), Norman and Schmidt (2000),
Colliver (2000), Enarson and Cariaga-Lo (2001) - Academic achievement
- Academic process
- Clinical functioning
- Concerns (Colliver 1993, 2000, Newman 2000,
Morrison 2004) - Basic medical science knowledge
- cost
33What is/are PBL(s)?
What do people do
- Some who claim to be doing might not be
- Some are doing without realizing
34PBL Learning Principles
Learning Principles (Graff Kolmos 2003)
35Variation
- Ways of implementation
- Problem solving techniques in the lecture
- Problem Based Learning in subjects / at
institutional level - Project Based Learning in subjects / at
institutional level - Problem and Project Based Learning
- Inquiry Based Learning
- Outcome Based Learning
- Modes of practice
- Senario
- Case
- Transdisciplinary
- Intercultural projects
- Mega project
- Individual / team
- Online Based / Face to face
36DIVERSITY OF PRACTICE PBL curriculum relations
Tadahiko (2008)
Hybrid track
PBL track
Partial attachment
37Diversity of PBL practice
Implementation
Moesby, E. 2004. "Reflections on making a change
towards Project Oriented and Problem-Based
Learning (POPBL), World Transactions on
Engineering Technology Education (WTETE), UICEE,
Monash University, Australia. Volume 3, No. 2,
December 2004.
38Problem solving skills in the lecture
- Lectures
- Literature
- Questions
- Answers
- Seminars
39Project Based Learning
Moesby 2004
40Innovations
Moesby 2004
41PBL at institutional level
Problem and Project Based Learning - An
innovation of the Aalborg Model
Study courses 7,5 ECTS
50courses
Projectcourses 7,5 ECTS
One semester
Group examination Individual examination
50project
Project 15 ECTS
Model from The Aalborg PBL model - Progress,
Diversity and ChallengesAnette Kolmos, Flemming
K. Fink Lone Krogh
1 ECTS (European Credit Transfer System) 30
working hours
42Evaluation from Danish industry on graduates
43Employers judgement of innovation, IDA, 2008
(N209)
43
44Overall assessment of Danish Engineering
Institutions. IDA, 2008
45DIVERSITY OF PRACTICE MODELS
Problem Process Team Assessment Role of teaching
Aalborg One semester Problems(5 months) - open and narrow Project Management and process skills 4-7 Ss Self-form, Discussing, writing and together, Individual judgement in a team based exam Facilitation based Consultancy (low level Of nstruction)
Maastricht One week - Case based Seven jumps 5-10 Ss Discussing together Individual exam progress Testing Facilitation based tutoring (low level of instruction)
Republic Polytechnic One day -structured 3 meetings a day Problem Solving process 5 Ss Discussing together Quiz and Individual Written reflection Problem giver and instruction
46Major changes of PBL curricula
Stage 3 2005 now COMPASS curriculum
(concept-oriented, multidisciplinary,
problem-based, practice for transfer, simulations
in clerkship, streaming).
Challenges insufficient assimilation of
fundamental basic science concepts, insufficient
attention on behavior and population
perspectives, professional competencies, etc.
Stage 2 1983 - 2005 Curriculum focused on
population problems. Aiming at essential
knowledge, fundamental skills, personal
qualities, values, and attitudes to becoming
physicians.
Challenges students required a broad-based basic
medical science foundation before they could
begin problem solving.
Stage 1 1969 -1983 Curriculum focused on
Biomedical problems. Aiming at skills of
self-directed learning for information explosion,
critical appraisal, self-assessment, etc.
(Neville et al 2007)
47Major changes of PBL curricula
Stage 3 2009-2010 Integrated courses of basic
medical sciences
Stage 2 2006-2008 increased number of courses and
PBL percentage in overall curricula
Stage 1 2004-2005 11 basic medical courses and 12
clinical courses (100, over 50, and less than
50 of curriculum)
48The case PBL model in medicine at AAU
49Bachelor program (project-oriented PBL in green)
otherwise case-based PBL all shared with
medicine
50Comparison of the three models
Students number /year Starting time of PBL Drivers for change Curriculum model
McMaster 3 year master Around 140 1969 Altanative teaching and learning Problem Based Learning (COMPASS)
AAU 5-6year master 50-70 1974 AAU Project Based Learing, 2006 medicine PBL AAU tradition? Case Project based Learning
CMU 7 years master More than 1000 200? GMER Hybrid PBL Shoestring model (Savin-Baden 2009)
51Comparison of the three models
- History, backgrounds, goals
- Students and staff resources
- Curriculum design in relation to educational
philosophy and theories (How much percentage of
the curricula) - Assessment and evaluation
- Educational/Staff development
-
52Questions and discussions