Mary Barnes (WG co-chair) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Mary Barnes (WG co-chair)

Description:

IETF 92 Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made within ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:72
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: iet71
Learn more at: https://www.ietf.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mary Barnes (WG co-chair)


1
DISPATCH WG IETF 92
  • Mary Barnes (WG co-chair)
  • Cullen Jennings (WG co-chair)

2
Note Well
  • Any submission to the IETF intended by the
    Contributor for publication as all or part of an
    IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made
    within the context of an IETF activity is
    considered an "IETF Contribution". Such
    statements include oral statements in IETF
    sessions, as well as written and electronic
    communications made at any time or place, which
    are addressed to
  • the IETF plenary session,
  • any IETF working group or portion thereof,
  • the IESG or any member thereof on behalf of the
    IESG,
  • the IAB or any member thereof on behalf of the
    IAB,
  • any IETF mailing list, including the IETF list
    itself, any working group or design team list, or
    any other list functioning under IETF auspices,
  • the RFC Editor or the Internet-Drafts function
  • All IETF Contributions are subject to the rules
    of RFC 5378 and RFC 3979 (updated by RFC 4879).
    Statements made outside of an IETF session,
    mailing list or other function, that are clearly
    not intended to be input to an IETF activity,
    group or function, are not IETF Contributions in
    the context of this notice. Please consult RFC
    5378 and RFC 3979 for details.
  • A participant in any IETF activity is deemed to
    accept all IETF rules of process, as documented
    in Best Current Practices RFCs and IESG
    Statements.
  • A participant in any IETF activity acknowledges
    that written, audio and video records of meetings
    may be made and may be available to the public.

3
Agenda Monday, March 23, 2015
  • 1300-1320 Agenda bash, RAI Status, items of
    interest (Chairs)
  • 1320-1340 Routing Out of Dialog Request (Andrew
    Allen)
  • 1340-1410 GeoJSON (Sean Gillies)
  • 1410-1440 Calling Name Identity Trust (CNIT)
    (Richard Shockey)
  • 1440-1500 Video Relay Service (VRS) (Brian
    Rosen)

4
Status
  • Other topics proposed within pre-IETF-92
    timeline
  • Cause URI Parameter for Service Number
    translation
  • http//datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mohali-dispa
    tch-cause-for-service-number/
  • DISPATCHed as AD sponsored.
  • Two week call for comments
  • Instance ID for OMA PoC
  • http//datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-allen-dispat
    ch-poc-instanceid-usage/
  • Proposed to be DISPATCHed as AD sponsored
    (pending)

5
draft-mohali-dispatch-cause-for-service-number-01
  • Solution to tag a called service access number
    that has been translated into a routable number
    by an application towards an endpoint (eg. call
    center)
  • Update of RFC4458 to add a new value for the
    cause URI parameter so that it can be possible to
    tag a service access number anywhere in the
    signaling path.
  • This draft also addresses an interworking need
    with TDM networks from 3GPP.
  • gt Please review and comment on DISPATCH WG
    mailing list

6
IETF-93 Deadlines
  • June 8, 2015. Cutoff date to notify the
    chairs/DISPATCH WG of plans to submit a proposal.
    (draft deadline 4 weeks)
  • June 15, 2015. Cutoff for charter proposals for
    topics.(draft deadline 3 weeks)
  • June 22, 2015. Announcement of topics that have
    been dispatched for IETF-93. (draft deadline 2
    weeks)
  • July 6, 2015. Draft deadline.

7
A brief word fromyour ADs
8
ClosedSucceeded since last update
  • cuss
  • dart
  • geopriv
  • salud
  • soc
  • drinks (almost)

9
ART!
ART!
10
RAI APP TSV ART
  • Goal More flexibility in managing
    application-ish WGs
  • ADs (as of Weds.) Ben, Alissa, Barry
  • Question What about RFC 5727?
  • Update so that it makes sense with reorg?
  • Move to Historic and rely on charters?

11
Other activities of interest
12
SIPNOC 2015
  • Technically-focused educational conference for
    service providers and network operators on how to
    Make SIP Work Better in the Network
  • June 23-25, 2015 at Dulles Hilton Hotel, Herndon,
    VA
  • Developed specifically for the technical and
    operational staff of service providers, including
    network architects and engineers
  • Focused on addressing key deployment and
    operational issues involving SIPbased technology
    and services
  • Soliciting speaking presentations now.
  • SIP Training session (New for 2015)
  • For more information http//www.sipnoc.org

13
SIP Forum - SIP Connect 2.0
  • Update the reference architecture that sets forth
    the common network elements necessary for service
    provider to IP PBX peering (e.g. to include
    SBCs).
  • Specify the basic protocols (and protocol
    extensions) that must be supported by each
    element of the reference architecture.
  • Specify the exact RFCs or other existing
    standards associated with these protocols that
    must or should be supported by each element of
    the reference architecture.
  • Update the security model based on existing
    standards to authenticate and authorize
    utilization of the service providers resources
    by an IP PBX.
  • Specify the consensus method for supporting IPV6
    and IPV4/6 Dual Stack components within the
    reference architecture.
  • Specify the consensus method for supporting
    secure media (SRTP).
  • Specify the consensus method for supporting Video
    enabled devices.
  • Specify the consensus method for supporting
    emergency calling (NG911/NG112) and the transport
    of location information.
  • Editors draft https//drive.google.com/file/d/0
    B7haaZ1Rd1KYZGlJWXJScmJ2Vkk/view
  • Discussion on SIP Forum Tech WG mailing list
    www.sipforum.org

14
SIP Forum - IP-NNI Initiative
  • In December 2013, the Alliance for
    Telecommunications Industry Solutions (ATIS) and
    the SIP Forum launched a joint task force to
    develop IP-NNI (Network-to-Network Interface)
    voluntary, consensus-driven specifications for
    North American Service Providers.
  • Identify a baseline set of features that should
    be common to all IP-NNI implementations for voice
    service.
  • Two draft specifications for public
    review/feedback
  • (1) IP Interconnection Profile ( what goes on the
    wire)
  • (2) IP Interconnection Routing Report (Number
    Translation and the databases/non normative)
  • A snapshot of the work in progress is available
    on both ATIS and SIP Forum websites
  • https//access.atis.org/apps/group_public/document
    .php?document_id18864wg_abbrevipnni
  • http//www.sipforum.org/content/view/421/171/

15
IMTC WebRTC TG
  • The IMTC WebRTC Activity Group will be at the
    upcoming IMTC SuperOp perform WebRTC
    interoperability testing in Porto, PortugalMay
    16 22, 2015
  • Will focus testing on interoperability of WebRTC
    implementations to SIP with WebRTC media either
    converted to a more traditional SIP (SDES or
    unencrypted RTP) profile, or for additional
    scenarios a WebRTC based profile (DTLS-SRTP and
    ICE).
  • IMTC members interested in participation in
    WebRTC testing should register directly at
    http//www.imtc.org/event/superop_2015/
  • Non-members, please contact Nathalie Mariano at
    nmariano_at_inventures.com to inquire about
    participation

16
Welcome to our new AD Ben Campbell
  • Thanks to Richard for his 2 years of service as
    AD from the following WGs

DISPATCH XRBLOCK BFCPBIS INSIPID DRINKS
STRAW P2PSIP SIPCORE SIPREC XMPP
Former Fellow RAI co-AD
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com